Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Mountain Climbing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #173 of 838 by danger score (40/100) at ER-volume #297 of 838 (4,791/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #173
- danger rank of 838
- #297
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 40/100
- danger score
- 4,791/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (40/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
40 Higher than most more dangerous than 75% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 62/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 12 | 82nd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 4,791 | 58th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -7% | 55th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 7 | 40th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 95,841 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1258. Segments sum to 95,841 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports & Recreation Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Sports & Recreation Equipment danger scores
How this 40/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 4,791 ER visits/yr Above median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 11.5% High admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.09% Above-typical fatality rate
- 5-year trend-7%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (6,738 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (3,095 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is strain, sprain to the ankle, accounting for approximately 9,893 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the ankle (6,665 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 35,283 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 11.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.09%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 7 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 556 | 370 | |
| 5-14 | 4,999 | 5,580 | |
| 15-24 | 22,353 | 12,930 | |
| 25-34 | 17,487 | 9,448 | |
| 35-44 | 8,393 | 2,899 | |
| 45-54 | 3,301 | 1,735 | |
| 55-64 | 2,018 | 1,539 | |
| 65-74 | 1,553 | 367 | |
| 75+ | 254 | 0 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Ankle | Fracture | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Shoulder | Dislocation | |
| Lower Leg | Fracture | |
| Foot | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Knee | Strain, Sprain | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Lower Trunk | Fracture | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Upper Trunk | Fracture | |
| Lower Arm | Fracture | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
23YOF WITH LEFT LATERAL FOOT PAIN. INJURED IT WHEN ROCKCLIMBING YESTERDAY. DX: FOOT PAIN
28YOM WAS WAS ROCK CLIMBING IN *** AND ACCIDENTALLY HAD A CARABINER DROP FROM FROM 120 FEET AND HIT HIM IN THE RIGHT EYE DX: VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE, CONCUSSION, RIGHT GLOBE INJURY
21YOM PRESENTS TO ED FOR RT THUMB PAIN. PT NOTES HE WAS ROCKCLIMBING AND HE HAD HIS HANDS IN UNDERHAND GRIP. NOTED FOOT SLIPPED AND FELT RT THUMB CRUNCH. HAS INJURED PREVIOUSLY. DX: THUMB PAIN RT.
6YOF C/O INJURY TO RIGHT FOOT S/P PT STATES SHE WAS AT A BIRTHDAY PARTY AT A TRAMPOLINE RECREATION PARK AND SHE WAS ON THE ROCK CLIMBING APARATIS WHEN SHE FELL DOWN AND TWISTED HER FOOT. DX: RIGHT FOOT INJURY
21YOM PT C/O ABSCESS & PELVIC PAIN AFTER ROCK CLIMBING; DEVELOPED GROIN PAIN @ END OF CLIMB, RT HEEL BLISTER DX: CELLULITIS
19YOF PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT WAS BOULDERING AT A ROCK CLIMBING GYM WHEN HE FELL COMPLAINING OF SHOULDER AND ARM PAIN. DX: ARM PAIN AND SWELLING, ELBOW DISLOCATION
66YOM PATIENT WAS BOULDERING AT *** FALL AND FELL 20FT. DX: DISTAL RADIUS/ULNAR FRACTURE, RIGHT FEMORAL FRACTURE, RIGHT CALCANEUS FRACTURE, PELVIC FRACTURE, SACRAL FRACTURE
27YOF WITH FALL WHILE ROCKCLIMBING DX: CHI AND NECK STRAIN
38YOM PRESENTS TO ED FOR EVALUATION OF LIP LACERATION SUSTAINED WHILE ICE CLIMBING. REPORTS WAS ICE CLIMBING AND SUSTAINED LACERATION TO LEFT UPPER LIP WHEN PIECE OF ICE FELL ON HIS FACE. TEETH INTACT. ED DX: LIP LACERATION
32YOF PRESENTS WITH FOOT INJURY AFTER A FALL WHILE ROCKCLIMBING. DX: PAIN OF FOOT
30YOF WAS ROCK CLIMBING AND FELL ABOUT TEN FEET TO THE GROUND DX: FRACTURED RIGHT ANKLE
19YOM PRESENTS WITH SHOULDER INJURY AFTER ROCKCLIMBING. DX: DISLOCATION OF SHOULDER
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Product: Hercules Paracord (Amazon) ASINs: B0BD1877TX, B0BD18GG55 Brand / Seller: Hercules The Amazon seller [REDACTED] is selling deceptively labeled paracord products (ASINs B0BD1877TX, B0BD18GG55). Independent testing by [REDACTED] (Test Report No. [REDACTED], May 19, 2025) confirms: Fiber content misrepresentation: Advertised as 100% Nylon. Testing found 0% Nylon (100% polyester outer yarns). Strength misrepresentation: Advertised as 550 lbs tensile strength. Testing showed 486.5 lbs average. Both results received failing marks from [REDACTED]. The product is marketed for survival and load-bearing use. Consumers relying on false strength claims could face serious injury or death. Please contact the undersigned for questions. /[REDACTED]/
