Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment)
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Sports Protective Equipment & Gear · CPSC Code 3200
Up 17% over 5 years
The verdict
Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) carry a danger score of 38/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 6,595 ER-treated injuries a year that are rising by about 17% over the last five years.
- 38/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 6,595
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 3.5%
- end in hospital admission
- 15-24
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 3200 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 38/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume6,595 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)3.5%
- Fatality rate0.05%
- 5-year trend+17%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) (CPSC product code 3200, in the Sports Protective Equipment & Gear category) generate an estimated 6,595 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 131,905 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 38/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are rising by about 17% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2010 (8,606 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2015 (5,280 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) is concussion to the head, accounting for approximately 6,587 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (6,530 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 52,064 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.05%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 7 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 336 | 165 | |
| 5-14 | 12,921 | 11,024 | |
| 15-24 | 26,273 | 25,791 | |
| 25-34 | 12,900 | 12,658 | |
| 35-44 | 7,685 | 9,117 | |
| 45-54 | 4,430 | 4,718 | |
| 55-64 | 1,449 | 1,080 | |
| 65-74 | 464 | 783 | |
| 75+ | 0 | 108 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Concussion | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Neck | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Shoulder | Strain, Sprain | |
| Knee | Strain, Sprain | |
| Shoulder | Dislocation | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Upper Trunk | Other | |
| Ear | Other | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Ear | Internal Injury | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Mouth | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
44YOF TUBING DOWN THE RIVER WENT UNDER THE WATER AND HIT A ROCK ON LOWER RIGHT SIDE OF BACK DX LUMBAR TRANSVERSE PROCESS FRACTURE
29 YOM INJ HEAD NECK CHEST LT SHOULDER LT WRIST AND LT ANKLE WATER TUBING AT HIGH RATE OF SPEED AT LAKE CRASHED DX CONCUSSION, CERVICAL STRAIN
12 YOF WITH ABRASION TO KNEE FROM TUBING AND WRIST PAIN FROM MOVING BOXES DX: SPRAIN WRIST KNEE ABRASION
22 YOF WATER TUBING HIT HEAD ON ROCK DX INJURY HEAD, CONCUSSION
36YOM ON A TUBE BEING PULLED BY A BOAT AT 45MPH, FELL OFF THE TUBE, HIT THE WATER C/O NECK PAIN SCAPULAR PAIN THORACIC PAIN FLANK PAIN HIP PAIN DX INJURY WHILE POWER BOATING OTHER CHRONIC PAIN R SUBSCAPULAR PAIN ACUTE FLANK PAIN
39YOF WAS TUBING YESTERDAY ON THE LAKE AND STATES SHE WAS THROWN FROM THE TUBE. SHE LANDED ON HER LEFT SHOULDER/NECK AND HER RIGHT KNEE HIT THE BOAT. DX: KNEE PAIN; HEADACHE; DIZZINESS; LEFT SHOULDER PAIN; NECK PAIN
52YOF, C/O SNAKE BITE LEFT HAND, TUBING ON CREEK, BIT ON LEFT HAND DX: NONVENOMOUS SNAKE BITE LEDT HAND
34YOF C/O SCRAP ON HER ARM ON A PIECE OF METAL AFTER TUBING IN A CREEK 4 DAYS AGO. SUSTAINED AN ABRASION WHICH HAS SINCE HEALED. REQUESTING TETANUS VACCINE. DX: ABRASION , ENCOUNTER FOR ADMINISTRACTION OF VACCINE
40YOF WAS WATERTUBING WHEN SHE TWISTED HER LEFT SHOULDER AND LEFT SIDE OF CHEST DX:STRAINED SHOULDER, CHEST WALL STRAIN
23YOF PATIENT WAS TUBING IN THE RIVER, SHE FELL OFF OF HER TUBE AND WAS UNDERWATER FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE MINUTE. SHE REPORTS THAT SHE SWALLOWED AND BREATHED IN SOME OF THE MURKY WATER. SHE THEN HAD A COUGING FIT AND VOMITED. DX: ASPIRATED LIQUID
23YOM PATIENT REPORTS HE WAS TUBING IN *** OVER THE WEEKEND, HE HAS BEEN VOMITING CONTINUOUSLY SINCE THEN WITH ASSOCIATED NAUSEA. HE WAS ENCOURAGED TO DISCONTINUE THC PRODUCTS AS THEY MAY BE CONTRIBUTING TO HIS SYMPTOMS. DX: DEHYDRATION, NAUSEA, VOMITING
7YOM WAS WATER TUBING BEHIND A BOAT AND THE ROPE STRUCK HIM IN THE EYE DX: RIGHT CORNEAL ABRASION
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
The consumer stated that she and her boyfriend went tubing on a river and every part of her body that came in contact with the tube she had a severe chemical burns. The consumer stated that they cleaned the tubes with dishwasher detergent and fresh water before using them. The consumer stated that she was in the water for approximately 12 hours. The consumer stated that she suffered chemical 1st and 2nd degree burns on approximately 36% of her body. The consumer stated that she was vomiting for approximately 24 hours and low potassium that caused cardiac arrhythmia. The consumer stated that on the side where the sun was touching her skin she did not suffer any burns. The consumer stated that she had to seek medical attention at the ER at North Georgia Medical Center. The consumer stated that she was not admitted; they kept her in the ER for approximately 14 hours. The consumer stated that has a follow up in 4 days to see her family physician. The consumer stated that her boyfriend suffered 1st degree burns on approximately 12% of his body. The consumer stated that he only received medical attention by a registered nurse. The consumer stated that they treated his burns with topical ointments. The consumer stated that she searched online for the tube and found that it was on a recent recall Release #12-266. The consumer stated that she contacted the manufacturer and she was awaiting a call back for further assistance.
