Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2018, Baby Carriers Or Slings (backpacks) ranks #780 of 838 by danger score (25/100) at ER-volume #607 of 838 (709/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #780
- danger rank of 838
- #607
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 25/100
- danger score
- 709/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (25/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
25 Among the lowest lower than 93% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2018
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 48/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 8 | 66th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 709 | 29th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -100% | 24th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 34 | 64th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 9,947 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1527. Segments sum to 9,947 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Nursery & Baby Products group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Nursery & Baby Products danger scores
How this 25/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for baby carriers or slings (backpacks) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 709 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 8.2% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-100%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 14-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2018, injury counts for baby carriers or slings (backpacks) are declining by about 100% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2017 (1,799 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2011 (272 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 3,365 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by contusions, abr. to the face (534 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 6,990 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 8.2% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 34 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how baby carriers or slings (backpacks) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2018-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2018)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 3,311 | 3,679 | |
| 5-14 | 326 | 172 | |
| 15-24 | 15 | 568 | |
| 25-34 | 192 | 506 | |
| 35-44 | 68 | 716 | |
| 45-54 | 48 | 163 | |
| 55-64 | 0 | 17 | |
| 65-74 | 91 | 55 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Fracture | |
| Not Stated/unk | Other | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| All Parts Body | Other | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Wrist | Strain, Sprain | |
| Neck | Other | |
| Elbow | Dislocation | |
| Knee | Strain, Sprain | |
| Shoulder | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
*4MOM,PT ON CARRIER FATHER LEANED TO FIX OTHER CHILD SUIT,FELL OUT OF CARRIER HIT SIDEOFHEAD,DX:HEAD INJURY
*6MOM,ON CARRIER FORGOT TO STRAP PT IN,FELL OUT CARRIER,STRUCK HEAD,FOREHEAD SWELLING,DX:BHT
*29YOM,GETTING SONS PACK OUT OF CAR STRUCK HEAD,TWISTED BACK,PAIN LOWBACK,DX:LUMBAR STRAIN
36YOF EVAL OF LOW BK PNX2 HRS PTA, PT BENT OVER TO PU A BACKPACK & FELTRIPPING SENSATION TO LOW BK DX ACUTE BL LOW BK PN W/O SCIATICA
34 YOF THUMB STRAIN, REPORTS HAVING A 3 MONTH OLD BABY AND HAS BEEN CARRY CHILD IN BABY CARRIER A LOT AND DEVELOPED PAIN TO THUMB
^9MOF EVAL S/P FALL.MOM STS TK PT FROM STRAP ON CARRIER PLACED ON PASS SEAT OF CAR,MOM DISTRACTED, PT FELL ON GRASS FACE DN DX CHI
35 YOF CHEST WALL STRAIN, REPORTS CARRYING A BABY IN BABY CARRIER WHEN SHE DEVELOPED PAIN TO CHEST
6WKOF BEING CARRIED IN *** CARRIER WHEN STRAP CAME APART AND BABY FELLTO LINOLEUM FLOOR, HITTING HEAD. NO LOC. DX: SUDBURAL HEMATOMA
6 MOF BEING CARRIED ON MOTHER IN BABY SLING WHEN DOG PULLED KNOCKING MOTHER DOWN IN THE STREET, BABY HIT HEAD, DX: CHI, FACIAL ABRASION
41YF BEEN USING A CARRIER TO CARRY HER BABY AROUND, ALSO IN PROCESS OF MOVING OUT&BEEN LIFTING HEAVY BOXES C/O SHOULDER PAIN>>MS
6MO F MOM CARRYIGN BABY IN BABY CARRIER SLING, FELL OUT OF SLING TO FLOOR;DX CHI
3 MOM IN A BABY CARRIER AND MOM SLIPPED ON ICE. PT HIT HEAD. DX HEAD INJURY
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I purchased a Thule Infant Sling for my Chariot stroller http://www.thule.com/en-us/us/products/active-with-kids/multifunctional-child-carriers/accessories/thule-infant-sling-_-20101000. The sling is an infant hammock style device and has 4 tie in supports and allows an infant with no head control to use a stroller unit designed for older more upright childen. My sling was less than 2 weeks old on its third use, and the upper support's stitching gave way on one of the support straps causing it to turn my daughter sideways (she was strapped into it and did not fall out, was only badly scared) and her head to flop down. The stitching had completely ripped out with my three month old using the product (it is marketed for 1-10 months), so guessing much larger and heavier kids than my daughter are using this thing. Further, my family was over a mile from home on a walk, and because the sling is the only safe way for an infant to use the stroller, we had to hand carry her all the way home, causing her to get over-exposed to the sun, since she could not sit in the shade of the stroller as we had planned. It seems dangerous that this product is designed to hold the full weight of infants in an active setting and is so poorly designed that the stitching will completely fail on the main components holding the child up. It could easily result in a serious injury, not to mention since its a product designed for mobility could fail at very inconvenient times for parents who are far from home and have no other method for safely transporting their child.
