Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, See-saws Or Teeter Boards ranks #526 of 838 by danger score (33/100) at ER-volume #325 of 838 (3,801/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #526
- danger rank of 838
- #325
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 33/100
- danger score
- 3,801/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (33/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
33 Lower than most lower than 63% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 42/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 4 | 32nd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 3,801 | 55th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -27% | 25th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 13 | 52nd | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 76,051 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1243. Segments sum to 76,051 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports & Recreation Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Sports & Recreation Equipment danger scores
How this 33/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for see-saws or teeter boards - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 3,801 ER visits/yr Above median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.8% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-27%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for see-saws or teeter boards are declining by about 27% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2007 (5,831 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (1,360 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 10,419 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the mouth (4,321 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 48,492 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 13 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how see-saws or teeter boards fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 11,134 | 8,052 | |
| 5-14 | 23,248 | 25,244 | |
| 15-24 | 1,405 | 2,538 | |
| 25-34 | 550 | 1,389 | |
| 35-44 | 174 | 1,003 | |
| 45-54 | 115 | 529 | |
| 55-64 | 219 | 240 | |
| 65-74 | 33 | 48 | |
| 75+ | 0 | 109 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Face | Laceration | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Fracture | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Elbow | Fracture | |
| Wrist | Fracture | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Upper Arm | Fracture | |
| Foot | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Wrist | Strain, Sprain | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
23MOF BROUGHT TO THE ER WITH AN ELBOW INJURY. SHE WAS AT DAY CARE AND ANOTHER CHILD TRIED TO PULL HER OFF THE TEETER-TOOTER BY PULLLING HER RIGHT ARM. THERE WAS NO FALL OR DIRECT BLOW TO HER ARM BUT SHE HASN'T WANTED TO USE HER RIGHT ARM SINCE. DX: SUBLUXATION RADIAL HEAD RIGHT
9YOM WITH RIGHT FOOT AND RIGHT ANKLE PAIN. STATES HE WAS AT SCHOOL TODAY AND WAS ON THE SEESAW AND WHEN COMING DOWN IT BENT HIS RIGHT FOOT BACKWARDS. DX: RIGHT ANKLE SPRAIN, FOOT PAIN
2YOM WAS ON A TEETER TOTTER, GOT HIS ANKLE CAUGHT AS THE PATIENT WAS GOING DOWN ON THE TEETER TOTTER INJURING HIS LEFT LEG CAUSING A SMALL ABRASION TO HIS LEG. DX: CLOSED DISPLACED SPIRAL FRACTURE OF SHAFT OF LEFT TIBIA
3YOF WAS ON A SEESAW AND STRUCK HER VAGINA DX: HEMATOMA TO VAGINA
6YOF WAS ON THE PLAYGROUND AND HIT IN THE FACE WITH A SEESAW DX: CONTUSION FACE
9YOF, COMPLAINS OF ANKLE PAIN AFTER GOT STRUCK TO FOOT BY SEESAW DURING RECESS, DX: SPRAIN OF RIGHT ANKLE
14YOF GOT LEFT GREAT TOE SMASHED IN A SEESAW AT THE PARK DX: SUBUNGAL HEMATOMA TO LEFT GREAT TOE
13YOF, PLAYING WITH A FRIEND ON SEESAW WAS LAUNCHED UP IN THE AIR AND UPON LANDING STRADDLED A METAL PART OF THE EQUIPMENT DX: CONTUSION OF LABIA MAJORA; ABRASION OF LABIA
5 YOM C/O DENTAL INJURY S/P FALL OFF A WOODEN SEESAW AT PLAYGROUND. DX: DENTAL INJURY
5YOM FELL OFF A SEE SAW. DX: HUMERUS FX
11 YOF PRESENTS WITH HEAD INJURY S/P FELL AGAINST A SEE-SAW. DX: HEAD INJURY
10YOM WAS PLAYING AT RECESS AND WAS HIT IN THE LEG BY A SEE-SAW DX: STRAIN OF LEFT LOWER LEG *
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
My 11 year old daughter was playing with her friends on the Gym Dandy Spinning Teeter Totter ( TT-360 Seesaw Play Set) and as they were spinning and see sawing, her foot got stuck under the raised base, and her body kept going. She endured severe ankle and knee injuries and a Femur fracture.
