Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Paints, Varnishes Or Shellacs ranks #137 of 838 by danger score (41/100) at ER-volume #153 of 838 (15,133/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #137
- danger rank of 838
- #153
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 41/100
- danger score
- 15,133/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (41/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
41 Higher than most more dangerous than 79% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 73/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 10 | 77th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 15,133 | 78th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -10% | 51st | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 57 | 76th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 302,678 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 960. Segments sum to 302,678 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores
How this 41/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for paints, varnishes or shellacs - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 15,133 ER visits/yr High volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 9.4% High admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.09% Above-typical fatality rate
- 5-year trend-10%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for paints, varnishes or shellacs are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2016 (17,744 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (13,135 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 40,131 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by strain, sprain to the lower trunk (19,957 cases). The 45-54 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 59,261 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 9.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.09%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 57 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how paints, varnishes or shellacs fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 8,586 | 6,144 | |
| 5-14 | 8,065 | 5,207 | |
| 15-24 | 15,160 | 11,651 | |
| 25-34 | 25,070 | 17,565 | |
| 35-44 | 30,675 | 20,197 | |
| 45-54 | 34,449 | 24,812 | |
| 55-64 | 27,756 | 19,400 | |
| 65-74 | 17,080 | 13,464 | |
| 75+ | 11,231 | 6,143 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| All Parts Body | Other | |
| Shoulder | Other | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Neck | Strain, Sprain | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Upper Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Eyeball | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
19YOM WAS BURNING A FIRE IN A BARREL AND THREW AN AEROSOL PAINT CAN IN AND IT EXPLODED, AND A LOT OF THE PAIN GOT HIS ARMS AND HIS RIGHT FACE., UNKNOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENT. DX: ARM BURN AND FACE BURN
79YOF C/O R KNEE PAIN & SWELLING AFTER SLIPPED ON PAINT LAST NIGHT DX KNEE PAIN
51YOF PRESENTS WITH COUGH THAT HAS LASTED FOR ABOUT 3 TO 4 DAYS, REPORTS IT STARTED AFTER SHE HAD BEEN REFINISHING FLOORS AND WAS EXPOSED TO POLYURETHANE. DX: BRONCHITIS
28YOM REDNESS AND PAIN TO FINGER WHEN HAVING A FINGER ABRASION AND GOT SPRAY PAINT IN ITDX PARONYCHIA FINGER
51YOM PAINTING IN SMALL ROOM WITH DOOR SHUT AND C/O DIZZINESS AND VOMITINGDX CVA
61YOM STATES THAT HE WAS PAINTING AND DOING CHORES AROUND HIS HOUSE WHEN HE DEVELOPED PAIN IN HIS CHEST AND UPPER BACK DX: ACUTE THORACIC BACK PAIN
73YOF PRESENTS AFTER SHE TRIPPED OVER A PAINT CAN IN HER BASEMENT AND FELL ONTO HER RIGHT ARM AND RIGHT HIP. DX: PAIN IN RIGHT SHOULDER; PAIN IN RIGHT HIP
49 YOF R SHOUDLER PAIN PAINTING AT HOME DX; SHOULDER PAIN
57YOF WITH SOB AND WORSENING ASTHMA AND STATES PEOPLE HAVE BEEN COMING TO HER HOUSE TO DO TREATMENT ON THE WALLS DUE TO LEAD PAINT DX: ASTHMA
15MOF TO ER W/ MOM COMING FROM PEDIATRICIAN THIS AM & HAVING A LEAD LEVEL 27 2 X'S, PEDITRICIIAN SAD TO BRING PT TO ER , MOM SAYS LIVES IN RELATIVLY NEW HOME, MOM SAYS HAS NOTICED PT EATING PAINT CHIPS LATELY , PT HAD LAB DRAWN , MOM & BABY LEFT ER W/O COMPLETING SERVICE DX ENCOUNTER FOR SCREENING, ELEVATED BLOOD LEAD LEVEL
