CPSC NEISS · code 3200

Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment)

Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment): danger rank #256 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #261 of 838 (6,595 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 17% over the last five years).

Sports Protective Equipment & Gear CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #256 of 838 by danger score (38/100) at ER-volume #261 of 838 (6,595/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#256
danger rank of 838
#261
ER-volume rank of 838
38/100
danger score
6,595/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (38/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

38 Around the middle lower than 30% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 51/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 4 34th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 6,595 63rd 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +17% 80th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 7 40th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 131,909 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 3200. Segments sum to 131,909 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Sports Protective Equipment & Gear group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Sports Protective Equipment & Gear danger scores

1. All Terrain Vehicles (# O…54/1002. Mopeds Or Power-assisted …54/1003. Exercise (activity Or App…48/1004. Snow Skiing (activity, Ap…47/1005. All Terrain Vehicles (fou…46/1006. Exercise Equipment45/1007. Tennis (activity, Apparel…44/1008. Water Tubing (activity, A…38/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10038/100
PlainSafety danger score · Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment)

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 38/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 6,595 ER visits/yr Above median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.5% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.05% Above-typical fatality rate
  • 5-year trend+17%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) are rising by about 17% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2010 (8,606 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2015 (5,280 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is concussion to the head, accounting for approximately 6,587 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (6,530 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 52,064 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.05%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 7 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

5K6K7K8K9K 20052008201120142017202020232024 7K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment), CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 336 165 501
5-14 12,921 11,024 23,945
15-24 26,273 25,791 52,064
25-34 12,900 12,658 25,558
35-44 7,685 9,117 16,802
45-54 4,430 4,718 9,148
55-64 1,449 1,080 2,529
65-74 464 783 1,247
75+ 0 108 108

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Head Concussion 6,587
Head Internal Injury 6,530
Neck Strain, Sprain 6,484
Face Laceration 5,614
Upper Trunk Contusions, Abr. 5,497
Shoulder Strain, Sprain 4,706
Knee Strain, Sprain 4,524
Shoulder Dislocation 4,370
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 3,762
Upper Trunk Other 3,438
Ear Other 2,970
Finger Fracture 2,721
Ear Internal Injury 2,316
Lower Trunk Other 2,310
Mouth Laceration 2,266

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 95.6% (126,168)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 2.4% (3,174)
Treated And Transferred 1.1% (1,506)
Left Without Being Seen 0.6% (857)
Held For Observation 0.1% (130)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.1% (74)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 44 · Female · Lower Trunk · Fracture · 2024

44YOF TUBING DOWN THE RIVER WENT UNDER THE WATER AND HIT A ROCK ON LOWER RIGHT SIDE OF BACK DX LUMBAR TRANSVERSE PROCESS FRACTURE

Age 29 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

29 YOM INJ HEAD NECK CHEST LT SHOULDER LT WRIST AND LT ANKLE WATER TUBING AT HIGH RATE OF SPEED AT LAKE CRASHED DX CONCUSSION, CERVICAL STRAIN

Age 12 · Female · Wrist · Strain, Sprain · 2024

12 YOF WITH ABRASION TO KNEE FROM TUBING AND WRIST PAIN FROM MOVING BOXES DX: SPRAIN WRIST KNEE ABRASION

Age 22 · Female · Head · Internal Injury · 2024

22 YOF WATER TUBING HIT HEAD ON ROCK DX INJURY HEAD, CONCUSSION

Age 36 · Male · Shoulder · Other · 2024

36YOM ON A TUBE BEING PULLED BY A BOAT AT 45MPH, FELL OFF THE TUBE, HIT THE WATER C/O NECK PAIN SCAPULAR PAIN THORACIC PAIN FLANK PAIN HIP PAIN DX INJURY WHILE POWER BOATING OTHER CHRONIC PAIN R SUBSCAPULAR PAIN ACUTE FLANK PAIN

