Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Dyes (noncosmetic) ranks #794 of 838 by danger score (24/100) at ER-volume #700 of 838 (187/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #794
- danger rank of 838
- #700
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 24/100
- danger score
- 187/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (24/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
24 Among the lowest lower than 95% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 17/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 2 | 18th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 187 | 13th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -46% | 11th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 2 | 25th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 3,740 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 957. Segments sum to 3,740 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores
How this 24/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for dyes (noncosmetic) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 187 ER visits/yr Low volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.4% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-46%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for dyes (noncosmetic) are declining by about 46% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2010 (378 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2007 (17 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 1,024 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by derma/conjunct to the all parts body (250 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 852 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 2 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how dyes (noncosmetic) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 353 | 499 | |
| 5-14 | 84 | 573 | |
| 15-24 | 56 | 564 | |
| 25-34 | 124 | 209 | |
| 35-44 | 70 | 189 | |
| 45-54 | 303 | 349 | |
| 55-64 | 116 | 151 | |
| 65-74 | 0 | 100 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| All Parts Body | Poisoning | |
| All Parts Body | Derma/conjunct | |
| Face | Derma/conjunct | |
| Head | Derma/conjunct | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Lower Arm | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Upper Trunk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Finger | Avulsion | |
| Shoulder | Derma/conjunct | |
| Face | Foreign Body | |
| Lower Trunk | Derma/conjunct | |
| Lower Leg | Derma/conjunct | |
| Foot | Burn, Scald | |
| Head | Burn, Chemical |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
2YOF PRESENTS WITH INGESTION OF FOREIGN SUBSTANCE. PER PT FATHER THEY WALKED IN ON PT PLAYING WITH EOSIN DYE WHICH WAS APART OF A PAINT SET, PT HAD DYE ALL OVER HER HANDS AND FACE, PER DAD HE THINKS SHE INGESTED SOME OF THE EOSIN.ED CALLED POISON CONTROL AND ASSURED ED THAT THE EOSIN IS NON-TOXIC AND PT WAS CLEARED FOR POISIONING. DX: INGESTION OF FROEIGN SUBSTANCE.
14YOF, AT SCHOOL WAS WORKING ON A PROJECT WHEN ACCIDENTALLY GOT A DYE COLORED CORNSTARCH IN EYE NOW WITH PAIN AND IR***ATION, DX: ABRASION OF LEFT CORNEA
46YOF PRESENTS TO ED FOR ALLERGIC REACTION. REPORTS THAT SHE USED A NEW HAIR DYE A FEW DAYS AGO. C/O FACIAL AND SCALP SWELLING. DX: ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS DUE TO DYES
10YOF MOM WENT TO GIVE HER LIQUID *** AND INSTEAD GAVE HER A TEASPOON OF SYNTHETIC DYE DX: INGESTION OF A FOREIGN SUBSTANCE
20MOF PRESENTS AFTER INGESTING TIE DYE POWDER DX INGESTION OF SUBSTANCE
49YOF USED *** HAIR DYE AND REPORTS SHE BROKE OUT IN HIVES ALL OVER SCALPDX ALLERGIC REACTION TO HAIR DYE
3YOF PT INGESTED A SMALL AMOUNT OF BLUE DYE; BEGAN TO COUGH & VOMITED DX: INGESTION OF SUBSTANCE BY PEDIATRIC PATIENT #
61YOM PRESENTED AT ED C/O OF ALLERGIC REACTION. 2 DAYS AGO, PATIENT WENT TO HIS BARBER AND THE BARBER APPLIED A DYE TO HIS ENTIRE SCALP AND HIS FACE WHERE HIS BEARD IS. UPON CONTACT PATIENT FELT LIKE THE DYE WAS BURNING MILDLY. SEVERAL HOURS LATER, EXPERIENCED WEEPING OF THE SKIN. OVER THE NEXT 2 DAYS, THE RASH BECOME SLIGHTLY MORE PAINFUL, WEEPING AND TODAY SWOLLEN. DX: CONTACT DERMATITIS
46YOM WAS AT BARBER SHOP AND HAD HAIR DYE IN AND STARTED WITH FACIAL SWELLING DX ALLERGIC REACTION TO HAIR DYE
24YOF HAD EYEBROW TINTED ON 13TH AND NOW RASH AND SWELLING AROUND EYEBROWS DX ALLERGIC REACTION TO DYE
15MOM MOM FOUND HIM DRINKING TIE DYE CLOTHING LIQUID DYE DX: INGESTION OF A SUBSTANCE
4YOM PRESENTS WITH ALLERGIC REACTION. DX: DYE ALLERGIC REACTION. %
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
3/7/2018: Caller dyed his fleece cap black. He had to add the dye along with the cap to a pot on his stove at a low boil for about 30 minutes to 1 hour. Caller left the windows open and wore a mask during the process because of the strong fumes that filled his entire apartment. After the process was complete the caller notice Ink residue droplets inside his kitchen. He begin to clean and noticed that the ink residue droplets made there way into the microwave that is positioned above his stove. As the caller cleaned his microwave he noticed ink residue inside the microwave filter along with the fan. When he cleaned the microwave, he thought that he removed all of the residue. NOTE: It is unknown what the caller used to clean the residue with. 3/11/2018: The caller's fiancee was cooking and used the microwave to prepare the food. She got sick on the same evening and seemed to have had an allergic reaction to the dye's residue, which got into his microwave's filter. 3/12/2018: The girlfriend is feeling better. The Caller thinks that this product presents and inhalation hazard. The products warnings were not given, but the caller may add more details upon his receipt of the report.
On October 8, 2024, my younger brother inadvertently ingested a clothing dye produced by the Rit brand. This incident precipitated symptoms of severe vomiting and uncontrolled bowel movements. Upon contacting the poison control center, my parents were advised to provide him with ample hydration, maintain vigilant monitoring, and seek medical consultation if his condition deteriorated. Regrettably, his symptoms escalated, necessitating urgent transport to the Emergency Room. Subsequently, he was admitted to the hospital, where the dye inflicted internal injuries. Seven days later, he was declared brain dead, and subsequently, life support was withdrawn, culminating in his passing on October 12, 2024.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to dyes (noncosmetic) on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Dyes (noncosmetic): cross-group products nearest on danger score (24/100), estimated annual ER visits (187/yr), and hospitalization share (2.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Attached Highchair Nursery & Baby Products 2.4%admitted
- Other Manual Workshop Tools Home Communication & Entertainment 2.4%admitted
- Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides) Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 2.4%admitted
- Electric Motors (separate) Home Communication & Entertainment 2.4%admitted
Related Products in Home Workshop Tools & Equipment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Dyes (noncosmetic) ranks #794 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #700 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does dyes (noncosmetic) rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, dyes (noncosmetic) ranks #794 by PlainSafety danger score (24/100) and #700 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (187/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from dyes (noncosmetic)?
The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 1,024 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from dyes (noncosmetic) increasing or decreasing?
Down 46% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for dyes (noncosmetic) injuries?
The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 852 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by dyes (noncosmetic)?
Of all ER visits involving dyes (noncosmetic), approximately 2.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.6%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with dyes (noncosmetic)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.