Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Saws, Not Specified ranks #173 of 838 by danger score (40/100) at ER-volume #151 of 838 (15,435/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #173
- danger rank of 838
- #151
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 40/100
- danger score
- 15,435/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (40/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
40 Higher than most more dangerous than 75% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 56/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 4 | 32nd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 15,435 | 78th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +19% | 81st | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 9 | 46th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 308,691 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 845. Segments sum to 308,691 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Communication & Entertainment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Communication & Entertainment danger scores
How this 40/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for saws, not specified - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 15,435 ER visits/yr High volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.3% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.05% Above-typical fatality rate
- 5-year trend+19%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for saws, not specified are rising by about 19% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2005 (21,547 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2018 (12,171 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 127,800 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (34,229 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 56,353 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.05%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 9 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how saws, not specified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 465 | 396 | |
| 5-14 | 6,363 | 1,705 | |
| 15-24 | 32,056 | 2,254 | |
| 25-34 | 45,988 | 2,690 | |
| 35-44 | 50,869 | 3,946 | |
| 45-54 | 52,014 | 4,339 | |
| 55-64 | 47,378 | 3,184 | |
| 65-74 | 33,444 | 2,695 | |
| 75+ | 17,721 | 1,019 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Finger | Avulsion | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Upper Leg | Laceration | |
| Finger | Amputation | |
| Wrist | Laceration | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Knee | Laceration | |
| Foot | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
39YOM COMES TO THE ER WITH A LEFT THUMB LACERATION. HE STATES HE WAS IN HIS GARAGE, USING A HOLE SAW TO CUT A PIECE OF WOOKD WHEN IT KICKED BACK AT HIM AND HIT HIM ON THE TOP OF THE LEFT THUMB, DENIES OTHER INJURY. DX: LACERATION WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY LEFT THUMB WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL INITIAL
23YOM WAS USING A SAW AND ACCIDENTALLY CUT HIMSELF. LWBS. DX: HAND LACERATION
58YOF PRESENTS WITH A LACERATION TO HER LEFT MIDDLE FINGER AFTER CUTTING IT ON A SAW BLADE WHILE DOING A CROSS CUT DX: LACERATION OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER
63YOM ACCIDENTALLY CUT SELF WITH SAW, DX FX FINGER
58YOM REPORTS WITH FINGER INJURY WHILE USING A SAW. DX OPEN FRACTURE OF FINGER.
35YOM USING A SAW AT HOME AND CUT HIS FINGER. DX LACERATION TO FINGER
53YOF WAS CUTTING PALM FRONDS AT HOME WITH A SAW WHEN SHE CUT LEFT WRIST DX:LAC TO WRIST
25YOM WAS USING A METAL SAW AND FELT SOMETHING GET INTO HIS RIGHT EYE DX: FOREIGN BODY OF CONJUNCTIVA
27YOM STATES THAT HE CUT HIS RIGHT FOOT WITH A SAW A MONTH AGO SUSTAINED A LACERATION THAT IS NOW INFECTED DX: CELLULITIS OF RIGHT FOOT
72 YOM CUTTING TREE WITH SAW WAS STRUCK BY BRANCH DX TRAUMA
42 YOM INJURY TO FINGER WITH HOLE SAW DX FINGER AVULSION
20YOM WAS SAWING WOOD WHEN A PIECE OF WOOD STRUCK HIM IN THE RIGHT EYE DX: CORNEAL ABRASION
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
What happened that made you want to report? - I have a small tree service. I recently purchased a Notch branded pole saw from Treestuff.com. It uses a Silky blade which are out standing. I have several Silky saws, but they recently started only selling blades and Notch is who manufacturers the pole and sells it all under their own brand name. I purchased on in May, 2023. It arrived sometime in June. My son and I were working and he was using the new Notch saw. He came to me and said he wouldn't use it anymore because the last extension with the blade popped out twice and nearly cut him. I looked the saw over and didn't see anything loose or damaged. I told him the ferrule latches had to snap into place and the cams had to be locked before using the saw. He said he had done so. So I tried it myself and whether extended or fully collapsed the same thing happened to me. The second time the last extension and blade popped out and came down on me. The razor sharp Silkey blade cut me and tor my shirt. It even ripped through my leather gloves. The only thing that saved my face was that I had my helmet on and eye protection. I notified the manufacturer (distributor). The only response is they wanted a video and if it looked like a problem they would issue a refund if I would find a box (8 feet long) and pay to return it. I will no longer use this saw. It is extremely unsafe and because of the nature of the saw, it could cause significant damage or even death. What type of product was being used? - 4373-42 20' Notch Nobasu 4 Section Telescoping Aluminum Polesaw Who was using the product(s)? - My son and I both used the saw and experienced the same results. My son has done trees for 12 years. I have 50+ years experience in arborist work. How were the product(s) being used? - Pruning trees. Were there any injuries that happened or may have happened while using the product? - Yes, cuts to my arm and shirt and gloves ruined. I could been much worse if I hadn't been usi
The consumer stated that he was sawing some 2x4s and the blade came apart. The saw blade is blackened. The consumer stated that the blade broke off and is bent. The consumer stated that he had purchased another blade before and it also did the same thing. The consumer took it to the retailer who offered him a discount on the purchase of another blade. There are no recalls on this product. The consumer stated that this blade is extremely dangerous as it could have caused harm to his hands or fingers.
