CPSC NEISS · code 1127

Nonglass Bottles Or Jars

Nonglass Bottles Or Jars: danger rank #137 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #188 of 838 (11,589 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Containers & Packaging CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Nonglass Bottles Or Jars ranks #137 of 838 by danger score (41/100) at ER-volume #188 of 838 (11,589/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#137
danger rank of 838
#188
ER-volume rank of 838
41/100
danger score
11,589/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (41/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

41 Higher than most more dangerous than 79% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 72/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

D
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 8 67th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 11,589 76th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +4% 72nd 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 73 78th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 231,800 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1127. Segments sum to 231,800 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Containers & Packaging danger scores

1. Bottles Or Jars, Not Spec…45/1002. Containers, Not Specified43/1003. Paper Products42/1004. Nonglass Bottles Or Jars41/1005. Bags, Not Elsewhere Class…41/1006. Other Containers41/1007. Other Specified Plastic P…40/1008. Plastic Bags40/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10041/100
PlainSafety danger score · Nonglass Bottles Or Jars

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 41/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for nonglass bottles or jars - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 11,589 ER visits/yr High volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 8.0% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.02% Low fatality rate
  • 5-year trend+4%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for nonglass bottles or jars are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2022 (15,997 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (6,027 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 56,238 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by ingestion to the internal (16,703 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 58,389 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 8.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.02%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 73 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how nonglass bottles or jars fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

5K10K15K20K 20052008201120142017202020232024 14K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Nonglass Bottles Or Jars, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 33,283 25,106 58,389
5-14 23,913 16,477 40,390
15-24 14,824 11,741 26,565
25-34 8,634 12,780 21,436
35-44 7,920 12,093 20,013
45-54 7,845 12,154 19,999
55-64 7,240 10,858 18,098
65-74 5,292 10,146 15,438
75+ 4,260 7,200 11,460

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
All Parts Body Poisoning 56,238
Internal Ingestion 16,703
Finger Laceration 11,642
Face Laceration 10,492
Foot Contusions, Abr. 9,149
Head Internal Injury 8,767
Hand Laceration 6,141
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 5,599
Lower Trunk Other 5,151
Mouth Laceration 4,223
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 3,843
Lower Trunk Foreign Body 3,409
Face Contusions, Abr. 3,336
Head Laceration 3,193
Eyeball Other 3,018

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 88.6% (205,454)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 6.3% (14,566)
Treated And Transferred 2.1% (4,796)
Left Without Being Seen 1.5% (3,450)
Held For Observation 1.5% (3,374)
Unknown, Not Stated 0.0% (89)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.0% (71)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 53 · Female · Lower Leg · Laceration · 2024

53YOF WITH RIGHT LEG LACERATION. STATES SHE BUMPED INTO A BROKEN PLASTIC STORAGE BIN ON THE CORNER AND IT DUG INTO THER LATERAL SHIN. DX; LACERATION OF LEG

Age 18 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

18YOF LOST THE CAP TO TEH BLEACH BOTTLE, SO SHE POURED IN INTO A WATER BOTTLE, HER ROOMMATE THOUGHT IT WAS ATER AND PUT IT INTO THE REFRIGERATOR, WHEN SHE RETURNED SHE GABBED THE BOTTLE THINKING IT WAS WATER AND TOOK TWO SWOLLOWS OF THE BLEACH DX: ACCIDENTAL INGESTION OF BLEACH

Age 14 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

14YOM C/O SMALL LAC OVER THE RT EYEBROW AFTER HE WAS ACCIDENTALLY HIT W/ A PLASTIC BOTTLE AT SCHOOL EARLY TODAY DX: FOREHEAD LACERATION, CONCUSSION

Age 15 · Female · Internal · Ingestion · 2024

15 YOF ACCIDENTALLY SWALLOWED THE PLASTIC CAP TO A WATER BOTTLE APPROXIMATELY 2 HOURS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL. DX: SWALLOWED FOREIGN BODY

Age 15 · Male · Internal · Ingestion · 2024

15YOM SWALLOWED A PLASTIC CAP FROM A PLASTIC BOTTLE DX: FOREIGN BODY INGESTION

Age 202 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

2MOM PATIENT'S COUSIN THREW A LARGE LOTION BOTTLE AND IT HIT THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PATIENT'S FACE. SHORTLY AFTER, THE PATIENT HAD A BRIEF EPISODE OF ABNORMAL EYE MOVEMENTS. DX: HEAD TRAUMA IN PEDIATRIC PATIENT, SEIZURE-LIKE ACTIVITY

Age 22 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

22 YOM PLAYING AROUND WITH A FRIEND GOT HIT ON THE HEAD WITH TWO PLASTIC BOTTLES A FEW DAYS AGO, C/O HEADACHE SINCE THEN, DX:POST CONCUSSION SYNDROMWE

Age 22 · Female · Internal · Ingestion · 2024

22YOF WAS CHEWING ON A PLASTIC BOTTLE CAP AND ACCIDENTALLY SWOLLED IT DX: FOREIGN BODY INGESTION

Age 36 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

36YOF WITH A 5 GALLON WATER JUG HITTING HER IN HEAD IN STORE DX; CHI

Age 42 · Male · Lower Trunk · Foreign Body · 2024

42 YOM UNABLE TO REMOVE A PLASTIC LUBRICANT BOTTLE FROM HIS RECTUM DX FOREIGN BODY REMOVAL

Age 11 · Female · Finger · Other · 2024

11YOF PRESENTED TO ED C/O FINGER PAIN, PT STATED SHE WAS HOLDING PLASTIC WATER BOTTLE AND CLASSMATE SPUEEZED BOTTLE IN HER HANDS, CAUSED PAIN TO FINGER. DX; FINGER PAIN