Age 39 · Female · Knee · Other · 2024

39YOF WAS TUBING YESTERDAY ON THE LAKE AND STATES SHE WAS THROWN FROM THE TUBE. SHE LANDED ON HER LEFT SHOULDER/NECK AND HER RIGHT KNEE HIT THE BOAT. DX: KNEE PAIN; HEADACHE; DIZZINESS; LEFT SHOULDER PAIN; NECK PAIN

Age 52 · Female · Hand · Other · 2024

52YOF, C/O SNAKE BITE LEFT HAND, TUBING ON CREEK, BIT ON LEFT HAND DX: NONVENOMOUS SNAKE BITE LEDT HAND

Age 34 · Female · Lower Arm · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

34YOF C/O SCRAP ON HER ARM ON A PIECE OF METAL AFTER TUBING IN A CREEK 4 DAYS AGO. SUSTAINED AN ABRASION WHICH HAS SINCE HEALED. REQUESTING TETANUS VACCINE. DX: ABRASION , ENCOUNTER FOR ADMINISTRACTION OF VACCINE

Age 40 · Female · Shoulder · Strain, Sprain · 2024

40YOF WAS WATERTUBING WHEN SHE TWISTED HER LEFT SHOULDER AND LEFT SIDE OF CHEST DX:STRAINED SHOULDER, CHEST WALL STRAIN

Age 23 · Female · All Parts Body · Submersion · 2024

23YOF PATIENT WAS TUBING IN THE RIVER, SHE FELL OFF OF HER TUBE AND WAS UNDERWATER FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE MINUTE. SHE REPORTS THAT SHE SWALLOWED AND BREATHED IN SOME OF THE MURKY WATER. SHE THEN HAD A COUGING FIT AND VOMITED. DX: ASPIRATED LIQUID

Age 23 · Male · All Parts Body · Other · 2024

23YOM PATIENT REPORTS HE WAS TUBING IN *** OVER THE WEEKEND, HE HAS BEEN VOMITING CONTINUOUSLY SINCE THEN WITH ASSOCIATED NAUSEA. HE WAS ENCOURAGED TO DISCONTINUE THC PRODUCTS AS THEY MAY BE CONTRIBUTING TO HIS SYMPTOMS. DX: DEHYDRATION, NAUSEA, VOMITING

Age 7 · Male · Eyeball · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

7YOM WAS WATER TUBING BEHIND A BOAT AND THE ROPE STRUCK HIM IN THE EYE DX: RIGHT CORNEAL ABRASION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/4/2012 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · Tractor Supply Company · Georgia

The consumer stated that she and her boyfriend went tubing on a river and every part of her body that came in contact with the tube she had a severe chemical burns. The consumer stated that they cleaned the tubes with dishwasher detergent and fresh water before using them. The consumer stated that she was in the water for approximately 12 hours. The consumer stated that she suffered chemical 1st and 2nd degree burns on approximately 36% of her body. The consumer stated that she was vomiting for approximately 24 hours and low potassium that caused cardiac arrhythmia. The consumer stated that on the side where the sun was touching her skin she did not suffer any burns. The consumer stated that she had to seek medical attention at the ER at North Georgia Medical Center. The consumer stated that she was not admitted; they kept her in the ER for approximately 14 hours. The consumer stated that has a follow up in 4 days to see her family physician. The consumer stated that her boyfriend suffered 1st degree burns on approximately 12% of his body. The consumer stated that he only received medical attention by a registered nurse. The consumer stated that they treated his burns with topical ointments. The consumer stated that she searched online for the tube and found that it was on a recent recall Release #12-266. The consumer stated that she contacted the manufacturer and she was awaiting a call back for further assistance.

9/16/2014 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · The Coleman Company, Inc. · Virginia

On or about May 18 2014 we purchased two (2) Sevylor River Racer inflatable tubes. Model #2000014090. We used these tubes once, on Memorial Day, May 26 2014. We used them on an average length river float, under normal conditions. The weather was warm but not extreme. Both my husband and myself experienced a very bad skin reaction in the areas which contacted the tubes. I missed a day of work due to being very uncomfortable. The areas affected took several weeks to heal, and appeared to be almost chemically burned.

