35
CPSC NEISS Data 2005–2024

Panelboards, Circuit Breakers, Gfcis, Or Fuses

Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.

Floors, Walls & Ceilings · CPSC Code 4063

Stable over 5 years

The verdict

Panelboards, Circuit Breakers, Gfcis, Or Fuses carry a danger score of 35/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 1,234 ER-treated injuries a year that are roughly flat over the last five years.

35/100
danger score (low risk)
1,234
ER visits per year (avg)
8.0%
end in hospital admission
35-44
most-injured age group

Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 4063 - last data year 2024.

PlainSafety danger score

0/100100/10035/100
PlainSafety danger score

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 35/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume1,234 ER visits/yr
  • Severity (hospitalization rate)8.0%
  • Fatality rate0.00%
  • 5-year trend-4%

See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Panelboards, Circuit Breakers, Gfcis, Or Fuses (CPSC product code 4063, in the Floors, Walls & Ceilings category) generate an estimated 1,234 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 24,683 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 35/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2007 (1,810 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (644 estimated visits).

The single most common ER diagnosis for panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses is electric shock to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 3,772 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the head (2,384 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 4,327 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 8.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 89 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

1,234
Injuries / Year
8.0%
Hospitalization Rate
0.00%
Fatality Rate

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

5001K2K2K 20052008201120142017202020232024 2K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Panelboards, Circuit Breakers, Gfcis, Or Fuses, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 691 295 986
5-14 1,877 549 2,426
15-24 2,877 1,371 4,248
25-34 2,937 882 3,819
35-44 3,234 1,093 4,327
45-54 3,257 905 4,162
55-64 1,672 430 2,102
65-74 1,161 406 1,567
75+ 686 369 1,055

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
All Parts Body Electric Shock 3,772
Head Laceration 2,384
Finger Laceration 2,002
Head Internal Injury 1,456
Hand Laceration 1,119
Hand Burn, Electrical 1,036
Face Laceration 857
Hand Fracture 663
All Parts Body Anoxia 538
Finger Burn, Electrical 479
Head Concussion 476
Lower Arm Laceration 468
Head Contusions, Abr. 436
Face Burn, Electrical 360
Internal Ingestion 358

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 88.3% (21,784)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 5.2% (1,279)
Treated And Transferred 2.9% (723)
Left Without Being Seen 2.3% (561)
Held For Observation 1.4% (337)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 27 · Female · Head · Concussion · 2024

27YOF HIT HEAD ON ELECTRICAL BOX HANGING ON WALL AT 5PM YESTERDAY. HAS HEADACHE. DX: CONCUSSION, HEAD INJURY

Age 35 · Female · All Parts Body · Electric Shock · 2024

35 YOF PARESTHESIA AFTER GETTING ELECTROCUTED, SHE WAS CHECKING HER BREAKER AT HOME WHEN IT HAPPENED. DX: ELECTRICAL INJURY IN ADULT, THUMB PAIN

Age 41 · Male · Hand · Burn, Electrical · 2024

41YOM PRESENTS WITH ELECTRICAL BURNS TO BILATERAL HANDS. PATIENT STATES HE WAS TRYING TO FIX THE BREAKER AT HIS FRIEND'S HOUSE WHEN HE FELT A SUDDEN SHOCK AND SAW A BRIGHT LIGHT WHICH MADE HIM FALL BACKWARD ONTO HIS BUTTOCKS. NO LOC. DX: BURN HAND PALM SECOND DEGREE LEFT, BURN HAND PALM SECOND DEGREE RIGHT.

Age 53 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

53YOM C/O FINGER LACERATION. PATIENT CUT HIS FINGER ON THE METALLIC PART OF AN ELECTRICAL BOX. 1.5 CM LACERATION MEDIAL ASPECT OF THIRD DIGIT RIGHT HAND NOTED. LACERATION CLOSED WITH ADHESIVE AND ***. DX: LACERATION WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 50 · Male · All Parts Body · Electric Shock · 2024

50YOM STS SHOCKED BY ELECTRICAL PANEL ABOUT 120 VOLTS DX NS

Age 54 · Female · Foot · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

54YOF DROPPED A BREAKER BOX ON HER LEFT FOOT YESTERDAY AT HOME.DX: CONTUSION LEFT FOOT.

Age 68 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

68YOF CUT HER RIGHT MIDDLE FINGER CLOSED IT IN AN ELECTRICAL BOX TWO WEEKS AGO DX: INJURY FINGER

Age 65 · Male · All Parts Body · Electric Shock · 2024

65YOM PT REAACHED WITH RT HAND TO TURN OFF A CIRCUIT BREAKER, THERE WAS AN EXPOSED WIRE THAT TOUCHED PT'S FOREARM & SHOCKED PT, WITH 277V DX: ELECTRIC SHOCK

Age 26 · Male · All Parts Body · Electric Shock · 2024

26YOM WAS HELPIN FATHER REPAIR A DRYER & PT TOUCHED WIRE & IT SHOCKED HIM LASTING 1 SECOND, DEVELOPED NUMBNESS & TINGLING LEFT ARM, PT SAYS SHOCKED W/ 18.5 AMP FUSE DX ELECTROCUTION NON FATAL EFFECTS OF ELECTRIC CURRENT

Age 45 · Female · Upper Arm · Burn, Electrical · 2024

45YOF PRESENTS WITH BURN TO UPPER LEFT ARM AFTER WHILE WALKING OUTSIDE SHE BECAME LIGHT-HEADED AND FELL AGAINST AN ELECTRICAL BOX DX: BURN OF BACK, BURN OF LEFT ARM, NEAR SYNCOPE

