CPSC NEISS · code 982

School Laboratory Chemicals

School Laboratory Chemicals: danger rank #659 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #646 of 838 (364 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Home Workshop Tools & Equipment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, School Laboratory Chemicals ranks #659 of 838 by danger score (30/100) at ER-volume #646 of 838 (364/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#659
danger rank of 838
#646
ER-volume rank of 838
30/100
danger score
364/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (30/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

30 Among the lowest lower than 79% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 33/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 4 32nd 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 364 21st 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +4% 72nd 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 2 25th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 7,281 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 982. Segments sum to 7,281 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores

1. Gasoline47/1002. Methyl Alcohol (solvent)45/1003. Caustics43/1004. Lye42/1005. Gasoline Cans41/1006. Paints, Varnishes Or Shel…41/1007. General Purpose Household…41/1008. School Laboratory Chemica…30/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10030/100
PlainSafety danger score · School Laboratory Chemicals

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 30/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for school laboratory chemicals - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 364 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.8% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+4%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for school laboratory chemicals are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (666 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2013 (122 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 2,360 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by derma/conjunct to the eyeball (818 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 4,962 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 2 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how school laboratory chemicals fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

0200400600800 20052008201120142017202020232024 666
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for School Laboratory Chemicals, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 24 0 24
5-14 527 370 897
15-24 2,166 2,796 4,962
25-34 593 697 1,290
35-44 16 81 97
55-64 0 15 15

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
All Parts Body Poisoning 2,360
Eyeball Derma/conjunct 818
Eyeball Other 683
Eyeball Burn, Chemical 618
Face Burn, Chemical 368
Lower Arm Burn, Chemical 332
All Parts Body Anoxia 201
Face Other 199
Hand Burn, Chemical 175
Upper Leg Burn, Chemical 167
All Parts Body Other 111
Face Derma/conjunct 109
Finger Laceration 95
Mouth Other 87
Foot Burn, Chemical 82

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 90.3% (6,577)
Left Without Being Seen 5.8% (425)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 2.4% (175)
Treated And Transferred 1.3% (98)
Held For Observation 0.1% (6)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 26 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

26 YOF PRESENTED WITH LIGHTHEADEDNESS, NAUSEA, ABDOMENAL CRAMPS, STUDENT IN LAB, ACCIDENTALLY SPILLED CHLOROFORM, ISOAMYL, EYTHER, AT SCHOOL. DX-EXPOSURE TO CHEMICAL INHALATION

Age 15 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

15YOF WAS IN CHEMISTRY IN SCHOOL WHEN SHE INHALED AN UNKNOWN CHEMICAL AND BECAME SHORT OF BREATH.DX: EXPOSURE TO CHEMICAL IRRITANT.

Age 20 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

20YOF WAS WORKING IN A SCHOOL CHEMISTRY LAB AND EXPOSED TO UNK CHEMICAL, PT C/O OF THROAT IRRITATION WITH SOB, DX EXPOSURE TO CHEMICAL IRRITANT IN SCHOOL LAB

Age 20 · Male · Hand · Burn, Chemical · 2024

20 YOM WAS IN A CHEMISTRY LAB MIXING POTASSIUM NITRATE, IRON OXIDE, TITANIUM SPONGE POWDER, AND SORBITOL AT 125 C WHEN IT EXPLODED. AT THE TIME PATIENT WAS WEARING A PROTECTIVE LAB JACKET, FACIAL SHIELD, BUT NO GLOVES. SUSTAINED IMMEDIATE BURNS TO HIS ENTIRE LEFT HAND PAST HIS WRIST. DX: CHEMICAL BURN, PARTIAL THICKNESS CHEMICAL BURN OF LEFT HAND.

Age 24 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

24YOF PRESENTS W/ C/O COUGH, ASTHMA EXACERBATION FOR 1 WEEK. STATES SHE IS AN ORGANIC CHEM STUDENT, AND WAS IN HER LAB WHEN SOMEONE DROPPED AN UNKNOWN CHEMICAL WHICH TRIGGERED HER SYMPTOMS DX: MODERATE PERSISTENT ASTHMA WITH EXACERBATION

Age 15 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

15YOF HERE BECAUSE EARLIER TODAY - AROUND 11AM, SHE WAS DOING A SCIENCE EXPERIMENT IN SCHOOL AND MISTAKENLY HAD SOME OF THE SOLUTION IN HER MOUTH, SAYS IT WAS A SMALL AMOUNT AND SPAT IT OUT IMMEDIATELY. THE SOLUTION WAS 8 PARTS WATER 21 PART BROMOTHYMOL BLUE. DX: ACCIDENTAL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID POISONING

Age 10 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

10YOM PRESENTS WITH INGESTION OF *** WHEN ANOTHER CHILD AT SCHOOL WAS PLAYING WITH IT IN CLASS WHEN IT BLEW INTO HIS MOUTH; PATIENT LEFT WITHOUT TREATMENT DX: NOT STATED

Age 10 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

10YOM PRESENTS WITH NAUSEA AND ABDOMINAL PAIN AFTER CONSUMING 3 TABLESPOONS OF *** WHILE MAKING *** AT SCHOOL TODAY ON A DARE FROM A FRIEND DX: CHEMICAL EXPOSURE, ADJUSTMENT DISORDER, ADHD, PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP PROBLEM

