CPSC NEISS · code 1409

Other Power Garden Tools

Other Power Garden Tools: danger rank #684 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #647 of 838 (364 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 25% over the last five years).

Lawn & Garden Equipment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Other Power Garden Tools ranks #684 of 838 by danger score (29/100) at ER-volume #647 of 838 (364/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#684
danger rank of 838
#647
ER-volume rank of 838
29/100
danger score
364/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (29/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

29 Among the lowest lower than 82% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 35/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 6 48th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 364 21st 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -25% 27th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 6 37th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 7,274 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1409. Segments sum to 7,274 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Lawn & Garden Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Lawn & Garden Equipment danger scores

1. Lawn Mowers, Not Specified47/1002. Riding Power Lawn Mowers44/1003. Manual Snow Or Ice Remova…44/1004. Snow Throwers, Blowers44/1005. Decorative Yard Equipment…43/1006. Garden Hoses, Nozzles Or …42/1007. Pruning Or Trimming Equip…41/1008. Other Power Garden Tools29/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10029/100
PlainSafety danger score · Other Power Garden Tools

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 29/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for other power garden tools - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 364 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 5.6% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-25%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for other power garden tools are declining by about 25% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2017 (908 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (16 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,103 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (411 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,441 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 5.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 6 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how other power garden tools fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

02004006008001K 20052008201120142017202020232024 384
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Other Power Garden Tools, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
5-14 567 228 795
15-24 717 0 717
25-34 246 302 548
35-44 1,270 171 1,441
45-54 983 163 1,146
55-64 944 146 1,090
65-74 552 155 707
75+ 579 253 832

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 1,103
Hand Laceration 411
Head Internal Injury 395
Finger Fracture 340
Lower Leg Laceration 277
Head Laceration 265
Finger Amputation 243
Lower Arm Laceration 227
Upper Trunk Other 222
Face Laceration 218
Hand Crushing 168
Foot Contusions, Abr. 164
Lower Trunk Other 163
Wrist Strain, Sprain 161
Hand Other 130

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 90.5% (6,583)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 4.1% (298)
Treated And Transferred 2.7% (198)
Left Without Being Seen 2.7% (195)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 77 · Male · Upper Trunk · Other · 2024

77 YOM INJURED RIB ON GARDENING TOOL DX: PAIN

Age 18 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2024

18 YOM WAS USING ELECTRIC GARDEN CUTTERS/SHEARS, CUT 5TH FINGER ON LEFT HAND. DX: FINGER LAC AND FX

Age 71 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

71YOF COMES TO THE ER FOR A WOUND CHECK. SHE STATEE SHE CUT HER FINGER WHEN USING AN ELECTRIC GARDEN TOOL, EXAM SHOWS A LACERATION OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER. DX: LACERATION WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY LEFT MIDDLE FINGER WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 10 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2024

10YOM, BROUGHT BY MOTHER, WAS AT HOME HELPING HIS OLDER BROTHER DO YARDWORK JUST PRIOR TO ARRIVAL, WAS USING AN ELECTRIC GARDENING TOOL, WHEN IT ACCIDENTALLY CAUGHT HIS FINGER, DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER; OPEN FRACTURE OF DISTAL PHALANX OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER

Age 10 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2024

10YOM WAS USING AN ELECTRIC GARDENING TOOL AT HOME WHEN HE ACCIDENTALLY CUT HIS RIGHT INDEX FINGER DX: OPEN FRACTURE OF FINGER, LACERATION FINGER

Age 68 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

68YOF WAS WORKING IN HER GARDEN AND CUT FINGER USING A GARDEN TOOL. DX: LEFT FINGER LAC

Age 65 · Male · Hand · Nerve Damage · 2024

65YOM PRESENTS WITH HAND TINGLING AND NUMBNESS AFTER WORKING IN HIS YARD USING POWER TOOLS. DX: IDIOPATHIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY

Age 6 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

6YOM TOUCHED SHARP PART OF ELECTRIC TRIMMER WHILE DAD WAS DOING YARD WORK DX: LACERATION OF FINGER

Age 57 · Male · Hand · Fracture · 2023

57 YOM C/O INJ TO WRIST/HAND AFTER HE WAS STRUCK BY HANDLE OF POWER POST HOLE DIGGER AT HOME DX CONTUSION WRIST/HAND, METACARPAL FX

Age 20 · Male · Finger · Amputation · 2023

20YOM WITH LAC. TO FINGER, USING ELECTRIC TOOLS.DX: TIP AMPUTATION LEFT INDEX FINGER.

