Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Telescopes, Binoculars, Microscopes, Magnifying Glasses ranks #684 of 838 by danger score (29/100) at ER-volume #618 of 838 (453/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #684
- danger rank of 838
- #618
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 29/100
- danger score
- 453/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (29/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
29 Among the lowest lower than 82% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 33/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 3 | 23rd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 453 | 25th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -8% | 54th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 9 | 46th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 9,055 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 529. Segments sum to 9,055 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Structures & Construction Materials group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Structures & Construction Materials danger scores
How this 29/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 453 ER visits/yr Low volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.8% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-8%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2016 (889 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (244 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 2,142 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the head (692 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,944 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 9 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 1,126 | 445 | |
| 5-14 | 1,325 | 619 | |
| 15-24 | 446 | 521 | |
| 25-34 | 400 | 432 | |
| 35-44 | 438 | 652 | |
| 45-54 | 407 | 428 | |
| 55-64 | 467 | 262 | |
| 65-74 | 613 | 269 | |
| 75+ | 157 | 45 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Face | Fracture | |
| Internal | Ingestion | |
| Neck | Strain, Sprain | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Leg | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Toe | Fracture | |
| Toe | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
29 YOF FIRING A GUN AND IT KICKED BACK SCOPE HIT HER IN FACE DX; CONCUSSION W/O LOC, FACE CONTUSION
45YOM PATIENT ACCIDENTALLY HIT THE LEFT KNEE WITH A MAGNIFYING GLASS WHILE TRYING TO SWAT A FLY AT HOME DX: ACUTE PAIN OF LEFT KNEE
70YOM PT STRUCK FOREHEAD WITH SCOPE OF HIS GUN, WHEN SCOPE HIT PT IN THE FOREHEAD DX: LAC TO FOREHEAD
41 YOF WAS AT A MOVIE THEATER WATCHING A MOVIE WAS A 3D MOVIE AND SHE PUT THE 3D GLASSES UNDER HER GLASSES. SHE WAS UNSURE OF HOW FAR THEY MADE IN THE MOVIE BUT WAS THEN AWOKEN BY BYSTANDERS SAYING THAT SHE HAD HAD A SEIZURE. SHE BIT HER TONGUE AND THE INSIDE OF HER LIP. C/O A HEADACHE. DX SYNCOPE VS SEIZURE
7YOF PRESENTS WITH LACERATION TO HEAD AFTER WHILE AT *** AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM A MICROSCOPE FELL OF A SHELF AND HIT HER IN THE HEAD DX: SUPERFICIAL LACERATION OF SCALP
54YOM PATIENT WAS OUTSIDE LOOKING AT THE MOON WITH A TELESCOPE WHEN HE HEARD HIS DOG BARK AND FELT A SHARP PAIN ON HIS GREATER TOE. PATIENT SAW A BABY RATTLESNAKE. PATIENT HAS ECCHYMOSIS AND 2 PUNCTURE BITES TO HIS TOE. DX: SNAKE BITE, BITTEN BY NONVENEMOUS SNAKE, THROMBOCYTOPENIA
59YOM,NECK PAIN AFTER HIT THERE BY TELESCOPING METAL WAND,DX:NECK CONT
75YOF WAS LOOKING THROUGH BINOCULARS AND GOT DIZZY AND PASSED OUT AND FELL STRIKING HEAD DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY, SYNCOPE
8YOM, ACCIDENTALLY RAN INTO METAL TELESCOPE AT A WATER BARK TODAY STRIKING FACE WITHOUT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS DX: FACIAL LACERATION
20YOF PRESENTS AFTER PT WAS AT SCHOOL WHEN SHE CUT FINGER ON GLASS LAB SLIDE AND STATES SHE WAS EXPOSED TO ANOTHER STUDENT WHOSE BLOOD SHE TOOK. DX: EXPOSURE TO BLOOD OR BODY FLUID; ABRASION TO RIGHT THIRD DISTAL FINGER
10YOM FELL FACE FORWARDS WHILE RUNNING W/ BINOCULARS WHICH HIT HIS EYES WHILE AT SUMMER CAMP TODAY. HIT FACE ON WOOD AND CUT ABOVE HIS TOP LIP. DX: CLOSED FX OF NASAL BONES, FACIAL LAC
14YOM PRESENTS WITH CONCERN FOR RASH TO THE FOREHEAD AND FACE THAT BEGAN A COUPLE HOURS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL. PATIENT SAYS HE FEELS A PRESSURE PAIN AT THE SITE OF THE RASH. PATIENT WENT TO A MOVIE AND WROE 3D GLASSES AND THE RASH BEGAN SHORTLY AFTER THE MOVIE AND IN THE AREA OF THE GLASSES. DX: RASH, DERMATITIS CONTACT - FACE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Coleman Nature Kit magnifying glass. I found two large button batteries in the toy box and they belonged to the magnifying glass. Upon inspection, the door to the batteries is dangerously designed and it opened on its own. Luckily my toddler hadn't taken to the batteries and I disposed of them.
