Go-carts
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Sports Protective Equipment & Gear · CPSC Code 3259
Stable over 5 years
The verdict
Go-carts carry a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk), driven by roughly 11,639 ER-treated injuries a year that are roughly flat over the last five years.
- 40/100
- danger score (moderate risk)
- 11,639
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 7.0%
- end in hospital admission
- 5-14
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 3259 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 40/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for go-carts - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume11,639 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)7.0%
- Fatality rate0.09%
- 5-year trend-5%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Go-carts (CPSC product code 3259, in the Sports Protective Equipment & Gear category) generate an estimated 11,639 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 232,785 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 40/100 for this category (moderate risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2005 (16,295 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (7,804 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for go-carts is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 14,970 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the lower arm (10,940 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 106,277 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 7.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.09%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 15 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how go-carts fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 6,780 | 3,100 | |
| 5-14 | 70,768 | 35,509 | |
| 15-24 | 32,301 | 19,777 | |
| 25-34 | 18,306 | 8,526 | |
| 35-44 | 13,545 | 6,784 | |
| 45-54 | 8,179 | 1,935 | |
| 55-64 | 3,802 | 1,406 | |
| 65-74 | 1,371 | 254 | |
| 75+ | 318 | 126 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Lower Arm | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Neck | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Upper Arm | Fracture | |
| Elbow | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Arm | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Knee | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
9YOM WAS RIDING A GO KART WHEN IT CRASHED AND ROLLED IT WHICH RESULTED IN A FRACTURE TO HIS LEFT FOREARM AND LEFT ELBOW PAIN. DX: CLOSED FRACTURE OF SHAFT OF BONE OF LEFT FOREARM; MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT
70YOM PRESENTS AFTER A LEFT SHOULDER INJURY AFTER ROLLING OVER IN A GO-CART THAT WAS TRAVELING 20 MILES AN HOUR AND THE GO-CART LANDED ON HIS LEFT SHOULDER DX: FRACTURE OF PROXIMAL END OF LEFT HUMERUS
44YOM PRESENTS WITH ACUTE INJURY TO LEFT POSTERIOR RIBS THAT OCCURED WHEN DRIVING A GO-CART ABOUT 15-20MPH AND HE WAS SLAMMED INTO THE WALL BY ANOTHER GO-CART CAUSING HIM TO HIT HIS LEFT BACK SIDE OF THE GO-CART. HE WAS WEARING A HELMET. DX: MULTIPLE RIB FRACTURE CLOSED
20YOF WAS DRIVING A GO-CART WHEN SHE WAS REAR ENDED. DX: CONCUSSION.
7YOF WITH C/O RIGHT HAND PAIN WHILE RIDING A GO CART TODAY AND SLIDING OFF. DX: HAND PAIN
25YOF WITH C/O LEFT SHOULDER PAIN. SHE HAS SOME BRUISING ON HER BACK IN THE UPPER PORTION AS WELL. SHE WAS RIDING GOKARTS AT THE LOCAL AMUSEMENT CENTER YESTERDAY WHEN SHE HIT ANOTHER GO KART BY ACCIDENT. DX: LEFT SHOULDER STRAIN, CONTUSION OF SCAPULA
14YOM WAS RACING A GO KART WHEN IT FLIPPED AND LANDED ON TOP OF HIM. DX: MVC, ABRASION OF RIGHT ELBOW, BILATERAL CONTUSION OF RIBS, CONTUSION OF RIGHT ELBOW
11YOM PATIENT WAS RACING GO-KARTS, HE WAS HIT ON THE SIDE, THE GO-CART WENT OVER HIS LEG. DX: LEG LACERATION, GREENSTICK FRACTURE OF THE PROXIMAL FIBULAR DIAPHYSIS
17YOF PATIENT WAS IN A GO KART AND COLLIDED WITH A WALL. SHE WAS HELMETED, RESTRAINED, AND IN FULL GEAR. +LOC. SHE REPORTS ABDOMINAL PAIN. DX: LUMBAR PAIN, LEFT LEG PAIN, MVC, ABDOMINAL PAIN, CLOSED HEAD INJURY
11YOF PRESENTS WITH RIGHT HAND AND WRIST PAIN AFTER RACING A GO-CART ON THE STREET THAT FLIPPED OVER CRUSHING HER HAND UNDER A METAL CROSSBAR DX: NAILBED LACERATION FINGER, HAND FRACTURE RIGHT
8YOF WAS AT A GO-CART TRACK WHEN HER FRONT WHEELS LOCKED UP AND HER HEAD JERKED FORWARD AND NOW HAS PAIN IN NECK DX: NECK PAIN
15YOF STATES HER LEFT FOOT WAS RUN OVER BY A GO-CART. DX: METATARSAL FRACTURE; HEMATOMA OF LEFT FOOT
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Go-kart tracks are regulated by the State Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, but that regulation is limited to approving the construction and engineering of the track and there is no real oversight or tracking of safety. This report is being placed because after My daughter, [REDACTED, was catastrophically injured at AJ's Fun Park there was a law suite brought by her (and her family) where alarming admissions of safety failures, administration indifference and what appears to be negligence on the part of the owners (hiding behind the corporate structure). We spent two year after the catastrophe focused on the healthcare requirements. In the last year we have settled into a routine to provide assistance to her husband and her children in their new life and some time discussing what we can do to prevent this type of disaster from happening to others and sparing them from this kind of suffering. I wanted to reach out to you to ask that you to review the events of that day and lingering results that happen. I do not believe you, or any of the senior management, were on site at the time of the event. But I am begging you to consider the event and review the corporate attitude toward safety and responsibility that was displayed that day and in the following time period all the way through today. I also want to share with you an article that was published by the New York Times (NYT) on the 18th of August 2018. It features the catastrophic event that happened 3 years ago at AJs Fun Park in Comstock (a suburb of Grand Rapids) on 25 August 2015. The link to that story is: [REDACTED] A TV CLIP From Wood TV 8 News Grand Rapids: [REDACTED] The case and documentation is available in the Michigan 17th District State Court House "File Number [REDACTED]. The interrogatories are very reveling about the poor considerations about equipment, training and administration.
