CPSC NEISS · code 836

Knives With Replaceable Blades

Knives With Replaceable Blades: danger rank #213 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #54 of 838 (48,104 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Home Communication & Entertainment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Knives With Replaceable Blades ranks #213 of 838 by danger score (39/100) at ER-volume #54 of 838 (48,104/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#213
danger rank of 838
#54
ER-volume rank of 838
39/100
danger score
48,104/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (39/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

39 Around the middle lower than 25% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 51/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 1 5th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 48,104 95th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -6% 57th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 27 60th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 962,068 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 836. Segments sum to 962,068 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Communication & Entertainment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Home Communication & Entertainment danger scores

1. Tools, Not Specified44/1002. Batteries43/1003. Bench Or Table Saws43/1004. Torches, Not Specified42/1005. Battery Chargers/adapters41/1006. Power Saws, Other Or Not …40/1007. Rope Or String40/1008. Knives With Replaceable B…39/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10039/100
PlainSafety danger score · Knives With Replaceable Blades

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 39/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for knives with replaceable blades - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 48,104 ER visits/yr Very high volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 0.8% Low admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-6%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for knives with replaceable blades are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2006 (63,622 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (38,199 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 501,853 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (189,389 cases). The 25-34 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 197,230 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 0.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 27 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how knives with replaceable blades fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

30K40K50K60K70K 20052008201120142017202020232024 42K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Knives With Replaceable Blades, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 7,165 3,421 10,602
5-14 36,218 15,887 52,105
15-24 141,475 48,380 189,870
25-34 157,071 40,062 197,230
35-44 137,945 35,921 173,904
45-54 115,823 32,417 148,240
55-64 87,814 22,583 110,447
65-74 43,414 14,866 58,280
75+ 16,243 5,147 21,390

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 501,853
Hand Laceration 189,389
Lower Arm Laceration 77,400
Upper Leg Laceration 44,221
Wrist Laceration 41,561
Lower Leg Laceration 21,147
Finger Avulsion 16,931
Knee Laceration 12,128
Foot Laceration 7,983
Lower Trunk Laceration 4,025
Toe Laceration 3,785
Finger Other 3,324
Face Laceration 3,238
Finger Amputation 2,606
Upper Trunk Laceration 2,468

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 97.9% (942,176)
Left Without Being Seen 1.2% (11,816)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 0.5% (5,078)
Treated And Transferred 0.3% (2,496)
Held For Observation 0.1% (502)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 60 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

60 YOM WAS USING A UTILITY KNIFE AND CUTTING ALONG A METAL GUIDE WHEN THE KNIFE SLIPPED AND SLICED INTO THE THUMB BED. DX: LEFT THUMB LACERATION

Age 42 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

42YOM C/O LACERATION TO HIS LEFT THUMB JUST PRIOR TO ARRIVAL. PT WAS USING A BOX CUTTER. DX: FINGER LACERATION

Age 74 · Male · Hand · Laceration · 2024

74 YOM CUT HAND WITH A BOX CUTTER DX: LAC

Age 23 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

23 YOF WAS USING A ROTARY CUTTER AND ACCIDENTALLY CUT HER FINGER. DX: FINGER LACERATION

Age 13 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

13YOM WAS CARVING WOOD WHEN HE WAS DISTRACTED AND HIS KNIFE SLIPPED AND HE CUT HIS LEFT INDEX FINGER DX: LEFT INDEX FINGER LACERATION

Age 66 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

66YOF PATIENT WAS USING A BOX CUTTER WHEN SHE SLICED HER FINGER DX: LACERATION OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 28 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

28YOM CUT HIS FINGER USING A BOX CUTTER DX: LACERATION OF LEFT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT FOREIGN WITH DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 58 · Female · Hand · Laceration · 2024

58YOF PATIENT REPORTS CUTTING HER LEFT HAND WITH *** KNIFE WHILE TRYING TO OPEN A PLASTIC CANDYCANE DX: LACERATION OF LEFT HAND WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY

Age 62 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

62YOF WAA USING A ROTARY CUTTER AND CUT LEFT INDEX FINGER DX:LAC FINGER

Age 19 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

19YOF WAS ATTEMPTING TO CUT A PLASTIC BOTTLE WITH A BOX CUTTER, SUS LAC TO THUMB, DX LAC TO THUMB

Age 37 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

37 YOF CUT LEFT INDEX FINGER ON A BOX CUTTER, DX; FINGER LACERATION

Age 40 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

40 YOM IS RENOVATING A HOUSE. HE WAS USING A BOX CUTTER TO CUT DRYWALL WHEN THE KNIFE SLIPPED CUTTING HIS LEFT THUMB AND 2ND/3RD FINGERS. DX FINGER LACERATIONS

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/21/2025 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · MENARD INC · Illinois

On September 12, 2025, I sustained a 3/8 cut on my finger while using the Masterforce Quick Change Folding Carpet Knife (Model MF90823, SKU 2375567), purchased from the Menards Evergreen Park, IL store on September 1, 2025. The injury occurred when I reached into my pocket and the exposed blade of the folded knife cut me. Unlike other utility knives I own, this model does not have a guard that fully covers the blade when folded, despite being advertised as having a Safety lock-back system. The exposed blade creates a serious hazard for anyone carrying or handling the knife. The cut was painful, required healing time, and has prevented me from safely carrying or using the knife since the incident. I previously reported this to Menards on September 15 and received only a brief acknowledgment. Despite a follow-up on September 17, I have not received further communication.

