CPSC NEISS · code 1928

Antihistamines

Antihistamines: danger rank #370 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #294 of 838 (4,808 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 23% over the last five years).

Transportation & Substances CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Antihistamines ranks #370 of 838 by danger score (36/100) at ER-volume #294 of 838 (4,808/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#370
danger rank of 838
#294
ER-volume rank of 838
36/100
danger score
4,808/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (36/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

36 Around the middle lower than 44% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 46/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 7 59th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 4,808 58th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -23% 30th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 1 18th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 96,155 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1928. Segments sum to 96,155 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Transportation & Substances group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Transportation & Substances danger scores

1. Tablet Or Capsule Drugs46/1002. Hot Water44/1003. Other Drugs Or Medications42/1004. Drugs Or Medications, Not…42/1005. Cigarettes, Cigars, Pipes…41/1006. Alcohol (beverage)39/1007. Liquid Drugs38/1008. Antihistamines36/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10036/100
PlainSafety danger score · Antihistamines

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 36/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for antihistamines - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 4,808 ER visits/yr Above median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 7.1% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-23%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for antihistamines are declining by about 23% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (6,206 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2022 (3,220 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 96,106 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by contusions, abr. to the face (28 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 96,160 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 7.1% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 1 consumer incident report filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how antihistamines fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

3K4K5K6K7K 20052008201120142017202020232024 4K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Antihistamines, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 50,731 45,429 96,160

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
All Parts Body Poisoning 96,106
Face Contusions, Abr. 28
Mouth Laceration 6
Eyeball Derma/conjunct 5
Face Foreign Body 5
Internal Aspiration 5

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 85.3% (82,017)
Held For Observation 5.4% (5,219)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 5.4% (5,156)
Left Without Being Seen 2.2% (2,089)
Treated And Transferred 1.7% (1,674)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 4 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

4YOF POSSIBLE INGESTION ON 25MG ***. + LETHARGYDX ENCOUNTER SCREENING

Age 2 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

2YOM C/O DRUG OVERDOSE. FAMILY REPORTS PATIENT POSSIBLY TOOK 2 *** TABLETS. MOTHER FOUND CHILD WITH *** TABLETS IN HIS MOUTH. POISON CONTROL CONTACTED AND RECOMMENDED ACTIVATED CHARCOAL AND OBSERVATION. DX: ACCIDENTAL OVERDOSE

Age 4 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

4YOM ACCIDENTALLY INGESTED WOMEWHERE BETWEEN 52 TO 122MG OF ***, MOTHER FOUND OPEN PACKS AROUND HIM. PT ACTING NORMALLY. DX: MEDICATION OVERDOSE, ACCIDENTAL OVERDOSE OF ***

Age 219 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

19MOF CHILD POSSIBLE INGESTION OF AN UNKNOWN AMOUNT OF DIPHENHYDRAMINE 50MG GEL CAPSULES DX: ACCIDENTAL DRUG INGESTION

Age 2 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

2YOM REPORTS WITH POSSIBLE INGESTION. PATIENT'S MOTHER STATES SHE WAS HAVING A DISAGREEMENT WITH THE BABY'S FATHER (POLYSUBSTANCE ABUSER) WHO WAS ABUSING PROMETHAZINE. FATHER HAD MIXED THE PROMETHAZINE WITH A GREEN JUICE AND MOTHER THINKS PATINET MAY HAVE SWALLOWED IT. DX POSSIBLE INGESTION.

Age 2 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

2 YOF C/O POSSIBLE DRUG OVERDOSE. PER PARENTS FOUND WITH OPEN BOTTLE OF *** AND PILLS SCATTERED ACROSS HER. PARENTS UNSURE IF PATIENT HAD INGESTED ANY. PATIENT WAS THEN PUT TO BED. PATIENT WOKE UP IN THE MIDDLE THE NIGHT AND APPEARED TO BE CONFUSED ACTING BIZARRE AND NOT TALKING. DX ACCIDENTAL DRUG INGESTION

Age 2 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

2YOM TO ER W/ MOM FOR SUSPECTED INGESTION OF *** BRAND MAXIMUM STRENGTH SINUS CONGESTION PHENYLEPHRINE HCL 10MG BLISTER PACK IN HAND , MOM SAYS 4 TABS MISSING & SAYS SHE MAY HAVE TAKEN DURING PREVIOUS ILLNESS, DOES NOT REMEMBER , SHE SAYS THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF PILLS IN PTS MOUTH, PT VOMITED 1X DX OBSERVATION FOR SUSPECTED TOXIC EFFECT FROM INGESTED SUBSTANCE

Age 218 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

18 MOM PRESENTS WITH POSSIBLE ACCIDENTAL INGESTION OF DOXYLAMINE 25 MG TABLETS. MOM WOKE AND THE BOTTLE WAS SPILLED ON THE FLOOR. DX: NO DX, LEFT WITHOUT BEING SEEN.

Age 223 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

23MOM INGESTED AN ENTIRE BOTTLE OF CHILDREN'S *** ALLERGY MEDICATION LIQUID DX: ANTICHOLINERGIC DRUG OVERDOSE

Age 215 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

15MOM PRESENTS AFTER ACCIDENTAL INGESTION OF *** AND MELATONIN. DX: DRUG INGESTION ACCIDENTAL

Age 3 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

3YOF PRESENTS AFTER INGESTING 20 TABLETS OF 4MG *** OUT OF A BLISTER PACK AT HOME. MOM REPORTS SHE CLIMBED UP ON A SHELF AND GOT THE MEDICATION. DX; ACCIDENTAL OVERDOSE

Age 4 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

4YOM INGESTED 4 OZ OF *** THIS MORNING. MOTHER CALLED POISON CONTROL WHO REFERRED HIM TO THE ED. DX: ACCIDENTAL DRUG INGESTION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

11/16/2016 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · Costco Wholesale · Illinois

I am reporting a faulty child safety cap on a bottle of Kirkland brand Children's Allertec liquid medicine (generic for [REDACTED]). My 2.5 year old daughter found a bottle of this medicine, opened it by herself, and ingested a large dose on 11/15/2016. She experienced negative effects from the medicine, and had to be taken to the emergency room. I tested the cap after finding her with the bottle, and found that though the cap said that it was a child safety cap, it did not offer any resistance to being simply unscrewed easily by a child. It behaved like a normal twist-off cap, not a safety cap.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to antihistamines on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Transportation & Substances

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Antihistamines: cross-group products nearest on danger score (36/100), estimated annual ER visits (4,808/yr), and hospitalization share (7.1%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Antihistamines ranks #370 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #294 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does antihistamines rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, antihistamines ranks #370 by PlainSafety danger score (36/100) and #294 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (4,808/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from antihistamines?

The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 96,106 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from antihistamines increasing or decreasing?

Down 23% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for antihistamines injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 96,160 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by antihistamines?

Of all ER visits involving antihistamines, approximately 7.1% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.9%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with antihistamines?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Antihistamines is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.