Flying Discs And Boomerangs
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment · CPSC Code 5017
Down 34% over 5 years
The verdict
Flying Discs And Boomerangs carry a danger score of 33/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 8,550 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 34% over the last five years.
- 33/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 8,550
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 2.5%
- end in hospital admission
- 15-24
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 5017 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 33/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for flying discs and boomerangs - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume8,550 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)2.5%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend-34%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Flying Discs And Boomerangs (CPSC product code 5017, in the Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment category) generate an estimated 8,550 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 128,256 ER-treated injuries across the 15-year span from 2010 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 33/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 34% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2015 (12,681 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (3,677 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for flying discs and boomerangs is strain, sprain to the ankle, accounting for approximately 13,070 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the face (10,588 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 54,474 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 8 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how flying discs and boomerangs fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2010–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 1,718 | 548 | |
| 5-14 | 18,462 | 7,676 | |
| 15-24 | 41,342 | 13,132 | |
| 25-34 | 16,162 | 5,118 | |
| 35-44 | 7,804 | 2,443 | |
| 45-54 | 5,796 | 2,551 | |
| 55-64 | 2,892 | 846 | |
| 65-74 | 666 | 662 | |
| 75+ | 17 | 419 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Knee | Strain, Sprain | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Shoulder | Fracture | |
| Shoulder | Dislocation | |
| Knee | Other | |
| Shoulder | Other | |
| Ankle | Fracture | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Trunk | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
62 YOF RT BREAST PAIN AFTER PLAYING *** ON THE BEACH 2-3 DAYS PRIOR WHEN SHE FELL AND LANDED ON HER BREAST. DX: CHEST WALL CONTUSION
27YOF PRESENTS TOE D FOR KNEE PAIN. PT WAS PLAYING *** ADN RT FOOT PLANTED ON GROUND IT LOOKED FUNNY ANGLE ADN PART OF KNEE WHEN ONE WAY OTHER PART WENT THE OTHER. DX: INJURY RT KNEE
14 YOM INJURED SHOULDER PLAYING *** DX: PAIN
17 YOF PRESENTS WITH L ANKLE INJURY. REPORTS IN PE TODAY AT SCHOOL SHE WENT TO CATCH A *** AND ROLLED HER L ANKLE 3 HRS PTA. DX: L ANKLE SPRAIN.
2YOM CHILD GOT HIT IN THE EYE WITH A *** DX: PERIORBITAL SWELLING
45YOM PATIENT WAS PLAYING DISK GOLF AND DEVELOPED CHEST WALL PAIN DX: CHEST WALL TENDERNESS, CHEST PAIN
10YOM WAS PLAYING *** WHEN IT BOUNCED OFF A TREE AND STRUCK HIM IN THE FACE DX: LACERATION FACE
69YOM C/O LOWER BACK PAIN S/P PT STATES AFTER PLAYING DISK GOLF ON SATURDAY HE BEGAN TO HAVE LOWER BACK PAIN. DX: BILATERAL LOWER BACK PAIN
19YOF, ACCIDENTALLY COLLIDED HEADS WITH ANOTHER *** PLAYER WHILE RUNNING NO LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS YET WITH PERSISTENT MILD HEADACHE SINCE, DX: CONCUSSION
11YOM, PLAYING *** WITH COUSIN AND ACCIDENTALLY GOT STRUCK WITH DISC TO FACE, NO LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, DX: FACIAL CONTUSION; FACIAL LACERATION
8YOF WAS BIT BY DOG AFTER PT WAS PLAYING AT THE PARK WITH *** WHEN ANOTHER DOG CAME UP TO PLAY BUT PT DID NOT GIVE UP *** AND DOG ATTACKED PT TO RIGHT SHOULDER AND ELBOW, AND LEFT BUTTOCK. DX: DOG BITE
19YOF PRESENTS WITH FINGER DEFORMITY AND LEG PAIN AFTER BEING STRUCK IN THE LEG WITH A ***. DX: FINGER DEFORMITY
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
We purchased a kids meal at sonic which included a toy. My 4 year old daughter's left pinkie finger became trapped in the cylinder of the toy for 4-5 hours. We first tried using liquid soap, vegetable oil and ice water to remove it. Then, after over an hour when we were going to the emergency room my boyfriend notified his sister we were on the way to the ED which was just passed her house, and she suggested we stop by to see if her friend at the fire department could get it off. The chief came to her house and used a device the department often uses to remove rings that are stuck on fingers. It has a special gaurd that protects the finger while it cuts the top part. After another hour hswears some progress but was unsuccessful in freeing her finger. He then call it in so the department sent a crew in another fire truck with additional tools and man power. It took 4 fireman, pliers and cutting devices and another 2 hours to finally remove it. After it was removed we could see an inner ring on the cylinder that was causing the pain and cutting into her finger. The finger was cleaned and bandaged with minor bleeding and significant swelling. 10 days later she still has a scab and red line around where the inner ring cut and trapped her finger. I have many pictures of the incident, as well as the toy but can't get them uploaded at this time.
Caller and her daughters went to the circus in March 2012, while there she purchased a boomerang disc for her thirteen year old son. He did not take the disc out of the package until May 25th when it became warm outside. He had been outside throwing the disc for approximately ten minutes when the disc came back after a throw and hit him in the face lacerating from inside his bottom lip on left side to the outside of the lip in same area. Caller took her son directly to a plastic surgeon that she had used in other circumstances. Plastic Surgeon estimated thirteen stitches inside and outside her son's lip. She contacted distributor around May 26th and received a return call from them via [REDACTED] who identified herself as the Manager of Consumer Products Customer Service for company. [REDACTED] asked if child was alright, what happened and ended call. She called again May 30th, asked caller for any numbers on product because she was planning to have this this item pulled from the distribution market for that area. She also asked caller to return disc to company, caller refused this request advising [REDACTED] that she would be filing report with CPSC. Around mid June 2012 caller was contacted by [REDACTED] who identified himself as a Third Party Claim Administrator who represented the distributor. [REDACTED] asked her to again state what had happened and informed her that he would be recording the conversation. She objected to the recording. She does not wish to sue, she would ask that the "balance" of any amount billed by the plastic surgeon and not covered by her insurance company then be paid at the distributor or manufacturer's expense.
