40
CPSC NEISS Data 2005–2024

Rope Or String

Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.

Home Communication & Entertainment · CPSC Code 852

Stable over 5 years

The verdict

Rope Or String carry a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk), driven by roughly 10,628 ER-treated injuries a year that are roughly flat over the last five years.

40/100
danger score (moderate risk)
10,628
ER visits per year (avg)
7.5%
end in hospital admission
5-14
most-injured age group

Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 852 - last data year 2024.

PlainSafety danger score

0/100100/10040/100
PlainSafety danger score

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 40/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for rope or string - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume10,628 ER visits/yr
  • Severity (hospitalization rate)7.5%
  • Fatality rate0.09%
  • 5-year trend-5%

See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Rope Or String (CPSC product code 852, in the Home Communication & Entertainment category) generate an estimated 10,628 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 212,551 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 40/100 for this category (moderate risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2008 (12,656 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (8,156 estimated visits).

The single most common ER diagnosis for rope or string is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 16,488 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the finger (12,507 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 47,618 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 7.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.09%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 7 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how rope or string fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

10,628
Injuries / Year
7.5%
Hospitalization Rate
0.09%
Fatality Rate

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

7K8K9K10K11K12K13K 20052008201120142017202020232024 10K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Rope Or String, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 6,775 5,592 12,367
5-14 28,486 19,132 47,618
15-24 24,709 12,946 37,655
25-34 18,407 7,528 25,935
35-44 16,611 6,898 23,509
45-54 13,979 7,588 21,567
55-64 11,595 6,673 18,268
65-74 9,108 5,423 14,531
75+ 7,123 3,992 11,115

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 16,488
Finger Fracture 12,507
Head Internal Injury 8,470
Hand Contusions, Abr. 7,460
Finger Amputation 5,533
Hand Laceration 5,456
Wrist Fracture 5,165
Face Laceration 5,052
Ankle Strain, Sprain 4,718
Shoulder Strain, Sprain 4,142
Neck Contusions, Abr. 3,402
Head Laceration 3,397
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 3,364
Wrist Strain, Sprain 3,310
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 3,271

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 91.5% (194,448)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 5.0% (10,585)
Treated And Transferred 2.4% (5,106)
Left Without Being Seen 0.9% (1,960)
Held For Observation 0.1% (286)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.1% (195)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 4 · Male · Wrist · Other · 2024

4YOM PRESENT TO ED W/ L WRIST/ARM PX. LAST NIGHT PT AND BROTHER WERE PLAYING W/ A STRING THAT WAS WRAPPED AROUND HIS L ARM,PULLING ON HIS ARM,UNWITNESSED BY PT'S MOTHER,REPORTED BY BROTHER-POOR HISTORIAN.PT WENT TO SLEEP WOKE THISAM W/ PX.WONT USE ARM,SEEMS LIMP.PT PLAYFUL NO APPARENT INJURIESDX:PX IN L WIST

Age 34 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

34 YOF INJ RT HAND HOOKING UP TOW ROPE TO VEHICLE ROPE SNAPPED AT HOME DX LAC RT MIDDLE FINGER ;

Age 6 · Male · Mouth · Other · 2024

6 YOM S/P FALL AT SCHOOL. TRIPPED OVER A ROPE AND FELL HITTING HIS LIP. DX SWELLING UPPER LIP, FALL

Age 74 · Male · Hand · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

74YOM GOT HIS FOOT TANGLED UP IN A ROPE AND FELL ON THE ICE LANDING ON HIS LEFT KNEE AND RIGHT WRIST, HAS A SUPERFICIAL ABRASION OF THE RIGHT PALM AND LEFT KNEE PAIN DX: LEFT KNEE PAIN; FALL

Age 75 · Female · Finger · Foreign Body · 2024

75YOF C/O RIGHT INDEX FINGER PAIN. WAS CLEANING OFF A PIECE OF WOOD FURNITURE AND A SPLINTER GOT STUCK UNDER HER NAIL ON CHRISTMAS. NOTED TO HAVE SMALL PIECE OF STRING ATTACHED TO IT AND WAS UNABLE TO PULL IT OUT. SIGNIFICANT PAIN NOW AND SWELLING. DX: FINGER INFECTION, SPLINTER OF FINGER

Age 18 · Female · Finger · Fracture · 2024

18YOF PRESENTS WITH INJURY TO RIGHT INDEX AND RING FINGER AFTER ROPING CATTLE DURING *** SHE GOT HER FINGERS CAUGHT IN THE ROPE DX: NEED FOR TDAP VACCINATION, OPEN FINGER FRACTURE

