CPSC NEISS · code 5005

Riding Toys, Not Specified

Riding Toys, Not Specified: danger rank #526 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #336 of 838 (3,445 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 19% over the last five years).

Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Riding Toys, Not Specified ranks #526 of 838 by danger score (33/100) at ER-volume #336 of 838 (3,445/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#526
danger rank of 838
#336
ER-volume rank of 838
33/100
danger score
3,445/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (33/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

33 Lower than most lower than 63% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 38/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

B
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 2 19th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 3,445 54th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -19% 36th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 12 51st 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 68,925 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 5005. Segments sum to 68,925 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment danger scores

1. Utility Vehicles51/1002. Bicycles And Accessories,…49/1003. Two-wheeled, Powered, Off…48/1004. Mountain Or All-terrain B…47/1005. Power-assisted Cycles, No…44/1006. Scooters, Powered44/1007. Snowboarding (activity, A…43/1008. Riding Toys, Not Specified33/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10033/100
PlainSafety danger score · Riding Toys, Not Specified

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 33/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for riding toys, not specified - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 3,445 ER visits/yr Above median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.4% Low admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.01% Low fatality rate
  • 5-year trend-19%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for riding toys, not specified are declining by about 19% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2015 (5,566 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (2,521 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 11,611 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the face (9,947 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 53,045 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.01%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 12 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how riding toys, not specified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

2K3K4K5K6K 20052008201120142017202020232024 4K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Riding Toys, Not Specified, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 34,327 18,718 53,045
5-14 7,478 5,301 12,779
15-24 164 482 646
25-34 45 442 487
35-44 63 507 570
45-54 161 527 688
55-64 71 96 167
65-74 125 269 394
75+ 79 32 111

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Head Internal Injury 11,611
Face Laceration 9,947
Head Laceration 4,900
Mouth Laceration 4,076
Face Contusions, Abr. 3,968
Lower Arm Fracture 2,886
Head Contusions, Abr. 2,879
Elbow Fracture 1,885
Head Concussion 1,568
Mouth Dental Injury 1,494
Upper Arm Fracture 1,143
Wrist Fracture 1,026
Shoulder Fracture 889
Elbow Dislocation 883
Foot Contusions, Abr. 832

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 95.7% (65,981)
Left Without Being Seen 1.8% (1,218)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 1.6% (1,110)
Treated And Transferred 0.8% (517)
Held For Observation 0.1% (77)
Unknown, Not Stated 0.0% (15)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.0% (7)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 35 · Female · Hand · Fracture · 2024

35 YOF JAMMED HER RIGHT 4TH FINGER INTO A CHILDS RIDING TOY. DX: ACUTE FRACTURE INVOLVING THE FOURTH METACARPAL

Age 4 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

4YOM C/O LACERATION TO CHIN, WAS PLAYING ON A TOY AIRPLANE AND FELL OFF AND HIT HIS CHIN ON THE FLOOR. DX: LACERATION OF CHIN WITHOUT COMPLICATION

Age 223 · Female · Lower Leg · Fracture · 2024

23MOF FELL OFF A RIDING TOY DOWN A HILL, HAD HER LEG TRAPPED BEHIND HER.DX: CLOSED NONDISPLACED SPIRAL FRACTURE SHAFT OF THE RIGHT TIBIA.

Age 2 · Female · Face · Laceration · 2024

2 YOF INJ FACE AND CHIN PLAYING ON A TOY CAR FELL AT DAYCARE DX LAC CHIN ;

Age 219 · Male · Head · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

19 MOM RIDING A TOY AND FELL OFF DX; SCALP AND FACE CONTUSIONS

Age 2 · Male · Head · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

2YOM, FELL OF RIDING TOY, PUNCTURE WOUND BACK OF HEAD AFTER FALLING DX: FALL, SCALP CONTUSION, SCALP PUNCTURE WOUND

Age 213 · Male · Face · Other · 2024

13MOM FELL OFF OF A TOY RIDING TRUCK TO A TILE FLOOR ONTO FACE DX: FACIAL INJURY

Age 2 · Female · Head · Concussion · 2024

2YOF FELL ON THE PLAYGROUND WHILE GETTING OUT OF A TOY CAR STRIKING HEAD ON THE GROUND DX: CONCUSSION

Age 219 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

19MOF FELL OFF A RIDING TOY ONTO A WOOD FLOOR. DX: HEAD INJURY

Age 3 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

3YOM WAS RIDING ON A TOY CAR WHEN HE FELL BACKWARDS STRIKING OCCIPITAL SCALP AGAINST HARDWOOD FLOOR DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY

Age 216 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

16MOM WAS AT HOME TODAY WHEN HE FELL OFF OF HIS SITTING TOY CAR, FORWARD ONTO FOREHEAD. DX: CHI, FOREHEAD BRUISE

Age 2 · Male · Lower Arm · Fracture · 2024

2YOM FELL FROM A TOY RIDING CAR TO THE FLOOR AT HOME DX: FRACTURE OF LEFT FOREARM *

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/6/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Radio Flyer INC. · Illinois

My daughter and her friend have each flipped forward while separately riding this Radio Flyer ride-on toy. If a child picks up some speed on the ride-on toy, it can flip forward, and the child can be hurt.