The maker of the carriers being sold through BabyJunk stated she was not in compliance with flammability testing requirements, insurance, or lead testing requirements.
While wearing my twins in the twingaroo carrier the waist buckle suddenly became unbuckled. Luckily I'm an experienced babywearer so I was able to grab both babies before the fell out of the carrier. The buckle has never been damaged and was properly secured prior to wearing both infants.
I was wearing my omni 360 ergo baby carrier with my 7 week old daughter in the front. I kneeled down to get my keys out of my purse. I had my left arm over the top so she wouldn't fall out the top and my daughter fell out the side. My daughter landed on the back of her head on the pavement. I heard her head smack the pavement both of her arms went next to her head and she looked like she had a seizure. She got a closed head injury. She had to have a head ct and Ct of spine. She also had to have labs and urine test done. This was a terrible experience. Please review this product. I am a trauma nurse at a children's hospital. I don't want anyone else's child to get hurt. This product is for children 7lbs to 45lbs. My daughter weighed at least 8.5 lbs when this happened.
Purchased this item from OnbuBaby (www.onbubaby.com) (owner [REDACTED]) on July 13th, 2015 under the assumption this carrier had passed all required safety and compliance testing as required by law. I was informed on September the 15th that this carrier/onbubaby/[REDACTED] had not, at the time of my ordering the carrier and to my knowledge still has not passed the required compliance. In addition the carrier is already starting to pull apart where the straps meet the bod of the carrier after very little use (less than 10 times).
When being worn briefly the waist strap loosened on it's own. When washed the dye bled excessively from the straps. Several washes and rinses later the color was still running.
Our baby was riding in the Osprey Poco Plus Child Carrier backpack on my husband's back while we were walking on the beach. Our baby is approximately 27 lbs and is 22 months old. She wiggled one leg out of the carrier so that both legs fell into one leg hole. She began to slip out of the baby carrier through the leg hole but got stuck. Her head/neck was caught on the shoulder strap. My husband realized there was a problem and took the back pack off, getting our baby's feet on solid ground. This prevented her from obtaining any injuries such as strangulation. She could have been "hung" by the her head/neck being caught in the strap. Our baby was okay, but I hadn't thought it was even possible for her to get both legs through one hole. [In another instance, she was able to shrug her shoulders out from under the shoulder straps and stand up in the carrier (by putting her feet on the middle seat divider) completely unstrapped. Again, injury was avoided because my husband and I saw what happened and took her out of the carrier.]
I received the product today from Amazon where it is listed for sale for $59.99. Within 10 minutes of using the carrier a strap broke and a clip came off. There's a zipper connecting the carrier to a seat part on the waistband and the zipper pulls apart. No injuries. I didn't see any labels saying it had been tested for safety so I kept hands on my daughter at all times because I am well versed in carriers. The carrier doesn't have a weight limit listed, only an age maximum (40 months) and I know that's not how the safety of a carrier is tested. I contacted the company and asked if they are compliant with safety testing and they said, "we are compliant with Amazon, don't worry." I told them I meant the actual safety laws that are in place to keep children safe and they were completely dismissive and dodged the question. They claim to be a company out of Delaware but their product is made in China.
Showing 8 of 34 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to baby carriers or slings (backpacks) on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Nursery & Baby Products
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Baby Carriers Or Slings (backpacks): cross-group products nearest on danger score (25/100), estimated annual ER visits (709/yr), and hospitalization share (8.2%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Nursery & Baby Products
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Baby Carriers Or Slings (backpacks) ranks #780 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #607 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does baby carriers or slings (backpacks) rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, baby carriers or slings (backpacks) ranks #780 by PlainSafety danger score (25/100) and #607 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (709/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from baby carriers or slings (backpacks)?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 3,365 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from baby carriers or slings (backpacks) increasing or decreasing?
Down 100% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for baby carriers or slings (backpacks) injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 6,990 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by baby carriers or slings (backpacks)?
Of all ER visits involving baby carriers or slings (backpacks), approximately 8.2% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (91.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with baby carriers or slings (backpacks)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.