Age 13 · Female · Wrist · Strain, Sprain · 2024

13YOF WAS DOING ROPE CLIMBING EXERCISES IN PE CLASS AT SCHOOL WHEN SHE FELL THE DX: STRAINED LEFT WRIST

Age 215 · Male · All Parts Body · Anoxia · 2024

15 MOM HAD WRAPPED STRING AROUND NECK DISCOVERED RED IN FACE DX ACCIDENTAL STRANGULATION

Age 27 · Female · Lower Trunk · Other · 2024

27YOF PRESENTS WITH ABDOMINAL PAIN AFTER TRIPPING OVER A ROPE AND FALLING ONE NIGHT PRIOR ISO ALCOHOL USE. NO BAC. DX: ABDOMINAL PAIN

Age 31 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

31YOM, WAS PLAYING WITH HIS DAUGHTER AT A RECREATIONAL CENTER WHEN ANOTHER KID THROUGH A ROPE THAT HIT HIM IN THE FACE, DX: LEFT EYELID LACERATION; ACUTE NON INTRACTABLE HEADACHE

Age 2 · Female · Face · Foreign Body · 2024

2YOF W/ A PIECE OF STRING STUCK IN HER NOSE. DX: FB NOSE

Age 2 · Female · Face · Foreign Body · 2024

2YOF PRESENTED TO ER WITH FOREIGN BODY IN NOSE. BALL OF SRING REMOVED FROM RT NOSTRIL. DX: FOREIGN BODY IN NOSE

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/16/2017 · Incident, No Injury · The MIBRO Group · Missouri

KingCord 5/16" x 75' Diamond Braid Polypropylene Rope Model Number: 301861 Purchased from Variation: Camouflage Forest UPC 0 6636630186 1 MenardsMANCHESTER 14161 MANCHESTER ROAD BALLWIN, MO 63011 Two of these ropes rated at 110lbs S.W.L were used to hang my child's swing in a shady outdoor location. No products other than water were ever sprayed on the rope. Both ropes snapped simultaneously about 18 inches above the child's hands while a child was swinging. There was no sign of excessive wear. This occurred after only 2 years of light occasional use by small children. Upon closer inspection and sampling along the length of the rope, the entire white solid core of the rope had completely disintegrated. When the core were removed from the outer wrapping and lightly compressed it turned to white dust.

6/18/2025 · No Incident, No Injury · HOKINETY · Kentucky

Independent third-party laboratory testing conducted by [REDACTED] in June 2025 revealed that multiple paracord rope products sold by the Amazon seller [REDACTED] were falsely advertised as having a 1,000 lb breaking strength and being made of 100% nylon. Testing confirmed significantly lower strength ratings and revealed that the material is 100% polyester. These discrepancies present serious safety risks for consumers relying on this product for survival, emergency, or load-bearing purposes. What type of product(s) were being used? Paracord rope marketed and sold as 1000 lb Paracord and 100% Nylon on Amazon.com by seller [REDACTED]. Specifically: B0B1N3HS5V (Green) B0B1N7T1J8 (Black) B0B1N18LH1 (Blue) Who was using the product(s)? This product is marketed to and available to the general public through Amazon.com. It is commonly used by outdoor enthusiasts, survivalists, emergency preparedness professionals, and general consumers. How were the product(s) being used? These types of paracord products are generally used for emergency situations, securing gear, climbing, rigging, survival situations, and load-bearing applications, based on their labeled tensile strength and material. Were there any injuries that happened or may have happened while using the product? No known injuries have been reported at this time. However, the risk of injury is substantial due to the false claims regarding load-bearing capacity and material composition. Consumers relying on this rope under emergency or weight-bearing conditions may experience catastrophic failure that could result in serious injury or death. How did any injuries occur? N/A no specific injuries documented at this time. However, the danger stems from reliance on misrepresented product specifications that could lead to equipment failure in high-risk situations.

6/11/2012 · Incident, No Injury · ROPE KING USA LLC · New York

I bought 200 feet of 3/4 inch twisted nylon rope from Rope King through Amazon.com. I unrolled the rope off the reel for some tree work and found two places where strands of the rope were cut completely through. I sent 2 e-mails to Rope King a week apart and when I got no response I called and spoke to [REDACTED], the customer rep. She told me she was not authorized to discuss the safety of the rope and sent me to someone's voicemail. After another week I figured I'm not going to get a response, but I think someone needs to look at the product this company is selling for heavy duty work. The rope type I bought was Rope King TN-34200. [REDACTED]

5/8/2025 · No Incident, No Injury · Dongguan Xingyunshu E-commerce Co, Ltd. · Kentucky

