CPSC NEISS · code 405

Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots

Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots: danger rank #137 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #659 of 838 (325 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 95% over the last five years).

Containers, Tableware & Packaging CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots ranks #137 of 838 by danger score (41/100) at ER-volume #659 of 838 (325/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#137
danger rank of 838
#659
ER-volume rank of 838
41/100
danger score
325/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (41/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

41 Higher than most more dangerous than 79% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 65/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

D
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 11 80th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 325 19th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +95% 100th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 110 83rd 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 6,511 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 405. Segments sum to 6,511 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers, Tableware & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Containers, Tableware & Packaging danger scores

1. Waste Containers, Trash B…45/1002. Knives, Not Elsewhere Cla…44/1003. Drinking Glasses, Cups, A…42/1004. Cookware, Not Specified42/1005. Unpowered Coffee Makers O…41/1006. Manual Cleaning Equipment…41/1007. Kitchen Gadgets, Not Else…41/1008. Tableware & Accessories (…40/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10041/100
PlainSafety danger score · Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 41/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for unpowered coffee makers or teapots - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 325 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 11.4% High admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+95%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for unpowered coffee makers or teapots are rising by about 95% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2021 (786 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2016 (94 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,177 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by burn, scald to the hand (691 cases). The 25-34 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,102 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 11.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 110 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how unpowered coffee makers or teapots fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

02004006008001K 20052008201120142017202020232024 337
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 582 410 992
5-14 421 312 733
15-24 381 307 688
25-34 416 686 1,102
35-44 304 705 1,009
45-54 153 447 600
55-64 285 398 683
65-74 47 391 438
75+ 78 184 262

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 1,177
Hand Burn, Scald 691
Upper Trunk Burn, Scald 376
Hand Laceration 351
Face Burn, Scald 321
Lower Leg Burn, Scald 306
Upper Leg Burn, Scald 303
Hand Burns, Thermal 253
Lower Trunk Burn, Scald 249
Lower Arm Burn, Scald 229
Foot Burn, Scald 195
Lower Arm Laceration 148
Wrist Laceration 143
Upper Arm Burn, Scald 109
Finger Foreign Body 99

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 89.1% (5,803)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 5.6% (364)
Treated And Transferred 4.3% (281)
Left Without Being Seen 0.5% (33)
Held For Observation 0.5% (30)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 44 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

44YOF FOR EVAL OF R THUMB LAC. SUSTAINED WHILE SHE WAS CLEANING A PRESS POT WHEN THE BOTTOM OF IT BROKE & SHE CUT HER THUMB ON THE PLASTIC. IT OCCURRED JUST PTA. DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT THUMB

Age 73 · Female · Upper Leg · Burn, Scald · 2024

73YOF PRESENTS TO ED S/[ BURN. PT WAS CARRYING A FRENCH PRESS W/ HOT COFFEE AND SPILLED ON RT THIGH LEADING TO INJURY. PT REMOVED CLOTHING AND RINSED AREA IN COLD WATER BEFORE CALLING EMS. ENDORSES BURN TO RT THIGH, RT LOWER BDOMEN NO BURNS TO GENITALIA. DX: PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF RT THIGH. PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF ABDOMEN

Age 43 · Female · Foot · Burn, Scald · 2024

43YOF PT SPILLED HOT TEA ON LT FOOT AND RT THIGH TODAY TEA KETTLE HIT HER THIGH AND LIQUID TEA HIT HER FOOT HAS THERMAL BURN TO RT THIGH AND LT FOOT DX: BURN

Age 66 · Female · Hand · Burn, Scald · 2024

66YOF, LEFT TEA KETTLE ON THE STOVE AND ALL THE WATER EVAPORATED WENT TO PUT WATER IN IT AND STEAM RUSHED UP BURNING HER RIGHT HAND DX: BURN

Age 2 · Male · Upper Trunk · Burn, Scald · 2024

2YOM KNOCKED A FRENCH PRESS FULL OF HOT WATER OVER AND SPILLED ON CHEST. DX: BURNS

Age 201 · Female · Face · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

7WOF WAS BEING HELD BY 2YO SIBLING AND HIT SIDE OF HEAD ON COFFEE PERCOLATOR DX: FACIAL BRUISING

Age 72 · Female · Knee · Fracture · 2023

72 YOF WAS BOILING WATER, TURNED TO TAKE A TEA KETTLE OFF THE STOVE AND THEN FELL.DX: FRACTURE DISTAL END OF RIGHT FEMUR, TRAUMATIC RHABDOMYOLYSIS

Age 36 · Female · Lower Trunk · Burn, Scald · 2023

36 YOF WAS USING HER FRENCH PRESS WHEN SHE PUSHED DOWN ON THE STRAINER AND THE FRENCH PRESS EXPLODED SPLASHING HOT LIQUID ON HER BELLY AND THIGH. DX: PARRTIAL THICKNESS BURNS LOWER ABDOMEN INVOLVING UMBILICUS, MONS PUBIS AND LEFT INNER THIGH

Age 25 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2023

25YOM PRESENTS WITH THUMB LACERATION AFTER CLEANING A FRENCH PRESS AND THE GLASS SHATTERED. DX: LACERATION OF THUMB

Age 52 · Female · All Parts Body · Anoxia · 2023

52YOF PRESENTED FOR SMOKE INHALATION. THE PT WAS AT HOME WHEN A KETTLE CAUGHT FIRE. SHE THINKS SHE INHALLED SMOKE FOR 5 MINUTES. SHE WAS GIVEN ALBUTEROL ON SCENE BY EMS. DX: SMOKE INHALATION, MODERATE ASTHMA WITH ACUTE EXACERBATION.