8/17/2015 · Incident, No Injury · BASS PRO SHOPS · Illinois

Caller stated that the inflated water tube malfunctioned while using it. He stated this incident caused a 17 year old girl to get entrapped which could have caused drowning. Her right foot was wedged in the between the tubes (canvas cover and inner tube) she was then capsized in the water face down, he had to deflate the tube to release her. This was the first time using it. No injuries were sustained from this incident. (8/17) The manufacturer was contacted and he was informed that the incident would be reported to upper management and that someone might call him back. Caller feels that the product is a safety hazard and should be reported.

7/9/2018 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · The Coleman Company, Inc. · South Carolina

I used the Sevylor River Racer inflatable rubber inner tube to float around in a lake for approximately 1 hour. I began to have a burning sensation on my back and the area that had made contact with the tube began to turn bright red. I washed the affected area with soap and water several times. The redness has decreased but I still have some redness and still feel the burning sensation 24 hours later. I am also feeling light headed and nauseous. I did not know the tube had been recalled at the time of use. Due to the burning, I searched the internet for potential causes of the burning after using the inner tube and found it had been recalled. I then deflated the inner tube so no one else would use it.

7/9/2014 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · The Coleman Company, Inc. · Washington

(07/02/2014) The consumer stated that the inner tub was inflated to be used as a floating device. The tube was placed in the water. The consumer was floating down the river on the tube. After about 15 minutes, all of her skin that was in contact with the inner tube started burning. It was a burning sensation. The burning sensation continued as long as she was floating down the river . After about an hour, the daughter tried the same inner tube and got the same burning sensation. After forty minutes, the consumer got back on the inner tube. She is still getting the burning sensation. The consumer did not require medical attention at the time, but did use ice and a cream to alleviate the pain. (7/07/2014) The consumer went to Trios Health Urgent Care in Kennewick, WA. It was determined that she got a chemical burn from the inner tube. The daughter did not have the same pain and discomfort and did not require medical attention.

6/9/2011 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · SUTONG CHINA TIRE RESOURCES INC · Kansas

Hello there, thank you for taking the time to read this. I bought a black rubber inner tube made for recreational use from Orschelns in Marysville, KS. That same day, I used the tube on a float trip and shortly into the float the backs of my legs started to burn. By the end of the day the backs of my legs, arms and back, anywhere that the tube had touched were bright red and felt like a really bad sunburn. I'm not allergic to rubber, it wasn't from the rubber getting hot, wasn't chafing, it was definitely some kind of reaction or chemical burn from something on or in the rubber. The sack the tube came sealed in has an obnoxious smelling florecent yellow powder on the inside of it. I have contacted the place I purchased the tube, as well as the distributer. Neither has had anyone else make this complaint. I'm waiting to hear back from the distributer who is going to contact the manufacturer in China and share the pictures with them that I sent. I just don't want this to happen to anyone else.

5/25/2014 · Injury, Level of care not known · Overton's, Inc · Tennessee

We were towing three people on a gladiator brawler 4 person tube (http://www.overtons.com/modperl/product/details.cgi?pdesc=Gladiator-Great-Big-Brawler-4-Person-Towable-Tube&i=16844) behind a sport boat. We had a mother and her two year old on the tube. At low speeds (no wake ~2 MPH) the front of the tube got sucked under water. The mother and child slid forward as it got sucked under water and got stuck under the tube for about 30 seconds as we tried to stop and the tube then slowly slid over them. Both were fine, but inhaled some water. Had they gotten wrapped around the tow line it could have been much worse. I've never seen a tube behave this way before, but have since tested it at low speeds with no one on it and found it to be very repeatable.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Sports Protective Equipment & Gear

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment): cross-group products nearest on danger score (38/100), estimated annual ER visits (6,595/yr), and hospitalization share (3.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) ranks #256 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #261 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) ranks #256 by PlainSafety danger score (38/100) and #261 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (6,595/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment)?

The most common injury is concussion to the head, accounting for approximately 6,587 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) increasing or decreasing?

Up 17% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment) injuries?

The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 52,064 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment)?

Of all ER visits involving water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment), approximately 3.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with water tubing (activity, apparel or equipment)?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Water Tubing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.