79 YOM WAS UP PAINTING THIS MORNING, GOT UP FROM A CHAIR AND TRIPPED OVER THE CHAIR FALLING OVER. DX: EAR ABRASION LEFT.
27YOM C/O LEFT KNEE PAIN S/P PT STATES LAST WEDNESDAY HE WAS PAINTING AND FELT POPS IN HIS KNEE WITH IMMEDIATE PAIN. DX: LEFT KNEE PAIN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I am an accredited U.S.EPA instructor and University research member. As such parents from around the states contact me when they have concerns over Lead. Recently, a parent from Florida contacted me because her child had a lead level of 11ug and her house was not painted with lead paint. The home was constructed in 1978. Interviewing the parent I discovered that they recently had a bathroom remodeled and no one controlled the dust. A certified inspector was called to the home and discovered that the remaining tile (just like that remodeled) registered over 20mg/cm2. It is possible the child was contaminated by the remodeling dust because he crawled on the carpet close to the area remodeled and only normal house cleaning (not abatement cleaning) was used. The parent's, now being aware of lead and its hazards panicked and had everything in the house tested. The child's school project painted with "Coloration" Green Glitter Paint registered (.4mg/cm2). This product concerns me. Many teachers buy this product from "Discount School Supplies" on line. Can CPSC test the product as purchased from this online service or do you want me to get the actual bottle from the preschool where the Florida child attended. (Issue 2)... Several years ago, the Southern Nevada Health Department closed down some [REDACTED] shops for excessively high levels of lead dust in the shops. The shop owners were made to abate the shops and asked to purchase un leaded ceramic paints. I thought they would comply but a student in one of my lead classes brought in a freshly painted ceramic plate made by his granddaughter in one of our local Las Vegas shops. It registered 8.6 to 5.6 mg/cm2. I thought ceramic paint (hobby paint) was now limited to 100ppm. Thank you for any help in this matter. Please let me know what else I can do to help. [REDACTED]
The consumer stated that she has a chemical sensitivity. After her living room was painted on May 21, 2023, she had an allergic reaction to something in the paint. There was a smell like formaldehyde. Her throat was sore. She had headaches and a sinus infection. The consumer stated that when her son came to visit, he was also affected by the smell of the paint. The consumer contacted the firm to find out what was in the paint but was told that the information is proprietary. The consumer sought medical attention.
Prior to getting sick I was exercising 6 - 7 days a week; teaching at least 4 [REDACTED] classes a week and swimming twice a week. I was growing my business and hired a couple of instructors. Plus I was involved in a project for filming for [REDACTED]. I was healthy and fit and rarely got sick. If I did get sick, symptoms were mild and usually only lasted a couple of days. But it all changed after we got our new hardwood floors placed with Glitsa Swedish Finish by a local hardwood floor company (Goss Floors). Because there were multiple other stressors occurring, it took awhile to figure out why I wasn't getting better. After what initially seemed to be a cold continued to manifest with worsening fatigue and lung pain, I was diagnosed with reactivation of EBV (mono virus). I thought maybe I had done too much with multiple work projects as well as renovating the upstairs of our home and dealing with a cat who had been sick for months. I started to question whether I had the capacity to do a large scale project and work alongside well-known professionals. My illness was initially blamed on pneumonia, but even after antibiotics, normal lab results except for EBV, I felt something was wrong. The one thing that concerned me was that my lung capacity when tested with an Incentive Spirometer was abnormal. Though it was blamed on inflammation. But what was causing the inflammation? Pneumonia continued to be ruled out by multiple providers. And yes, there was the reactivation of EBV, but something else seemed wrong. The final straw was waking up early on a Monday morning and having difficulty breathing. I felt I couldn't take a full deep breath and started getting anxious. After an hour of not being able to sleep and struggling with breathing, I had my husband take me to the ER. However, my vital signs were stable and since my previous lab work and Chest X-ray were normal, the doctor didn't know what else to do. I remember starting to cry, because I knew something was
I purchased Olympic Premium interior, eggshell, latex paint at Lowe's. The batch number is 02v36486. P.P.G. says the paint was made in February 2011 and there should be an "M" at the end. The Material Safety Data Sheet, provided by Lowe's was prepared on November 7, 2000, (Product Code 72401). Has the paint's formula changed in 11 years? I painted a bedroom on September 1. The next day the painted walls smelled stronger than when the paint was wet. I went online and found about 9 cases involving Olympic zero -VOC paint with the same problem. Some said the smell was still there a year later. So I complained to the store on September 5th. By this time, the odor was burning my nose and mouth. On September 9th, Lowe's manager and Loss Prevention Officer came to photograph the room and collect the leftover paint for testing. On September 13th, I moved out of the house, and received medical attention for acute sinusitis. Other people said the smell was very strong, like formaldehyde, but not burning. The problem was gone when I left the house. I don't know what happened to my leftover paint. It was not tested. P.P.G. sent an e-mail saying that they tested "retains" from the same batch and other batches of paint. All of them came out pure and clean, all the chemicals are E.P.A. approved, and I am the only one with a problem. What's more, they said, the loss prevention people didn't smell anything at all. Is it safe to shellac over the offending smell, or better to tear out the walls? Many other brands of zero-VOC paint have had this problem too. It doesn't happen with every can, what's going on?