On or about May 18 2014 we purchased two (2) Sevylor River Racer inflatable tubes. Model #2000014090. We used these tubes once, on Memorial Day, May 26 2014. We used them on an average length river float, under normal conditions. The weather was warm but not extreme. Both my husband and myself experienced a very bad skin reaction in the areas which contacted the tubes. I missed a day of work due to being very uncomfortable. The areas affected took several weeks to heal, and appeared to be almost chemically burned.
Caller stated that the inflated water tube malfunctioned while using it. He stated this incident caused a 17 year old girl to get entrapped which could have caused drowning. Her right foot was wedged in the between the tubes (canvas cover and inner tube) she was then capsized in the water face down, he had to deflate the tube to release her. This was the first time using it. No injuries were sustained from this incident. (8/17) The manufacturer was contacted and he was informed that the incident would be reported to upper management and that someone might call him back. Caller feels that the product is a safety hazard and should be reported.
I used the Sevylor River Racer inflatable rubber inner tube to float around in a lake for approximately 1 hour. I began to have a burning sensation on my back and the area that had made contact with the tube began to turn bright red. I washed the affected area with soap and water several times. The redness has decreased but I still have some redness and still feel the burning sensation 24 hours later. I am also feeling light headed and nauseous. I did not know the tube had been recalled at the time of use. Due to the burning, I searched the internet for potential causes of the burning after using the inner tube and found it had been recalled. I then deflated the inner tube so no one else would use it.
(07/02/2014) The consumer stated that the inner tub was inflated to be used as a floating device. The tube was placed in the water. The consumer was floating down the river on the tube. After about 15 minutes, all of her skin that was in contact with the inner tube started burning. It was a burning sensation. The burning sensation continued as long as she was floating down the river . After about an hour, the daughter tried the same inner tube and got the same burning sensation. After forty minutes, the consumer got back on the inner tube. She is still getting the burning sensation. The consumer did not require medical attention at the time, but did use ice and a cream to alleviate the pain. (7/07/2014) The consumer went to Trios Health Urgent Care in Kennewick, WA. It was determined that she got a chemical burn from the inner tube. The daughter did not have the same pain and discomfort and did not require medical attention.
Hello there, thank you for taking the time to read this. I bought a black rubber inner tube made for recreational use from Orschelns in Marysville, KS. That same day, I used the tube on a float trip and shortly into the float the backs of my legs started to burn. By the end of the day the backs of my legs, arms and back, anywhere that the tube had touched were bright red and felt like a really bad sunburn. I'm not allergic to rubber, it wasn't from the rubber getting hot, wasn't chafing, it was definitely some kind of reaction or chemical burn from something on or in the rubber. The sack the tube came sealed in has an obnoxious smelling florecent yellow powder on the inside of it. I have contacted the place I purchased the tube, as well as the distributer. Neither has had anyone else make this complaint. I'm waiting to hear back from the distributer who is going to contact the manufacturer in China and share the pictures with them that I sent. I just don't want this to happen to anyone else.
We were towing three people on a gladiator brawler 4 person tube (http://www.overtons.com/modperl/product/details.cgi?pdesc=Gladiator-Great-Big-Brawler-4-Person-Towable-Tube&i=16844) behind a sport boat. We had a mother and her two year old on the tube. At low speeds (no wake ~2 MPH) the front of the tube got sucked under water. The mother and child slid forward as it got sucked under water and got stuck under the tube for about 30 seconds as we tried to stop and the tube then slowly slid over them. Both were fine, but inhaled some water. Had they gotten wrapped around the tow line it could have been much worse. I've never seen a tube behave this way before, but have since tested it at low speeds with no one on it and found it to be very repeatable.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment)?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) have a danger score of 38/100 (low risk). An estimated 6,595 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment)?
The most common injury is concussion to the head, accounting for approximately 6,587 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) increasing or decreasing?
Up 17% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) injuries?
The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 52,064 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment)?
Of all ER visits involving water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment), approximately 3.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Sports Protective Equipment & Gear
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 38/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 15-24 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.