Window Shades, Venetian Blinds Or Indoor Shutters
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Home Furnishings & Fixtures · CPSC Code 638
Stable over 5 years
The verdict
Window Shades, Venetian Blinds Or Indoor Shutters carry a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk), driven by roughly 4,019 ER-treated injuries a year that are roughly flat over the last five years.
- 40/100
- danger score (moderate risk)
- 4,019
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 12.0%
- end in hospital admission
- 75+
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 638 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 40/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume4,019 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)12.0%
- Fatality rate0.08%
- 5-year trend-4%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Window Shades, Venetian Blinds Or Indoor Shutters (CPSC product code 638, in the Home Furnishings & Fixtures category) generate an estimated 4,019 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 80,386 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 40/100 for this category (moderate risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2015 (5,257 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2007 (3,060 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 7,587 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the finger (6,711 cases). The 75+ age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 23,582 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 12.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.08%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 37 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 6,345 | 3,952 | |
| 5-14 | 3,386 | 2,707 | |
| 15-24 | 2,423 | 2,536 | |
| 25-34 | 2,697 | 3,623 | |
| 35-44 | 2,408 | 3,671 | |
| 45-54 | 2,082 | 4,326 | |
| 55-64 | 2,678 | 5,897 | |
| 65-74 | 2,738 | 5,257 | |
| 75+ | 5,986 | 17,596 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Fracture | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Wrist | Fracture | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Mouth | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
65 YOM HANGING BLINDS FELL ONTOP OF ENTERTAINMENT CENTER HURT RIBS DX CLOSED FX RIB
48YOF COMPLAINS OF PAIN IN LOWER BACK AFTER HANGING BLINDS. SHE WAS USING A STEPSTOOL AND WORKING OVER HER HEAD AND TWISTED. DX: STRAIN OF LUMBOSACRAL REGION
31YOM STATES METAL BLINDS FELL ON HEAD, DX LAC TO HEAD
28YOM W/ PMHX OF DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY HITS HEAD AS PART OF HIS BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCES, PT HIT FOREHEAD ON HIS WINDOW'S BLINDS AND THE PLASTIC CUT HIM DX: LACERATION OF FACE
54YOM KICKED METAL BLINDS ON A WINDOW OUT OF FRUSTRATION AND THE METAL BLINDS FELL FROM THE WINDOW ONTO HIS FOOT AND CUT HIS RIGHT FOOT DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT FOOT
62YOF PRESENTING TO THE ER WITH L SHOULDER PAIN AFTER MECHANICAL FALL. PATIENT REPORTS THAT SHE WAS ADJUSTING HER BLINDS, TURNED AROUND AND TRIPPED OVER THE WALKER CAUSING HER TO FALL ONTO HER LEFT SIDE. PT HAS SHOULDER AND ARM PAIN DX: CLOSED DISPLACED SPIRAL FX OF SHAFT OF HUMERUS
68YOF C/O LEFT SHOULDER DISLOCATION S/P PT STATES SHE 1-2 WEEKS AGO SHE WAS TRYING TO HAND SHADES IN A BEDROOM AND FELL ONTO HER ARM. DX: ANTERIOR DISLOCATION OF LEFT SHOULDER
78YOM PT LOST BALANCE IN KITCHEN & FELL INTO THE BLINDS AGAINST A WALL DX: WEAKNESS, FALL
50 YOM REPORTS HE WAS SHUTTING THE WINDOW BLINDS WHEN THE METAL BAR CAME DOWN SMASHING HIS LEFT MIDDLE FINGER, DX:CLOSED FRACTURE OF TUFT OF MIDDLE FINGER, SUBUNGAL HEMATOMA OF FINGER
22YOM PRESENTS WITH INJURY TO SMALL FINGER. PATIENT STATES HE BRUSHED HIS FINGERS ACROSS THE BLINDS IN HOME WHICH WERE SHARP AND LACERATED HIS FINGER. DX: FINGER LACERATION
2YOM PRESENTED TO ED C/O LIP LACERATION, SUSTAINED LIP LACERATION AFTER A WINDOW SHADES FELL ONTO HIM. DX; LIP LACERATION
2YOM PRESENTED TO ED C/O LACERATION TO UPPER LIP, PT SUSTAINED LIP LACERATION FROM WINDOW BLINDS, BROKE AND FELL ONTO PATIENT. DX; LACERATION OF LIP
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
On September 4, 2010, three year old [REDACTED] was strangled by the continuous loop cord on a set of window blinds in his home. On September 6, [2010], [REDACTED] died as a result of the asphyxiation. The window blinds were cellular pleated Louverdrape Carousel blinds, a brand name of Levolor home fashions. The clutch component of the blinds was designed and manufactured by RollEase, Inc. The blinds were sold by Bud's Drapery Den of Tucson, Arizona in July, 2002. At the time of [REDACTED] death, the blinds contained by warnings, and there was no tension device installed.