I live with my wife and two year old son. We used three cans of Rust-Oleum black satin countertop coating in our house. The paint didn't work, so my wife sanded the paint leaving the black dust from the paint all over and coated it with a feather cement. The original coats of paint went on in March, and the sanding happened around July 24, 2018. We had cleaned up the dust with a wet rag and vacuum, but I am very concerned about lead exposure for my son. Additionally, the paint ruined our countertops and we are in the process of having them replaced.
I was a first time user of Alpine Roof Paint Semi Gloss, when after applied on a metal roof, I slipped and fell off that roof and suffered serious head trauma, and shattered elbow. The manufacturer states my failure to wear fall protection caused my fall, but as I explained to the retailer I had never painted a metal roof prior to the incident. Also, I was not a roofer nor had knowledge of the OSHA REQUIREMENTS. I walked on this metal roof for 5 days preparing it for paint prior to the incident; even during a period of pressure washing. I slipped off the roof the day (20 hours) after I applied this roof paint in warm sunny weather, well within parameters of the label's instruction for recoat. Common sense and reason dictates the the slippery condition of this roof paint caused my fall. The slippery condition of this roof paint makes for a dangerous situation. I certainly did not expect nor was prepared for the slippery condition of the roof paint!!! The manufacturer failed to warn me of the product's dangerous propensities. They did not require me to have knowledge of or certification in OSHA roofing safety standards.
In the course of our work we often spot prime some of our parts when required. The product we use is Zinsser "Bulls Eye 123". It is a stain blocker/primer in a 16oz. spray can. This morning an employee of ours was shaking the can as directed by the manufacturer's application label only to have the can explode in his hand. Metal from the can pierced the side of his hand with a rather deep laceration. Medical attention was required and administered immediately at the local emergency room. There is a high risk infection as paint entered the wound and will need to be monitored through follow up visits. We still have several more cans of this paint that we will dispose of as they are of the same manufacturing batch.
Text of Consumer's Complaint: I purchased four cans of 3M Professional Grade Rubberized Undercoating (Stage 4) for my new pickup truck. Copies of the can are included to help you identify what I used. I read the directions before using this product, and nowhere on the can does it say that an organic respirator needs to be worn while applying this undercoating. I am usually extremely careful about not breathing in any fumes, pesticides or herbicides and I almost always wear a respirator if I think the fumes may be harmful. I did not wear a respirator while applying this undercoating because I was outside and I was keeping my face away from the spray. After using two cans per rear fender, for a total of four cans, I had to run into the house and I had diarrhea. Then I started to feel nauseous and I developed a headache shortly thereafter. I have had soar lungs and a headache for over two weeks now. I saw my doctor today and she is starting me on prednisone for a couple of weeks to try to bring the swelling in my lungs down. I believe that this product is way too toxic to be allowed to be used at the consumer level. There should be a warning on the can that an organic respirator has to be worn while applying this product, along with a picture of what this type of respirator looks like as most consumers won't know. I am very upset about damaging my lungs with this undercoating. I hope your agency will test the toxicity of this product and ban it from consumer use if it proves to be too toxic for consumer use.
Showing 8 of 57 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to paints, varnishes or shellacs on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Paints, Varnishes Or Shellacs: cross-group products nearest on danger score (41/100), estimated annual ER visits (15,133/yr), and hospitalization share (9.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Paints, Varnishes Or Shellacs ranks #137 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #153 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does paints, varnishes or shellacs rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, paints, varnishes or shellacs ranks #137 by PlainSafety danger score (41/100) and #153 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (15,133/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from paints, varnishes or shellacs?
The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 40,131 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from paints, varnishes or shellacs increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for paints, varnishes or shellacs injuries?
The 45-54 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 59,261 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by paints, varnishes or shellacs?
Of all ER visits involving paints, varnishes or shellacs, approximately 9.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (90.6%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with paints, varnishes or shellacs?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.