CPSC NEISS · code 463

Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders

Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders: danger rank #213 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #215 of 838 (9,476 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Containers, Tableware & Packaging CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders ranks #213 of 838 by danger score (39/100) at ER-volume #215 of 838 (9,476/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#213
danger rank of 838
#215
ER-volume rank of 838
39/100
danger score
9,476/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (39/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

39 Around the middle lower than 25% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 73/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

D
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 8 65th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 9,476 72nd 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -3% 61st 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 306 99th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 189,539 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 463. Segments sum to 189,539 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers, Tableware & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Containers, Tableware & Packaging danger scores

1. Waste Containers, Trash B…45/1002. Knives, Not Elsewhere Cla…44/1003. Drinking Glasses, Cups, A…42/1004. Cookware, Not Specified42/1005. Manual Cleaning Equipment…41/1006. Kitchen Gadgets, Not Else…41/1007. Unpowered Coffee Makers O…41/1008. Candles, Candlesticks And…39/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10039/100
PlainSafety danger score · Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 39/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for candles, candlesticks and other candle holders - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 9,476 ER visits/yr Above median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 8.0% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-3%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for candles, candlesticks and other candle holders are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2005 (12,703 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (7,310 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 20,910 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by burns, thermal to the hand (15,316 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 34,127 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 8.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 306 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how candles, candlesticks and other candle holders fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

6K8K10K12K14K 20052008201120142017202020232024 10K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 17,692 16,348 34,127
5-14 11,367 12,264 23,631
15-24 11,962 19,127 31,089
25-34 10,312 19,119 29,431
35-44 7,446 17,017 24,519
45-54 6,915 13,046 19,961
55-64 5,003 8,642 13,645
65-74 3,377 4,685 8,062
75+ 995 4,008 5,003

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 20,910
Hand Burns, Thermal 15,316
Hand Laceration 15,051
Face Burns, Thermal 11,613
Hand Burn, Scald 8,921
Foot Laceration 8,038
Finger Burns, Thermal 7,680
Face Laceration 6,872
All Parts Body Anoxia 6,097
Head Laceration 4,896
Head Internal Injury 3,632
Foot Contusions, Abr. 3,336
Finger Burn, Scald 3,219
Lower Arm Burns, Thermal 2,613
Upper Trunk Burns, Thermal 2,528

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 90.2% (170,897)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 4.9% (9,363)
Treated And Transferred 2.7% (5,192)
Left Without Being Seen 1.9% (3,665)
Held For Observation 0.2% (422)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 21 · Male · Hand · Burn, Scald · 2024

21YOM PRESENTS WITH A BURN TO HIS RIGHT HAND AND FOREARM AFTER A POT OF MELTED WAX AND FIRE EXPLODED AND LANDED ON HIS RIGHT HAND AND FOREARM, UNKNOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENT DX: BURN OF HAND

Age 33 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

33YOF WITH LACERATION TO HER RIGHT THIRD FINGER. STATES SHE WAS REMOVING A CANDLE THAT WAS BROKEN, HER FINGER SLIPPED AND SHE ACCIDENTALLY CUT HER FINGER ON A PIECE OF BROKEN GLASS. LACERATION NOTED. DX: FINGER LACERATION

Age 47 · Female · Face · Burns, Thermal · 2024

47YOF, C/O BURNS TO NOSE AFTER HER DOG KNOCKED OVER A CANDLE SET FIRE TO HER HOUSE, , SOOT NOTED AROUND NOSE & MOUTH BUT NOT INSIDE EITHER DX:: PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN TO FACE, AMA

Age 50 · Male · Ankle · Burn, Scald · 2024

50YOM P/W BURN TO FEET, PT WAS HOLDING CANDLE, HE DROPPED IT W/ BLISTERS ON ANKLE AND TOE, PT ENDORSES USING 6 BAGS HERION LAST NIGHT, DX:BURN, DRUG PROBLEM

Age 72 · Male · Face · Burns, Thermal · 2024

72 YOM WAS ATTEMPTING TO LIGHT A CANDLE WHEN HIS OXYGEN TUBING CAUGHT FIRE AND BURNED HIS FACE. +FD. DX: FACE BURNS FIRST DEGREE, SUPERFICIAL BURN OF LEFT HAND.

