Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Scales, Not Elec. Or Battery Or Not Specified ranks #63 of 838 by danger score (44/100) at ER-volume #399 of 838 (2,263/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #63
- danger rank of 838
- #399
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 44/100
- danger score
- 2,263/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (44/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
44 Higher than most more dangerous than 90% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 68/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 23 | 94th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 2,263 | 50th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +4% | 72nd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 9 | 46th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 45,256 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 4068. Segments sum to 45,256 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Floors, Walls & Ceilings group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Floors, Walls & Ceilings danger scores
How this 44/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for scales, not elec. or battery or not specified - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 2,263 ER visits/yr Above median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 22.6% Very high admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend+4%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for scales, not elec. or battery or not specified are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2020 (3,342 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2006 (853 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 7,084 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the lower trunk (3,720 cases). The 75+ age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 22,493 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 22.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 9 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how scales, not elec. or battery or not specified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 1,143 | 961 | |
| 5-14 | 453 | 490 | |
| 15-24 | 339 | 826 | |
| 25-34 | 436 | 1,216 | |
| 35-44 | 339 | 1,351 | |
| 45-54 | 933 | 1,350 | |
| 55-64 | 1,940 | 2,526 | |
| 65-74 | 2,784 | 5,669 | |
| 75+ | 7,193 | 15,300 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Lower Trunk | Fracture | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Upper Trunk | Fracture | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Toe | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Not Stated/unk | Other | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Upper Leg | Fracture | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Knee | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
89YOM PRESENTS TO ED FOR EXTREMITY WEAKNESS. THURSDAY MORNING PT CAUGHT EDGE ON SCALE AND CAUGHT EDGE FALLIGN STIRKING HEAD AND ELBOW. STATSE INCE YESTERDAY FEELS LIEK GRIP STRENGTH IS DIMINISHED AND DROPPIGN THINGS. PT IS ANTCOAGULATED. DX: EPIDURAL HEMATOMA. TRAUMATIC SUBDURAL HEMATOMA W/O LOC
81 YOM HERE WITH HIS WIFE AFTER FALLING IN THEIR HOME. PATIENT DOES NOT REMEMBER THE FALL OR ANY EVENTS THIS AFTERNOON. PATIENTS WIFE REPORTS HE TRIPPED OVER THE SCALE WHEN HIS HOME HEALTH NURSE WAS RECORDING HIS WEIGHT AND FELL BACK AND HIT HIS HEAD. DX: HEAD INJURY
73YOF FROM HOME HAD A SLIP AND FALL IN THE BATHROOM IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT STRIKING HEAD ON A BATHROOM SCALE DX: LACERATION OF SCALP
82YOF LIVES AT THE NURSING HOME WAS BEING WEIGHED AND FELL FROM THE SCALE HAVING LOW BACK AND HIP PAIN. DX CONTUSION OF HIP
28YOF WITHI DROPPING A SCALE ON FOOT DX; CONTUSION TO FOOT
68YOM C/O LACERATION OF RING FINGER WITH OPEN FRACTURE OF FINGER S/P PT STATES HE WAS AT THE DR'S OFFICE HAVING SOME BLOOD WORK DONE AND HE HAD AN EPISODE OF DIZZINESS AND FELL GETTING OFF OF THE SCALE. DX: LACERATION AND OPEN NONDISPLACED FRACTURE OF FINGER
88YOF C/O CLOSED HEAD INJURY AND KNEE BRUISING S/P PT WAS AT THE *** CLINIC AND TRIPPED OVER A SCALE, CAUSING HER TO FALL. PT'S DAUGHTER STATES THE PT HIT HER HEAD ON A CABINET AND THEN FELL TO THE FLOOR. DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY
64YOF PRESENTS AFTER A FALL WHILE WEIGHING HERSELF ON A SCALE WHEN SHE LOST HER BALANCE AND STRUCK HER HEAD ON THE GROUND. DX: FALL
79YOF LOST HER BALANCE & FELL ONTO A SCALE. DX: HEAD INJURY
81YOF PRESENTS WITH WRIST INJURY AFTER A SLIP AND FALL WHILE STEPPING ON THE SCALE AT HOME. DX: FRACTURE OF DISTAL RADIUS AND ULNA
75YOM WAS ON THE SCALE WITH SLIPPER SOCKS STEPPED BACK AND WAS HALFWAY OFF MISSTEPED AND FELL BACK ONTO A RECLINER HITTIN HEAD ON THE ARM OF THE ARMREST NO LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS, DX: ACCIDENT DUE TO MECHANICAL FALL
56YOM, TRIPPED OVER A SCALE AND FELL 2 DAYS AGO, COMPLAINS OF CHEST PAIN, DX: CONTUSION OF RIB ON LEFT SIDE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Bought a beurer designer glass scale GS44, from Bed Bath and Beyond in Westland Michigan on Sept 3, 2011. The scale not even 24 hours old. I put the scale on the floor between the toilet and the counter. I pulled it out and weighed myself and then pushed the scale back between the toilet and the counter, it caught the corner of the glass ( one big piece you stand on) and nicked the toilet. Once the corner nicked the toilet the glass exploded. I was standing in shattered glass which covered my bathroom floor and rugs. This resulted in a cut to my finger. I was in a sea of glass no exaggeration either, so my husband went to get my slippers so that I could move. Nothing you stand on should be a type of glass that shatters. What if a small child did this. Thankfully I only weigh 117 pounds!
