Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Cardboard Products ranks #173 of 838 by danger score (40/100) at ER-volume #133 of 838 (17,734/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #173
- danger rank of 838
- #133
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 40/100
- danger score
- 17,734/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (40/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
40 Higher than most more dangerous than 75% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 57/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 4 | 30th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 17,734 | 80th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +9% | 76th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 21 | 56th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 354,697 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1114. Segments sum to 354,697 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Containers & Packaging danger scores
How this 40/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for cardboard products - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 17,734 ER visits/yr High volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.6% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend+9%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for cardboard products are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2022 (23,695 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2011 (10,024 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 39,019 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by strain, sprain to the lower trunk (31,766 cases). The 25-34 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 52,281 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 21 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how cardboard products fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 10,998 | 7,403 | |
| 5-14 | 19,901 | 12,281 | |
| 15-24 | 22,127 | 18,540 | |
| 25-34 | 24,958 | 27,323 | |
| 35-44 | 24,293 | 26,011 | |
| 45-54 | 22,778 | 27,821 | |
| 55-64 | 19,102 | 25,768 | |
| 65-74 | 12,303 | 21,180 | |
| 75+ | 11,337 | 20,446 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Upper Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Shoulder | Other | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Upper Leg | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
65 YOF REPORTS SHE MOVED HER FROM *** AND HAS BEEN MOVING BOXES FOR 4 DAYS. C/O RIGHT WRIST PAIN. DX: CMC ARTHRITIS
67 YOM WAS STOMPING ON A BOX AND GOT DIZZY AND FELL HITTING HIS HEAD ON A METAL DOG BOWL. DX: MAXILLARY FRACTURE, ORBIT FRACTURE
56YOM WITH C/O LEFT FOOT PAIN AFTER ACCIDENTALLY DROPPING ABOUT A 30 POUND BOX ON TOP OF HIS LEFT FOOT EARLIER TODAY. DX: FOOT PAIN
51YOM WHO STATES HE THREW HIS BACK OUT AS HE WAS LOADING HIS SEMI-TRAILER AND WAS LOADING A BOX. HE STUMBLED FORWARD, TRYING NOT TO DROP THE BOX AND THREW HIS BACK OUT. DX: LUMBAR STRAIN.
57YOF WITH RIGHT SHOULDER PAIN AND ELBOW PAIN AFTER MECHANICAL TRIP AND FALL, SHE TRIPPED OVER AN *** BOX. DX: FRACTURE OF HUMERAL HEAD, RIGHT, INFERIOR SUBLUXATION OF HUMERUS, RIGHT ELBOW PAIN
12MOF WAS SITTING INSIDE A CARDBOARD BOX AND WAS PLAYING WHEN SHE TIPPED THE BOX OVER AND FELL FACE FIRST INTO THE HARDWOOD FLOOR. DX: FACIAL ABRASION
31 YOM CUTTING CARDBOARD BOXES WITH BOX CUTTER CUT HAND DX LACERATION HAND
23YOM HAS BEEN MOVING AND HAS BEEN CARRYING ALOT OF BOXES AND MOVING FURNITURE. COMPLAINS OF PAIN IN LOW BACK THAT RADIATES DOWN HIS LEG. DX: STRAIN OF LUMBOSACRAL REGION, SCIATICA
55 YOF WAS WALKING IN THE KITCHEN, AND HER FOOT GOT CAUGHT ON A CARDBOARD BOX, AFTER WHICH SHE SLIPPED AND HIT HER HEAD ON THE FRIDGE. +BACK PAIN. DX: FALL.