I am submitting a complaint regarding an unsafe and misleadingly advertised product currently being sold on Amazon by the seller VVAAGG. Product Details: Paracord Rope 1000 lb Product Listing Links: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D5B6QEDF https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D5B5G8H8 The product listings referenced here make two key representations: Breaking Strength: 1000 lbs Material Composition: 100% Nylon However, independent lab testing ([REDACTED] report attached as [REDACTED]) demonstrates the following: Actual Breaking Strength: Only 324 lbs for the Army color and 361.2 lbs for the black color, well below the 1000 lb claim Actual Material Composition: 0% Nylon; the rope consists of 100% polyester (inner core) and 100% polypropylene (outer sheath). Testing. The FTC requirement is 100% nylon for both inner and outer fibers. This discrepancy is severe and poses a material risk to consumers who may rely on this product for critical weight-bearing applications such as climbing, rescue, or survival gear. Applicable Violations: False Advertising: Misrepresentation of strength and materials is a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act (unfair and deceptive practices). Product Safety Concern: The grossly exaggerated strength rating creates a serious safety hazard to consumers who depend on the product's advertised capabilities. Labeling Concerns: Initial review indicates that the product lacks compliant labeling as required under federal law, including the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) and the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act (TFPIA).

4/4/2024 · No Incident, No Injury · Pellini SpA · Ohio

Flower one year old pulled the string off of a glass door. The string is supposed to pull the blinds inside the glass up and down. The string was attached by a magnet and our son was caught in the string and almost put the magnet in his mouth.

3/20/2025 · Incident, No Injury · HOKINETY · United States

This law firm is submitting a formal complaint concerning the Amazon seller [REDACTED]. [REDACTED] actively engages in deceptive advertising, product misrepresentation, and the sale of dangerously defective merchandise, notably, the Hokinety "Paracord Type III 1000 lb", on the Amazon platform. More specifically, this matter involves the Hokinety "Paracord Type III 1000 lb" (the Product) falsely advertised under multiple listings: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B1N7T1J8 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B1N3HS5V The advertised specifications of the Product are materially false and misleading, and Amazon's continued sale of these listings poses a serious risk to consumer safety. Consumers are relying on the attributes outlined in the Amazon listings for load-bearing applications, which is particularly dangerous. The [REDACTED] testing we commissioned provides incontrovertible proof of misrepresentation, demonstrating violations of Amazon's policies, federal consumer protection laws, and the FTC guidelines on deceptive advertising. We are happy to provide the [REDACTED] testing results we have obtained to date upon request. We are diligently pursuing additional testing and may supplement this submission. Key Violations & Findings 1. False Advertising: Breaking Strength Claims (1,000 lbs. vs. 525 lbs.) The Product is marketed as Paracord Type III 1,000 lb breaking strength on both Amazon listings and product packaging. [REDACTED] independent lab testing confirms that the actual breaking strength is only 525 lbs., nearly 50% lower than advertised. This egregious misrepresentation endangers consumers relying on the specifications for the product's survival, safety, and load-bearing applications. 2. Material Misrepresentation: Polyester Material Rather than Nylon (as Advertised) The Product is advertised as 100% Nylon in its Amazon listing and packaging. [REDACTED] testing proves the Product is, in fact, 100% polyester, a cheap

12/28/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Tea Forte Inc. · United States

A flame ignited from to heating a teabag in the microwave. This product is from TeaForte.com. I received this nice tea set as a gift. I was heating up one of their teabags in a cup of water in the microwave like I normally do for other teas I purchase. A flame on the "string" connected to the tea bag immediately ignited. Thankfully, I was able to stop the power on the microwave and blow out the flame. Had I walked away, that flame could have caused a horrible fire in my home and possibly injuring myself. Afterwards, I looked closer at the tea box. On the BOTTOM of the box and the BOTTOM of each package of tea (each is packaged individually in a smaller box), it does say DO NOT MICROWAVE INFUSER. I inspected the string further by cutting it open and found that there is a thin metal string with cloth string wrapped around it. So it is not apparent that this product contains metal and must not be used in the microwave. The product that I specifically have is in an orange box and labeled CHAKRA. I am not sure how can this company can expect every consumer to know to look at the BOTTOM and read the very small printed instructions. This is a very dangerous product for those not familiar with this type of tea bag infuser. The box says this is a product crafted for Tea Forte, Inc. Maynard, MA 01754, USA, Certified Organic by CERES GMBH, a Product of Germany and packed in China.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to rope or string on the CPSC website.

Frequently Asked Questions

How dangerous are rope or string?

Based on 20 years of CPSC data, rope or string have a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk). An estimated 10,628 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.

What are the most common injuries from rope or string?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 16,488 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from rope or string increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for rope or string injuries?

The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 47,618 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by rope or string?

Of all ER visits involving rope or string, approximately 7.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with rope or string?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Safety Guides

What this means for you

Treat the 40/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.

  • See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
  • Injuries cluster in the 5-14 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
  • Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls

NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.

Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.