9/13/2011 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · Kiddieland Toys Limited · Florida

The disney 4 in 1 ride on toy has a ring around it to hold younger children on it while rocking or riding. We have a baby gate on my childs room door so she can safely play in her room and we can watch her easily. The ride on toy was left in my childs room with her for a few minutes. She started screaming and I found her with her head stuck in it and her body on the floor. She must have climbed onto the toy and then her body slipped on the side and under the ring and her head became trapped. I couldn't get her free by pulling her head out (down towards the floor). I had to push her body back up (toward the ceiling/seat) and thus freeing her head. I had to use some force to get her free. She has scrapes on her face, back of her neck and on her arm. She must of had her arm pinned at one point also. She is 15 months old. I did take several pictures of her scrapes and one using a stuffed animal to show her position on the toy when I found her. The picture may make things clearer. I can email the pictures, just let me know where. This toy is always in her room and I never though this would happen. Of course from now on it will not be. My fear is that a child might become trapped in the neck area and strangle. This toy was rated for 12 to 36 months. It was bought at ToysRus and is made by kiddieland. It is the disney princess 4 in 1 rideon.

6/4/2018 · Injury, Hospital Admission · Columbia-Inland Corporation · Oregon

A child in our preschool program was crossing into the area where the pumper car was being ridden by another child who was going down a small hill. The toy car hit the child that was injured on the back of the heel- causing a severe cut to her Achilles heel which required surgical intervention.

4/4/2011 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · FISHER-PRICE BRANDS · Maryland

My daughter fell out her Power Wheels Disney Princess Tot Rod by Power Wheels/Fisher Price. She fell out easily and quickly. She has two large scrapes on her face. There is no seatbelt with this product. The recommended age is 12 months and above. My daughter is 13 months I just want other parents to be warned. Thank you.

4/29/2013 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · WESCO NA Inc · Unspecified

(04/23/2013) The consumer stated that her child was at the daycare.The consumer stated that she was told that her child was riding the toy and the toy tipped over. Her child tipped over the toy and fell on concrete on her right shoulder and broke her collar bone. The child was taken to Goodnight Pediatrics in Peoria, AZ. They xrayed her shoulder and found out that the child's collarbone was broken. She was referred to the ER at Banner Thunderbird Medical Center in Glendale, AZ. They put the child's arm in a sling. She was also given pain medicine. The consumer stated that she had a follower- up 4/29 at Banner Children Specialist. The specialist looked at the shoulder and said that it was healing just fine.

4/27/2011 · Injury, Level of care not known · Kiddieland Toys Limited · Connecticut

Consumer stated that the toy train has a funnel that the ball can be dispersed from, her 3.5 year old son got his arm stuck in the funnel and the motor was still running to cause flapping of small parts and was causing discomfort to his fingers. It took her 5-10 minutes at least before she could release his arms from the product. There were no serious injuries just soreness to the arm. Her son was so shook up that he fell asleep (at only 5:30 for the night) after he calmed down. Consumer stated that she is concerned that the toy is geared for 12-36 months, however, her 3.5 yr old almost had a minor injury from this toy. Consumer feels that this toy is a safety hazard and should be reported.

4/12/2016 · Incident, No Injury · PACIFIC CYCLE, INC · Colorado

I bought the Schwinn No-Pinch Buckle Infant helmet for my 2 year old daughter last week. Tonight, I found a magnet in my four year old son's pocket. I scoured my house for something that would have this magnet in it, knowing that if my two year old or four year old swallowed it, they could die. I eventually found the Schwinn cover. My husband looked at the helmet and realized that the magnetic no pinch buckle fell apart, before it was even used, and the magnet fell on the floor where my son found it. It could have easily ended up in my infant's mouth.

3/9/2021 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · FISHER-PRICE BRANDS · United States

Barbie car continued a fan over child's arm even though she was no longer in the car.

Showing 8 of 12 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to riding toys, not specified on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Swimming, Water & Beach Equipment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Riding Toys, Not Specified: cross-group products nearest on danger score (33/100), estimated annual ER visits (3,445/yr), and hospitalization share (2.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Riding Toys, Not Specified ranks #526 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #336 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does riding toys, not specified rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, riding toys, not specified ranks #526 by PlainSafety danger score (33/100) and #336 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (3,445/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from riding toys, not specified?

The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 11,611 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from riding toys, not specified increasing or decreasing?

Down 19% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for riding toys, not specified injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 53,045 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by riding toys, not specified?

Of all ER visits involving riding toys, not specified, approximately 2.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with riding toys, not specified?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Riding Toys, Not Specified is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.