Age 72 · Male · Ankle · Fracture · 2024

72YOM DROPPED HIS WATER BOTTLE AND WHEN HE BENT DOWN TO PICK IT UP HE TWISTED HIS LEFT ANKLE AND FELL TO THE FLOOR DX: FRACTURED LEFT ANKLE

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/5/2012 · Incident, No Injury · BZB PRODUCTS, LLC · New Jersey

Shark Skinzz collapsible water bottles for kids were sold on Groupon.com. The bottles come with a sport-type cap that you pull up to open. When I opened the cap for my kids (ages 6 and 4) it came right off in my hand. I am concerned that these loose-fitting caps are a choking hazard for small children.

9/4/2013 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Lifetime Brands · Tennessee

On July 23, 2013, consumer incurred an injury to the right eye caused by the peeling paint on a water bottle made by the company. Her eye was seriously damaged which prompted an emergency room visit and a follow up appointment with an eye specialist the following day. At this time, she still have some blurriness in her vision. She contacted the firm because she believes there is a dangerous defect in the product and should be addressed. Attached are pictures of her injured eye on Day 1 and Day 2 along with photos of the bottle, hospital statement, physician statement and hospital report. She is still waiting on the report from the eye specialist [REDACTED] she saw the following day. Due to injury caused by the peeling paint on the Design for Living product, she asking for the company to reimburse her for the costs incurred for treatment, as well as for recovery time.

9/30/2015 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · Zak Designs, Inc. · Wisconsin

I purchased my 6 year old daughter a Zak Designs brand Wonder Woman water bottle. She used it for several weeks. One evening, she was drinking water out of it and stopped suddenly. A piece of the inner straw had broken off and she had swallowed it. As it was sharp plastic, we took her to the emergency room where she was xrayed and stayed for several hours to make sure the sharp edge didn't puncture her lower digestive tract. Thankfully, she was fine. I just received a call tonight from Target (where we purchased the bottle) and I checked their website to see what bottle they were talking about and saw it was the WonderWoman Zak brand bottle. I am VERY pleased to see the recall was issued. Extra kudos to Target for utilizing their computer/store Red Card systems to contact me to let me know about the recall. Unfortunately, for us it was a bit late, but again... we are VERY thankful the piece of plastic didn't do any internal damage to our daughter.

9/30/2013 · Unspecified · Klean Kanteen, Inc. · Unspecified

We have two Klean Kanteen bottles with a silicone 3.0 sport cap. The sport caps are coming apart. My children do use their teeth to open the spouts as it is difficult for them to do with their hands. But my 3 year old daughter's bottle has a small chunk of silicone that came out of the spout, and it appears it will continue to come apart in chunks (looks like more chunks could easily be pulled away). I was not with her when this happened, and for all I know, she swallowed the chunk. She wasn't sure what happened to it.

9/28/2017 · Incident, No Injury · Lock & Lock USA Distributor, Inc. · Michigan

Plastic liquid container made by Lock and Lock (China, sold on QVC) model HPL 738, developed mold in the blue seal on lid of container. Has reoccurred. Simple internet search reveals other complaints of similar nature.

9/27/2020 · Incident, No Injury · STEPHEN JOSEPH COMPANIES · New York

I have found rust spotsin the bottom of a Childs metal drinking bottle

9/22/2015 · Incident, No Injury · Zak Designs, Inc. · Missouri

8 year old child was using water bottle and brought to parent that the inner straw that is hard plastic had cracked. It was cracked into 5 pieces that were sharp fragments. Child was not injured as they noticed it before drinking from bottle.

9/21/2017 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Bell Sports, Inc. · Illinois

Bottle water made by Camelbak eddy has a suction apparatus on the top of the bottle to suck the water. THe apparatus has an opening in the middle that has cut my son's tongue. On the opening his tongue got stuck and cut his tongue, causing bleeding. The opening grabs into the tongue when sucking the water. My son suffered a cut tongue that bleed over 10 minutes. This product is very dangerous for people, not only kids. The product is not safe and should be taken out the market. The suction aparatus is like a lip opening that when there is suction it grabs the toungue. We called doctor and doctor told us to monitor the cut and so glad it was not a deep cut. If my son gets an infection, I will like to sue the company that sells this product.

Showing 8 of 73 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to nonglass bottles or jars on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Containers & Packaging

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Nonglass Bottles Or Jars: cross-group products nearest on danger score (41/100), estimated annual ER visits (11,589/yr), and hospitalization share (8.0%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Nonglass Bottles Or Jars ranks #137 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #188 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does nonglass bottles or jars rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, nonglass bottles or jars ranks #137 by PlainSafety danger score (41/100) and #188 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (11,589/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from nonglass bottles or jars?

The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 56,238 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from nonglass bottles or jars increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for nonglass bottles or jars injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 58,389 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by nonglass bottles or jars?

Of all ER visits involving nonglass bottles or jars, approximately 8.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with nonglass bottles or jars?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Nonglass Bottles Or Jars is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.