Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Lighter Fluids ranks #173 of 838 by danger score (40/100) at ER-volume #423 of 838 (2,012/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #173
- danger rank of 838
- #423
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 40/100
- danger score
- 2,012/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (40/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
40 Higher than most more dangerous than 75% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 60/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 16 | 91st | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 2,012 | 48th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -4% | 60th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 2 | 25th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 40,233 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 940. Segments sum to 40,233 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores
How this 40/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for lighter fluids - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 2,012 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 16.1% Very high admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.04% Above-typical fatality rate
- 5-year trend-4%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for lighter fluids are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2006 (3,024 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (1,513 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is burns, thermal to the face, accounting for approximately 9,502 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by poisoning to the all parts body (8,806 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 9,612 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 16.1% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.04%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 2 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how lighter fluids fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 4,887 | 2,730 | |
| 5-14 | 1,768 | 707 | |
| 15-24 | 7,437 | 2,175 | |
| 25-34 | 5,301 | 2,362 | |
| 35-44 | 3,452 | 1,482 | |
| 45-54 | 3,120 | 930 | |
| 55-64 | 2,121 | 494 | |
| 65-74 | 693 | 184 | |
| 75+ | 303 | 93 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Burns, Thermal | |
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| Hand | Burns, Thermal | |
| Lower Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| Lower Leg | Burns, Thermal | |
| Upper Trunk | Burns, Thermal | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Upper Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| Upper Leg | Burns, Thermal | |
| Foot | Burns, Thermal | |
| Eyeball | Burn, Chemical | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| All Parts Body | Burns, Thermal | |
| Neck | Burns, Thermal | |
| Hand | Burn, Chemical |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
71YOM COMES TO THE ER FOR BURNS. HE STATES HE WAS MANAGING A BRUSH FIRE FOR 2 HOURS AND ATTEMPTED TO PUT LIGHTER FLUID ON IT AND THE FIRE BURNED HIS LEG. HE HAS BURNS ON BOTH LOWER LEGS. EXAM SHOWS BLISTERS RIGHT SHIN WITH SKIN RED AND PAINFUL. LEFT LEG HAS A SMALL BURN, WITHOUT BLISTERS. WITH SKIN RED AND TENDER. DX: BURN LEG LEFT; BURN LEG RIGHT
2YOM PRESENTS AFTER HE DRANK A SMALL AMOUNT OF*** TORCH LIGHTER FLUID. DX: CORROSIVE INGESTION
10YOF HAD LIGHTER FLUID SPLASHED ON HER DRESS, THEN HER DRESS CAUGHT FIRE. FAMILY WAS GRILLING ON CHARCOAL OUTSIDE.NO FD ATTEND. DX: MULTPLE 2ND DEGREE B URNS TO THE RIGHT LOWER LEG AND LEFT THIGH.
52YOM STS WAS FILLING LIGHTER WITH LIGHTER FLUIDS AND FLUID RAN DOWN HAND SO WHEN HE LIT THE LIGHTER HIS HAND CAUGHT FIRE NO INFO ON IF FD PRESENT DX R HAND BURN
9 YOF INJ FACE BIL ARMS AND HANDS TOOK LIGHTER FLUID AND SQUIRTED IT INTO A FIRE FLAMES SHOT UP NO FD AT HOME DX MULT SECOND DEGREE BURNS NOSE BIL HANDS ;
21YOM PATIENT STATES THAT HE WAS OPENING A CAN OF GLYCOL WICK FUEL USING HIS TEETH WHEN HE ACCIDENTALLY SWALLOWED LIGHTER FLUID, HE EXPERIENCING LIGHT HEADEDNESS AND NAUSEA DX: CHEMICAL EXPOSURE
37 YOM WAS BURNING EXCESS WOOD IN A BURN BARREL, POURED SOME LITER FLUID OVER IT TO INCREASE THE FLAME LEADING TO A FLASH BURN INJURY. FD NS. DX: PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF MULTIPLE FINGERS OF RIGHT HAND.
47YOF WAS LIGHTING A CHRISTMAS TREE WITH LIGHTER FLUID IN HER FRONT YARD WHEN SHE SUSTAINED BURNS NOTHING STATED ABOUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DX: BURNS INVOLVING 60-69% OF BODY SURFACE WITH 40-49% THIRD DEGREE BURNS
36 YOM ADDING LIGHTER FLUID TO FIRE, BLEW UP IN FACE, FD UNKNOWN DX THERMAL BURN FACE AND HANDS
22YOM PT POURED LIGHTER FLUID ONTO A HEATED GRILL, WIND BLEW & BURNED PT'S FACE; NO FD NOTED AT THE SCENE DX; BURN BY FIRE
50 YOM STATES THAT MONDAY, WHICH WAS 4 DAYS AGO, HE WAS GRILLING, HE SPILLED LIGHTER FLUID ON HIS FOOT AND THEN HE SMELLED THE BURNING AND NOTICED THAT HE HAD A BURN ON HIS LEFT FOOT. UNKNOWN FD DX 2ND DEGREE BURN
60YOM PRESENTS AFTER A FLASH BURN TO HIS ARM AND FACE AFTER DUMPING A GALLON OF LIGHTER FUEL ON AN OUTDOOR FIRE AT HOME AND IT EXPLODED. DX; FACIAL BURN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Over the past 2 yrs, every time I have purchased Ronsonol Lighter Fuel, the plastic bottle cracks under my grip, causing great potential safety issues due to the flammable nature of the liquid (8 fl.oz. bottle)
On Saturday, April 18, 2015, consumer was prepared to grill on his back deck. He used Frontier brand EcoStart Natural Lighter Fuel Gel ("EcoStart"), with charcoal. He prepared the grill and placed the bottle of Ecostart to the left of the grill. He then lit the charcoal with a lighter. He picked the bottle of EcoStart up to move it back to storage and as he did, the bottle started to whistle and before he could react, the bottle of EcoStart exploded. The burning fuel gel was ejected all over his upper body. He attempted to extinguish the flames with blankets and pillows, and his partner tried pouring liquids on him. It was several minutes before the flames were extinguished, and not before spreading to some additional objects, including his pants. He was rushed to the hospital where the doctors at the Burn Center determined that he had suffered second and third-degree burns to at least 15% of his total body.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to lighter fluids on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Lighter Fluids: cross-group products nearest on danger score (40/100), estimated annual ER visits (2,012/yr), and hospitalization share (16.1%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Lighter Fluids ranks #173 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #423 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does lighter fluids rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, lighter fluids ranks #173 by PlainSafety danger score (40/100) and #423 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (2,012/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from lighter fluids?
The most common injury is burns, thermal to the face, accounting for approximately 9,502 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from lighter fluids increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for lighter fluids injuries?
The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 9,612 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by lighter fluids?
Of all ER visits involving lighter fluids, approximately 16.1% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (83.9%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with lighter fluids?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.