Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Workshop Furnishings ranks #526 of 838 by danger score (33/100) at ER-volume #442 of 838 (1,816/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #526
- danger rank of 838
- #442
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 33/100
- danger score
- 1,816/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (33/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
33 Lower than most lower than 63% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 44/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 6 | 54th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 1,816 | 45th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -28% | 23rd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 7 | 40th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 36,312 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 854. Segments sum to 36,312 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Communication & Entertainment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Communication & Entertainment danger scores
How this 33/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for workshop furnishings - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 1,816 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 6.5% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-28%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for workshop furnishings are declining by about 28% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2017 (2,646 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (745 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 3,129 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the finger (2,232 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 6,114 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 6.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 7 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how workshop furnishings fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 1,463 | 380 | |
| 5-14 | 1,452 | 815 | |
| 15-24 | 1,981 | 232 | |
| 25-34 | 3,092 | 459 | |
| 35-44 | 4,308 | 718 | |
| 45-54 | 4,998 | 1,116 | |
| 55-64 | 4,365 | 1,373 | |
| 65-74 | 3,484 | 1,235 | |
| 75+ | 4,076 | 655 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Laceration | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Upper Trunk | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Hand | Fracture | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
79 YOM INJ FACE ETOH CONSUMPTION BAC NOT DONE TRIPPED AND HIT HEAD ON SAW HORSE AT CAMP DX ORBITAL FLOOR FX WITH COMPARTMENT SYNDROME RT EYE
52 YOM C/O INJ TO HAND WHEN HE SLID IT ACROSS HIS WORK BENCH, AND IT CAUGHT ON A PIECE OF METAL AT HOME DX LAC HAND
48 YOM C/O INJ TO RIB AREA/LOWER LEG/ANKLE AND FOOT AFTER FALL OFF BENCH IN HIS GARAGE ONTO WOODEN BEAM AT HOME DX RIB FX'S, DISTAL FIBULA FX, ANKLE/FOOT SPRAIN
65YOM PRESENTS WITH LEFT UPPER ARM AND SHOULDER PAIN AFTER HE WAS STANDING ON A WORK BENCH AND AS HE WAS REACHING UP TO THE CEILING HE BEGAN TO FALL GRABBED AN OBJECT WITH HIS LEFT HAND AS HE WAS FALLING TRYING TO KEEP FROM FALLING AND FELT A HOT SEARING PAIN IN HIS LEFT UPPER ARM. DX: LEFT SHOULDER STRAIN
54YOM WORKBENCH THAT WAS HANGING ON A WALL CAME DOWN AND HIT HEAD, ABOUT 100 POUNDS. DX: LACERATION OF FOREHEAD.
87YOM WAS DOING SOME YARDWORK OUTSIDE AND TRIPPED OVER A SAWHORSE AND LANDED ON HIS SIDE. DX: UPPER TRUNK CONTUSION
81YOM HAD A FALL THREE DAYS AGO SLIPPED OFF OF HIS WORKBENCH IN HIS GARAGE AND HAS HAD CONTINUED PAIN IN UPPER BACK STATES THE PAIN IS SO BAD THAT HE CAN'T EVEN WALK DX: ACUTE BILATERAL THORACIC BACK PAIN
^63YOM PATIENT FELL OUT OF THE CAR ON THE PASSENGER SIDE IN THE GARAGE AT HOME, FELL BACKWARD HITTING HIS BACK ON SOMETHING IN HIS GARAGE, POSSIBLY A WORKBENCH, BACK PAIN, ADMITS TO DRINKING EARLY AT A BARBECUE BAL NOT COLLECTED DX: SOFT TISSUE INJURY OF BACK, ABRASION OF RIGHT BACK WALL OF THORAX
32YOM PATIENT FELL ON A METAL WORK BENCH AND LACERATED HIS EAR DX: LACERATION OF HELIX OF LEFT EAR
96YOM C/O FALL AND ANKLE PAIN AT HOME. WAS AT HOME AND WENT TO STAND UP FROM HIS WORK BENCH WHEN HE TRIPPED AND FELL ON HIS LEFT ANKLE 3 DAYS AGO. DX: ACUTE LEFT ANKLE PAIN, FALL, ANEMIA
77YOM WAS CLEANING SAW HORSES WHEN HE INJURED HIS LEFT MIDDLE FINGER DX: FINGER INJURY
59 YOM STATES A HEAVY METAL PLATE FELL OFF HIS WORKBENCH WHICH IS ABOUT WAIST HIGH CRASHING ON THE TOP OF HIS RIGHT FOOT. DX: CONTUSION OF DORSUM OF FOOT.
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
This report regards a defective wheel(s) on a Kobalt brand large mobile tool storage chest designed to hold hundreds of pounds of tools. Use: The tool chest was used by an adult homeowner in a home workshop environment. The tool chest was not exposed to degrading or unusual substances or any improper use. The chest is normally stationary and only moved a few feet on occasion. On September 8, 2020 I was relocating the large tool chest (this is the lowest system of three stacked/nested tool chests) when it stopped rolling suddenly. I checked the wheels and noticed that there were rubber pieces next to one of the wheels. Looking closer it was apparent that the wheel was not functional. Hazardous condition: Apparently the defective plastic wheel tread overmold deteriorated causing the wheel tread to separate from the plastic wheel hub. The resulting reduction in circumference of the single affected wheel caused a severe wobble and loss of unit stability. The large and heavy tool chest (six feet tall when combined with the other three chests) in that condition is not able to be used safely and a dangerous condition exists in that there is a high risk of collapse and an accompanying potential for serious injury of death.
