CPSC NEISS · code 428

Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified

Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified: danger rank #137 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #168 of 838 (13,500 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 29% over the last five years).

Containers, Tableware & Packaging CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified ranks #137 of 838 by danger score (41/100) at ER-volume #168 of 838 (13,500/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#137
danger rank of 838
#168
ER-volume rank of 838
41/100
danger score
13,500/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (41/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

41 Higher than most more dangerous than 79% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 68/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

D
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 4 35th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 13,500 77th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +29% 86th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 322 100th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 270,003 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 428. Segments sum to 270,003 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers, Tableware & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Containers, Tableware & Packaging danger scores

1. Waste Containers, Trash B…45/1002. Knives, Not Elsewhere Cla…44/1003. Drinking Glasses, Cups, A…42/1004. Cookware, Not Specified42/1005. Kitchen Gadgets, Not Else…41/1006. Manual Cleaning Equipment…41/1007. Unpowered Coffee Makers O…41/1008. Tableware & Accessories (…40/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10041/100
PlainSafety danger score · Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 41/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 13,500 ER visits/yr High volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 3.9% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.02% Low fatality rate
  • 5-year trend+29%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified are rising by about 29% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (22,453 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (7,576 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 78,340 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by ingestion to the internal (49,984 cases). The 0-4 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 55,652 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 3.9% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.02%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 322 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

5K10K15K20K25K 20052008201120142017202020232024 22K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 32,053 23,599 55,652
5-14 30,604 22,979 53,618
15-24 14,440 15,493 29,933
25-34 13,631 17,252 30,883
35-44 11,426 15,540 26,966
45-54 7,816 15,732 23,548
55-64 6,954 14,256 21,210
65-74 5,025 10,213 15,238
75+ 3,641 9,308 12,949

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 78,340
Internal Ingestion 49,984
Finger Avulsion 19,439
Hand Laceration 10,597
Foot Contusions, Abr. 5,817
Face Laceration 5,309
Head Internal Injury 4,560
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 4,559
Face Foreign Body 4,354
All Parts Body Poisoning 4,246
Foot Laceration 3,499
Head Laceration 2,801
Finger Contusions, Abr. 2,448
Hand Burns, Thermal 2,214
Internal Aspiration 2,214

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 93.7% (252,960)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 3.1% (8,286)
Left Without Being Seen 1.4% (3,847)
Treated And Transferred 1.3% (3,583)
Held For Observation 0.5% (1,272)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.0% (55)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 46 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

46YOF WAS COOKING AND PINCHED HERSELF ON RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITH TONGS DX:LAC FINGER

Age 12 · Male · Head · Laceration · 2024

12YOM WAS IN ART CLASS AT SCHOOL, HAD A FIGHT WITH A PEER WHO THREW A CUTTING BOARD AT HINE, DX LAC TO HEAD

Age 9 · Female · Eyeball · Hemorrhage · 2024

9YOF STABBED SELF IN EYE WITH A DISPOSABLE CHOPSTICK, WAS POKING A PILLOW AND HIT SELF IN EYES, DX CONJUNCTIVAL HEMORRHAGE OF EYE, HEADACHE

Age 9 · Female · Mouth · Foreign Body · 2024

9YOF STUCK 2 MAGNETS UNDER HER TONGUE, MAGNETS ARE STRADDLING HER FRENULUM, MOM UNABLE TO REMOVEM, DX FB IN MOUTH

Age 13 · Male · Finger · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

13YOM PATIENT WAS USING A POTATO PEELER, FINGER INJURY, SUPERFICIAL ABRASION TO LEFT INDEX FINGER DX: ABRASION

Age 21 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

21 YOF PEELING APPLE WITH APPLE PELLER CUT FINGER DX LACERATION THUMB

Age 31 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

31YOM TO ER FPR LEG PAIN THAT STARTED AFTER DOING *** OVER THE LAST COUPLE WEEKS, DENIES FALLS DX LEG NUMBNESS, ADVERSE EFFECT OF NITROUS OXIDE

Age 31 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

31YOM TO ER SEEKING HELP FOR ABUSE OF ***, PT LAST USED X1 DAY, NO SUICIDAL IDEATIONS DX RECREATIONAL DRUG USE

Age 23 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

23YOM PRESENTS WITH A CUT TO HIS FINGER AFTER A PAIR OF TONGUES SLIPPED AND CUT HIM. DX: LACERATION OF FINGER

Age 4 · Male · Finger · Foreign Body · 2024

4YOM INSERTED HIS RIGHT INDEX FINGER INTO A COOKIE CUTTER NOW IT'S STUCK THERE DX: FOREIGN BODY FINGER

Age 3 · Male · Internal · Ingestion · 2024

3YOM WAS PLAYING W/ SMALL CUBICAL FRIDGE MAGNETS WHEN MOM NOTICED HE MADE A SWALLOWING SOUND AND 2X MAGNETS WERE MISSING. DX: SWALLOWED F.B.

