Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Slingshots Or Sling-propelled Toys ranks #780 of 838 by danger score (25/100) at ER-volume #661 of 838 (324/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #780
- danger rank of 838
- #661
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 25/100
- danger score
- 324/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (25/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
25 Among the lowest lower than 93% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 27/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 3 | 27th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 324 | 19th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -53% | 13th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 10 | 49th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 6,490 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1352. Segments sum to 6,490 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Toys & Children's Recreation group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Toys & Children's Recreation danger scores
How this 25/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for slingshots or sling-propelled toys - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 324 ER visits/yr Low volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.3% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-53%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for slingshots or sling-propelled toys are declining by about 53% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (605 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (10 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is contusions, abr. to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 1,204 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by other to the eyeball (656 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 3,501 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 10 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how slingshots or sling-propelled toys fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 289 | 119 | |
| 5-14 | 3,108 | 393 | |
| 15-24 | 760 | 240 | |
| 25-34 | 464 | 98 | |
| 35-44 | 287 | 307 | |
| 45-54 | 15 | 0 | |
| 55-64 | 72 | 76 | |
| 65-74 | 56 | 204 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Face | Fracture | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Knee | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Hemorrhage | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
66 YOM HURT R HAND USING SLING SHOT DX; HAND LAC
13YOM WAS SHOT WITH A SLING SHOT IN THE LEFT EYE DX: ABRASION TO LEFT EYE
40YOF WAS PLAYING WITH A SLINGSHOT DEVICE WITH HER SONE AND PART OF THE PLASTIC CAME BACK AND HIT HER HAND AND FINGER DX: RT HAND LACERATION
10YOM. PT TOLD MOM THAT CLASSMATE HAD A SMALL SLINGSHOT WAS POSSIBLY HIT TO HEAD WITH A SMALL PEBBLE OR ROCK. MOM CALLED SCHOOL. PT WITH HEMATOMA TO LEFT TEMPLE. DX: CHI EPISTAXIS- HEMATOMA TO LEFT TEMPLE.
5YOM. PT WAS HIT TO LEFT EYE WITH CRAB APPLE THAT SIBLING & PT PLAYING WITH SLINGSHOT PT WITH PAIN & BLURRY VISION. DX: LEFT CONJUNCTIVA/HYPHEMA.
5 YOF C/O DENTAL INJURY S/P ACCIDENTALLY HIT WITH A SLINGSHOT WHILE AT A DOG PARK. DX: DENTAL INJURY
11YOM STATES GOT HIT IN THE EYE WITH A PIECE OF A BLACK WALNUT SHELL WHILE SHOOTING A SLING SHOT WITH A FRIEND. REPORTS PUTTING WALNUT IN SLING SHOTAND FIRED IT. PER PROVIDER NOTE FROM DESCRIPTION IT SOUNDS LIKE HE WAS STRUCK IN THE EYE WHEN THE SLING SHOT BAND RECOILED. DX: BLUNT TRAUMA OF RT EYE., HYPHEMA OF RT EYE
17 YOF C/O THUMB INJURY USING SLINGSHOT STRUCK BY ROCK DX ABRASION THUMB
2YOM WAS SHOT IN THE LEFT EYE WITH A TOY SLINGSHOT FROM HIS BROTHER DX: CORNEAL ABRASION
16 YOF USING A SLING SHOT THAT BROKE AND HIT FINGER. DX CONTUSION
41YOF HAS RIGHT EYE PAIN AFTER SHE WAS HIT WITH TOY CAR FROM SLING SHOT. DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT CONJUNCTIVA; SUBCONJUNCTIVAL HEMORRHAGE OF RIGHT EYE
9YOM PT WAS PLAYING WITH A SLINGSHOT THAT SNAPPED BACK HITTING PT'S LT EYE PAINFUL DX CONTUSION LT EYE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Bought "Silly Shotz", a toy slingshot with foam balls and when my daughter pulled back the launcher the strink untied and she hit herself in the face extremely hard. Her lip is red and swollen.