Harbor Freight has been stringing me along for 7 months. I purchased your 60in 4 drawer wood workbench,and had a number of problems with defective parts, I understand wood splits, no quality control. Ive been remodeling my garage to fit; which includes electrical so it's been a while, my point is I've only opened these drawers less than ten times, and 2 of the 4 drawers do not function, the slide exploded and as a result cut my finger. I can send photos of the blood still on the drawers and the cut. Also the pieces of slide that came apart. You need to assist me in this problem as I am more than certain that the other two drawers will do the same and I am already upset about your product injuring me; which, is just absurd for a drawer. I do Not wish to send back a fully assembled bench, but I would bring in the drawers or slides, If I get hurt again, this would bad for you and me, and I'm certain you want to fix a Dangerous product. Product_Or_Service: 60 in. 4 drawer work bench Order_Number: [REDACTED] Account_Number: [REDACTED] I Assembled this bench with glue and a lot of time and effort,because, it wobbles and is not made for the type of work it is sold for, such as sawing and sanding. Harbor freight made ME research replacement drawer glides; because,"Unfortunately, the replacement parts youre requesting are not available, and we are unable to order the parts from our manufacturer." The have agreed to pay for replacement glides (IF) I sign and notarize a statement and give a color copy of my Drivers License; which, I don't believe is even legal. These drawers were empty and brand new when the guides exploded, they are unsafe and a hazard. two drawers are unusable, the other two obviously can't have any weight placed in them or pulled in or out or the glides will explode. They obviously lied about the weight limits they listed. I have researched the safe replacement guides, they agreed to replace them; But, I refuse to sign their statement and send
I recently have a small space to build a work shop and picked up a table kit from Harbor Freight SKU: 58832. The safety issue I have with this is the drawers are set back from the lip of the table and since the drawer slides require a bit of force to pull them open. If you have any fingers above the top of the handle you will crush your fingers between the drawer and the underside of the lip of the table. I did so and smashed my nail hard enough to leave a painful hematoma under my thumb nail. I also asked someone else to try them and they did the same thing their finger. I think this is a flaw in the design and that the drawers should come all the way out to the end of the table so you can't get fingers caught in the drawer/table lip.
The consumer wanted to illustrate his concerns about a wooden work bench he recently purchased. The size is designed to be 48X24 inch. The consumer feels the product is unsafe because the legs of the workbench have very sharp corners and poses a potential safety concern. The consumer stated that the packaging gives a false sense of how the product will appear upon assembly. The consumer has not been harmed by the product. The consumer has been in contact with the firm about the issue and was told that the design was changed six months to the current format. The consumer was directed by the firm to call the retailer for a refund. The consumer called the retailer today and they are aware of the problem, but is unsure if they have removed their stock from the shelf. The consumer also feels this product is unstable and could fall on a nearby child.
The consumer stated he purchased a 6 foot stainless steel work surface and he installed it in his garage. The consumer stated that his 12 years old son was sitting on a stool (the seat twist) in front of the work surface. The consumer stated that his son twisted the stool he brushed his arm against the bottom edge of the front face of the working surface and received a laceration diagonal on his left arm above the elbow. The consumer stated that they put pressure on the wound to stop the bleeding and then proceeded to place a bandage. The consumer stated that the next day the realized the bleeding would not stop and they had to take his son to his family physician. The physician used butterfly [REDACTED] to assist in closing the laceration. The consumer stated that the physician did not prescribe any medicine. The consumer stated that he contacted the manufacturer and they did not assist him. He stated that they kept transferring him to different departments and the recall department advice him to contact CPSC. The consumer believes that this product has a laceration hazard that should be investigated.
We have a TRINITY 48" Stainless Steel Rolling Workbench that tipped over and fell on my wife. We purchased this product from Costco in December 2015. This product appears to be too-heavy. It was filled with an assortment of tools and supplies. It was on a hard, level surface in the basement of our home. The workbench caused a puncture wound to her foot resulting in a visit to the emergency room.
WE PURSHASED THE TIMBER TUFF TMW-10 LOGGING SAW HORSE ON DEC 11 2014, WE USED 1 TIME. AFTER USING IT THE 2ND. TIME AND PLACING A LOG ON THE SAW HORSE THE WHOLE THING COLLASPED. HITTING MY LEG CASUSING A CUT AND INJURING MY FOOT, CAUSING SWELLING AND BRUSING. THIS THING IS A PEICES OF DANGEROUS JUNK, STATED IT CAN HOLD UP TO 150 POUNDS, THE LOG WE PUT ON IT WAS NO MORE THEN 60 POUNDS AT THE MOST, VERY DANGEROUS ITEM.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to workshop furnishings on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Communication & Entertainment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Workshop Furnishings: cross-group products nearest on danger score (33/100), estimated annual ER visits (1,816/yr), and hospitalization share (6.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Communication & Entertainment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Workshop Furnishings ranks #526 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #442 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does workshop furnishings rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, workshop furnishings ranks #526 by PlainSafety danger score (33/100) and #442 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (1,816/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from workshop furnishings?
The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 3,129 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from workshop furnishings increasing or decreasing?
Down 28% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for workshop furnishings injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 6,114 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by workshop furnishings?
Of all ER visits involving workshop furnishings, approximately 6.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (93.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with workshop furnishings?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.