Age 2 · Male · Knee · Burn, Scald · 2024

2YOM PULLED A HOT WATER DISPENSER OFF OF THE COUNTER SPILLING HOT WATER ON HIS KNEE DX: PARTIAL THICKNESS BURN OF RIGHT KNEE TBSA 2% *

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/9/2023 · Incident, No Injury · PROGRESSIVE INTERNATIONAL CORP. · Indiana

Hello: I’m writing about a product that could potentially harm consumers. My husband and I bought the “Progressive Microwave Breakfast Egg Maker” on 8/28/23 from a Container Store. We have followed the product instructions and have repeatedly had issues, trying to make eggs in our home microwave. First of all the lid will pop off in the microwave when cooking causing the egg to fly all over the place. Secondly, the most hazardous issue is that after removing the product from The microwave after cooking and taking off the lid, the egg can explode right into your face and eyes. We have had this happens 3 times now, trying to make sure we weren’t doing something incorrectly, and have decided we cannot use the product anymore. There is not a disclaimer on the packaging saying this, only that the product can be hot and beware of steam. This product should not be available to anyone! Thank you.

9/9/2013 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · World Kitchen, LLC · Canada

I had an 8 cup Pyrex measuring cup explode in my dishwasher. I think my explosion experience is different from most of the others I have read. I had a 2 quart measuring cup explode in the dishwasher a few days ago. The cup had completely cooled, I was reaching to pull it out of the dishwasher and had just touched the side of it when it shattered into pieces sending shards all around the kitchen, fortunately I only suffered two minor cuts to my fingers, more fortunately I was the only one in my kitchen at the time. This pyrex was at room temperature when it exploded! Unfortunately I did think to take pictures or save the glass. I can assure you it was Pyrex, I had used it to make pancake batter, there was no stovetop heat, used my normal dishwashing cycle, etc. I have reported the incident to World Kitchen. I am not hopeful of a serious response from World Kitchen, most of the responses I have read blame the consumer, and use the "small percentage" of explosions as proof of the overall safety. I intend to ask them point blank, what level of consumer injury is considered too much?

9/6/2015 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · MACY'S MERCHANDISING GROUP · United States

I cut my fingers on several different occasions using the Martha Stewart silicon cooking spatula, because the chrome seams and grommet chip and flake over time, making the edges very sharp.

9/5/2011 · Incident, No Injury · World Kitchen, LLC · Michigan

On August 26, 2011, I used a 2-cup glass Pyrex measuring cup to melt butter in my micrwave. I put 1 stick of butter in the cup, covered it with a paper towel and set the timer for 20 seconds. Part way through the timed cycle, the glass shattered in the microwave. The cup was used periodically over the previous days to heat water for tea. The cup was filled with 2 cups of water and heated for 3 minutes, then removed to the counter where tea bags were steeped to make the tea. No problems occurred with that use. The cup was noted as microwave safe. After reading the October issue of Consumer Reports, I realized I should report this incident.

9/30/2019 · Incident, No Injury · The Pampered Chef, Ltd. · North Carolina

It is hard to see in the picture, but the metal blade of my my Pampered Chef spreader actually cut through the plastic and came back at my hand. I felt the plastic break and was able to move my hand fast enough that the metal blade did not cut me. I briefly looked at this site and could not find other complaints on this item, but I am worried that it could hurt others if this was to happen to them. Have there been other incidents with this product? Can I return this item?

9/3/2016 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · CMS Magnetics, Inc. · New Jersey

During installation into a wood piece I was making, while sitting still, the neodymium bar magnets purchased at Amazon, https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0181LX5Q0/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1, where breaking and shattering at random intervals sending small parts with sharp points, sharp edges, and very strong magnetic forces all over the room. These pieces were the since of small neodymium spheres, except they were covered in sharp points and edges. While picking them up, the sharp edges and sharp points gave me lots of deep scratches and scraps and removing all magnetic splinters was difficult due to the strength of the magnets.

9/26/2013 · Unspecified · World Kitchen, LLC · New York

pyrex® exploded while cooling on cotton pad after making microwave oatmeal. I now understand that this isn't the borosilicate glass that we grew up with, but they should be required to reveal that before we buy it.

9/25/2016 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · NORPRO · Washington

I was using the Norpro Jelly Strainer Stand to strain my grapes because I was canning grape jelly. I tried several bowls to set it on (it has 3 long metal legs that fit over the edge of the bowl) before finding one that seemed like the strainer was steady on. The box says the product can be used with different size bowls because the legs bend. I used a bowl similar to the one in the picture. As I was carefully ladling the boiling hot grape pulp in to the strainer, it slipped/tipped over onto my arm. I had to hold still, while the grapes were burning my arm, until my husband could grab it so that more of the boiling grapes didn't pour down the front of me. I received 1st, 2nd and 3rd degree burns. I purchased this at my local Wilco Farm Store. Afterwards I looked up the reviews on [REDACTED] and saw that the wobbly legs are an ongoing problem. I contacted Norpro and they claim that this was the first time they had ever heard of a problem with this product.

Showing 8 of 322 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Containers, Tableware & Packaging

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified: cross-group products nearest on danger score (41/100), estimated annual ER visits (13,500/yr), and hospitalization share (3.9%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified ranks #137 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #168 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified ranks #137 by PlainSafety danger score (41/100) and #168 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (13,500/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 78,340 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified increasing or decreasing?

Up 29% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified injuries?

The 0-4 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 55,652 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified?

Of all ER visits involving kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified, approximately 3.9% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (96.1%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with kitchen gadgets, not elsewhere classified?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Kitchen Gadgets, Not Elsewhere Classified is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.