Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Animal Traps ranks #526 of 838 by danger score (33/100) at ER-volume #482 of 838 (1,391/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #526
- danger rank of 838
- #482
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 33/100
- danger score
- 1,391/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (33/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
33 Lower than most lower than 63% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 42/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 4 | 30th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 1,391 | 39th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +3% | 71st | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 10 | 49th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 27,830 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1432. Segments sum to 27,830 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Lawn & Garden Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Lawn & Garden Equipment danger scores
How this 33/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for animal traps - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 1,391 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.5% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend+3%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for animal traps are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (2,974 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (640 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is other to the finger, accounting for approximately 4,032 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by puncture to the finger (3,696 cases). The 65-74 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 3,668 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 10 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how animal traps fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 2,034 | 1,321 | |
| 5-14 | 1,188 | 1,458 | |
| 15-24 | 2,204 | 1,203 | |
| 25-34 | 1,807 | 1,189 | |
| 35-44 | 1,187 | 871 | |
| 45-54 | 1,867 | 1,194 | |
| 55-64 | 1,554 | 2,080 | |
| 65-74 | 2,034 | 1,634 | |
| 75+ | 1,550 | 1,458 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Other | |
| Finger | Puncture | |
| Finger | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Hand | Other | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Hand | Puncture | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Finger | Foreign Body | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Foot | Puncture | |
| Finger | Crushing |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
71YOM PRESENTS TO ED FOR WOUND INFECTION. P THAD A PUNCTURE WOUND FRO PIECE OF REBAR THAT WAS HOLDING A BEAVER TRAP IN PLACE. HAD INJURY ON DORSAL ASPECT OF RT HADN NEAR MCP JOINTS OF THE THIRD AND FOURTH FINGERS DX: CELLULITIS OF HAND RT
79 YOM FELL WHILE CARRYING A CAT IN A LIVE TRAP. DX: RIB PAIN
42YOM WAS RECOVERING FROM A PREVIOUS PARTIAL TEAR/SHOULDER PAIN WHEN HE WAS SETTING A MOUSE TRAP AND THE TRAP SPRUNG AND HE QUICKLY RETRACTED HIS RIGHT ARM DX: RIGHT SHOULDER SPRAIN OR STRAIN WITH SUSPECTED PARTIAL ROTATOR CUFF TEAR
9YOF PRESENT TO ED W/ R LOW LEG PX AFTER SHE PUT HER FOOT INTO A FOX TRAP.THE FOX TRAP DIDNT HAVE SHARP TEETH/SERRATED EDGES,NO BLEEDING OR LACS.AFTER GETTING FREE HAD DIFFICULTY WALKING,PX.DX:CONTUSIONS OF R LOW LEG
64YOF STS WITH A MOUSE BITE TO R MIDDLE FINGER WHEN FREEING THE MOUSE FROM A TRAP DX LWOT
49 YOM WAS USING AN ANIMAL TRAP TO CATCH CAT AND DROPPED IT WAS BITTEN BY CAT ON FOOT DX: CAT BITE
56YOM WITH DOG BITE TO THUMB, THE DOG WAS IN A TRAP AND THE PATIENT WAS BITTEN WHEN HE WAS RELEASING THE TRAP.DX: SINGLE DEEP ANIMAL BITE RIGHT THUMB.
61YOF WITH BITE FROM A MOUSE THAT SHE HAD CAUGHT IN A STICKY TRAP.DX: PUNCTURE WOUND LEFT THUMB.
79YOF WAS LETTING A RACCOON OUT OF A TRAP WHEN IT BITE HER ON THE LEFT THIRD FINGER DX:PUNCTURE TO FINGER
32YOF,MOUSE BITE TO FINGER CAUGHT IN MOUSE TRAP,TRYING TO REMOVE IT,BIT HER,DX:FINGER BITE
4YOM WAS ATTEMPTING TO GRAB A PACKET OF CHIPS AT HOME & A RAT EMERGED FROM NEARBY STICKY TRAP & BIT PTS RIGHT 5TH TOE, PT HAS AN ABRASION OF RIGHT 5TH TOE DX ANIMAL BITE, STREP THROAT EXPOSURE
79 YOF TRIPPED AND FELL YESTERDAY AFTER LOSING BALANCE AND STEPPED ONTO MOUSE TRAPS, HIT HEAD AND LEFT WRIST, DOES NOT TAKE BLOOD THINNERS, DX: LEFT WRIST CONTUSION, LEFT HAND CONTUSION
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I baited and set traps and placed them in my utility room where I seen evidence of mice. I left the utility room and before long (from several minutes to an hour) heard a strange noise. Upon investigating I discovered that the traps had come apart and pieces of the traps were scattered around the area where traps had been left. If I had still been holding the trap in my hand and leaning over to put trap on floor I could have sustained an eye injury.
I baited and set traps and placed them in my utility room where I had seen evidence of mice. I left the utility room and before long (from several minutes to an hour) heard a strange noise. Upon investigating I discovered that the traps had come apart and pieces of the traps were scattered around the area where traps had been left. If I had still been holding the trap in my hand and leaning over to put trap on floor I could have sustained an eye injury.
In my apartment for the past 2 years, I set out a readily available pest control product called "Catchmaster", a small glue board, 4 to a package, which was very effective. The product, listed in many varieties on Amazon, is noted as being "non-toxic, home and family safe". However, I discovered that the chemical in the glue has been causing me a severe breathing problem. Not knowing for 2 years what was causing my shortness of breath, I was putting out more and more of this product around my apartment because it had great results, until I realized that the more of them I placed around my apartment, the more serious my breathing problem became. Having gradually found and removed all of the product that I had placed around my apartment, I continue to have residual chemical effects, mostly in my bedroom area.
