Electric Kettles Or Hot Pots
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Kitchen Cooking Appliances · CPSC Code 269
Down 24% over 5 years
The verdict
Electric Kettles Or Hot Pots carry a danger score of 30/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 432 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 24% over the last five years.
- 30/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 432
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 7.5%
- end in hospital admission
- 0-4
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 269 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 30/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for electric kettles or hot pots - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume432 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)7.5%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend-24%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Electric Kettles Or Hot Pots (CPSC product code 269, in the Kitchen Cooking Appliances category) generate an estimated 432 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 8,644 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 30/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 24% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2018 (830 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (122 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for electric kettles or hot pots is burns, thermal to the hand, accounting for approximately 1,169 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by burns, thermal to the finger (1,040 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,350 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 7.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 146 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how electric kettles or hot pots fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 854 | 496 | |
| 5-14 | 350 | 976 | |
| 15-24 | 377 | 583 | |
| 25-34 | 464 | 725 | |
| 35-44 | 503 | 530 | |
| 45-54 | 273 | 570 | |
| 55-64 | 283 | 795 | |
| 65-74 | 221 | 386 | |
| 75+ | 78 | 177 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Hand | Burns, Thermal | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Lower Arm | Burn, Scald | |
| Hand | Burn, Scald | |
| Lower Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| Upper Trunk | Burn, Scald | |
| Lower Leg | Burn, Scald | |
| Foot | Burn, Scald | |
| Face | Burn, Scald | |
| Finger | Burn, Scald | |
| All Parts Body | Electric Shock | |
| Wrist | Burn, Scald | |
| Lower Trunk | Burn, Scald | |
| Upper Leg | Burn, Scald | |
| Finger | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
18 YOF BURNED BY HOT WATER TO HER HER BACK. SHE HAD HEATED WATER IN AN ELECTRIC KETTLE ON HER DESK AND WAS BENT DOWN TO UNPLUG THE KETTLE WHEN THE ELECTRIC CORD PULLED AND TOPPLED THE KETTLE SPLASHING HOT WATER ON HER BACK. DX PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN LOWER BACK, PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN ABD
21YOM PRESENTING TO THE ED WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN AND SWELLING TO THE 1ST DIGIT OF THE RIGHT FOOT AFTER DROPPING A HOT *** ON THE DORSUM OF HIS RIGHT FOOT TWO WEEKS AGO . PT ALSO HAS SWELLING TO FOOT DX; CELLULITIS OF RIGHT TOE
71 YOF TEA KETTLE OF BOILING WATER SPILLED ON FOOT. DX ANKLE BURNS
19MOM GRANDMA WAS MAKING COFFEE AND *** PULLED THE POT FROM THE MACHINE AND IT SPILLED ONTO HIM. BURN TO CHEST FROM HOT COFFEE. DX: BURN
28YOF PRESENTED TO ED C/O BURNS, PT STATED SHE SUSTAINED THIGH BURN 4 DAYS AGO, REPORTED SHE PICKED UP THE ELECTRIC KETTLE. DX; PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF R THIGH
17MOF PT PULLED AND ELECTRIC KETTLE WITH BOILING WATER ONTO HERSELF HAS BLISTERING ON BELLY BOTH THIGHS RT FOOT RT BUTTOCK TODAY DX: SUPERFICIAL PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF THIGH
47YOF PRESENTS AFTER SHE BURNED HER LEFT FOREARM WHEN SHE ACCIDENTALLY TOUCHED A HOT POT 5 DAYS AGO. DX: PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF LEFT UPPER EXTREMITY
4YOM PRESENTS AFTER HE PUT HIS RIGHT ARM INTO A HOT POT. DX: PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN WRIST
41 YOF TURNED OFF A HOT CHOCOLATE MACHINE, IT SPARKED, AND SHE WAS SHOCKED. DX: ELECTROCUTION RIGHT THUMB.
5YOM RUN UNDER A KETTLE OF HOT WATER THAT SISTER WAS HOLDING AT HOME AND IT SPILLED ON HIS RIGHT SHOULDER, BACK, SIDE, AND ARM. DX: BURN.
9YOF HIT THE BACK OF HER HAND ON A HOT POT YESTERDAY. BURN NOTED TO LEFT HAND DX: VIRAL URI; BURN
2YOM PULLED HOT WATER KETTLE ONTO HIMSELF AND BURNED FACE AND EXTREMITIES AND TRUNK DX: SECOND DEGREE BURN OF ARM
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Rival brand electric kettle. Model MK-17P13B2. Walmart product. Used about one week - no problem. Then on 9/9/16 the device turned itself on while unattended.
09/15/2015 (Approximate) - The consumer indicates that as soon as he puts water in the unit, it leaks water at the base of the handle approximately where the electricity runs through. 09/22/2015 - The consumer contacted the manufacturer and explained the situation he had been having with their unit. The representative he spoke to informed the consumer that although the unit is under warranty, they would have to inspect it to make sure he did not cause intentional damage to it. If they found the consumer to not be at fault, they informed him they would replace the unit. The consumer searched online and indicates that many people are having the same issue. The consumer has since returned the unit to the manufacturer. The consumer believes this product poses a safety hazard to consumers.
