CPSC NEISS · code 3294

Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides)

Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides): danger rank #419 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #267 of 838 (5,990 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Sports Protective Equipment & Gear CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides) ranks #419 of 838 by danger score (35/100) at ER-volume #267 of 838 (5,990/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#419
danger rank of 838
#267
ER-volume rank of 838
35/100
danger score
5,990/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (35/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

35 Lower than most lower than 50% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 43/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 2 18th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 5,990 61st 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -10% 51st 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 14 52nd 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 119,824 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 3294. Segments sum to 119,824 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports Protective Equipment & Gear group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Sports Protective Equipment & Gear danger scores

1. All Terrain Vehicles (# O…54/1002. Mopeds Or Power-assisted …54/1003. Exercise (activity Or App…48/1004. Snow Skiing (activity, Ap…47/1005. All Terrain Vehicles (fou…46/1006. Exercise Equipment45/1007. Tennis (activity, Apparel…44/1008. Water Slides, Backyard/ho…35/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10035/100
PlainSafety danger score · Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides)

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 35/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 5,990 ER visits/yr Above median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.4% Low admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-10%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2016 (8,093 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (2,579 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 9,476 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by strain, sprain to the ankle (6,594 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 63,755 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 14 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

2K4K6K8K10K 20052008201120142017202020232024 5K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides), CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 6,978 4,246 11,224
5-14 33,444 30,311 63,755
15-24 8,343 12,101 20,444
25-34 5,392 6,138 11,530
35-44 3,124 4,175 7,299
45-54 1,577 1,978 3,624
55-64 862 617 1,479
65-74 210 200 410
75+ 0 28 28

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Head Internal Injury 9,476
Ankle Strain, Sprain 6,594
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 5,263
Head Concussion 5,059
Face Laceration 4,806
Foot Strain, Sprain 3,798
Knee Laceration 3,672
Lower Leg Fracture 3,424
Finger Fracture 2,887
Shoulder Fracture 2,686
Foot Laceration 2,682
Knee Strain, Sprain 2,470
Lower Trunk Contusions, Abr. 2,397
Ankle Fracture 2,324
Upper Trunk Other 2,190

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 96.4% (115,568)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 1.5% (1,791)
Treated And Transferred 0.9% (1,114)
Left Without Being Seen 0.8% (938)
Held For Observation 0.3% (413)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 21 · Female · Upper Trunk · Other · 2024

21YOF-PRESENTED TO THE ER FOR EVALUATION OF RIGHT-SIDED CHEST WALL PAIN. YESTERDAY SHE SLIPPED ON A *** AND LANDED ON HER RIGHT SIDE. DEVELOPED GRADUAL ONSET OF RIGHT-SIDED CHEST WALL PAIN. DX: CHEST PAIN

Age 7 · Male · Face · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

7 YOM WAS SLIDING ON A WATERSLIDE AT HOME AND INJURED FACE DX CONTUSION FACE

Age 11 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

11YOM, ON ***E FELL BACKWARDS, HIT BACK OF HEAD X 2 DAYS AGO, C/O HEADACHE DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY, MIGRAINE

Age 10 · Male · Foot · Fracture · 2024

10 YOM HURT L FOOT ON *** DX; FOOT FX

Age 5 · Male · Lower Arm · Fracture · 2024

5YOM, C/O RIGHT ARM PAIN, WENT DOWN WATERSLIDE, SLIPPED OFF, FELL 4 FOOT TO GROUND DX: RIGHT MID ULNAR & RADIAL FRACTURES

Age 4 · Male · Wrist · Fracture · 2024

4 YOM PLAYING ON *** HURT WRIST DX WRIST FX

Age 37 · Female · Foot · Strain, Sprain · 2024

37YOF,GOING DOWN SLIDE AT WATER PARK ANKLE WAS CAUGHT ROLLED IT,FOOT,DX:FOOT SPRAIN

Age 17 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

17YOM TO ER FOR HWAD INJURY W/ LOC AFTER PT WAS HIT BY ANOTHER PERSON COMING DOWN A BLOWUP WATER SLIDE, PT HAD LOC, PT SAYS HAD BLEEDING FROM LEFT NOSTRIL , PT LOC LASTED 10 SECONDS DX INJURY OF HEAD, CONCUSSION W/ LOC OF 30 MINS OR LESS

