Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Welding Equipment ranks #370 of 838 by danger score (36/100) at ER-volume #171 of 838 (13,312/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #370
- danger rank of 838
- #171
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 36/100
- danger score
- 13,312/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (36/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
36 Around the middle lower than 44% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 41/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 2 | 15th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 13,312 | 77th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -16% | 42nd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 5 | 34th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 266,234 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 896. Segments sum to 266,234 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Communication & Entertainment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Communication & Entertainment danger scores
How this 36/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for welding equipment - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 13,312 ER visits/yr High volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.0% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-16%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for welding equipment are declining by about 16% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2007 (17,518 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (7,122 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is radiation to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 135,388 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by foreign body to the eyeball (40,630 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 73,326 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.0% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 5 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how welding equipment fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 375 | 489 | |
| 5-14 | 2,467 | 238 | |
| 15-24 | 70,661 | 2,665 | |
| 25-34 | 65,814 | 1,010 | |
| 35-44 | 54,364 | 1,039 | |
| 45-54 | 37,708 | 414 | |
| 55-64 | 18,332 | 102 | |
| 65-74 | 7,814 | 104 | |
| 75+ | 2,516 | 0 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Eyeball | Radiation | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Eyeball | Derma/conjunct | |
| Hand | Burns, Thermal | |
| Finger | Burns, Thermal | |
| Lower Arm | Burns, Thermal | |
| Lower Leg | Burns, Thermal | |
| Face | Burns, Thermal | |
| Eyeball | Burns, Thermal | |
| Finger | Laceration | |
| All Parts Body | Electric Shock | |
| Finger | Puncture | |
| Foot | Burns, Thermal |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
17 YOM WAS AT SCHOOL IN BUILDING TRADES CLASS USING A WELDER AND GOT SOMETHING IN EYE DX ABRASION EYE2 VFOREIGN BODY EYE
33 YOM USING MIG WELDER ENDED UP STABBING HAND WITH WIRE DX PUNCTURE WOUND HAND
29 YOM WAS WELDING YESTERDAY AND DID NOT USE THE APPROPRIATE HYPERADDUCTION. NOW HAD EYE PAIN AND IRRITATION. DX: WELDERS FLASH OF BOTH EYES
24YOM C/O EYE PROBLEM/WELDING ARC BURNS TO BOTH EYES. HE WAS WELDING WITHOUT USING A WELDING SHIELD. LEFT CORNEAL ABRASION. DX: PHOTOKERATITIS, BILATERAL
36YOM C/O SHOULDER/ARM PROBLEM. HAS RECURRENT ISSUES WITH SHOULDER WHICH HAVE WORSENED SINCE WELDING. RADIOGRAPHS NEGATIVE FOR ACUTE FRACTURE. COMPLAINS OF RIGHT LATERAL SHOULDER PAIN. DX: SHOULDER STRAIN
34YOM PRESENTS AFTER HE WAS STRUCK IN THE RIGHT THIGH WITH A SMALL STEEL ROD WHILE HE WAS DOING SOME WELDING DX: CELLULITIS AND ABSCESS OF UPPER LEG AND SKIN FOREIGN BODY
22 YOM BILAT EYE PAIN WELDING W/O PROTECTION DX; UVK
34 YOM WAS WELDING METAL WHEN A SPARK FLEW UNDER HIS PROTECTIVE GLASSES INTO HIS LEFT EYE. DX: FOREIGN BODY LEFT EYE.
59 YOM CHEST PAIN WHILE WELDING DX; CHEST PAIN
38YOM PRESENTS WITH REDNESS AND SWELLING AND PAIN TO HIS LEFT INDEX FINGER AFTER HE POKED IT WITH A WELDING WIRE DX: CELLULITIS
34YOM, C/O EYE TRAUMA RIGHT EYE, WELDING ACCIDENTALLY STABBED RIGHT EYE W/ PIECE OF METAL, BLURRY VISION & PHOTOPHOBIA DX: CORNEAL ABRASION RIGHT EYE
37 YOM PRESENTS WITH BILATERAL EYE PAIN. HE WAS WELDING HIS CAR WEARING A WELDING HOOD. IT WAS A DUSTY ENVIRONMENT. DX CORNEAL ABRASIONS
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Welder was welding with a fibre-metal Model 110WH HLMT 110 WHITE SH 10 PC made by North Safety Products co., Cranston, RI, when the weld hood caught on fire around the lens and forehead area.
