Ear Protection Devices
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Personal Care & Safety Products · CPSC Code 1617
Down 22% over 5 years
The verdict
Ear Protection Devices carry a danger score of 31/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 1,957 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 22% over the last five years.
- 31/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 1,957
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 0.8%
- end in hospital admission
- 5-14
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 1617 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 31/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for ear protection devices - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume1,957 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)0.8%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend-22%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Ear Protection Devices (CPSC product code 1617, in the Personal Care & Safety Products category) generate an estimated 1,957 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 39,145 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 31/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 22% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2012 (2,884 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (1,348 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for ear protection devices is foreign body to the ear, accounting for approximately 28,982 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the ear (6,325 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 6,445 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 0.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 11 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how ear protection devices fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 1,144 | 785 | |
| 5-14 | 3,461 | 2,984 | |
| 15-24 | 3,595 | 2,007 | |
| 25-34 | 3,660 | 2,416 | |
| 35-44 | 2,852 | 2,404 | |
| 45-54 | 3,332 | 2,495 | |
| 55-64 | 3,246 | 1,509 | |
| 65-74 | 964 | 1,133 | |
| 75+ | 575 | 588 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Ear | Foreign Body | |
| Ear | Other | |
| Face | Foreign Body | |
| Internal | Ingestion | |
| Ear | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ear | Internal Injury | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Toe | Other | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Ear | Hemorrhage | |
| Internal | Aspiration | |
| Upper Leg | Puncture | |
| Face | Other | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
19YOM, C/O FOREIGN BODY IN EAR, PT HAS EAR PLUG STUCK IN EAR. DX:ACUTE FOREIGN BODY OF LEFT EAR CANAL
49YOF TIP OF SILICONE EAR PLUG STUCK IN EARDX FB EAR
60YOM HAD EAR PIECE GET STUCK IN EAR. DX: FOREIGN BODY OF RIGHT EAR.
21YOM, EAR BUD STUCK IN RIGHT EAR DX: FOREIGN BODY RIGHT EAR-REMOVED
27YOM WALKED IN TO ED. PATIENT HAS AN EAR PLUG IN HIS LEFT EAR THAT IS PUSHED IN TOO FAR FOR HIM TO RETRIUEVE. PATIENT MENTIONS THERE IS A LITTLE PAIN IN EAR. PATIENT PUT EAR PLUG IN FOR A CONCERT HE WAS ATTENDING TONIGHT. DX:FOREIGN BODY OF LEFT EAR.
54YOM C/O EAR PLUG COVERING GOT STUCK IN RT EAR CANAL DX: FOREIGN BODY IN EAR
47YOF PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT GOT A SILICONE EAR PLUG STUCK IN HIS RIGHT EAR. DX: EAR FOREIGN BODY, EAR PAIN
38 YOM PUT AN ORANGE SILICONE EAR PLUG IN HIS EAR FOR A CONCERT 3 WEEKS AGO AND HAS BEEN UNABLE TO GET IT OUT, WENT TO URGENT CARE AND WAS REFERRED TO ED FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. DX: FOREIGN BODY LEFT EXTERNAL EAR CANAL
13YOM PATIENT PRESENTS WITH EAR PLUGS STUCK IN HIS EARS BILATERALLY. HE STATES THAT HE PLACES EAR PLUGS EVERYNIGHT TO SLEEP BUT PUSHED THEM IN TOO FAR AND COULD NOT GET THEM OUT. DX: FOREIGN BODY IN EAR
31YOF, COMING IN WITH LEFT EAR PAIN FOR PAST 4 DAYS, WHICH SHE ATTRIBUTES TO USING A SILICONE EAR PLUG AND HAS FOREIGN BODY SENSATION, DX: FOREIGN BODY OF LEFT EAR; CERUMEN DEBRIS ON TYMPANIC MEMBRANE OF LEFT EAR
44YOM HAS EAR PLUG STUCK IN LEFT EAR. STATES HE CUT OFF THE STRING AND NOW CANNOT RETRIEVE IT. DX: FOREIGN BODY OF LEFT EAR; ACUTE OTITIS EXTERNA OF LEFT EAR
3YOM TOLD GRANDMOTHER HE PUT SOMETHING IN HIS NOSE, RUBBER EAR PLUG. DX: FOREIGN BODY IN NOSE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
While attempting to put the Pro Ears Ultra 33 ear muffs on my head in a normal fashion, the plastic headband snapped. The result was two sharp-edged plastic ends. Had I not ducked quickly, the band snapping back could have cut me as it was under some tension. A perusal of reviews on Amazon for this product revealed that this sort of thing has happened to others.