2/15/2022: The consumer sustained a burn to her hand, while lifting the product by the handle. Over the past few months, she has sustained burns to the area between her hand and wrist, when steam escapes from the kettle. Somehow steam escapes from an area of the pot and burns the holders wrist. Shes had approximately 5 of these incident. She tried wearing an oven mitt to prevent further injuries. 9/22/2022: The consumer called the manufacturer and reported the matter to their rep. (name unavailable). The rep. told the consumer that they could not do anything unless they had a receipt number. The consumer offered the information from the product, but the rep. said they could not do anything with that information. The consumer said it was a gift, but the rep. did not offer anything else. Also called before this time no response Rx. treatment was done at home.
Here is my email to the manufacturer: I just purchased a GK-17 ViewPro 1.7L electric kettle from Bed Bath & Beyond. I ran the 3 full kettle cleaning cycles you recommend. The kettle never automatically shut off as it is supposed to. I let it run for multiple minutes at full boil and had to shut it off manually each time. I tried it 3-4 more times, with varying levels of water, and still the same problem. I finally tried it with very little water in it, perhaps 1/2, and it shut off automatically. Subsequently, after having done that test, it now shuts off automatically with any amount of water in it! I fixed it, inadvertently, but it makes me wonder if there is an underlying defect to be concerned about. The date code on the bottom says 1920 B. I supposed in a sense it passed the safety test because it did shut off with a mostly empty pot. If it never shuts off when it has a reasonable amount of water in it, then its just wasting energy by continuing to boil pointlessly. I do wonder if like many products, it has a duty cycle where it is not designed to run continuously without a resting period? If it is not designed to handle continuous running, then perhaps this is a potential safety issue all the way around. In any case, I would suggest sharing this information with your QC and engineering department.
Aroma Professional Digital Glass Electric Tea Kettle, Model AWC-155DI. Lid assembly is made from cheap plastic parts that fall apart after a few weeks of regular use. The lid falls when pouring off causing boiling water and/or steam to rush out. I have sustained minor steam burns but feel the potential is there for more serious injuries.
[REDACTED] Date: 07/15/2025 U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission 4330 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Subject: Urgent Product Safety Complaint Exploding Rival Electric Kettle (Purchased at Walmart) Dear Consumer Product Safety Commission, I am writing to report a serious safety incident involving a Rival brand electric kettle, purchased at Walmart, which exploded without warning in my kitchen on [Insert Date of Incident]. The explosion caused significant smoke damage, leaving my home uninhabitable and myself temporarily homeless. The kettle was being used properly at the time of the incident. Suddenly, it burst apart violently, filling the area with smoke and damaging nearby property. I have attached a photo of one of the destroyed components for your review, which highlights the severity of the malfunction. To date, neither Rival (the manufacturer) nor Walmart has taken responsibility for this dangerous defect. My attempts to reach out to both parties have been met with silence or deflection. This incident has had a serious impact on my living situation, health, and emotional well-being. I am requesting an immediate investigation into this products safety, and I strongly urge you to consider initiating a recall or consumer alert to prevent harm to others. Product Information: Product: Electric Kettle Brand: Rival Retailer: Walmart Model Number Purchase Date: 10/2021-22 Supporting Evidence: Enclosed are photos of broken kettle and smoke damages to my furnitures and apartment Unless I receive a resolution or response from the manufacturer in a timely manner, I will pursue legal action to seek damages related to property loss and displacement. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please confirm receipt of this complaint, and let me know what next steps I should take. I am willing to provide any additional documentation you may ne
Sunbeam Electric kettle model number SEK17 has a faulty switch. This shows up in a couple of ways. 1/ When the kettle reaches a full boil, I can hear the auto-off mechanism click 'off', but the electrical switch inside stays on and the kettle continues to boil in the off position. 2/ With the switch in the off position and the kettle 'off' I was filling the kettle with water and the internal switch went on, providing power to the kettle element, even though the external switch was still in the off position. I believe that if left unattended, the kettle would fail to switch off, then boil dry and possibly melt down and cause a fire. FYI - I have been using other brands and types of electric kettles for 45 years and I am very familiar with their normal operation.
Collapsible travel kettle can collapse when in use, scalding the user. [REDACTED]
Showing 8 of 146 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to electric kettles or hot pots on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are electric kettles or hot pots?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, electric kettles or hot pots have a danger score of 30/100 (low risk). An estimated 432 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from electric kettles or hot pots?
The most common injury is burns, thermal to the hand, accounting for approximately 1,169 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from electric kettles or hot pots increasing or decreasing?
Down 24% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for electric kettles or hot pots injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,350 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by electric kettles or hot pots?
Of all ER visits involving electric kettles or hot pots, approximately 7.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with electric kettles or hot pots?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Kitchen Cooking Appliances
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 30/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 0-4 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.