Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Sabre Saws ranks #684 of 838 by danger score (29/100) at ER-volume #538 of 838 (894/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #684
- danger rank of 838
- #538
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 29/100
- danger score
- 894/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (29/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
29 Among the lowest lower than 82% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 27/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 2 | 19th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 894 | 31st | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -26% | 26th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 5 | 34th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 17,865 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 864. Segments sum to 17,865 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Communication & Entertainment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Communication & Entertainment danger scores
How this 29/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for sabre saws - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 894 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.4% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-26%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for sabre saws are declining by about 26% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2013 (1,858 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (31 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 6,841 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by foreign body to the eyeball (1,847 cases). The 55-64 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 3,321 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.4% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 5 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how sabre saws fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-14 | 167 | 76 | |
| 15-24 | 1,707 | 150 | |
| 25-34 | 3,007 | 56 | |
| 35-44 | 2,576 | 292 | |
| 45-54 | 2,698 | 16 | |
| 55-64 | 3,163 | 158 | |
| 65-74 | 2,850 | 224 | |
| 75+ | 543 | 185 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Upper Leg | Laceration | |
| Foot | Laceration | |
| Wrist | Laceration | |
| Wrist | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Hand | Fracture | |
| Finger | Crushing | |
| Finger | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
63 YOM INJ LT INDEX FINGER USING A RECIPROCATING SAW AT HOME DX LAC LT INDEX FINGER
55YOM WAS CUTTING A 2X4 WITH A *** WHEN IT BOUNCED OFF THE WOOD AND LACERATED HIS RIGHT THIGH. DX: LACERATION THIGH WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY INITIAL RIGHT
73YOM WAS USING A RECIPROCATING SAW AND ACCIDENTALLY CUT HIS LEFT HAND. PT IS ON ***. DX: LACERATION LEFT HAND WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY
65YOM USING A *** TO CUT CABINETS AND CUT FINGER. DX: FINGER LACERATION
64YOM FOR EVAL OF INJURY TO LEFT THUMB. PT ACCIDENTALLY CUT HIS THUMB WITH A *** WHILE PERFORMING MAINTENANCE AT HOME. DX: OPEN FRACTURE OF THUMB;LACERATION OF THUMB WITH DAMAGE TO NAIL
48YOM ACCIDENTALLY CUT HIS RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITH A RECIPROCATING SAW 3 HOURS AGO. DX: LACERATION WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY RIGHT INDEX FINGER WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL
79 YOM-WAS WEARING BOOTS WHEN THE *** HE WAS USING SLIPPED & CUT HIS FOOT DX: FOOT LACERATION
62 YOM WAS USING A RECIPROCATING SAW WHEN IT FELL ONTO HIS FOOT. DX: LACERATION OF FLEXOR TENDON OF RIGHT HAND, OPEN DISPLACED FRACTURE OF SHAFT OF METACARPAL BONE.
30YOM PATIENT WAS CUTTING METAL YESTERDAY USING A *** REPORTS EYE PAIN DX: CORNEAL ABRASION, LEFT EYE FOREIGN BODY
41 YOM WAS CUTTING ALUMINUM WITH A *** AND SUSTAINED FOREIGN BODY TO LEFT EYE. DX: NO DX, LEFT WITHOUT BEING SEEN.
66 YOM WAS USING A ***WHEN HE WAS STRUCK BY THE COLLAR. DX: SUBUNGUAL HEMATOMA DIGIT OF HAND
64YOM TO ER FOR LACERATION OF LEFT HAND, PT WAS USING A SABRE SAW AT HIS EX WIFES HOUSE AT 2PM & SUFFERED ACCIDENTAL LACERATION TO LEFT HAND, TETNUS UPADATED, PT WENT TO UC FIRST & THEY SENT PT TO ER DX LACERATION OF LEFT PALM OF HAND ,
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
This power tool has no safety switch. Also the way to hold the product does not provide a trustworthy way to keep held where the blade won't hurt an operator There were no injuries but only because I caught it almost happen Tool Shop 6-Amp Corded Reciprocating Saw Model Number: MRS600SE Menards SKU: 2419865
Reciprocating saw has a failure, power does not disable after the safety button is released. Caller stated that she could not get the power to turn off when she took her hand off the trigger. The saw kept running and was extremely dangerous. Caller stated that the saw is a replacement (62370) for the original (65570) which had a failure in not working. Caller stated that she informed the store managers about the issue she was having but they were unwilling to assist her in replacing it or refunding it. Caller feels that this saw is unsafe and should be recalled.
My left index finger was crushed by DeWalt DCS369 reciprocating saw while cutting 2x4. Fingers were nearly crushed several times before and after this incident. Blade release tab on reciprocating piston crushed finger against saw body. Tab is unguarded and located adjacent to area used to leverage cut. I have photos that better explain. I contacted DeWalt 18 Nov 21 and was told I would be contacted. I am still awaiting contact. [REDACTED]
The 10Amp Bauer 1975E-B Reciprocating Saw is extremely dangerous, and based on my most recent personal experience I believe that the position of the large, protruding, auto-lock button right next to the trigger has the potential to be a deadly design flaw. No other brands of [REDACTED]s that I had seen put a lock button next to the trigger that can easily be pressed accidentally and unknowingly with only the palm of your hand. In fact, not even all of the models of Harbor Freight reciprocating saws are designed this way. After further research, I only found the [REDACTED] to have a similar large button and placement. Many saws do not even have this auto-lock button, and the ones that do have one, have it as a small button (half the size or smaller than the button Bauer model 1975E-B) placed above the triggercompletely out of the way of the natural hand placement for holding the saw. has the potential to be a deadly design flaw. No other brands of [REDACTED]s that I had seen put a lock button next to the trigger that can easily be pressed accidentally and unknowingly with only the palm of your hand. In fact, not even all of the models of Harbor Freight reciprocating saws are designed this way. After further research, I only found the [REDACTED] to have a similar large button and placement. Many saws do not even have this auto-lock button, and the ones that do have one, have it as a small button (half the size or smaller than the button Bauer model 1975E-B) placed above the triggercompletely out of the way of the natural hand placement for holding the saw. Despite working with power tools from a young age, I have never had any injury that required a visit to the hospital even through decades of working with various power tools. That changed on the afternoon of October 6, 2023, because I had a terrifying experience that I hope no one else will ever have to face that was caused by this dangerous auto-lock feature. I was using the 10Amp Bauer reciproc
A battery-powered reciprocating saw spontaneously combusted and caught fire in the basement of the single-family residence. Product: Flex Model # FX2271-C. Purchased at Lowes on 3/20/2023. Not in use or plugged in at the time of the fire. No injuries were reported. Date of the fire 11/12/2023
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to sabre saws on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Communication & Entertainment
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Sabre Saws: cross-group products nearest on danger score (29/100), estimated annual ER visits (894/yr), and hospitalization share (2.4%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Communication & Entertainment
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Sabre Saws ranks #684 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #538 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does sabre saws rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, sabre saws ranks #684 by PlainSafety danger score (29/100) and #538 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (894/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from sabre saws?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 6,841 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from sabre saws increasing or decreasing?
Down 26% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for sabre saws injuries?
The 55-64 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 3,321 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by sabre saws?
Of all ER visits involving sabre saws, approximately 2.4% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.6%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with sabre saws?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.