Consumer stated that the circular rim of the helping magnifier he purchased is very sharp. The consumer has bought 3 of these products from the retailer. The consumer's daughter cut her right index finger when she tried to remove the protective plastic from the magnifier, resulting in a her applying a band aid. She did not go to the doctor nor seek medical attention. The product is a manual tool. The incident occurred as soon he presented product to his daughter and she tried to open the product. The consumer has yet to call the retailer about the product but does intend to return two of the magnifiers. The consumer has yet to call the manufacturer about this incident. Update: Consumer returned all 3 back to the recently opened Braintree store on Aug 09, 2011 (store #351) (Copy of return receipt enclosed)
[REDACTED] I was at a restaurant when a woman at the next table turned on a device that was about the size of a cell phone, but had a ring of intense, blue-rich LED lights, acting something like a flashlight. I was struck directly by the LED lights, and a few seconds later began going into a panic and meltdown. I got up from the table and began breathing hard and made my way outside, and then collapsed to my knees and began crying.
While using a Bushnell Sportview T1403 432 riflescope mounted on a [REDACTED]-branded .30-06 bolt-action rifle, a safety-related failure occurred. The small metallic turret indicator disc (part of the windage adjustment dial) detached from the scope and fell into the action of the rifle. The disc became lodged in the bolt and chamber area, jamming the rifles bolt. It was crushed during bolt operation. Although no injury occurred in this case, I believe this incident presents a serious safety hazard due to the nature of how the disc entered the firearms action. If a shooter were to unknowingly force the bolt closed with the disc obstructing the chamber, it could lead to: An out-of-battery discharge, Gas or metal blowback toward the shooter, Catastrophic failure of the firearm, and Potential injury or death. This part failure occurred without abuse or modification. Photos of the damaged scope and the bent disc are available and were submitted to Bushnell Customer Support for review. I am submitting this report to raise awareness and in hopes of initiating a safety evaluation of this failure mode.
I have a small magnifying glass with a light that allows you to see things up close The light had stopped working. I opened the battery case on the magnifier and there were three batteries inside, fitted tightly, that looked similar to hearing aid batteries. I had to pry the batteries out of the compartment with a small metal flathead screwdriver. The batteries were dumped onto a couch. moments latter, one of the batteries exploded, sending small mental shards through the living room. No injuries were sustained. I was wearing glasses and I felt some of the debris hit my glasses. Without glasses, I suspect I would have had an eye injury. The magnifying glass was purchased at Barnes & Noble Book Store several years ago and no receipt exists. The "brand" name on the magnifier is "Mighty Bright" and on the back a stencil saying, "Made in China".
We bought a pair of kid binoculars at the Atlanta Zoo gift shop. They are small and definitely for children. My child was swinging outside and came in with a serious mark around his neck. He had tried to get off the swing but the binocular string had tangled and was choking him. Thankfully the string broke at the plastic point where it was connected to the binoculars. It did not have a break-away clasp at all and I didn't think about it. It seems that since these are being marketed to children they should have a safety break-away clasp. There is no identifying information on the binoculars, it just says "Zoo Atlanta".
Five year old Grandchild received a Bebang handheld microscope for kids labeled by them on the Amazon product page for ages 4+. It included glass slides. The slides were very thin glass and had no covering or reinforcement along the edges which were not smooth. (This is a significant difference from the product which they were clearly copying to sell for a lower price.) The slide broke into two pieces during play and the edges created were very sharp. Child was cut by it and needed basic first aid. I am concerned that this product may not have gone through compliance testing and will be dangerous to others. I was able to quickly find a reviewer whose child was cut during use in the Amazon reviews.
My 5 year old got these binoculars for his birthday and his 3 (almost 4) year old brother was playing with them in the next room. Within a couple hours came frantically in the room with the cord wrapped around his neck tightly several times and the binoculars stuck behind his back and couldnt reach them. The safety latches were not releasing properly and I fought with trying to untangle the several tight twists.
Showing 8 of 9 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Structures & Construction Materials
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Telescopes, Binoculars, Microscopes, Magnifying Glasses: cross-group products nearest on danger score (29/100), estimated annual ER visits (453/yr), and hospitalization share (2.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Structures & Construction Materials
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Telescopes, Binoculars, Microscopes, Magnifying Glasses ranks #684 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #618 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses ranks #684 by PlainSafety danger score (29/100) and #618 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (453/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses?
The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 2,142 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,944 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses?
Of all ER visits involving telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses, approximately 2.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, magnifying glasses?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.