Age 4 · Male · Lower Leg · Fracture · 2024

4 YOM PLAYING ON *** FELL REFUSING TO WALK DX TIB/FIB FX CLOSED

Age 8 · Female · Ankle · Strain, Sprain · 2024

8YOF WAS ON A *** AT HOME AND TWISTED RIGHT ANKLE DX: STRAINED ANKLE

Age 12 · Male · Foot · Other · 2024

12YOM PRESENTS FROM HOME WITH FOOT INJURY. PATIENT WAS ON *** WHEN HIS FOOT GOT CAUGHT BEHIND HIM. DX: FOOT INJURY

Age 16 · Male · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

16YOM WITH EPIGASTRIC PAIN AND HEAD INJURY X 2 DAYS, REPORTS SECONDLY THAT HE WAS ON A *** 2 DAYS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL AND WHILE DOING THE SLIDING AND SLIPPING, HE FELL TO THE RIGHT TEMPLE OF HIS HEAD. DX: INJURY OF HEAD

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

8/29/2018 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · Focus Brand Ltd · North Carolina

Caller says that they used the toys for a few days with no incident. One evening her 7 year old came down the slide and bounced off of the product about 6ft in the air. When she came down, she broke her elbow in 2 places. Received invasive reconstructive surgery at Brenner's Children Hospital NC. Caller says the sidewall is very low with no protection and believes that is what caused the incident. Caller believes this product poses a fall hazard.

8/24/2012 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · MANLEY TOYS (TOY NETWORK) · California

The consumer stated that she inflated the slides and the pool and she made sure that she checked the weights the corners. The consumer stated that she placed them on the concrete floor. The consumer stated that several kids were playing on it for approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes before the incident. The consumer stated that the kids were going up the slide one at a time and two going down the slide at the same time. The consumer stated that when they were located at the top of the slide sitting to slide down the inflatable slides tipped over. The consumer stated that the slides are approximately 8-9’ high. The consumer stated that the kids fell and landed on the concrete floor scratching their knees and their sides. The consumer stated that the kids were 5 years old boy (40 pounds) and 9 years old boy (60 pounds). The consumer stated that to treat the scratches they just used first aid. The consumer stated that she tried to contact the manufacture several times, but the contact number she has always disconnects the call. The consumer stated that this product was completely unstable and a hazard to children. The consumer believes that this product should be investigated.

8/20/2024 · Incident, No Injury · Sunny and Fun, Inc · New Jersey

Slide blew a hole during routine use

8/13/2012 · Incident, No Injury · MANLEY TOYS (TOY NETWORK) · New York

The consumer stated that they were using the double drop water slide and one of the children noticed that there was water leaking inside the sleeve that connects to the blower. The consumer stated that it was a high amount of water that was going inside where the blower was located. The consumer stated that one of the children immediately turned off the blower. The consumer stated that no one was injured. The consumer stated that she contacted the manufacturer and they told her that they could not do anything for her. The consumer stated the representative asked her to recreate the scene to take pictures. The consumer stated that she asked the representative to provide her report to her quality control department. The consumer stated that she exchanged emails with one of the managers from the manufacturer and she informed her that they could not provide any replacements. The consumer stated that the representative informed her that it most of been that the issue arise due to the fact that they did not properly stored the slide after use. * A couple of items report does not reflect – - Water was pouring into the blower. - Consumer was asked to recreate the scene in order to take good pictures which would involve danger of electrocution. Consumer refused to recreate the scene. A manager later told consumer they should not have asked consumer to do that. - Manager had no interest in their quality assurance looking at product which consumer volunteered to send back. She basically said that while they try to keep products safe, they can’t guarantee it. She focused blame on consumer saying (consumer) must not have stored it properly. Consumer stored the product properly last winter + it is one year old. [REDACTED]

7/3/2014 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · TOY QUEST · Washington

The consumer stated that her son was on the slide. The consumer's son was sliding down when his finger got caught in a loose nylon thread at the bottom of the slide. Her son's left hand pinky finger got caught in the thread and received two cuts through the finger tissues. One of the cuts was a deeper cut that removed the top layer of the skin. The consumer consulted a medical professional and is treating the cut with prescription ointment. The consumer was asked to bring her son in for examination if the cut is not healed by 7/5/2014. The consumer stated that there were multiple loose threads. The consumer stated that a larger body part could have been caught too. The consumer also reported issue with the slide landing depth. The consumer stated that when a child slides down, the part they land on is not thick enough. The consumer stated that the child can be injured if they hit the ground hard enough. The consumer will contact the manf.