This caller purchased rat traps around June 25th or June 26th, 2018 from retailer in [REDACTED] then came home and began setting them the next day. One of them snapped right after he set it and when he inspected it he saw that the staples were not set deeply enough for it to work properly. He set another trap that snapped while he was setting it and just missed his head as it went flying past it. He is reporting these traps as a severe injury hazard and would ask that CPSC inspect and recall them. There are no injuries being reported He reported these incidents to the manufacturer who is sending him three more rat traps. He states that the store where he purchased his has seven more of these defective traps and that other stores are also selling them which could result in someone being severely injured and he is asking that the stores become notified and told to remove them from the shelves. Caller asked that a note be placed advising that ACE Distributing should be contacted immediately and advised to inspect then remove any of these rat traps still on the shelves.
I am writing to notify you of a malfunction with a Tomcat wooden rat snap trap that caused me to suffer a serious eye injury. Monday June 6th just before 2pm, in my home, a set trap was about 10 feet away from me when the hammer tripped but not due to the trigger arm operating normally. Instead, the small metal U-shaped staple that holds the trigger arm came loose from the wooden base, which triggered the trap and shot the staple straight into my right eye. The trigger arm went flying in another direction; the trap basically blew up sending metal pieces flying around the room. It was a shocking, painful, and traumatic event in which I suffered deep lacerations to my inner eyelid, lacerations to my cornea, and damage to my pupil and globe. I lost vision completely. After being seen at the nearest hospital they transferred me to another hospital with more advanced equipment and an optometry specialist. He performed emergency surgery to repair the cuts in my eye, and I will have stitches in my eyeball for a few more weeks. At that time, we'll know how much of my vision will fully return. As we look closer at the trap, we are surprised to realize how insecure that staple is, it would be so much safer if it was longer and hammered down on the backside to secure it from coming loose and airborne with all the pressure of the springs behind it. My Father in Law has said that he's also had that u-shaped nail come out of a Tomcat trap before but he never found where it flew to, thankfully he was not injured like I was. I'm so interested to know if other consumers of this product have had that staple come loose, if so I hope that like my Father In Law that they were not hit directly with the staple, or the metal arm. I had no idea that these traps were capable of turning into projectile weapons, I'm still in shock this happened and feel so lucky that it wasn't one of my four children in the room who had been hit. I'm extremely concerned that there is a pretty major
There is, in my opinion, a strong risk of personal injury using a Havahart model 1085animal trap. Shame on me for trusting this Havahart trap. They have been in business for years. They had a good reputation until now. The trap consists of 3 different size holes: 1x7/8, 1/2x7/8, AND a 1x2. Now there are 2 columns of the later size running down each side right below the handle on top. Note the attached picture of my latest capture. It was able to extend its reach for 6". There is a trough dug out of the dirt along the bottom corner. Would you really want to put this on your deck? Grass would eventually recover in a week or so. Concrete would be best. Unfortunately, I don't have any. But wait that's not all. I don't kill the critter. I figure he's just trying to make a living like the rest of us. I take them on a 4-5 mile trip to release. So this trap probably weighs about 10 pounds. Say the coon weighs 20-25 pounds. Since the geniuses place the largest openings right below the handle, one then has to hold the 30-35 pounds straight out from your side, don't forget it has at least a 6" reach. Walk that way for 75 feet, then lift it up int your vehicle. I do have to get back to the gym. One more dandy little tidbit is they advertise proudly how there are no sharp edges inside the trap so it's safe for the animal. My question is what about my leg?
Product malfunctioned, causing a fire that burned a section of our home.
Friday, March 16, 2012 caller purchased T-Con Mouse Trap, set it up in his kitchen then after approximately an hour he heard a "snap", went to kitchen. No mouse in trap Bottom piece is round, 4" in diameter, Spindle in center comes up about 2", then a plastic top that goes over the spindle. Somehow the axle from the bottom part snapped and a quarter inch of the plastic shot up and caller found it a couple inches away from the rest of the trap. Model# 0261071 He is reporting as a safety hazard because if a curious child had been trying to see how it worked or got close to it for any reason could have lost an eye or been injured in another way when the plastic hit him or her. He believes that the plastic should be much tougher. UPDATE FROM SUBMITTER: A quarter inch of the vertical axle was found a couple of inches away but that was only half of the piece that had broken off. When the piece broke off it split vertically and a second piece was found on 31 March 2012 across the kitchen in a wicker basket on the opposite counter that is used to hold bags of onions. That second half was imbedded in the weave of the wicker and at first I thought it was a black spot on the wicker. I was able to pry it out. That piece had traveled more than 52 inches and I do not know how high above the counter the apex of the arc was.
Showing 8 of 10 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to animal traps on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Lawn & Garden Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Animal Traps: cross-group products nearest on danger score (33/100), estimated annual ER visits (1,391/yr), and hospitalization share (3.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 3.5%admitted
- Other Playground Equipment Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 3.5%admitted
- Drapery Or Curtain Rods, Hooks Or Rings Floors, Walls & Ceilings 3.5%admitted
- Baby Carriers (bicycle-mounted) Nursery & Baby Products 3.5%admitted
Related Products in Lawn & Garden Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Animal Traps ranks #526 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #482 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does animal traps rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, animal traps ranks #526 by PlainSafety danger score (33/100) and #482 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (1,391/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from animal traps?
The most common injury is other to the finger, accounting for approximately 4,032 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from animal traps increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for animal traps injuries?
The 65-74 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 3,668 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by animal traps?
Of all ER visits involving animal traps, approximately 3.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with animal traps?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.