Age 43 · Unknown · Hand · Burns, Thermal · 2024

43YO *** FEMALE HAD A CANDLE BURNING LAST NIGHT AND HAD CONCERNS IT WAS GOING TO BURN ITEMS AROUND IT SO *** SMOTHERED IT WITH *** HAND RESULTING IN BLISTERED TO THE R PALM DX: BURN

Age 14 · Female · Foot · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

14YOF PATIENT DROPPED A CANDLE ON HER FOOT DX: CONTUSION OF RIGHT FOOT

Age 24 · Male · Pubic Region · Burn, Scald · 2024

24 YOM STATES HE GOT HOT CANDLE WAX ON THE TIP OF HIS PENIS. DX: SUPERFICIAL BURN

Age 40 · Male · Hand · Burns, Thermal · 2024

40 YOM PRESENTS WITH A BURN. REPORTS A CANDLE CAUGHT HIS FIREPLACE MANTEL ON FIRE. HE TRIED TO PUT OUT THE FIRE INITIALLY WITH POTHOLDERS AND BURNED HIS HANDS. ?FD DX BURNS TO HANDS

Age 36 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

36YOM COMING FROM LIVING FACILITY AFTER SETTING FIRE IN WHICH CANDLE FELL AND IT SET HIS CURTAINS ON FIRE. UNKNOWN IF *** INVOLVED. PT HAS PALPITATIONS AND ENDORSES CRACK USE DX: SUBSTANCE USE

Age 51 · Female · All Parts Body · Anoxia · 2024

51 YOF WAS SHOWERING AND SMELLED SMOKE, AND NOTICED A CANDLE HAD CAUGHT SOMETHING ON FIRE, PT SUSTAINED A SUPERFICIAL BURN TO BACK, COHGB NOT DONE, UNKNOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT. DX: SMOKE INHALATION

Age 23 · Female · Lower Leg · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

23YOF C/O OF LOWER LEG ABRASION S/P PT STATES PT SCRAPPED HER LEG ON A BROKEN CANDLE A WHILE AGO. NO FOREIGN BODY FOUND IN LEG DURING EXAM. DX: LOW LEG ABRASIONS

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/7/2022 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · GOOSE CREEK CANDLES, LLC · Rhode Island

I purchased a Goose Creek Candle (double wick) "Blueberry Cheesecake" scent. I lit it and about 2 hours later, the flames starting getting higher and higher and the candle shattered.

9/6/2025 · Incident, No Injury · APOTHEKE · Tennessee

On September 1, 2025, I was burning an Apotheke charcoal Votive candle. The candle was lit indoors on a flat, stable, non-flammable kitchen counter surface, away from other objects or debris, and was being used exactly as intended for normal household fragrance and ambiance. The entire top surface of the candle ignitednot just the wick. The container split apart during the fire. When I moved it to the sink and poured water on it, a fireball erupted before the flames finally went out. Wax spread across my sink and into the garbage disposal, possibly causing damage. This incident could have easily resulted in a house fire or injuries if I had not been present. I have photos of the aftermath and the remains of the candle. I have also experienced abnormal performance with another Apotheke charcoal, petite candle (flame extinguishing after short burns), which I understand may relate to fragrance oil load or wick design. I am concerned this represents a wider safety issue with the brand.

9/5/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Lulu Candles · Washington

I was burning a scented 9oz candle in a glass container made by LULU CANDLES. The candle had been used many times previously and approximately 1/2 inch of wax remained in the candle the last time I lit it. The candle was burning for approximately 3-4 hours and the majority of the wax was gone, at which point the glass container violently shattered. Glass fragments were scattered across my floor and counter, and the wick, which was still on fire had fallen out onto my counter top as well. I was able to quickly extinguish the fire but I believe that had I not been within sight of the candle, my apartment could have caught fire.

9/29/2020 · Incident, No Injury · GREENBRIER INTERNATIONAL · Delaware

. We received a complaint yesterday about a 2in1 Sure Scents candle (Peaceful Stream/Moonlit Waves) catching fire and exploding which was purchased from Dollar Tree by [REDACTED] in Dover. We visited the same store that the complainant purchased the candle from this morning ([REDACTED]) and purchased 2 of the candles. We also purchased Sure Scents 2in1 in Hawaiian/ Sweet Vanilla and Ambient brand in Coconut & Beachwood. We conducted a test burn of these items in normal conditions. Within 10 minutes of lighting these candles the Sure Scents (Peaceful Stream/Moonlit Waves) wax ignited onto a flame reaching 6 inches tall. The flame temperature of this candle was over 800 degrees. The candles with no issue had a flame temperature of around 200 degrees. We allowed it to burn for an hour this way before extinguishing it and the entire test was recorded. Both glass containers failed and broke apart. The other two candles had no issues.

