Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Drain Snakes ranks #684 of 838 by danger score (29/100) at ER-volume #625 of 838 (435/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #684
- danger rank of 838
- #625
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 29/100
- danger score
- 435/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (29/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
29 Among the lowest lower than 82% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 38/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 8 | 67th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 435 | 24th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -48% | 12th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 3 | 28th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 8,689 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 880. Segments sum to 8,689 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Communication & Entertainment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Communication & Entertainment danger scores
How this 29/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for drain snakes - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 435 ER visits/yr Low volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 8.3% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-48%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for drain snakes are declining by about 48% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2013 (917 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2008 (195 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,261 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the finger (1,046 cases). The 55-64 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 2,021 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 8.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 3 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how drain snakes fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 222 | 94 | |
| 5-14 | 114 | 56 | |
| 15-24 | 401 | 7 | |
| 25-34 | 798 | 155 | |
| 35-44 | 1,348 | 265 | |
| 45-54 | 1,687 | 199 | |
| 55-64 | 1,827 | 194 | |
| 65-74 | 1,090 | 16 | |
| 75+ | 220 | 0 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Finger | Amputation | |
| Hand | Other | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Hand | Strain, Sprain | |
| Finger | Other | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Finger | Dislocation | |
| Hand | Foreign Body | |
| Finger | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Avulsion | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Upper Trunk | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
62YOM PRESENTS TO ED VIA EMS FOR COMPLETE AMPUTATION OF RIGHT THUMB AT FIRST KNUCKLE. REPORTS USING A DRAIN SNAKE WHEN THE AMPUTATION OCCURRED. DX: AMPUTATION OF RIGHT THUMB, RIGHT HAND PAIN.
19YOM PRESENTS FROM HOME WITH BILATERAL WRIST AND FOREARM PAIN AFTER HELPING A FAMILY MEMBER USE DRAIN SNAKE YESTERDAY WITH REPETITIVE FLEXION OF BOTH WRISTS. DX: BILATERAL WRIST PAIN, BILATERAL FOREARM PAIN
62YOF WAS USING AN ELECTRIC SNAKE FOR HER DRAIN AND IT CAUGHT HER HAND AND GLOVE DX; LT FINGER DISLOCATION
65YOM PRESENTS FROM HOME WITH INJURY TO HAND. PATIENT WAS USING A MACHINE DRAIN SNAKE WHEN IT KICKED BACK AND CAUGHT HIS FINGER. DX: PARTIAL AMPUTATION OF RING FINGER
46YOM, WAS USING DRAIN SNAKE AT HOME WHICH WHIPPED OUT FROM THE DRAIN INJURING RIGHT 5TH DIGIT DX: LACERATION OF LITTLE FINGER
44YOM, WAS USING A LARGE DRANK SNAKE TO CLEAN A CLOGGED SEPTIC DRAIN, THE SNAKE GOT STUCK AND ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE IT GOT A LARGE LACERATION OF THE TIP OF HIS FINGER FROM A PIECE OF METAL, DX: FINGERTIP AVULSION; OPEN FRACTURE OF TUFT OF DISTAL PHALANX OF FINGER
13YOM WAS IN BASEMENT AND HIT A METAL PLUMBING SNAKE ON LEG DX: LACERATION OF SHIN
55YOM WITH LAC TO FINGER S/P UNCLOGGING A DRAIN WITH AN ELECTRONIC DRAIN SNAKE AND WAS CUT AT HOME DX: LAC OF FINGER
70YOM SAYS SUSTAINED ACERATION TO RIGHT EYELID WHEN HE & FRIEND WERE USING A PLUMBING WIRE & IT STRUCK HIM IN THE EYELID DX RIGHT EYELID LACERATION
34 YOM C/O THORACIC SPINE PAIN S/P LIFTING A HEAVY DRAIN SNAKE AND PUTTING IT INTO THE EXTERIOR BED OF HIS TRUCK. DX: THORACIC SPINE PAIN
52YOM PRESENTS WITH FINGER LACERATION AFTER USING AN ELECTRIC SNAKE TO CLEAR A DRAIN PIPE AT HOME. DX: LACERATION OF FINGER
60YOM PRESENTED TO ED C/O HAND PAIN, PT STATED HE WAS SNAKING A DRAIN (PLUMBING) WHEN GLOVES GOT STUCK AND TWISTED HIS HANDS. DX; HAND SPRAIN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
The electric drain cleaner machine, model#46769, that I purchased from Harbor Freight on 9/13/2008, has an electric floor pedal on-switch enclosed in a rubber boot, which presents an electrocution hazard because under working conditions the pedal sets in an area that is usually very wet. Harbor Freight apparently is aware of this since the current model has replaced the electric switch with an air-bladder pedal that pneumatically pushes air though a tube to the on- switch mounted up on the machine away from any wetness. I phoned Harbor Freight 3 times last week: 9/17, 9/19, and 9/21/2013 requesting either a refund or replacement with the current improved model. All three times, I was told by the customer service reps that a supervisor would contact me within 24 to 48 hours. On the second and third calls, I told the reps that I had been contacted by no one! They assured me that they would prioritize the case for immediate attention. I believe they are willfully avoiding me because they already know the danger of this product and also know they are protected because I cannot reach them through their customer service. This item is dangerous and should be recalled. (I have since found out that someone else has contacted the CPSC for the same reason. Refer to report # [REDACTED])
The incident occurred when minor victim was submerged under the water of the spa and victim's hair became entrapped in the drain cover, keeping victim submerged under the water for an extended period of time. The drain cover was eventually detached from the wall and the victim was taken out of the water. Victim required CPR resuscitation and hospitalization. The drain cover referred to was a SDX model drain cover manufactured by Paramount Leisure Industries, Inc.
Using product to clear drain. Cutter cable kept twisting and tangling into tight twists. Did with two people attempting to control cable. Finally got twists on twists. Caught pants, gloves, electrical cords, and control line in twists. Once a glove was pulled off hand. A clear danger for finger hand injury.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to drain snakes on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Communication & Entertainment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Drain Snakes: cross-group products nearest on danger score (29/100), estimated annual ER visits (435/yr), and hospitalization share (8.3%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
- Fuel Multi-purpose Lighters, Incl. Micro-torches Personal Care & Safety Products 437/yr
- Electric Kettles Or Hot Pots Kitchen Cooking Appliances 432/yr
- Window Or Door Security Barriers Building Materials & Home Structures 430/yr
- Darts, For Indoor Use (activity Or Equipment) Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 444/yr
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Baby Carriers, Not Specified Nursery & Baby Products 8.3%admitted
- Combination Fire/smoke Alarm And Carbon Monoxide Detector Home Heating & Cooling Equipment 8.3%admitted
- Water Softeners Or Conditioners (appliances) Laundry & Household Appliances 8.3%admitted
- Doorstops Containers, Tableware & Packaging 8.3%admitted
Related Products in Home Communication & Entertainment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Drain Snakes ranks #684 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #625 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does drain snakes rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, drain snakes ranks #684 by PlainSafety danger score (29/100) and #625 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (435/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from drain snakes?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,261 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from drain snakes increasing or decreasing?
Down 48% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for drain snakes injuries?
The 55-64 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 2,021 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by drain snakes?
Of all ER visits involving drain snakes, approximately 8.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (91.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with drain snakes?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.