Age 36 · Female · Mouth · Burn, Chemical · 2024

36YOF PRESENTS WITH MOUTH BLISTER AND CONCERN FOR CHEMICAL BURN TO THROAT AFTER BEING EXPOSED TO DICHLOROPHENOL IN CHEMISTRY LAB; PATIENT LEFT WITHOUT TREATMENT DX: CHEMICAL EXPOSURE

Age 18 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

18YOM WHO IS *** STUDENT PRESENTS AFTER INHALING UNKNOWN REAFENT FROM CHEMISTRY LAB DX: EXPOSURE TO CHEMICAL INHALATION

Age 27 · Male · Face · Burn, Chemical · 2024

27YOM P/W FACIAL BURN INJURIES. PATIENT IS A *** STUDENT WHO WAS WORKING WITH A SOLUTION OF LITHIUM CHLORIDE AND POLYVINYL ALCOHOL WHEN IT EXPLODED ON HIS FACE. SOLUTION BURNED RIGHT SIDED OF FACE PRIMARILY. PT WITH SUPERFICIAL BURNS SCATTERED OVER R. FOREHEAD. ED DX: BURN

Age 16 · Female · Mouth · Burn, Chemical · 2024

16YOF TOUCHED FLAKES OF SODIUM HYDROXIDE AT SCHOOL THEN TOUCHED HER LIP, C/O BLISTERING. DX: CHEMICAL BURN OF LIP.

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

12/21/2017 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · Glo Germ Company · Michigan

Hello, my name is [REDACTED]. Mother of a [REDACTED]. She attends [REDACTED] Elementary, at [REDACTED], MI. My daughter and half her class had a severe chemical reaction to your product. It was used by Ferris State Univeristy in Michigan to teach the kids about hand-washing . It occurred on . 11-10-17. The teachers called us parents inside for a special meeting. Half the class had ice bags on I their bright red, itching faces, necks and hands. The school said it may have been contact dermatitis and ---to-ke p-an -eye-Gn-th&--kids They-saiEl-te-see-a-ElGGter--if/when-needed.,- I--teelr[REDACTED]-te-the-ER-that-day. -­ The ER doctor said it looked like a chemical burn and it was not a contagious illness. They prescribed medication. My daughter's face hurt to even touch it for 5 days. It itched severely, even after the redness left it (after meds were given) . [REDACTED] has a scar from the burn :m her face, now. It slowly healed. [REDACTED] told me that other kids told her, that it burned their hands when they touched the glow-in-the dark lotion. [REDACTED] said that wherever they touched their hands, it burned and itched severely. I saw half her class with ice bags on their faces. They all had a severe reaction. It occurred at the same time, after they used the lotion. I found out that that batch was used at [REDACTED]. The school nurse ([REDACTED]) said that they disposed of that batch and that batch wont be used again. The principal called me last week and told me: the school wont use that lotion again and not on my daughter. I am still very concerned, that it may not have been just that batch. It may have been the product in general. It affected half the children in her class and my daughter, severely. My daughter and others sought medical care. I am concerned about anyone using this product, esp those with chemical allergies (like my daughter and -her class). I pray that this email gets noticed . I don 't see the school calling the

10/12/2023 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Science Interactive Group · Illinois

I experienced long-term chemical exposure from an unused chemistry lab kit made by Science Interactive. It was stored in its original box in a shared bedroom up on a shelf in the closet. Without my knowledge, the liquid chemicals were evaporating and forming gases, causing me respiratory issues for months starting around February 2023. I had it for a year and a half when the respiratory issues started because of the kit. I experienced coughing if I had been near where the kit was stored, such as sitting at my desk, and I would also get a burning sensation in my lungs. During these months the burning feeling would last around half an hour after leaving the area and would become a lighter irritation after more time passed. I noticed that the symptoms would only start when I was in my room around that area. Not knowing the cause, I got an air purifier for the desk, which didn't help. I also searched for mold, and I contacted a testing company. I suspected a chemical was causing the symptoms, but I didn't suspect the kit at that point because nothing inside had been opened. I was concerned and tried to avoid the area while also trying to figure out the cause. I then started to clean out the room. In May I emailed Science Interactive asking how to dispose of the unused lab kit. On May 31st I opened the box and saw that the chemicals had been evaporating because there was little liquid in the bottles. I was scared but quickly took a few pictures to show a professor and then closed the box. Minutes later I started coughing and experiencing the familiar burning sensation, so I then knew this was what had been causing my respiratory issues. I messaged a professor and brought the kit to campus with the help of her instructions. Even after removing it, I continued to experience the burning sensation for many days. I emailed Science Interactive explaining the situation and asked to speak with someone about their product's safety or a chemistry expert. There were so many liqu

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to school laboratory chemicals on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for School Laboratory Chemicals: cross-group products nearest on danger score (30/100), estimated annual ER visits (364/yr), and hospitalization share (3.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, School Laboratory Chemicals ranks #659 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #646 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does school laboratory chemicals rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, school laboratory chemicals ranks #659 by PlainSafety danger score (30/100) and #646 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (364/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from school laboratory chemicals?

The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 2,360 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from school laboratory chemicals increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for school laboratory chemicals injuries?

The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 4,962 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by school laboratory chemicals?

Of all ER visits involving school laboratory chemicals, approximately 3.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with school laboratory chemicals?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on School Laboratory Chemicals is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.