Caller stated that the pole saw is made from fiberglass which deteriorates into the fan and causes it to dispersed into the air. He stated that the user breathes this in . Caller stated that this is a health hazard. Caller stated that he has been experiencing eye and breathing problems. He stated that he has seen a physician but they advised him that they are unable to help with the problem he is having. The manufacturer was not contacted because there was no contact number.
I was using my brand new DeWalt DWS779 miter saw cutting lumber in accordance with the instructions in the manual. Toward the end of one cut a plastic piece of the saw violently flew out in two pieces and sliced my left hand leaving a bleeding wound.
Caller is reporting that he experienced similar problems as recall [REDACTED] Hazard: The telescoping poles of the pole saw/pruner can separate, causing the poles to come apart and fall down and the saw blade and pruner head to drop, posing a laceration hazard. Caller stated that while someone using the unit the upper portion became loose from the lower portion because the lock mechanism did not hold causing the blade to fall down to the tree and injured the person that was using it. The manufacturer was contacted and he was informed that they did not have a recall for the 12 or 14 foot units and when he enquire they could not tell him why. Caller feels that these poles should be recalled as well due to the safety hazard they present.
This concerns the blade change on a Dewalt, 12" miter saw, model DWS779, {type 21}, I feel there is the potential to be cut with the blade, because it requires, that you have to "force it off," the arbor, and of course do the same, when installing the sharpened blade. This is not addressed in the manual, and again, their customer service e-mail service, seems more concerned about completing their survey, than addressing this issue. I'm a hobbyist woodworker and use this saw on a daily basis, the blades become dull and require that they be changed out, periodically.
Caller stated that while using the miter saw the guard touch the blade and shattered which caused serious injury to his left index finger. He stated that he went to the emergency room at Paris Regional where he was transported by ambulance to another hospital in TX for admission and emergency surgery. He was released the following day for follow up with a hand specialist. The manufacturer was contacted and they informed him that they will be reviewing his case. Caller feels that his saw is a safety hazard and should be reported.
the tooth on the blade broke off and embedded into my leg
Showing 8 of 9 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to saws, not specified on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Communication & Entertainment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Saws, Not Specified: cross-group products nearest on danger score (40/100), estimated annual ER visits (15,435/yr), and hospitalization share (3.3%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
- Laundry Baskets Containers, Tableware & Packaging 15,448/yr
- Lacrosse (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports & Recreation Equipment 15,451/yr
- Garage Doors (excl. Automatic Garage Doors Or Openers) Building Materials & Home Structures 15,362/yr
- Garden Hoses, Nozzles Or Sprinklers Lawn & Garden Equipment 15,625/yr
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Communication & Entertainment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Saws, Not Specified ranks #173 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #151 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does saws, not specified rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, saws, not specified ranks #173 by PlainSafety danger score (40/100) and #151 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (15,435/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from saws, not specified?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 127,800 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from saws, not specified increasing or decreasing?
Up 19% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for saws, not specified injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 56,353 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by saws, not specified?
Of all ER visits involving saws, not specified, approximately 3.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with saws, not specified?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.