Norton Truck at Comic-Con give away a coiled up Spring Metal/Nylon Frisbee of the "Captial America Shield". The frisbee is a coiled spring steel ring with a swed nylon cover, coiled up this Frisbee in the pouch has no Warning that it snaps open, when pulled out of the pouch. The Frisbee hit me iunnthe eye, has a great deal of Kinetic Energy and could be potentially injurious to a child or even AN ADULT, AS IT POPS OUT OF THE POUCH WHEN HALF PULLED OUT, AND YOU CANNOT CONTROL IT IF YOU HAVEN'T USED IF BEFORE. THE RING HAS THE POTENTIAL OF SEPERATING A SNAPPING INTO AN EYE OR PENETRATING THE SKIN. IT IS A VERY DANGEROUS TOY, WITH POTENTIAL DEATHLY RESULTS. this is an extreamly dangerious toy/gift being given out due to how it is contained in the pouch coiled up....
Today my son was thrown a Mini Beamo 16" Flying Hoop. It hit him in the face at eye level, as it was spinning towards him. The toy broke the skin left of his left eye, as well as severing the bridge of his nose. He required 4 stitches to reattach his nose below the laceration. The physician told us his cartilage was severed and that the wound will be at risk of infection until healed. The flying hoop toy was thrown to him by a 5 year old boy. His parents purchased the toy 48 hours prior. The toy is a fabric and foam wrapped fiberglass hoop, with a splinter revealed and poking through the fabric. The splintered piece of fiberglass mostly like cut my son's face and nose. Numerous customer reviews posted on Amazon.com reflect that the durability of this product is insufficient for lasting more than a day or two. In my son's case, he nearly lost his eye sight, and we will be fortunate if he just gets away with a scared face.
Consumer stated that this sport equipment that can be used as a toy, however, he was struck in the face with the product which caused severe damages to his glasses and losing sight in his right eye, by someone using it on the golf field. He was taken to an emergency room by an helicopter to Massachussets In air, Mass. General hospital, where surgery was performed and he was admitted for 3 days and had to returned for a follow up surgery, he spent over a week in the hospital. Consumer suffered the following injuries: A) a hatchet like blow to the right orbital area which cleaved the polycarbonate lens the defendant was wearing, B) lacerations to the wall of the socket C) rupture of the eye D) near excision of the cornea E) expulsion and loss of the intraocular lens F)total destruction of the iris G)detachment of the retina H)loss of anterior/posterior integrity of the eye I)ultimately enucleation of the eye. The lack of proscription, warning and labeling of the disk contributed to reckless and negligent behavior on the part of the person who threw the disk and a lack of awareness of the lethality of what can only be described as a flying hatchet. Furthermore, the disk has been apparently engineered to maximize rotation and flight dynamics which increases its lethality without explicit warning to the general public. Consumer would not have trusted his health or safety to general or negligent use of the disk by anyone if he had known of the terrifying consequences. Chronic and ongoing injuries conssit of residual inflammation of the eyelids and socket, chronic pain, loss of binocular vision, depression and generalized physical debilitation. Consumer stated that the product is a safety hazard in the way it is designed and is concern what it can do to children, if he has been injured by this product. Consumer feels that this sporting equipment/toy should be investigated.
My son (8 years old) was playing with his brother (6 years old). The toy is a flying ring similar to a frisbee. However, the toy is very stiff with sharp/hard edges. My 6 year old threw it toward my 8 year old who attempted to catch it. He missed and it struck his face. The disc sliced his face which required 3 stitches. This is NOT a safe toy. It is meant to be thrown back and forth between children, but it's like throwing a knife!!
My husband purchased some outside toys on Saturday for the nice weather outside. He bought the JA-RU pull spin saucer for my son. No where on the warning or label did it mention to stand a certain distance from toy nor did it mention that the saucer can go sideways instead of straight up. I was on the right side of my husband and the saucer flew side ways and side swiped my face giving me burns and ripping parts of my skin off my cheek and nose. I am thankful that it was not my son's face that got injured. I am requesting a stronger warning label or that this toy be removed. It could have injured my eye it was so close. I have pictures.
My 6 year old son suffered a severe eye injury while playing with a Wham-O Frisbee Field Goal product (item 72105). He was cleaning up the game in our back yard. He was pulling one of the field goal poles out if the ground. When the spike (which is attached to an elastic band) was released from the ground it struck his right eye and destroyed his lens and iris. A break away elastic band or cord with less strength may have prevented this injury. Additional precautions or warnings may also be helpful to prevent similar eye injuries to others.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to flying discs and boomerangs on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are flying discs and boomerangs?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, flying discs and boomerangs have a danger score of 33/100 (low risk). An estimated 8,550 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from flying discs and boomerangs?
The most common injury is strain, sprain to the ankle, accounting for approximately 13,070 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from flying discs and boomerangs increasing or decreasing?
Down 34% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for flying discs and boomerangs injuries?
The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 54,474 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by flying discs and boomerangs?
Of all ER visits involving flying discs and boomerangs, approximately 2.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with flying discs and boomerangs?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 33/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 15-24 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.