9/19/2016 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · GOLDEN VENTURES INC, HOMECARE PRODUCTS · Unspecified

Cut finger during change of the razor blade: The design of the scrapper was that changing the razor blade required first sliding of the scrapper cover out of a tab, then removal of the cover so that the worn blade can be replaced with a new one. The cover could be re-installed by re-engaging the tab after installation. In the process of change the blade, I sustained a cut in my finger about 1.5 cm long and 1.5 mm deep. I was told that size cut normally would have required at least 2 stitches. Luckily the cut had smooth edges and seemed to close with little gap, and the emergency staff was able to send me home with a medical tape over the wound. The accident was caused after the new blade had been installed, the cover had to be secured by re-engagement of the tab lock. During the re-engagement, the cover had to be pushed which coincidentally expose the blade. If a finger or body part was anywhere in front of the blade, there would be an accident for sure. Someone else had reported this problem a few years ago (required 7 stitches). I am surprised this design has not been updated and there is not even a serious safety warning sticker to alert of the danger. I am an extremely safety conscious person. I have safely used many powered tools that are potentially more dangerous than this. But this design is inherently dangerous. Worst is that it seems so deceptively harmless. I urge the manufacture to do something now, either change the design, make it impossible to change the blade, or at a minimum put out a RED warning label.

9/19/2016 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · GOLDEN VENTURES INC, HOMECARE PRODUCTS · Unspecified

This razor blade scraper consists of 2 pieces of plastic which slide with respect to each other. One piece of plastic is mounted a razor blade (the blade piece), the other piece acts as a protector (the protect piece). In the "open" position, the protect piece moves behind the blade piece, thereby exposing the blade. In the "close" position, the protect piece goes in front of the blade piece, presumably offering protection from being cut by the blade. Except it does not work because there is no locking of the pieces in position either closed or opened position. So if the blade is closed and you pushes the scraper toward a part of your body, you the protector will retreat and the blade will be exposed to cause a cut. This design is careless and extremely dangerous. My wife was cut at least 2 times just picking the scraper up. I have also reported a more serious accident with this device in No. 20160919-208F0-2147413945

9/11/2022 · Incident, No Injury · LF, LLC · Missouri

While cutting a light duty cable tie with my Kobalt Speed Release Folding Utility Knife (sharp) a pin holding a necessary component failed causing the blade to fall out of the knife which almost hit me in the head.

8/7/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Argonauts Online Inc · Tennessee

On July 19, 2021 I placed an order online at modernmint.com for an arts & crafts specialty cutting tool. When it arrived on August 5, 2021 I tried to use it and found that it did not work as advertised online. When I tried to change the cutting blade, I almost cut off the tip of a finger. It came with no instructions and no safety warnings. I hate to think what would happen if a child got a hold of this tool.

8/25/2024 · Incident, No Injury · Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. · United States

Blade installation of this product places one at risk for deep cuts to the hand. The warnings are generic and instructing the use of gloves in the instructions will not prevent cuts as new sharp blades are being installed and will cut thru leather gloves easily. The difficulty in removing worn blades and installing new sharp blades adds to the inherent danger of this product. Only by using vice grips or steel woven gloves can blades be safely replaced. I was not injured but I do recognize the risks.

8/17/2020 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · Harbor Freight Tools · California

I used box cutter to open a box, then, when I tried to retract the blade, the mechanism broke and the blade shot out the rear end, cutting my finger. I have strong, steady hands (no arthritis, weakness, nor tremor). This could have happened to anyone. Product should be removed from the market. I bought a few of these box cutters several months ago at Harbor Freight Hard Ware in San Rafael, CA. They were sold individually without identifying info. They are light orange plastic, about 5" long and 1/2" wide. I would be happy to send the broken one as well as an intact one to you.

7/4/2013 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · FISKARS · Texas

I was trying to open the Fiskars Contour Rotary Cutter to cut fabric at my home. Upon attempting to open the packaging the Fiskars Contour Rotary Cutter blade came through the left side of the plastic packaging and at that point cut off the pad of my dominant right thumb. There is not a protective cover over the entire blade to ensure safety while opening this tool. The cutter remains inside the packaging as it was not fully removed during the initial incident. The incident happened so quickly that I felt the pain then looked down to see profuse amounts of blood. The pad of my thumb was half inside the packaging and half outside the packaging when my husband found it. He placed the skin back onto my thumb and we went to the hospital. After an 8 hour wait and excruciating pain, the ER doctor re-attached the pad with 8 stitches on half of the injury but was unable to place stitches on the other side of the pad due to the severity of the injury. I am deeply concerned that this accident could happen again to another innocent person trying to cut fabric at home. This product did not have a protective cover over the blade or a warning for how to open it safely.

Showing 8 of 27 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to knives with replaceable blades on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Home Communication & Entertainment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Knives With Replaceable Blades: cross-group products nearest on danger score (39/100), estimated annual ER visits (48,104/yr), and hospitalization share (0.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Knives With Replaceable Blades ranks #213 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #54 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does knives with replaceable blades rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, knives with replaceable blades ranks #213 by PlainSafety danger score (39/100) and #54 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (48,104/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from knives with replaceable blades?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 501,853 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from knives with replaceable blades increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for knives with replaceable blades injuries?

The 25-34 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 197,230 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by knives with replaceable blades?

Of all ER visits involving knives with replaceable blades, approximately 0.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (99.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with knives with replaceable blades?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Knives With Replaceable Blades is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.