Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Other Manual Workshop Tools ranks #419 of 838 by danger score (35/100) at ER-volume #247 of 838 (7,359/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #419
- danger rank of 838
- #247
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 35/100
- danger score
- 7,359/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (35/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
35 Lower than most lower than 50% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 42/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 2 | 18th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 7,359 | 65th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -21% | 33rd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 15 | 53rd | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 147,188 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 881. Segments sum to 147,188 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Communication & Entertainment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Communication & Entertainment danger scores
How this 35/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for other manual workshop tools - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 7,359 ER visits/yr Above median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.4% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-21%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for other manual workshop tools are declining by about 21% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2017 (8,837 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (5,051 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 36,561 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (13,501 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 24,872 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 15 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how other manual workshop tools fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 7,975 | 2,995 | |
| 5-14 | 7,948 | 2,598 | |
| 15-24 | 16,744 | 3,592 | |
| 25-34 | 20,046 | 3,993 | |
| 35-44 | 19,662 | 5,210 | |
| 45-54 | 17,314 | 4,582 | |
| 55-64 | 13,424 | 3,364 | |
| 65-74 | 9,564 | 2,192 | |
| 75+ | 4,380 | 1,602 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Wrist | Laceration | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Foot | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Head | Concussion |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
90YOM SUSTATINED A GROUND LEVEL FALL, SHE WAS STANDING TO TAKE OFF HER SWEATER AND STUMBLED BACKWARDS FALLING AGAINST A MILK CANISTER WITH A YARD STICK IN IT AND THE YARDSTICK JABBED INTO THE SIDE OF HER NECK DX: LACERATION OF THE NECK
34 YOM WAS WORKING ON CAR PINCHED HAND WITH A CROW BAR DX: CRUSH INJURY HAND
52YOM PRESENTS TO ED W/ LACERATION TO VOLAR ASPECT OF RT THUMB. PT WAS HANGING SOMETHING WHEN TAPE MEASURE RETRACTED AND CUT HIS THUMB. DX: LACERATION OF THUMB. W/O FOREIGN BODY W/O DAMAGE TO NAIL.
53YOM C/O LACERATION. PATIENT WAS WORKING ON CAR AND USING CROWBAR. THE CROWBAR SLIPPED AND CAUGHT HIS RIGHT EARLOBE CAUSING LACERATION. 1.5 CM LACERATION SUTURED. DX: LACERATION RIGHT EAR
48YOF ACCIDENTALLY INSERTED A PLUNGER CAP INTO VAGINAL CANAL, DX FB IN VAGINA
85YOM PRESENTS WITH VISUAL DISTURBANCES WITH FLASHES OF LIGHT AFTER HE BUMPING HIS HEAD ON CAR GETTING UP OFF FLOOR USING HIS CAR CREEPER THAT CAUSED HIS FIRST FLASHING LIGHTS DX: POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT
46YOF STATES SHE WAS TRYING TO UNCLOG HER TOILET YESTERDAY WITH A METAL ROD AND USED HER HAND TO GET BEYOND THE TENDENCIES OF PEOPLE. SHE CUT HER RIGHT INDEX FINGER TIP WITH A WET TOILET PLUNGER. UDS:+AMPHETAMINE, +BENZODIAZEPINE DX: HAND PAIN, RIGHT, CELLULITIS AND ABSCESS OF HAND, INJURY OF FINGER OF RIGHT HAND.
54 YOF FELL OUT OF HER WHEELCHAIR WHILE PLUNGING A TOILET AND HIT HER KNEE ON THE GROUND AT JAIL. DX: HIP PAIN RIGHT.
53YOM WAS WORKING IN HIS CAR WHEN THE CROWBAR SLIPPED AND STRUCK HIM IN THE HEAD DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY
17MOF WITH LAC TO FINGER FROM MEASURING TAPE DX: FINGER LAC
33YOM PATIENT REPORTS THAT HE ACCIDENTALLY LACERATED HIS FINGER WHILE SMASHING GLASS WITH A CROWBAR. HE REPORTS HE WAS AT AN ACTIVITY WHERE THEY SMASH APPLIANCES FOR FUN.DX: FINGER INJURY, FINGER LACERATION
52YOM PRESENTS WITH L ANKLE WOUND X 1 WK AFTER DROPPING A TOOL ON IT AT HOME WHILE DOING HOUSE WORK. PT DROPPED DRY WALL SCRAPER ON HIS ANKLE. LAC NOTED TO THE ANKLE. DX: WOUND OF LT LOWER EXTREMITY
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
No incident has occurred, but I'm concerned that the design of a floor cutter could be prone to sudden catastrophic failure after prolonged use. Marshalltown 13-in Floor Cutter, Model #FS213-L The tool's hardened steel blade impacts against the "anvil," a narrow fin protruding from a cast or extruded aluminum part. I expressed concerns about this to the manufacturer, and they told me that the anvil is intended to deform over time with repeated pressure from the blade. My worry is that since the blade strikes the anvil so close to the edge (about one millimeter) the intended deformation of the aluminum could cause the edge to eventually split off, deflecting and shattering the blade. In my opinion the anvil should be wider to eliminate the risk of splitting. I plan to return the tool to the store because I feel it's unsafe.