My six year old child was gifted an Original Koosh Sharp Shot toy which has an electronic target and rubberized Koosh Flingers which are soft rubberized balls with rubber band like attachments that are sling shot at the target using the shooters to loop the rubber band around and pull back the ball to aim at the target. My child pulled back on a Koosh Flinger from a shooter but accidentally let go of the hard plastic shooter instead of the Koosh Flinger. The hard plastic shooter flipped around the rubber band part of the Koosh Flinger and struck him hard in the face. It just missed his eye and could blind any child. The Original Koosh Sharp Shot manual says the product is from PlayMonster, LLC, and is licensed by Hasbro, and that Koosh is a trademark of Oddzon, Inc.
A 14 year old boy purchased a Mega Rocket toy from Winn-Dixie in Jacksonville, FL, on October 16, 2011. On that same date, the boy launched the rocket using the instructed method for a single individual. In the launch process, he was struck in the left eye by the Mega Rocket and experienced severe injury and blindness in his eye as a result thereof. The Mega Rocket toy is unreasonably dangerous because when launched as instructed, it passes at high rates of speed within inches of the user's face. This creates a high risk of being struck in the face by the Mega Rocket which can cause serious injury, including blindness. The Mega Rocket is not safe for children 8 years of age as advertised and is not made of "Safe Soft Foam."
I was shooting the ucho Professional slingshot when the top of the frame broke, sending the metal piece into my cheek. It almost knocked me out and at first I thought somebody had hit me with a pole. My teeth started hurting that night and after a week or so I went to the dentist, and he had to pull the tooth. When you get hit by a metal piece stretched with a rubber band it's really a shock.
Child was pulling the rocket back with the sling shot. Upon release it hit her thumb resulting in a deep cut. 3 hours in the ER - Doctors removed part of her nail bed and put in three stitches. Child was under adult supervision at the time of the event.
Purchased a new Barnett Black Widow slingshot for my 14 yr old son. Third time shooting it with him the wrist support slid off at full draw causing the sling shot to torque out of my hand and into my face/eye causing er visit, including brow stiches and eye damage. The wrist strap is not permenantely attached in any way and it's soft plastic, causing it to flex and pull right off the handle/wrist support. Very unsafe design. This happened to me and not my son, thankfully.
Purchased this product and inside was a packet of multicolored water beads, packaging looked like a toy Namii W Slingshot Chicken Rubber Chicken Flick Chicken Flying Chicken Flingers Stress Gag Toys, Rubber Chicken Slingshot Funny Christmas Stuffers Easter Chicks Novelty Gifts for Kids (Yellow 10 Pcs) https://a.co/d/glkRka6
My 4 year old son and I were playing with the Superheros Flying spiderman and the spiderman part of the toy broke into 5 pieces in mid air. The body pieces were extremely sharp and could have easily caused bodily injury had it hit either one of us.
Showing 8 of 10 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to slingshots or sling-propelled toys on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Toys & Children's Recreation
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Slingshots Or Sling-propelled Toys: cross-group products nearest on danger score (25/100), estimated annual ER visits (324/yr), and hospitalization share (3.3%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Toys & Children's Recreation
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Slingshots Or Sling-propelled Toys ranks #780 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #661 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does slingshots or sling-propelled toys rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, slingshots or sling-propelled toys ranks #780 by PlainSafety danger score (25/100) and #661 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (324/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from slingshots or sling-propelled toys?
The most common injury is contusions, abr. to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 1,204 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from slingshots or sling-propelled toys increasing or decreasing?
Down 53% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for slingshots or sling-propelled toys injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 3,501 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by slingshots or sling-propelled toys?
Of all ER visits involving slingshots or sling-propelled toys, approximately 3.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with slingshots or sling-propelled toys?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.