I have a TaoTao brand go-kart for my kids. The machine has chronic problems with components rattling off due to the vibrations. Recently, the entire rear brake caliper fell of when the bolts vibrated out. I purchased new bolts. When I went to reassemble the brakes, it became evident that the caliper had been rubbing on the wheel assembly, damaging the bolts that hold the wheel onto the axle. Had these bolts worn completely through, the entire wheel would have fallen off. The machines are designed for young children and can achieve speeds in excess of 45 mph. This is very unsafe.Our neighbors also have one. The very first day they received it, the brakes failed and the kids drove, uncontrolled, into our garden, striking a fence. TaoTao ATK125
My child was riding the cart and the steering wheel popped off and busted him in his lip
I purchased a go kart online that was approximately 80% assembled. I finished the assembly at home after I received it. I used the product as intended. With less than 3 hours of use, the go kart motor started to leak massive amounts of fuel, the frame and the parking brake broke.
We purchased (2) GoTrax Go-Karts for our sons (ages 4 & 6). Within a few weeks of using them, the gas pedal started sticking, so there was no way for them to stop. My youngest son was safely driving in our driveway and the gas pedal stuck, so he couldn't stop so he entered onto the road. A car was coming and luckily slammed on their brakes so they didn't hit my son. This is extremely unsafe. When i tried to contact the manufacturer they just said it was on longer under warranty.
I am reporting a dangerous safety defect in a childrens electric go-kart manufactured by GoTrax, purchased in December 2024 as a holiday gift. The issue is with the throttle system. When the go-kart is in use, pressing the acceleration pedal sometimes causes the vehicle to continue accelerating even after the rider has released the pedal. This malfunction causes the go-kart to move uncontrollably until it is powered off manually, which is difficult and unsafe for a child to manage in an emergency. The go-kart was used exactly as intended on a flat, paved surface by a child within the products stated age and weight limits, and under adult supervision. During one such incident, the faulty throttle led to the child losing control and falling, which resulted in a minor injury. This situation could have been much worse and presents a clear risk of serious harm. I contacted GoTrax customer support multiple times to report the malfunction and requested escalation to their safety or product team. The company refused to assist, directing me back to the retailer (Target) for a return, ignoring the fact that this is a defect with serious safety implications, not a routine return. Because GoTrax failed to address the problem or acknowledge the potential danger, I am submitting this report to notify the CPSC of a hazardous product malfunction in a children's electric vehicle.
My son was riding his nerf go kart when the steering wheel broke off. The front plastic piece also broke. We never reported this before as we were not aware of the recall. We ultimately threw away the go kart and wrote is up as being garbage. We were very dissatisfied with the product and the poor quality. The date given below is approximate date.
The consumer indicates that her daughter was riding in circles in her go-kart around their home for about twenty-five minutes. When her daughter was done, the consumer and her husband tried to bring the unit to the basement like they always do but, before it could be fully stored, the welded steering column snapped off. The consumer notes that her husband pushes the go-kart while she steers it from the front and that it never bumped into anything. Upon inspection, the consumer realized that the weld was completely rusted from the inside out. The consumer is very concerned because her daughter could have been seriously injured had the steering wheel came off while she was riding it. The consumer contacted the manufacturer and explained the situation; the representative she spoke to informed her that the unit was out of warranty so they could not assist her free of charge. The consumer states that, prior to the incident, the unit was used once or twice weekly for approximately twenty minutes. The consumer plans on keeping the go-kart for at least the next thirty days in case an investigation ensues.
Showing 8 of 15 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to go-carts on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are go-carts?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, go-carts have a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk). An estimated 11,639 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from go-carts?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 14,970 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from go-carts increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for go-carts injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 106,277 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by go-carts?
Of all ER visits involving go-carts, approximately 7.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (93.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with go-carts?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Sports Protective Equipment & Gear
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 40/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 5-14 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.