Reference: VINCA DCLA-0605 Quality Electronic Digital Vernier Caliper, made by Clockwise Tools (clockwisetools.com, 661-888-1206). The DCLA-0605 has a data port which accepts a micro usb connection; however, using a regular micro usb cable will result in the lithium battery exploding. Clockwise Tools does NOT specify nor provides a hazard warning on its enclosed user manual, packaging, or website product link https://clockwisetools.com/collections/clockwise-tools/products/clockwise-tools-dclr-0605-ip54-rs232-digital-caliper-6-inch. Clockwise Tools does mention it features RS232 data transfer with its DTCR-02 Data cable on the website product link, but no warning about not using a regular micro usb cable. The data transfer feature is also not specified in its user manual enclosed with the product.
Model TU_tp210 toilet plunger made by TULGIGS which uses CO2 cartridges: I have purchased this item three times. No unit has been able to discharge more than 8 CO2 cartridges before failing. Firing pin problems have been reported online but it could also be Probably a poorly designed switch, but whatever is the problem needs to be fixed. When the device fails, it becomes dangerous and potentially can harm anyone nearby. The CO2 cartridge in the chamber is live. Removing the end cap exposes the live cartridge, which can easily self-discharge if touched. An 8 gram cartridge can shoot 20+ feet across a room. A 15 gram cartridge will exceed that distance and with greater impact. You do not want to be looking into the device when that happens. I request the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). to ban the sale of this device until the manufacturer provides, and demonstrates, a safe method of removing a live cartridge.
My son was using his tape measure from the create to learn construction tool set. He was measuring an entertainment center we built to make sure it would fit in the area it was going the tape measure reeled in and sliced his index finger open and it required 6 stitches to close it.
Using a new tape measure, my hand was cut as if by a knife when retracting the steel tape into its case. The speed and force of the retraction caused the tape to coil and slice across my hand. A photo of my cut thumb is available. I returned the item to the store where I acquired it, Harbor Freight, and asked to exchange it for a safer model. All of the tape measures sold by Harbor Freight had tapes with knife edges. I left the tape measure with them without compensation. A tool store next door had several tape measures, all of which had polymer-coated tapes that did not present a hazard. I have used one of them without incident.
Metal edge is sharp and will cut a child
My son was playing with the build and grow measuring tape we got in the children's toolbox from Lowe's. He broke the thing open by dropping it on the floor. I didn't realize it was sharp thin metal inside because it looked like black plastic. So I was letting him try to fix it and wasn't paying too much attention to it. He then came up to me and wanted me to kiss his finger because he had hurt it. When looking at his finger I noticed two thin slices on it. I then realized it was metal in the measuring tape that had sliced his finger in 2 places and not plastic. The wounds were also black in color because of whatever was on the metal that gave it the black color. It wasn't bad enough to take him to a doctor but it was concerning enough for me to want to report the toy because it is meant for kids and should not contain thin sharp metal capable of slicing skin.
CAT XL 9in1 Multi-Tool set model number 980045S CATERPILLAR brand tool CAT XL 9in1 Multi-Tool set model number 980045S In order to use the screw driver tool in the set, I could see that i needed to collapse all the other tools. All of the tools (pliers, saw, screwdrivers, and opener) collapsed easily into the storage handle with ease, except for the knife blade. When the knife with the exposed blade would not collapse into the handle I could not find instructions to collapse the knife or protect myself from blade. Before attempting to use the screwdriver, I also referred to the website, and even[REDACTED] videos for this item how to collapse knife in CAT XL 9in1 Multi-Tool set I still could find no instructions to collapse blade or protect myself from blade. The package or information from the website, videos etc. did not say to only use one tool at a time, or to retract all other tools before using screwdriver. Z I proceeded to use the screwdriver holding the intended handle with the knife blade exposed. I assumed the screw driver would not move when using it for multiple reasons. A. because the knife blade wouldnt move. B. I assumed the screwdriver would lock in place like the knife did. C. The package and consumer information did not instruct me to collapse the knife, or that the screwdriver would collapse when used. As the screwdriver made contact w my screw in the wall, I attempted to turn the screw. Immediately, the screwdriver collapsed into the handle. Forcing my hand against the exposed knife blade. Resulting In the blade cutting my hand. After cutting my hand. I used a towel to control the bleeding. I used bandages to cover blade to keep from further injury. I then watched several unboxing [REDACTED] of CAT XL 9in1 Multi-Tool set in order to observe how they closed the blade. A After watching 3 unboxing / demo videos of the item posted by customers, I observed one of them sliding a metal piece on the handl
Showing 8 of 15 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to other manual workshop tools on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Communication & Entertainment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Other Manual Workshop Tools: cross-group products nearest on danger score (35/100), estimated annual ER visits (7,359/yr), and hospitalization share (2.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Communication & Entertainment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Other Manual Workshop Tools ranks #419 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #247 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does other manual workshop tools rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, other manual workshop tools ranks #419 by PlainSafety danger score (35/100) and #247 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (7,359/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from other manual workshop tools?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 36,561 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from other manual workshop tools increasing or decreasing?
Down 21% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for other manual workshop tools injuries?
The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 24,872 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by other manual workshop tools?
Of all ER visits involving other manual workshop tools, approximately 2.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.6%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with other manual workshop tools?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.