25
CPSC NEISS Data 2017–2024

Personal Fitness/activity Trackers

Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.

Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment · CPSC Code 5038

Up 32% over 5 years

The verdict

Personal Fitness/activity Trackers carry a danger score of 25/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 67 ER-treated injuries a year that are rising by about 32% over the last five years.

25/100
danger score (low risk)
67
ER visits per year (avg)
2.5%
end in hospital admission
15-24
most-injured age group

Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 5038 - last data year 2024.

PlainSafety danger score

0/100100/10025/100
PlainSafety danger score

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 25/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for personal fitness/activity trackers - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume67 ER visits/yr
  • Severity (hospitalization rate)2.5%
  • Fatality rate0.00%
  • 5-year trend+32%

See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Personal Fitness/activity Trackers (CPSC product code 5038, in the Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment category) generate an estimated 67 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 467 ER-treated injuries across the 8-year span from 2017 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 25/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are rising by about 32% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2018 (146 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (17 estimated visits).

The single most common ER diagnosis for personal fitness/activity trackers is other to the ankle, accounting for approximately 151 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by dislocation to the wrist (81 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 151 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 205 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 9 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how personal fitness/activity trackers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

67
Injuries / Year
2.5%
Hospitalization Rate
0.00%
Fatality Rate

Annual Injury Estimates (2017–2024)

050100150200 2017201820192020202120222024 56
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Personal Fitness/activity Trackers, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
15-24 78 73 151
25-34 17 73 90
35-44 20 0 20
45-54 81 18 99
55-64 73 0 73
65-74 17 0 17
75+ 0 17 17

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Ankle Other 151
Wrist Dislocation 81
Mouth Laceration 73
Finger Fracture 56
Lower Trunk Nerve Damage 20
Wrist Contusions, Abr. 18
All Parts Body Derma/conjunct 17
Ankle Contusions, Abr. 17
Upper Trunk Other 17
Wrist Other 17

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 96.4% (450)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 3.6% (17)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 49 · Male · Wrist · Dislocation · 2022

49YOM WRECKED DIRT BIKE LAST NIGHT AT 2000 IN THE GYM, INJURING WRIST AND LOWER LEGDX DISLOCATION WRIST ABRASIONS TO LOWER LEG

Age 29 · Male · Ankle · Contusions, Abr. · 2021

29YOM WAS WEARING AN ANKLE TRACKER WHILE IN A TRIATHALON AND IT CAUSED PAIN AND BRUISING TO HIS ANKLE. DX: LEFT ANKLE CONTUSION.

Age 24 · Male · Ankle · Other · 2020

24YOM C/O ANKLE PAIN DUE TO ANKLE MONITOR. DX: ACUTE ANKLE PAIN

Age 82 · Female · Wrist · Other · 2020

82YOF, DEVELOPED REDNESS/ULCERATION ON WRIST @ THE SITE OF HER ***&NOW WITH WORSENING REDNESS DX: CELLULITIS

Age 41 · Male · Lower Trunk · Nerve Damage · 2019

41YOM, C/O WORSENING LOW BACK PAIN RADIATING TO BUTTOCKS&LOWER LEG SINCE SITTING ON A TRACKER YESTERDAY DX: ACUTE LT SIDED LOW BACK WITH LT SIDED SCIATICA

Age 46 · Female · Wrist · Contusions, Abr. · 2019

46YF WAS WEARING RIGID *** BRACELET WHILE DOING YARDWORK&RUBBED AGAINST THE WRIST DX: ECCHYMOSIS

Age 17 · Female · Mouth · Laceration · 2018

17YOF WAS HIT IN THE LIP WITH A *** WHILE PLAYING BASKETBALL DX LIPLACERATION

Age 55 · Male · Ankle · Other · 2018

55YOM STARTED WALKING LONG DISTANCES AFTER PURCHASED *** , HURTING 10 DAYS DX: L ANKLE PAIN/ OVERUSE

Age 31 · Female · All Parts Body · Derma/conjunct · 2017

31 YO F WEARS A FITNESS TRACKER SUSPECTED IT CAUSE HIVES ALL OVER BODYURTICARIA

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/8/2019 · Injury, Hospital Admission · Fitbit, Inc · Connecticut