Age 13 · Male · Wrist · Laceration · 2022

13YOM WAS CLEANING HIS MOTHER'S GLASS TEAPOT WHEN IT BROKE AND LACERATED HIS RIGHT INNER WRIST DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT WRIST

Age 222 · Male · Upper Trunk · Burn, Scald · 2022

22MOM PULLED A TEA KETTLE OFF THE STOVE SPILLING HOT WATER DOWN HIS CHEST, FACE, UPPER BACK, ANKLE, AND KNEE. DX: BURN

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/9/2024 · Incident, No Injury · FRIELING USA, INC. · Florida

Frieling French press- 44 oz. The handle detached from the pot and the pot crashed to the floor. Fortunately the press was empty at the time. It it was full of hot coffee it caused have caused an injury.

9/9/2012 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · Wilton Brands Inc. · Delaware

On Thursday September 6, 2012 I was using a COPCO Fusion tea kettle to boil water to make a cup of coffee using a single cup [REDACTED] filter cone. When the kettle boiled (it whistles slightly) I picked it up and tipped the kettle when the whistle mechanism "jammed" causing steam pressure to build up which popped the lid off. My 4th finger on the right hand (which wraps around the handle to hold it) was severely burned by the steam that rose out of the kettle.

9/7/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Le Creuset of America, Inc. · Michigan

Le Creuset Tea kettle constantly splashes boiling water wildly from the spout after heating water to boil. It doesn’t seem to matter how high or low the burner is (I have tested on both gas and glass stovetops) or if I hang the spout far off the burner or not. I, a healthy and physically coordinated person have this occur whenever I hear water for my coffee, tea, ramen, etc. I have not been injured but I can see massive potential for injury, especially if someone with muscle weakness, dull reaction time, tremor, or any similar impairment attempts to use this kettle.

9/6/2013 · Incident, No Injury · Golden Star Imports · California

I bought a 4 litter tea kettle from Golden Star Imports Inc., which had a thick base (kettle's base, a thick layer of a metal, and another sheet of metal on top of that). Last night after half an hour when I understood that the kettle has ran out of water, I wanted to put it on the counter, the outer sheet of metal fell on the counter while the thick layer of metal, which was lead, was completely melted and dripping on the counter. Thanks God it didn't drip on my foot because it would have melted my foot all the way to the bone. Is it safe to make the base of a kettle which will obviously be in direct contact with hot stove elements with Lead which its melting point is about 621? I know that the kettle had no water for about half an hour, but this should not happen to a kettle or they should have a warning that says if you leave it on stove without water for half an hour the bottom part of the kettle can melt and create very dangerous situation.

9/29/2023 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · GROSCHE INTERNATIONAL INC · North Carolina

GROSCHE Monaco Glass Teapot is the product that I’m reporting. The teapot’s handle broke while I was pouring hot tea, it shuddered and hot tea spilled everywhere. I had a throw in top of me that saved me from the burns, but a piece of glass cut me deep in the side of my ankle. I handled the teapot with care and it wasn’t damaged or anything before the incident! I believe it’s the design and craftsmanship that caused the handle to break and therefore the unfortunate accident to happen. I hope you recall this product and look into anything similar to ensure other people won’t get hurt! The cut was deep enough to frighten me, and I’m glad it didn’t hit a major artery, otherwise I would have ended up in an emergency room. I always handled the teapot with care and only used it 3 or 4 times. It wasn’t damaged before the incident.

9/27/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Copco · Virginia

I set my Martha Stewart Collection® Enameled Steel Tea Kettle on the stove on a high setting about half full of water. I became distracted and returned about 30 minutes later to find the kettle miscolored, the red paint had adhered to the stove and the handle was deformed. Upon researching the product, I realized it had been recalled last year for problems with the handle.

9/2/2020 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · CONTINUUM SALES & MARKETING · Georgia

Using tea kettle to boil water the front part of top handle gets extremely hot when you try to pour out the water. Numerous times I have burned my right fingers.

9/17/2021 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · IKEA North America Services, LLC · New York

I bought a French press at an IKEA in CT & was preparing to use today. Started to wash it & the glass broke, giving me a cut in my wrist.

Showing 8 of 110 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to unpowered coffee makers or teapots on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Containers, Tableware & Packaging

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots: cross-group products nearest on danger score (41/100), estimated annual ER visits (325/yr), and hospitalization share (11.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots ranks #137 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #659 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does unpowered coffee makers or teapots rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, unpowered coffee makers or teapots ranks #137 by PlainSafety danger score (41/100) and #659 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (325/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from unpowered coffee makers or teapots?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,177 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from unpowered coffee makers or teapots increasing or decreasing?

Up 95% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for unpowered coffee makers or teapots injuries?

The 25-34 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,102 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by unpowered coffee makers or teapots?

Of all ER visits involving unpowered coffee makers or teapots, approximately 11.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (88.6%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with unpowered coffee makers or teapots?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Unpowered Coffee Makers Or Teapots is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.