I went to pick up my Wexford Bathroom Scale that was purchased at a Walgreens a few months ago and it literally shattered in my hands. It didnt hit anything or drop or bump into anything. It just shattered in my hands.
Taylor glass top scale. Wife was in the bathroom doing makeup, heard a very loud pop, and turned around to see glass all over the floor. It broke into hundreds of small pieces. She screamed and I came in, and we watched the glass continue to break down into smaller pieces for the next 3-4 minutes.
I had a glass bathroom body weight scale. Out of no where the scale exploded. Had I or any of my family been near it not even standing in it we would be dead.
A Whithings Body scale was shipped to me through Betr Health as part of a weight loss and type 2 diabetes program processed through my health insurance company. When the scale was received, I placed it next to my existing scale in my master bedroom. I had the Withings for less than a week. On the morning of 5/11/2021, I walked past the scales and in doing so stubbed my baby toe against the Withings Body scale. This action caused its corner to get pushed into my scale. The Withings Body scale glass shattered on impact sending glass chunks and shards everywhere on my bathroom floor. I got a little piece of glass in my foot, but was able to immediately remove it. I am still finding glass pieces and fear one will end up in mine or my husband's feet in the future. I searched online and found others who had this issue where the impact was also extremely minor. My existing scale has a glass top and gets bumped around a lot with no issues. Also, it was not impacted by the Withings Body scale hitting it. By design, I feel a scale should be able to withstand various impacts, pressures and weights. However, the Withings Body scale couldn't withstand a very minor impact. Broken glass in bathrooms is dangerous. I reported the issue to Betr Health and was told floor scales should be put up after every use to prevent damage. I feel that is a ridiculous suggestion. I contacted Withings and they simply said that the damage is not covered under warranty but they will offer a 25% discount. There was no consideration of the safety issue, no investigation or recall.
Last night, between midnight and 1am, I was awakened by the sound of something shattering. I went looking for what could have caused the sound, and found my scale broken. It had spontaneously broken/exploded. There was glass all over the bathroom floor. The scale had not been dropped (I was asleep).
I wish to notify CPSC of an injury that I suffered from one of its products. Walmart sells a "Luggage Scale" (product number: 063312582864) that suddently fractured when I used it. The device consists of a small scale that connects to a spring and luggage hook that are very poorly engineered. Today (2/19/22) the device fractured upon my first use of it. The plastic body of the scale broke away from the spring/hook assembly, ejecting the scale upward. It struck and injured my mouth. This incident could have been disastrous if the scale had struck my eye. Walmart's packaging for the device states "Holds up to 80 pounds". This is false, since at the time that the device fractured and I was hit by it, it was lifting a 54 pound suitcase. I ask CPSC to initiate in inquiry into this matter with Walmart and its importer/distributor. This product is a hazard to the public. The luggage scale is made in China, according to its packaging. I can supply photos if desired.
The Greater Goods digital scale recall of 30 January 2025 does not include model number 0475, even though this model clearly includes an unsecured button battery cover. They claim my scale is not impacted by the recall. I disagree.
Showing 8 of 9 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to scales, not elec. or battery or not specified on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Floors, Walls & Ceilings
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Scales, Not Elec. Or Battery Or Not Specified: cross-group products nearest on danger score (44/100), estimated annual ER visits (2,263/yr), and hospitalization share (22.6%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Floors, Walls & Ceilings
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Scales, Not Elec. Or Battery Or Not Specified ranks #63 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #399 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does scales, not elec. or battery or not specified rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, scales, not elec. or battery or not specified ranks #63 by PlainSafety danger score (44/100) and #399 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (2,263/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from scales, not elec. or battery or not specified?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 7,084 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from scales, not elec. or battery or not specified increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for scales, not elec. or battery or not specified injuries?
The 75+ age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 22,493 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by scales, not elec. or battery or not specified?
Of all ER visits involving scales, not elec. or battery or not specified, approximately 22.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (77.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with scales, not elec. or battery or not specified?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.