Welding goggles that I purchased failed, causing me to burn myself. I was using a new pair of welding goggles that I purchased just the day before to do some brazing of copper tubing in my basement. I had almost completed my braze, when I lifted up the shaded glass on the goggles (it's hinged) to inspect my braze, when suddenly the shaded glass fell from the goggles. I was holding the lit torch in my right hand, and I operated the goggles with my left hand. When the glass fell, I instinctively reached for it, causing the lit torch, with a large, multi-flame tip attachment, to come into direct contact with the back of my arm, causing a severe burn. I almost dropped the lit torch. I shut off the torch, removed the goggles, and then got a wet cloth on my burned arm. I inspected the goggles and noticed that they appear to have a manufacturing defect which caused this problem to happen. The frame that holds the shaded glass into the goggles is designed to allow the glass to be removed and replaced (possibly for different levels of shading?). The glass is retained by a piece of springy wire that is supposed to hook into holes on the left and right at the top of the frame. The hole on one side of that frame was defective. Instead of a hole through the plastic, the back-side was missing, so it was just a dent. As long as the shaded glass frame was down, it held the wire in place, but as soon as it was raised, the wire would spring out, thereby allowing the shaded glass to fall out. Here is a link to the product at Lowe's: http://www.lowes.com/pd_13867-47120-SGY-WELD14_0__?productId=50017000&Ntt=blue+hawk+welding&pl=1¤tURL=%3FNtt%3Dblue%2Bhawk%2Bwelding&facetInfo= Product name: "Blue Hawk Black Welding Safety Glasses" Item #: 13867 Product #: SGY-WELD14
My BernzOmatic propane torch started to leak propane through a small hole on the gas valve. The manufacturer claims that this is a safety in the event of an internal seal failure. I purchased this torch approximately 8 years ago and used it less than 10 times and it failed. The manufacturer seems to have no issue with their product failing after minimal use and feels that venting flammable gas in the direction of the operator is a good safety practice. After I discovered the failure I discontinued use and detached the propane cylinder. I have read on-line about others having the same issue. The torch is black plastic with a blue plastic grip and a red gas valve and ignition trigger. The blue handle says BernzOmatic and the number 307 is stamped near the ignition trigger. There are no other markings on the torch and no safety instructions or mention of the safety relief on the gas valve.
(12/8/2015The consumer is concerned that the machine can explode because it does not have safety valves. The consumer also stated that the product is poorly constructed. There is stainless steel welded to regular steel. Regular steel will rust and leak causing it to leak hydrogen and oxygen gas. The water and gas exchange chamber on the top of the machine is welded together by pieces of flimsy sheet metal that has a high possibility of rupturing if there is a flashback to the chamber. The water and gas exchange chamber does not have an emergency release valve in case of flashback. This will cause a major explosion. (12/08/2015) The consumer contacted the manufacturer with his concerns. He asked for his money and was refunded. He was advised to ship the product back to the company in California. The consumer still has the product. Here is a YouTube Video that will explain this King Kar 600 dangers I am talking about. https://wwwyoutube.com/watch?v=TGo3udd0t7g&feature=youtu.be Hello there I been dealing with HHO Gas machines for a long time. I understand fully the dangers of the manufacturing of the machine to be safe or not. I ordered this King Kar 600 machine from China and I was promised it would be high-quality and safe to use. After a thorough examination I found this machine to be unsafe for the public and for commercial applications. There is many different issues going on with this King Kar 600 model that you will see clearly in our video on YouTube. I thought doing a YouTube video would be great because videos give you a 360 degree outlook on what is taking place instead of pictures that do not say anything showing compared to a video that is show and tell. This video is on YouTube marked unlisted and not available to the public to be viewed. Only people that are given this link has the permission to view this video. Here is a YouTube Video that will explain this King Kar 600 dangers I am talking about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGo3u
I was welding with a brand new auto darkening helmet and it failed to darken enough to protect my eyes . As a result I recieved burns to my retina on both eyes . Worse was my left eye .
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to welding equipment on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Communication & Entertainment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Welding Equipment: cross-group products nearest on danger score (36/100), estimated annual ER visits (13,312/yr), and hospitalization share (2.0%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Communication & Entertainment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Welding Equipment ranks #370 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #171 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does welding equipment rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, welding equipment ranks #370 by PlainSafety danger score (36/100) and #171 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (13,312/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from welding equipment?
The most common injury is radiation to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 135,388 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from welding equipment increasing or decreasing?
Down 16% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for welding equipment injuries?
The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 73,326 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by welding equipment?
Of all ER visits involving welding equipment, approximately 2.0% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (98.0%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with welding equipment?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.