7/3/2012 · Incident, No Injury · MANLEY TOYS (TOY NETWORK) · New York

Caller stated that he owns a Banzai water slide. He is experiencing similar problems of Release #12-174. His kids are between 60 and 40 pounds, however, the slide tends to deflate and cave in every time they are using it. There has been no injury. 5/2012 The manufacturer was contacted, however, the information they were instructing him to send to them are irrelevant. This slide needs to be recalled because of the safety hazard it poses.

7/25/2014 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · PalPlay (Marian Plast) Ltd · California

We purchased a Slide from Wal-Mart. It is a Plastic slide, a Marian Plast 587 Jumbo Slide with water connection. It was put together as per their instructions. The slide has a weight limit at 110 lbs. A 7 year old child was the first to use it. She went down it at a speed which we thought was a little too fast. When she hit the second part of the slide she went airbourne and came off the slide about 4-5 inches. When she finally mader contact with the slide again it was at the very end of the slide. She slammed her butt at the end of the slide very hard with her butt. The end of the slide even bounced when she hit it. I feel this product is dangerous to the children it is made for. The speed in which the children get to is to fast considering the design of the slide. After the second hump in the slide the slide is to steep and too short which causes the child to go airbourne then slamming into the end of the slide. That then causes the child to suffer from needless pain and the jarring of the child's backbone. I feel this could cause a child to sustain a back injury just playing on this slide

6/9/2016 · Injury, Level of care not known · Focus Brand Ltd · Arizona

The 66" tall, 140 lbs., consumer was sliding down the water slide, head first and on her stomach. The consumer hit her stomach against the edge of the pool, which was covered by the edge of the inflatable slide. She sustained bruises to the front right and left sides of her hip bones from the incident. There was bruising, but the consumer treated herself at home. This prompted the consumer to search the Internet and that is when she found out that this mfr's pools had been recalled. 6/2015: The consumer contacted her local Wal-Mart in AZ. The retailer's rep. told her that the bar code that she had did not come up in their system. The rep. suggested that the consumer contact the mfr. The caller contacted ToyQuest, which is the firm listed on her slide's packaging. The caller spoke to a representative who informed her that the recall is over. The consumer then sent an e-mail (customerservice@toysinquiry.com) to the company. The consumer was sent a reply stating "..Please note that the recall on your product stopped in 2012. Sorry we will not be able to assist you with this matter." The email was signed from Toys Inquiry (1-800-434-6178). (date unknown) During another instance, one of her children were on the slide and it began to deflate and caused the child to fall off of it. However, the child was not injured. (date unknown) During another instance, another one of her children was on the slide, when it started to deflate. The child fell off of hit and hit the concrete, but was not injured. * Since these instances occurred prior to her finding out about the recall, the consumer thought that the air pump might have malfunctioned or wasn't set up properly. After finding out about the recall, she became aware of other people who experienced problems with these slides. NOTE: The consumer purchased one slide and liked it so much that she purchased a 2nd slide. She has 4 children, which allowed the slides to be used more frequently. 6/

Showing 8 of 14 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Sports Protective Equipment & Gear

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides): cross-group products nearest on danger score (35/100), estimated annual ER visits (5,990/yr), and hospitalization share (2.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides) ranks #419 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #267 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) ranks #419 by PlainSafety danger score (35/100) and #267 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (5,990/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides)?

The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 9,476 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides) injuries?

The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 63,755 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides)?

Of all ER visits involving water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides), approximately 2.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.6%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with water slides, backyard/home (not swimming pool slides)?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Water Slides, Backyard/home (not Swimming Pool Slides) is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.