Age 42 · Female · Head · Hematoma · 2024

42YOF PT WAS SLEEP WALKING, WALKED INTO A BREAKER BOX, WOKE UP BLOODY DX: HEMATOMA OF SCALP

Age 10 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

10 YOM WAS WALKING SIDEWAYS AND HIT RIGHT SIDE OF FOREHEAD ON AN ELECTRICAL BOX, HAS A LACERATION ABOVE HIS RIGHT EYEBROW, DX: FOREHEAD LACERATION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/6/2022 · Incident, No Injury · Schneider Electric USA Inc · Maryland

We were informed of a Schneider circuit breaker panel recall of its QO line when we experience serious rusting and overheating in our Schneider breaker panel, which was only installed 1.5 years ago. Our panel is a Homeline panel and not part of the recall, however the manufactured date code matches the QO recall. We are having to pay out of pocket for a full replacement, and in the meantime, less than half of our house has electricity.

9/27/2016 · Incident, No Injury · Schneider Electric USA Inc · Tennessee

On Sunday September 25 2016, a fire was reported at [REDACTED] in Knox County, Tennessee. Fire was determined to have started in a electrical disconnect box for the HVAC unit. 5 other boxes also showed similar damage from a high resistance heating connection where the breaker snaps onto the bus bars. All units were installed in 1990 and were Square D model QO200TR with 30 amp breakers installed.

9/24/2022 · Incident, No Injury · EATON CORPORATION · California

We plugged our [REDACTED] into our 240 v power [REDACTED] charger, which had been installed by an electrician and permitted by the city. After charging for 3% the charging stopped. The circuit breaker appeared to have blown. When my electrician arrived to fix the issue he discovered that the circuit breaker had not blown but had actually caught fire and burned the fuse box. The electrician explained it should never happen and appears to be a defective product. He has seen numerous other Eaton circuit breakers fail, when used with electric vehicles, but this is his first experience with one causing a fire.

9/20/2022 · Incident, No Injury · Schneider Electric USA Inc · New Jersey

Electrical panel has tripped several times. The one that tripped is very hot to the touch

9/16/2011 · Incident, No Injury · EATON CORPORATION · Wisconsin

The consumer's husband works in the basement and sometimes uses an electric heater. Their basement developed an odor and they believe that it started around 3/8/2010. The consumer had the installer check her furnace and hot water heater, but they did not find anything. The consumer noticed a burning odor in her home and a dead-mouse like odor around September 2010. (9/16/11) The consumer had an electrician come out to her home and he checked the breakers in the home. The consumer electrician was familiar with this problem and he was able to identify that the circuit breakers were the problem. The electrician removed 4 of the breakers, but he plans to come back out on 9/19/11, to replace all of their breakers. The electrician said that the consumers could have had a house fire. The corners of the breakers were burned, but damage was limited to the breakers. The consumer also check www.saferproducts.gov and she said that someone reported a similar problem on 4/27/2011, with this same exact mfr's breakers.

8/5/2013 · Incident, No Injury · SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC · Illinois

Siemens circuit breaker-- double 30A "2 pole Type QP" Household use-- connected to air conditioner. One pole tripped, but did not cause second pole to trip. This caused an overheat/arc situation, resulting in the spring clip of one pole breaker to melt to the busbar in the panel, and damage to the outer casing of the breaker.

8/4/2012 · Incident, No Injury · SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC · Michigan

On Saturday, 7-28-12 I lost partial power to my pole barn. I went to my main fuse panel in the house and heard electrical sparking. I removed the face panel and could hear it was coming from a 60 amp breaker which fed my pole barn. I put a screwdriver on one of the screws and tightened and the sparking went away. On 7-29-12 at appx 6pm my compressor in the barn kicked on and I heard a loud crack. All of my power in the barn was out. I went downstairs to look at my panel. There was black residue on the panel cover. I removed the panel cover and noticed that both of the legs were black and the 60 amp breaker was tripped and angular. I checked voltage and there was none at the 60 amp breaker. I pulled the 60 amp breaker out, for replacement purposes, and the panel began to arc. I tried to pull the main, 200 amp breaker but it would not move. The panel is on fire and electricity continues to flow into the panel. The wires and breakers were burning. I used two fire extinguishers on the fire. The fire department responded and pulled the meter. If I had not been home I am sure the house would have caught on fire. Luckily the damage, smoke, was confined mostly to the basement of my home. I still have the damaged panel in my possession.

8/31/2015 · Incident, No Injury · AMERICAN CIRCUIT BREAKER CORPORATION · Washington

1. My sister was renting my condo from May 2013 to August 2014. During that time, a ceiling mounted track lighting fixture with four lights "blew up". She also reported having repeated electrical problems with kitchen outlets not working. No irregular use. No Injuries. 2. I moved into my condo in August 2014. I also experienced kitchen outlets not working. Also my FPE box has loose circuit breakers. One of them was so loose, that when turned back on, the outlets connected to that circuit, remained dead for several minutes. The FPE box would cause that circuit to fail. I therefore replaced my panel box in June 2015.

Showing 8 of 89 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses on the CPSC website.

Frequently Asked Questions

How dangerous are panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses?

Based on 20 years of CPSC data, panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses have a danger score of 35/100 (low risk). An estimated 1,234 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.

What are the most common injuries from panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses?

The most common injury is electric shock to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 3,772 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses injuries?

The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 4,327 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses?

Of all ER visits involving panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses, approximately 8.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with panelboards, circuit breakers, gfcis, or fuses?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Safety Guides

What this means for you

Treat the 35/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.

  • See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
  • Injuries cluster in the 35-44 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
  • Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls

NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.

Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.