The mechanism for a cordless window shade failed suddenly sending an eleven inch spring rocketing a cross the room and impacting a wall with such force as to create a hole in the sheetrock wall six feet three inches away. The spring broke through a plastic end cap sending sharp pieces of plastic all over the room. This is the fifth such failure of this model cordless shade and the most dramatic.
The consumer stated that there is a design flaw in the three solar shades. The consumer purchased the product about 15 years ago. About 4 months ago, as he was bringing one of the shades down by using the release chain, the plastic mechanism fractured. The consumer was standing under the shade as it was coming down and was hit right about his eye. About 4 weeks ago, the same thing happened with a different shade. This time the shade hit the consumer's hand. The consumer stated that the shades weigh about 8 to 10lbs each. No medical attention was required time. However, the consumer stated that he has pains in his hand and may seek medical attention.
My family has window blinds from SelectBlinds.com installed on almost every window in our home (20+ windows). All installations used the provided hanging hardware, and followed directions as indicated from SelectBlinds.com. All of the products were purchased approximately 4 years ago. On the evening of Monday, September 14, 2020, my husband and I were sitting in our family room when a loud explosive/bang startled us. A large metal spring (approx. 9 inches long and 1 inch thick) was ejected from the top of the window blind, broke through a plastic end cap on the product, and hit the window trim and opposite wall with great force. The malfunction resulted in plastic fragments strewn about the room, and of course, a broken window covering. Upon examination, we surmised that the large metal spring was under tension when the plastic "hook" that was holding it in place cracked and released it. The potential for this malfunction, and the force at which the spring hit part of our window and wall is a major safety concern. We have two small children who play in this room often, and we have the same product installed in almost every room of our home. I immediately contacted SelectBlinds to notify them of the incident, and they replied that their Quality Control department would look into it and get back to me. I found this response to be lacking and untimely. I truly hope that there is a way to quickly notify all customers of the potential for this to occur, the safety risk, and the danger to children for a significant injury.
07/2012 The consumer stated that he was closing the blinds with the remote. The blinds continued to spin for about 5 or 6 seconds. The consumer stated that he discovered that the plastic gears had fractured. Shortly afterwards the blinds fell to the floor. It made a little dent on the floor. These blinds are located in the family room. (9/09/2012) The consumer stated that he opened all of the blinds in his house that are motorized. He heard a funny noise. He looked up. The blinds in his child's playroom was going up and down by itself. The consumer's wife heard the sound and she went and grab the child preventing her and the child from being hit. Within 45 seconds the blind crashed down to the floor from its bracket. The fall is about 12' minimum. The consumer stated that he looked at it and saw that the plastic mechanism that hold its in place was fractured. The consumer stated that he contacted the manufacturer each time. He was told that they would replaced all of the motorized bilnds. He was also told that they would not replace them with the same product. No one ever came out to look at the blinds. They just suggested that they be replaced. The manufacturer ws contacted on 9/9 and 9/10. Messages were left. He is still waiting for a call.
I was taking down a set of 2" custom cut mini blinds so I could paint the window trim. You have to push up on the bracket that houses the ends of the blind's headrail in order to open the bracket and slide out the headrail. I had the right side bracket open and was trying to open the left one when the headrail slipped out of the bracket on the right. The edge of the headrail landed on my right wrist, causing a 2" long laceration and exposing tendons and my wrist bone. I received approximately 20 stitches (10 external, I was not informed how many internal stitches were required), and may have nerve damage. These blinds were custom cut to fit our window and the edge of the headrail is very sharp where thy were cut to size. One of the EMTs who responded to my 911 call even commented on how sharp it was.
Caller says that when she put the blinds up they had a very foul odor. Caller says that she had to open the patio door and place a fan in the room because the fumes where very strong. Caller says that she went to the doctor on 8/27/18 and the doctor informed the caller that there may have been formaldehyde in the product based on her symptom's. Caller has not contacted the manufacturer. Contacted home depot cooperate office they informed the caller that they would give her a call back but she has not heard from them yet.
We received some blinds in 2012 manufactured by Bali which have cords which don't seem to meet the rules enacted in 1995 (no external cord ends joined in a loop) and are a choking hazard to our grandchild.
Showing 8 of 37 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters have a danger score of 40/100 (moderate risk). An estimated 4,019 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 7,587 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters injuries?
The 75+ age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 23,582 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters?
Of all ER visits involving window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters, approximately 12.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (88.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with window shades, venetian blinds or indoor shutters?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Home Furnishings & Fixtures
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 40/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 75+ age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.