Flexible Flyer swing set Fantastic Playground model 42126 was purchased at Paducah Ky Walmart store#0431 on September 14, 2013. We assembled the swing set the afternoon of the 14th and the first use was Sunday September the 15th. After it's first use, both see saw seats broke, both bolts that hold the seats broke through the seat. Today is September 24th and I decided to email the company to see about getting replacement seats and seen where there was a recall. When was this recall and if before September 14th, why did Walmart sell me this product?
My daughters ages 11, and 6 were using the see saw on their Windsor ii flexible flyer swing set when the see saw seat broke away from its bolts and toppled my eldest daughter to the ground.
A swing set was purchased for our grandson for his third birthday from Wal Mart. His birthday was [REDACTED] of this year. The swing set. the Troxel Flexible Flyer, model Triple Fun !!, # 42560, was placed on a level place in our yard. It was used only by small children. Our grandson, who weighed between 32 and 34 pounds at the time, was using the see saw when the seat snapped off, landing him on the ground. Fortunately he was not injured but he was shook up and upset. The incident was several months ago, about a month after the set was first used, in April. I am just discovering where to report the incident.
Teeter totter broke with handle in my babies hand on first lift. She fell flat faced into the ground missing the cross bar by less than 1/2 inch. She was not seriously hurt, but could have knocked out teeth and bashed face. This was brand new never been used birthday gift for a 2 year old 30 lb baby. Just picked up from Walmart on sat August 11 and assembled, she tried it out Sunday when it broke. The ladder from the slide also should be looked into,because the steps are so weak they bend under her weight. As this was a birthday gift the whole incident was video taped.
Purchased Flexableflyer swing set model # WM42033-061013 from Wal Mart , [REDACTED], on 12-14-2013. Was not told that this model number was on a recall for the see-saw seat at the time. This unit should not have been sold by Wal Mart at that time without the problem corrected. Called recall phone number/ service number at Troxel corp. for this recall and was told recall was from 2012 through 2013 for this swing set/ see-saw. Why then is this not covered anymore? July 17, 2017 my 3 yr old granddaughter attempted to use this see-saw with her 2 yr old brother and the handle broke on her side and she fell off, almost catching her fingers in the crack opening that would have pinched and cut her fingers badly. At that moment took them off of the see-saw and removed the plastic seat. Went on-line to the Flexableflyer web site and noticed the recall on this set.
We purchased the Triple Fun ll #42560 Swing set from walmart in May of 2012 for our daughters 2nd birthday. Without much use at all the seat from the see saw snapped off then then shortly after that where the see saw attaches to the frame that also came off. There was actually very little use of the see saw before it all together broke.
The consumer stated that she purchased a swing set and it was was only up for 3 months. The consumer stated that her 2 years old grandson was playing on the see saw and the sit broke. She stated that her grandson got bruises and scrapes on his legs and arms. The consumer stated that he was not taking to the hospital. The consumer stated that they have not use the swing set since the incident because they are afraid anything else would brake and hurt her grandson. The consumer stated that she contacted manufacturer and they informed her that they were not aware of any incidents with the swing set. The consumer stated that the representative informed her that she could take it back to the retailer for a refund. The consumer stated that the representative she spoke with was [REDACTED]. The consumer stated that she will be contacting the retailer because she does not want the swing set at all. The consumer stated that she was aware of the recall Release #12-220. The consumer believes that after the incident she would not place her grandson back on the swing set, because of fear. She stated the incident could have been worse.
Showing 8 of 13 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to see-saws or teeter boards on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Sports & Recreation Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for See-saws Or Teeter Boards: cross-group products nearest on danger score (33/100), estimated annual ER visits (3,801/yr), and hospitalization share (3.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
- Art Or Ceramics Supplies And Equipment (excl. Paintbrushes) Home Structures & Construction Materials 3,787/yr
- Combs Or Hairbrushes, Unpowered Personal Care & Safety Products 3,820/yr
- Electric Holiday Decorations (excl. Christmas Tree Lights) Home Medical & Assistance Devices 3,832/yr
- Carbon Monoxide Detectors Home Heating & Cooling Equipment 3,845/yr
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Sports & Recreation Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, See-saws Or Teeter Boards ranks #526 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #325 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does see-saws or teeter boards rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, see-saws or teeter boards ranks #526 by PlainSafety danger score (33/100) and #325 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (3,801/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from see-saws or teeter boards?
The most common injury is laceration to the face, accounting for approximately 10,419 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from see-saws or teeter boards increasing or decreasing?
Down 27% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for see-saws or teeter boards injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 48,492 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by see-saws or teeter boards?
Of all ER visits involving see-saws or teeter boards, approximately 3.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with see-saws or teeter boards?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.