41 YOM PRESENTS WITH LEFT EYE PAIN. HE INITIALLY INJURED HIS EYE ON 1/4/24, STATING HE CUT IT DOWN THE CENTER WITH A PIECE OF CARDBOARD. HE SAW HIS EYE DOCTOR. TODAY WITH INCREASED EYE PAIN, WATERY DISCHARGE AND SOME SWELLING AROUND EYE. HE WENT TO AN URGENT CARE WHO REFERRED HIM TO THE ED DX CORNEAL INJURY, PRESEPTAL CELLULITIS
52 YOM C/O SHOULDER PAIN AFTER LIFTING SEVERAL CARDBOARD BOXES DX SHOULDER PAIN
46YOM WAS AT HOME AND WAS TRYING TO CUT OPEN A PACKAGE WITH A KNIFE AND CUT HIS LOWER ABDOMINAL WALL DX: LACERATION TO LOWER ABDOMINAL WALL
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
7/25/2024: The product arrived, and some type of substance leaked from the packaging box onto the palm side of the consumers left hand. The consumer has experienced a tingling feeling on her hand, which later extended up her arm and to her chest. The consumer went to the ER and has been to the doctor a total of 4 times, because of her pain. These shower steamers can be placed in the shower, and they create steam and a scent. The product comes in a heavy-duty plastic and very secure shipping material. The consumer has ordered this exact brand many times in the past and never experienced any problems. The consumer reported this incident to the retailer. 7/25/2024: The consumer received a letter from the retailer advising her to let them know if she needed to see a doctor and they would help with medical expenses. 7/26/2024: The doctor at Urgent Care advised the consumer to contact Poison Control, which she did. The Poison Control representative said the symptoms resemble exposure to fiberglass. The consumer called the retailer and was directed to various numbers, before reaching their headquarters. She was then directed to [REDACTED] (their Claims Department). The symptoms continued and the consumer visited the ER, because of the pain with her heart. The test came back fine, but the consumer was referred to a heart specialist. However, without knowing what the substance is, the doctors cannot provide any guidance. 7/29/2024: The consumer received a letter from the retailer, indicating that her case would be reviewed, and someone would get back in touch with her.
Caller ordered shipment of two large pieces of furniture July 28th, 2012 which were both delivered Thursday, August 23rd, 2012. She began opening and removing approximately four layers of padding which consisted of cardboard, plastic wrap, cellophane, [REDACTED] then particle board pieces at the bottom. She developed a headache, tiredness, and began sneezing often while opening the first box, then after she unwrapped the second box, she became ill, she was regurgitating and becoming more and more listless and then laid down. She is fine today but wanted to report these odors from what she believes is obvously dangerous fumes/chemicals that was wrapping the furniture. Caller did not received medical attention, she treated herself with rest and fluids. She contacted the manufacturer, spoke [REDACTED] who asked if she wanted to ship the furniture pieces back to them, apologized and said that she "would make a note of the incident". Caller is reporting this product and the affect it had on her because she is thinking more of the elderly or the very young and any potential long term affects these wrappings may have on them or have possibly had on her long term health.
I picked up a box of spindrift sodas and the cardboard cut my finger
In the past year, I have been having a harder and harder time opening cardboard boxes like cereal, crackers and soft drink containers. The edges are very sharp and I keep getting cut. My skin is very delicate but I doubt that I am the only one this is happening to. It is like there is some type of plastic added to the cardboard. Thank you.
In the past year, I have been having a harder and harder time opening cardboard boxes like cereal, crackers and soft drink containers. The edges are very sharp and I keep getting cut. My skin is very delicate but I doubt that I am the only one this is happening to. It is like there is some type of plastic added to the cardboard. Thank you.
In the past year, I have been having a harder and harder time opening cardboard boxes like cereal, crackers and soft drink containers. The edges are very sharp and I keep getting cut. My skin is very delicate but I doubt that I am the only one this is happening to. It is like there is some type of plastic added to the cardboard. Thank you.
In the past year, I have been having a harder and harder time opening cardboard boxes like cereal, crackers and soft drink containers. The edges are very sharp and I keep getting cut. My skin is very delicate but I doubt that I am the only one this is happening to. It is like there is some type of plastic added to the cardboard. Thank you.
The new McDonalds coffee cup burns when reheated in a microwave. It put a small blister on my pinkie finger as I reached in and grabbed it. There was a brown burn mark on the white cardboard base. I called McDonalds and talked to a rude representative who said very sharply: "That's why we put 'Do Not Microwave' on the cup." WHO READS THE CUP for crying out loud?! I believe there are too many people like myself out there who don't drink their coffee all at once and reheat it to have this kind of product on the market. I will add that it was not posted in an obvious location on the cup and that the cup was very busy with an excessive amount of other writing and decoration.
Showing 8 of 21 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to cardboard products on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Containers & Packaging
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Cardboard Products: cross-group products nearest on danger score (40/100), estimated annual ER visits (17,734/yr), and hospitalization share (3.6%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Containers & Packaging
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Cardboard Products ranks #173 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #133 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does cardboard products rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, cardboard products ranks #173 by PlainSafety danger score (40/100) and #133 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (17,734/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from cardboard products?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 39,019 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from cardboard products increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for cardboard products injuries?
The 25-34 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 52,281 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by cardboard products?
Of all ER visits involving cardboard products, approximately 3.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with cardboard products?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.