Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Garage Doors (excl. Automatic Garage Doors Or Openers) ranks #256 of 838 by danger score (38/100) at ER-volume #152 of 838 (15,362/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #256
- danger rank of 838
- #152
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 38/100
- danger score
- 15,362/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (38/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
38 Around the middle lower than 30% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 53/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 5 | 43rd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 15,362 | 78th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -18% | 38th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 8 | 43rd | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 307,219 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1886. Segments sum to 307,219 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Building Materials & Home Structures group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Building Materials & Home Structures danger scores
How this 38/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 15,362 ER visits/yr High volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 4.5% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.05% Above-typical fatality rate
- 5-year trend-18%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) are declining by about 18% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2008 (18,428 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (10,581 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 39,586 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the finger (28,528 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 48,123 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 4.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.05%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 8 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 4,662 | 2,310 | |
| 5-14 | 11,925 | 7,572 | |
| 15-24 | 18,417 | 9,663 | |
| 25-34 | 25,507 | 15,902 | |
| 35-44 | 30,709 | 17,305 | |
| 45-54 | 29,249 | 18,874 | |
| 55-64 | 27,365 | 17,656 | |
| 65-74 | 21,381 | 13,731 | |
| 75+ | 19,547 | 15,454 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Finger | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Finger | Crushing | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Hand | Fracture | |
| Finger | Amputation |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
58YOM PRESENTS TO ED W/ INJURY TO LEFT LONG FINGER. HE CRUSHED IT BETWEEN 2 PANELS ON GARAGE DOOR. INJURED DISTAL ASPECT OF LEFT LONG FINGER JUST PROXIMAL TO NAIL. BLEEDING CONTROLLED ON ARRIVAL. DX: CLOSED NONDISPLACED FX OF DISTAL PALANX OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER.
72YOM PRESENTS WITH DOUBLE VISION AFTER THE GARAGE DOOR HIT HIS HEAD DX: CEREBRAL VASCULAR ACCIDENT AND VISION CHANGES
52 YOM GARAGE DOOR FELL ON R HAND DX; FX 5TH MC
47YOM PATIENT STATES LAST WEDNESDAY HE WAS TRYING TO LIFT HIS GARAGE DOOR WHEN HE FELT A POP IN HIS RIGHT ARM, ARM PAIN, HE ALSO REPORTS THE GARAGE DOOR HIT HIM ON HIS NECK, NECK IS SORE AND MUSCLE SORENESS DX: MUSCLE STRAIN, RIGHT ARM PAIN
72YOM WAS THE DRIVER OF HIS CAR WHEN HE DROVE AND STRUCK HIS HOME HIT THE GARAGE DOOR AT 50 MILES AN HOUR DX: MVC; FRACTURE OF THORACIC VERTEBRA
72YOF WAS ATTEMPTING TO OPEN HER GARAGE DOOR WHEN SHE HAD A FALL BACKWARDS DX: STRAINED LEFT WRIST
61YOF WITH LAC TO FINGER FROM GARAGE DOOR DX:LAC TO FINGER
77 YOM CUT LEFT MIDDLE FINGER ON GARAGE DOOR, TAKES ***, DX: FINGER LACERATION
37YOM WAS HIT WITH A CLOSING GARAGE DOOR ON THE RIGHT UPPER ARM DX: CONTUSION UPPER ARM
69YOM, ACCIDENTALLY GOT HIS FINGER CAUGHT IN THE GARAGE DOOR PANELS WHILE CLOSING IT, DX: CLOSED FRACTURE OF TUFT OF DISTAL PHALANX OF FINGER
22YOM, WAS ADJUSTING A GARAGE DOOR WHEN THE WIRES CONNECTING IT INJURED HIS LEFT THUMB, DX: PARTIAL TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION OF RIGHT THUMB THROUGH PHALANX
51YOF, ACCIDENTALLY GOT HER FINGER CAUGHT IN THE GARAGE DOOR HAS FINGER LACERATION AND IMAGING SHOWED FRACTURE, DX: CLOSED FRACTURE OF TUFT OF DISTAL PHALANX OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER; LACERATION OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
The garage door is coming down to close and once it gets to the bottom it springs back and opens making the door open thus leaving the garage open.
Caller purchased a metal building from Eagle builders (commercial garage door) that didn't come with a garage opener. He stated that he purchased the garage opener from another company because the door is not made strong enough. The end of the garage door barrel is not made to support the bolt causing the chain to come off, this can cause the door to close on the user causing serious injuries. Caller stated that he contacted the door manufacturer and he was informed that he was informed that someone would contact him. Caller feels that this door presents a safety hazard and should be reported.