I went climbing and used a friend's climbing chalk and noticed lung and nasal irritation. The chalk was called Maglock climbing chalk (https://rungne.com/products/maglock-8g-1),. I used the product on my hands but because it is a chalk/dusty product it can float in the air. I am thinking that the silica silylate in product may have been a reason for my lung irritation. I worry because this was being used in a gym were there were kids and young adults present and maybe it could also irritate their nose/lungs and impact their development.
Avalanche beacon moved from search to send mode when being slid back into it's carrier.
during a repelling trip with a friend, this sling failed, snapped, and dropped me about ten feet, this was the first time i used it, i bought 4 of them, and threw all of them away after this. when i fell i sprained my ankle pretty bad, and got all bruised up. lucky i only fell 10 feet, could have died.
WRT CPSC Release # 12-038, November 10, 2011 Cassin Joss Rock Climbing Cam Unit recall by Sierra Trading Post The posting states that no accidents or deaths have been reported in the U.S. On November 6, 2004, [REDACTED] died in a climbing accident in the Shawangunks of New York. Failure of a Cassin Joss Cam was the major contributing factor to the fatality. I conducted the accident investigation and notified both Sierra Trading Post and CAMP/Cassin. I had extensive followup communications with CAMP/Cassin.
I've been a climber for nearly 20 years. When climbing, I use many types of equipment, all of which must function flawlessly. One of the pieces of equipment I use are carabiners which act as a conection point/link between pieces of gear, rope, etc. Carabiners have spring-loaded gates; it is critical that a carabiner's gate close automatically; not closing automatically greatly weakens the carabiners ability to resist dynamic forces, as well as creates an unsafe situation where gear can become detached from the climbing safety system. I recently replaced the majority of my carabiners with CAMP Nano 22 carabiners. Although these carabiners have seen very little use, I found two last weekend while climbing with open gates (gates that were open while in use). This creates an incredibly unsafe situation that can easily lead to death.
The consumer has a safety concern about the product. He purchased them as a gift but have not given them because he can see that there is a flaw in the manucature. There is a flaw on the hook of the nose. If used at max load it will fail due to cracks. The consumer contacted the firm but did not receive a response. UPDATED ON 1/18/2024: [Note that image 4450 does not pertain directly to the original claim, but shows another manufacturing flaw: poor machining where the wire gate attaches to carabiner body. Images 4457 through 4473 show the fractures in the hooks of carabiner noses. Image 4476 is the UPC label for the product. I believe the model number is 40-ASTROCCLQDS1 as shown on this label. Image 20240117_104342534 shows what I believe is either a serial number or manufacturing code. The same number appears on all the carabiners.]
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Sports & Recreation Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Mountain Climbing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment): cross-group products nearest on danger score (40/100), estimated annual ER visits (4,791/yr), and hospitalization share (11.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Sports & Recreation Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Mountain Climbing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #173 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #297 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) ranks #173 by PlainSafety danger score (40/100) and #297 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (4,791/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment)?
The most common injury is strain, sprain to the ankle, accounting for approximately 9,893 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment) injuries?
The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 35,283 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment)?
Of all ER visits involving mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment), approximately 11.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (88.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with mountain climbing (activity, apparel or equipment)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.