My daughter who is a perfectly healthy 38-year-old female decided to buy a Fitbit to monitor different things in her body. She bought the Fitbit and put it on and the very next night she began to have panic attacks which she’s never had before. She had so many of them that she needed to be hospitalized for eight days. It is week three now and she continues to have a racing heart and her whole life has been turned upside down. She finally realized, after she kept waking up during the night, and feeling very fatigued and just generally ill, that she finally started looking into the Fitbit and found numerous responses from people and how this item is affecting them. It seems more than a coincidence that she has become ill after wearing this for an extended period of time. She finally removed it from her and had a decent nights sleep but she continues to have a racing heart incident at least twice a day. Although it may seem coincidental, she has been completely healthy, and all of her tests on her body organs have come back positive, but the problem now seems to be something in her brain is not firing right. We are fully convinced that this item has done something to her, and I am asking that you look into this because numerous people have put down their experiences which have been very bad ones. Please if you can investigate what this item is doing to people and possibly have it taken off the market. Thank you and I hope this issue can be resolved so other people don’t have to go through this

9/7/2017 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · Fitbit, Inc · Virginia

I have developed a rash from wearing my Fitbit charge 2. It looks like a burn.

9/5/2020 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · Fitbit, Inc · Unspecified

Watch is leaving a red burn mark on my wrist.

9/4/2017 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · Fitbit, Inc · California

Rash on wrist caused by band. Slowly going away. 6-Days so far, and rash is not totally gone.

9/30/2017 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Walmart Stores Inc. · Louisiana

I puchased a BlackWeb brand Replacement Fitbit band from Walmart in DeRidder, Louisiana. I have worn it for a while, of course taking it off at night and when I shower/do dishes. On 28 September my wrist began to get itchy and red. I took the watch off, and it stopped. I worn it again the next day and half way through the day had to take it off because it was itching and burning. I have a horrid rash on my wrist where the band touches my skin. Note that it is not where the Fitbit device touches the top of my wrist. I’ve reached out to walmart to no avail. I see on the package that this product is made in China, and I do not believe it is safe for everyday use. I have to wait until 2 Oct to see my doctor because the rash will not stop burning.

9/29/2019 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · Fitbit, Inc · Virginia

I purchased a Fitbit Charge2 tracker. It leaves a severe rash my wrists.

9/28/2021 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · Garmin International, Inc. · Virginia

I have owned Garmin fitness watches for perhaps as many 4 years (Vivoactive HR since 2018 & Vivoactive 4 since 2020-- the Vivoactive HR was replaced twice for issues unrelated to the medically related one addressed in this complaint). "When did this happen" goes back about 3.5 years, <one year after I purchased my first Garmin, the Vivoactive HR. "Where" this happened was whenever/wherever the watch was on my wrist -- either wrist following the first 4 mos - 1 yr.

9/24/2025 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · Fitbit, Inc · Michigan

What happened that made you want to report? While wearing the fitbit it began to be painful and irritated. The fitbit was removed to reveal a burn like skin reaction. What type of product(s) were being used? Fitbit Ace3 Who was using the product(s)? A 7 year old girl How were the product(s) being used? The product was being used in it's typical design intent manor. The consumer had previously used the product for approximately 8 months without prior issue. Were there any injuries that happened or may have happened while using the product? Yes, the wrist area that comes in contact with the back of the Fitbit was injured. How did any injuries occur? It is unclear what the true root cause of the injury was, however the skin damage is precisely in the shape of the area that the Fitbit was contacting so it appears very obvious to be caused by some interaction between the skin and Fitbit.

Showing 8 of 205 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to personal fitness/activity trackers on the CPSC website.

Frequently Asked Questions

How dangerous are personal fitness/activity trackers?

Based on 20 years of CPSC data, personal fitness/activity trackers have a danger score of 25/100 (low risk). An estimated 67 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.

What are the most common injuries from personal fitness/activity trackers?

The most common injury is other to the ankle, accounting for approximately 151 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from personal fitness/activity trackers increasing or decreasing?

Up 32% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for personal fitness/activity trackers injuries?

The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 151 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by personal fitness/activity trackers?

Of all ER visits involving personal fitness/activity trackers, approximately 2.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with personal fitness/activity trackers?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Safety Guides

What this means for you

Treat the 25/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.

  • See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
  • Injuries cluster in the 15-24 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
  • Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls

NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.

Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.