9/29/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Bath & Body Works · Michigan

I bought a small stress relief votive candle that is in a plastic holder, from bath and body works in August of 2011. I cut the wick and burned it once for about 20 minutes. The Second time, I cut the wick and burned it again, after 15 minutes, I noticed that the candle had burned down, melted and started to burn my wood dresser. It was on fire!! And burning everything, including two library books and a pair of cotton pants that where nearby. I thank God that I saw this in time and could put it out before it burned my home down to the ground.... Please look into this,as the company has not been forthcoming about this product and the danger it can cause in minutes. There is no warning on this item!!

9/28/2019 · Incident, No Injury · Bath & Body Works · Michigan

Last night, before going to bed, my husband went to blow out a Bath & Body Works candle on our bedside dresser. As he did so, flames shot up the wall and erupted into a fireball across the ceiling. I had just fallen asleep, so it was especially frightening to open my eyes and see nothing but flames above me. I’ve heard of this happening to quite a few others with this particular brand, but figured since we always followed proper precautions - keeping the wicks trimmed, the candle away from combustible objects, and only burned for a couple hours at a time - it wouldn’t happen to us. Sadly, I was wrong. We’ll be spending the weekend scrubbing soot and repainting. However, I’m so thankful that nobody was injured!

9/26/2018 · Incident, No Injury · Walmart Stores Inc. · Arizona

This consumer is reporting an incident with a candle that she purchased from a retail store sometime around September 12th, 2018. On September 24th, 2018 she and her husband were sitting in their family room and had been burning the mulled cider scent candle in the middle of a long counter in their kitchen. Nothing was around the candle, the counter was empty with the exception of this candle. The candle is a wax based candle and it had been burning for approximately one and one half hours when her husband got up to go to the kitchen for a drink and saw the flames from the candle burning at approximately 18 inches high. He immediately pushed the jar to move it but it was too hot for human touch. He kept blowing on the fire at the candle level until it did extinguish. He and the caller let it sit on the counter until it cooled off then they moved it outside to the patio. On September 25th, 2018 the caller wanted to just check whether the candle would burn slowly, however after around an hour it did not flame up the way it had on September 24th but it did become so hot that it blew out the side of the glass jar it was contained in blowing the piece of glass approximately 12 inches outward. There are no injuries being reported. The consumers contacted the retailer because this is their brand and the retailers corporate offices continuously re-route to the nearest store to their caller In addition: * The consumer contacted the manger & assistant manager in person at the store where she purchased the candle. (7421 West Thunderbird Rd., Peoria, AZ 85381 602.627.9848) She was told an email notification would be sent to all stores & added to their "database." * There are numerous YouTube videos online depicting & describing nearly identical experiences with 2 Walmart, Mainstay, jar candles.

9/24/2020 · Incident, No Injury · Pier 1 Imports · Unspecified

My boss gave me a Pier One pumpkin spice candle as a gift. While using the gift, for a second time, and the flames started to get really high and there was quite a bit of smoke. As I went to put out the candle, it exploded. Luckily nothing caught fire and I didn’t get burnt or anything. I managed to put the flames out.

Showing 8 of 306 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to candles, candlesticks and other candle holders on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Containers, Tableware & Packaging

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders: cross-group products nearest on danger score (39/100), estimated annual ER visits (9,476/yr), and hospitalization share (8.0%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders ranks #213 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #215 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does candles, candlesticks and other candle holders rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, candles, candlesticks and other candle holders ranks #213 by PlainSafety danger score (39/100) and #215 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (9,476/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from candles, candlesticks and other candle holders?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 20,910 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from candles, candlesticks and other candle holders increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for candles, candlesticks and other candle holders injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 34,127 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by candles, candlesticks and other candle holders?

Of all ER visits involving candles, candlesticks and other candle holders, approximately 8.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with candles, candlesticks and other candle holders?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Candles, Candlesticks And Other Candle Holders is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.