I purchased the ZOZZGO Noise Reduction Ear Muffs Eye Mask for Sleeping Set (ASIN B0DXLCMHC7) from Amazon on June 1, 2025. Upon opening the package, the product emitted a very strong chemical odor. The odor was consistent with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), raising concerns about exposure to substances such as benzene, toluene, and formaldehyde. These chemicals are known carcinogens and respiratory irritants. The product is designed to be worn for hours at a time directly over the eyes, nose, and surrounding skin. This creates two serious exposure pathways: Inhalation: Users may unknowingly breathe VOCs for prolonged periods during sleep. Skin contact: Harmful chemicals may leach into the skin where the mask and earmuffs press tightly against the face. Because the toxins are subtle and not immediately recognizable to a lay consumer, users may expose themselves without realizing the risk. Out of concern for my health, I destroyed the product immediately after purchase rather than risk storing or using it. When I attempted to leave a verified purchase review on Amazon to warn others, Amazon blocked my review, displaying a message that reviews for this product were restricted due to unusual review activity. This prevents buyers from being alerted to the potential hazard. I am reporting this because the product appears unsafe and may pose serious health risks to consumers through both inhalation and skin contact.
(07/23/2025) The consumer had the earplugs in his ears. When he removed the product from his right ear, the end piece came loose and got stuck in his ear canal. The consumer went to the emergency room, but the technician could not find the end piece. However, the consumer's ear was in pain. He went to an ENT who found the end piece and removed it.
Serious harmful hearing loss at an indoor shooting range while using Howard Leight by Honeywell Impact Sport Sound Amplification Electronic Shooting Earmuff
Loop earplugs are customizable because the plug end - which comes in different sizes - can be detached and replaced, to find the end that has the best fit. While making different size plugs is a great idea, making them detachable is not. If you insert the plugs far enough that that they will stay in firmly and not fall out while sleeping, the flanged plug ends catch on the sides of the inner ear and make it hard to pull the plug out. Recently a plug end came off in my ear one night while I was sleeping. I was lucky my boyfriend was home and I could wake him to use tweezers and a flashlight to pull it out, otherwise I would have needed an urgent care. The detached plug end was buried so deeply and stuck so tight it took about 20 minutes to remove it. After this incident I looked at the Amazon reviews and quite a few people report the same exact issue. Making sizes in earplugs is a great idea, but its *not* a great idea to make the part that sticks firmly in your ear detachable - especially if the part will remain deep in your ear canal if it comes off!
We purchased 3 sets of the DUBS Acoustic Filters. They go into the Ears. On one of the sets a piece of the ear filter got stuck in the ear. It took us a while to get it out. We had to use tweezers to do so. When we removed the other filter the same piece just fell off in our hands.
RE: Mack's AquaBlock Earplugs. On March 3, 2011, I used these earplugs for swimming, as advertised on the box of the product. These plugs are made especially for water use to "help prevent swimmer's ear." When I inserted the plugs into my ears as instructed on the box, the plug for my left ear slipped down the ear canal and was impossible to get out with my fingers. I had to go to the emergency room at the local hospital in Bellingham, WA. There was a lot of pressure and increasing pain during this incident. Though I went to the hospital immediately after this happened, I waited approximately 2 hours and 45 minutes with the plug in my ear before the doctor could see me to get it out. He took a long needle, bent it into a kind of hook and had to literally fish it out of my ear. The doctor was shocked to learn that the earplug was designed for water sports and for adults, as the plug is too thin to insert safely into an adult ear. This incident created a huge trauma for me as well as an emergency room visit cost I have not yet been billed for.
I have a 3m tekk protection ear muffs for sound protection while leaf blowing. It has a ansi s3.19 1994 on it. As I was putting them on the plastic strap across the top that holds them together snapped. When it did the broken ends it struck me on the head. Fortunately it did not cut me. This product could be dangerous in other cases when it strikes someone. If I had hair to push back, as a woman might have, they may have pulled them apart in front of their face possibly damaging an eye. The product has only been used 6 times at the most.
Showing 8 of 11 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to ear protection devices on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are ear protection devices?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, ear protection devices have a danger score of 31/100 (low risk). An estimated 1,957 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from ear protection devices?
The most common injury is foreign body to the ear, accounting for approximately 28,982 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from ear protection devices increasing or decreasing?
Down 22% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for ear protection devices injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 6,445 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by ear protection devices?
Of all ER visits involving ear protection devices, approximately 0.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (99.3%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with ear protection devices?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Personal Care & Safety Products
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 31/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 5-14 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.