Age 33 · Female · Finger · Amputation · 2023

33 YOF USING A GARDEN SHREDDER AND FINGER GOT CAUGHT IN THE BLADE DX AMPUTATION

Age 49 · Male · Lower Trunk · Nerve Damage · 2023

49 YOM RENTED A MACHINE FOR YARD WORK YESTERDAY AND THE MACHINE JERKED PT FORWARD.DX: RIGHT SIDED LOW BACK PAIN WITH RIGHT SIDED SCIATICA

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

7/16/2020 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · Harbor Freight Tools · Texas

(06/15/2020) The consumer stated that he followed the instructions provided with the product. This was also the first time that he had used the product. The consumer had the product outside in his pasture. Also, there was no wind on that day. He started the post hole digger up and within 15 minutes, he has passed out from the exhaust gases aimed toward face. The consumer stated that he was out for a few seconds and eventually made it back to his patio to recover. The consumer stated that his wife is a critical nurse, so no other medical attention was required.

6/4/2013 · Unspecified · Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. · Indiana

Toro handheld power head, model 51945, sn 311006335, mfg date 11-04-1. Leaking fuel from fitting in gas tank, fire hazard. Powerhead is approximatly 1 year old. Fuel tank has rubber grommet with 2 holes for fuel line and return line to pass through. Grommet appears to have shrunk and no longer seals the tank. When running fuel drips from tank. Fuel tank assy pn is 310833001.

6/23/2025 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · Yibei-tech · Pennsylvania

purchased a motorized honey extractor on ebay numerous unfinished edges on metal parts sustained deep wound on my leg. The most dangerous problem is exposed 110 volt wiring in the area where the honey is extracted the frames spin at a high speed and it covers all areas !there is no ground fault protector on the ac power cord ! this product is inferior and very dangerous it is imported without any inspections !

6/22/2025 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · Power Planter, Inc. · Pennsylvania

I was sustained a serious avulsion (to the bone) using the power planterauger. The auger advertisers depicts women in shorts and completely inappropriate footwear and sockless in many videos. It also makes the claim to work in rocky soil. (It does not). It hit a rock and kicked back stricking my shin. I was dresses much more appropriate than individuals marketing the ad!

4/25/2012 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · ECHO Inc. · Florida

echo ea-410 earth auger, used for drilling holes to plant flowers, fence posts. When in use the exhaust gases from the motor blow directly in the face of the operator. It is a design problem.

12/14/2018 · Incident, No Injury · ARDISAM INC · California

Hello I bought a gasoline powered post hole digger from [REDACTED] item number 6062 250 they say to store it with gasoline in the tank and following their directions with the gas additive in it. I soon found out that if you do this the gas tank will explode because of improper venting of the tank. If it would’ve done this while running it would’ve been a huge fireball. The fuel tank of this model should be recalled or taken off the market I have tried to contact them and so far they have not gotten back to me and it has been months.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to other power garden tools on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Lawn & Garden Equipment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Other Power Garden Tools: cross-group products nearest on danger score (29/100), estimated annual ER visits (364/yr), and hospitalization share (5.6%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Other Power Garden Tools ranks #684 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #647 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does other power garden tools rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, other power garden tools ranks #684 by PlainSafety danger score (29/100) and #647 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (364/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from other power garden tools?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,103 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from other power garden tools increasing or decreasing?

Down 25% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for other power garden tools injuries?

The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,441 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by other power garden tools?

Of all ER visits involving other power garden tools, approximately 5.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (94.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with other power garden tools?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Other Power Garden Tools is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.