Date: April 5, 2021 Time: Approximately 18:15 MDT Location:\[REDACTED] Claimant\[REDACTED] was approaching the underbuilding parking garage entry door when the garage door opened and a Dark Gray/Silver [REDACTED] was exiting. [REDACTED] waved the [REDACTED] to exit so she could enter. [REDACTED] entered the garage while driving her[REDACTED] with a [REDACTED] and made it approximately one-third of the way into the garage when the door closed upon her car. This resulted in breaking the windshield, putting several deep, severe scratches along the roof and severely scratching the sun roof. All need to be repaired. The driver of the [REDACTED] may have pressed the button on their remote to close the door upon exiting as they normally do so this would be a habit. The garage door does not close properly. The required auto-reverse (16 CFR Part 1211) mechanism malfunctioned and continues to malfunction. [REDACTED] tested the functionality of the garage door on April 6, 2021 using the following described steps while opening and closing the garage door using both the direct wired switch for opening and closing and the Home Owner/Condo Owner Association (HOA) provided remote and found the following: 1. Utilizing the remote opener provided by the HOA and pressing the button to open the door, it opened. After remaining in the open position for a short period of time and while no other buttons or switches were activated or pressed the door will start to close on its own. I used my hands to see if I could stop the door from closing once it made contact with me as it should per 16 CFR Part 1211. The door stopped with minimal downward force and immediately opened again as it should. 2. Next test was to use the HOA provided remote opener to test and see if the auto reverse as required by 16 CFR 1211 functions properly when the remote is used to close the door rather than the timer as described above. This test replicates how the remotes are used by those who
We experienced a failed hinge on a pre-fabricated steel vehicle gate. The gate was being installed and had not received any use or force when the rivnuts became dislodged from the post and the gate dropped to the ground on the leading edge. Clearance at this locations was about 2". Had the gate been fully open the clearance would have been more than 18" and would have resulted in complete dislodgement and likely injury and or death. The fastening component of the gates are designed with a rivnut. This product is installed like a rivet and provides a point of attachment via a bolt for the hinges. The rivnut was not designed for this thick of post. Additionally, I was unable to find any engineering calculations for rivnuts.
On 10/10/2022,for the third time,the torsion spring that works as counter balance on the garage door broke without warning locking the garage door in plac
In May 2008, I purchased an installed steel insulated residential garage door for the house I was building from Lowes of Jacksonville, NC. Lowes and the manufacturer, AMARR, contracted with Griffin Garage Doors of Goldsboro, NC. The garage doors were installed in Dec 2008. The manufacturer's installation instructions state "Torsion spring and opener applications require 2" x 6" minimum spring anchor pads". Amarrs instructions are based on the guidance and standards published by the Door & Access Systems Manufacturers Association, International (DASMA). Griffin Garage Doors, AMARR's chosen installer, attached the center bearing plate of the torsion spring assembly onto a 1"x6" torsion spring pad mounted on a drywall base. While the installer used the correct 5/16" x 1 5/8" lag bolts provided by the manufacturer they effectively only had 3/4" of the lag bolt imbedded into the spring pad. Griffin has stated that they frequently installed torsion spring assembly pads onto 1"x6" anchor pads. On November 20, 2009 while inspecting and opening the door, the lag bolt anchors suddenly failed causing the torsion spring assembly center bearing plate to violently become detached from the anchor pad which struck me in the right hand causing severe physical and permanent damage to my right hand. Physical injuries included a crushing injury coupled by severe lacerations. These injuries required emergency vascular surgery with a 3 day hospital stay. 2 more additional day orthopedic surgeries were required to minimize the degree of permanent disabilities. An independent professional engineer judgment places the cause of the anchor failure on faulty installation practices. Based on statements of Amarr's installer that they frequently have installed garage doors utilizing a 1"x6" anchor pad, it is recommended that AMARR issue a recall, conduct inspections of all installed garage doors, and correct any deficiencies identified. This issue, if not corrected, places th
I purchased an overhead garage door in 2011 manufactured by Garaga. Since the door was installed, 5 (five) of the thermopane windows have imploded, most recently on 12/17/14. The local dealer (North Country Garage Doors, Inc.) has ordered replacement windows to replace the broken ones but they have so far rebuffed my attempts at resolving the real issue which is these windows are DEFECTIVE! Some of the imploded windows were in fact replacements, so the manufacturer is replacing defective windows with more defective windows. Over time, the windows come under vacuum pressure, possibly due to loss (or absorption by the dessicant used) of the inert gas that they are charged with at manufacture. The glass becomes visibly concave as the vacuum pressure increases and eventually they implode, scattering glass shards for several yards. I sent the manufacturer (Garaga) an email on 12/17/14 detailing the problem but got no response.
A gust of wind blew the door right out of its hinges. It's an aluminum back door standard size to my garage. Wife, female age 50 the product/door was being used to exit or enter garage door as intend for normal everyday use. Injury- the door caused injury to my shoulder. The door swung wide open and hit my shoulder, my shoulder causes severe pain.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Building Materials & Home Structures
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Garage Doors (excl. Automatic Garage Doors Or Openers): cross-group products nearest on danger score (38/100), estimated annual ER visits (15,362/yr), and hospitalization share (4.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Baby Carriages Nursery & Baby Products 4.5%admitted
- Musical Instrmnts, Not Elect. Or Battery Or Not Spec. Home Structures & Construction Materials 4.5%admitted
- Car Seats (for Infants Or Children) Nursery & Baby Products 4.5%admitted
- Battery Chargers/adapters Home Communication & Entertainment 4.5%admitted
Related Products in Building Materials & Home Structures
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Garage Doors (excl. Automatic Garage Doors Or Openers) ranks #256 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #152 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) ranks #256 by PlainSafety danger score (38/100) and #152 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (15,362/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers)?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 39,586 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) increasing or decreasing?
Down 18% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers) injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 48,123 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers)?
Of all ER visits involving garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers), approximately 4.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (95.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with garage doors (excl. automatic garage doors or openers)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.