Product Safety Trends 2005–2024
Two decades of CPSC NEISS data reveal a clear pattern: products subject to strong safety standards tend to improve, while emerging product categories with regulatory gaps often show rapid injury growth.
Key Takeaway
The biggest safety gains over 20 years have come from mandatory standards for children's products (car seats, cribs, inclined sleepers). The biggest worsening trends involve new product categories that outpaced regulation: e-scooters, lithium battery products, and button batteries. The pattern is predictable, the first years after a new product's mass adoption are always the most dangerous.
Products Getting Safer (2005–2024)
The following products have seen statistically significant reductions in injury rates, not just raw counts, over the 20-year NEISS dataset. Rate reductions are more meaningful than count reductions because they account for population growth and increased product adoption.
| Product | Injury Rate Change (2005–2024) | Primary Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Child Car Seats | -45% | Mandatory standards, improved design |
| Baby Walkers | -76% | ASTM mandatory standard (2010), fall prevention |
| Cigarette Lighters | -62% | Child-resistant requirement (1993, continued benefit) |
| Infant Cribs | -55% | Drop-side ban (2011), strengthened ASTM standards |
| Table Saws (professional) | -28% | Flesh-detecting safety technology (SawStop) |
| Lawn Mower Blade Contact | -31% | Improved blade-disengage dead-man controls |
| Hoverboard Fires | -96% | UL 2272 certification requirement (2016) |
Source: CPSC NEISS 2005–2024; CDC WISQARS; CPSC enforcement action data CPSC NEISS 2005–2024; CDC WISQARS; CPSC enforcement action data Rate changes are per 100,000 population
Products Getting More Dangerous (2015–2024)
Worsening trends are concentrated in two categories: new technology products that outpaced safety standards, and battery-powered products where lithium energy density has created new hazards not present in alkaline products.
| Product | ER Visits (2015) | ER Visits (2023) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-Scooters / E-Bikes | ~2,000 | ~42,000 | +2,000% |
| Button / Coin Batteries | ~2,500 | ~3,500 | +40% |
| Lithium Battery Fires | ~700 | ~2,800 | +300% |
| E-Cigarettes / Vapes | ~100 | ~2,800 | +2,700% |
| Exercise / Peloton-type Equipment | ~350,000 | ~420,000 | +20% |
Source: CPSC NEISS 2015–2023 CPSC NEISS 2015–2023 Exercise equipment increase reflects expanded home gym adoption post-2020
The Regulatory Lag Problem
The pattern in the worsening products above is consistent: new product categories grow faster than CPSC's rulemaking process can follow. Issuing a mandatory safety standard takes 3–7 years on average from initial hazard identification to final rule. During that window, millions of units reach consumers without safety requirements.
The CPSC has accelerated this process in recent years, the button battery standard was completed in record time (approximately 2 years) due to the severity of pediatric fatalities. But e-scooters and lithium battery products still lack comprehensive federal safety standards as of 2024. UL certifications exist (UL 2272 for e-scooters, UL 2580 for e-bike batteries) but are voluntary.
The COVID-19 Effect on Injury Patterns
The pandemic years (2020–2021) created unusual shifts in NEISS data. Total ER visits dropped sharply in spring 2020 (people avoided hospitals for non-emergency issues), then rebounded. Product-specific patterns shifted:
- Home exercise equipment injuries surged as gyms closed and consumers purchased treadmills, Pelotons, and free weights for home use without instruction.
- Power tool injuries increased as home improvement projects spiked among inexperienced users.
- Playground equipment injuries declined initially (closed parks) then surged as restrictions lifted.
- Disinfectant/cleaning product ingestions rose significantly in spring 2020 as households stockpiled and misused chemical products.
Watch List: Emerging Hazards (2024–2027)
Based on CPSC early warning signals and NEISS trend data, these product categories warrant monitoring over the next several years:
- Large-format lithium batteries (home energy storage, e-bike batteries): Battery fire incidents growing at 30%/year. No federal mandatory standard for residential installations.
- Smart home / IoT devices: Electrical fire incidents involving smart plugs, charging devices, and low-cost electrical imports rising. CPSC import surveillance increasingly focused here.
- Weighted blankets: Pediatric suffocation reports appearing in NEISS at increasing frequency for children under 2 using adult-weight blankets.
- Furniture tip-overs: Despite IKEA recall and increased awareness, dresser and furniture tip-over child fatalities (approximately 2/month) have not declined meaningfully.
Track Trends in Real Data
PlainSafety's product pages show 20-year injury trend charts for each of the 838 CPSC product categories. You can see exactly which products have worsening trajectories and which are improving. Start with the Worsening Trends rankings for a curated view, or browse all products to search for a specific category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which consumer product has improved the most in safety over the past 20 years?
Why are e-scooter injuries increasing so rapidly?
Have button battery injuries increased even after new CPSC standards?
Are riding lawn mowers getting safer?
How has hoverboard safety changed since the original 2015-2016 fires?
What is the overall trend in consumer product injury deaths?
Sources
- CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), 2005–2024
- CPSC Injury Statistics, cpsc.gov/safety-education/safety-guides
- SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports
- CPSC Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction, annual summaries
- UL Standards (2272, 2580) for e-mobility products
This guide is for informational purposes only. PlainSafety is not affiliated with CPSC. Trend percentages are derived from NEISS weighted estimates and are subject to sampling variability, especially for low-volume product categories. Year-to-year fluctuations in small categories may reflect sample variation rather than true population trends.