Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Stools, Other Or Not Specified ranks #63 of 838 by danger score (44/100) at ER-volume #91 of 838 (28,843/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #63
- danger rank of 838
- #91
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 44/100
- danger score
- 28,843/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (44/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
44 Higher than most more dangerous than 90% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 77/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 10 | 77th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 28,843 | 88th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +3% | 71st | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 36 | 65th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 576,891 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 4080. Segments sum to 576,891 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Floors, Walls & Ceilings group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Floors, Walls & Ceilings danger scores
How this 44/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for stools, other or not specified - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 28,843 ER visits/yr High volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 10.1% High admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.01% Low fatality rate
- 5-year trend+3%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for stools, other or not specified are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (37,442 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (23,740 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 77,982 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the face (37,594 cases). The 75+ age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 133,449 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 10.1% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.01%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 36 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how stools, other or not specified fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 61,848 | 52,998 | |
| 5-14 | 27,520 | 29,549 | |
| 15-24 | 7,404 | 16,333 | |
| 25-34 | 8,257 | 18,995 | |
| 35-44 | 10,969 | 27,136 | |
| 45-54 | 14,858 | 31,617 | |
| 55-64 | 18,563 | 42,059 | |
| 65-74 | 23,916 | 51,259 | |
| 75+ | 40,755 | 92,694 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Fracture | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Wrist | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Fracture | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Arm | Fracture | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
15YOM IN THE SHOP WITH HIS DAD, TRIPPED AND FELL AND HIT HIS RIGHT KNEE ON A N/S STOOL.DX: SPRAIN RIGHT MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT; CONTUSION RIGHT KNEE
92 YOF WAS SITTING ON A STOOL WHEN SHE TURNED AND THEN LOST HER BALANCE AND FELL OVER TO THE SIDE. DX: FALL, HEAD INJURY, ECCYMOSIS LEFT PARIENTAL HEAD
65 YOM AT A SMALL GATHERING WITH FRIENDS. HAD SOME ALCOHOL BUT NOT TOO MUCH, GOT DIZZY AND PASSED OUT. FELL FROM A STOOL TO THE FLOOR. ETOH <10. DX FINGER LACERATION
79YOM HAD A SLIP AND FALL OFF OF A STOOL LANDING ONTO BUTTOCKS NOW NECK HURTS DX:STRAINED NECK
50YOF C/O FALL FROM SEATED POSITION AT ADULT DAY CENTER. WAS SITTING ON A STOOL AND FELL BACKWARDS HITTING HER HEAD. SCANS WERE NEGATIVE. DX: FALL, ACUTE LOW BACK PAIN WITHOUT SCIATICA, LEFT SEROUS OTITIS MEDIA
88YOF PATIENT REPORTS SHE WAS ATTEMPTING TO STEP INTO A CAR, SHE LOST HER BALANCE AND SLIPPED. SHE STRUCK HER SHIN ON A STOOL RESULTING IN A LACERATION WITH A LARGE AMOUNT OF BLEEDING. SHE IS ANTICOAGULATED ON ***. DX: LACERATION OF LEG, BLOOD THINNED DUE TO LONG-TERM ANTICOAGULANT USE
72 YOM WAS SITTING ON A STOOL AT HOME WHEN HE HAD A SEIZURE AND FELL. DX: BREAKTHROUGH SEIZURE
38YOM PT WENT TO SIT BACK DOWN ON A STOOL, BUT SOMEONE MOVED STOOL & PT FELL BACK ONTO BUTTOCKS DX: COCCYX PAIN
7YOF WITH FALL OFF STOOL DX: ABRASION TO VAGINAL AREA
26YOF TO ER FOR LACERATION TO PINKY TOE ON RIGHT FOOT, PT SAYS SHE STEPPED ON ASTOOL IN HER KITCCHEN & SUSTAINED LACERATION, PT SAYS NEEDS UPDATE OF TETNUS DX LACERATION OF LESSER TOE ON RIGHT FOOT, NEED OF TETNUS
75YOF PRESENTS AFTER A FALL WHILE STANDING ON A STOOL AND LOSING HER BALANCE. DX: FALL, T12 COMPRESSION FRACTURE
76YOM, STANDING UP ON A 2 FEET HEIGHT STOOL PAINTING WHEN LOST BALANCE AND FELL STRIKING HEAD WITHOUT LOSS OF CONSCIOUS, HAS SHOULDER AND KNEE PAIN, DX: ACUTE PAIN OF RIGHT KNEE; ACUTE PAIN OF RIGHT SHOULDER
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
My elderly father was using the garden cart, which is marketed for elderly persons. He was sitting on the seat doing his gardening, as the cart was intended to be used, when the cart tipped backwards. My father fell and hit his head on the cement driveway. I contacted the manufacturer and was told "if you push or tip your weight backwards you can in fact tip over." My father has balance issues, thus the need for the cart. The product is not safe for senior citizens and should not be marketed as an aid for the elderly. As an aside, reading the reviews, this has happened to other users. Injuries: Cut and lump on back of head Model: EX530 Product link: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0BN2MS9PS/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Assembly required. ONE Bolt holds seat to Pneumatic seat post. NO detent or depression to assure ONE BOLT to keep holding of SEAT to Pneumatic seat post. I Assembled as directed, picked up Roll Around Stool by seat, bolt did NOT tighten sufficiently to keep Metal Base from DROPPING ON TO USER's FEET, CAUSING INJURY. Defective threads on seat collar would not allow it to tighten onto Pneumatic Seat Post. This product is Dangerous. This product has a fatal DESIGN flaw. SEAT CAN FALL OFF PNEUMATIC POST CAUSING INJURY It should be recalled.
Castor broke and almost caused me to fall. It was aVEVOR Mechanic Stool, 300 lbs Capacity Garage Seat/Work Stool with Wheels, 360 Swivel Rolling Workshop Stool with Tool Tray, Mechanics Creeper Seat/Step Stool, for Garage, Shop & Auto Repair, Black. A male that weighed about 200 pounds. It could have lead to falling and getting a concussion or other injury. If power tools were in use other injuries could have resulted. I managed to regain balence before I fell over.
The seat of a new stool separated from the stool base when my husband sat on it. He fell to the floor onto the base of his spine and then back onto the base of the stool. He received a significant bruise on his tailbone, an abrasion at the base of his skull, and muscle strains throughout his torso as a result of the fall.
I would like to report the "Bosmere N468 Plastic Kneeler Seat for Gardening". They market it as useable as a seat as well as a kneeler. But when used as a seat, the seat is 10" wide and the base if 7.25" wide. It is very tipsy. I tried using it as a seat and unless I was positioned exactly right, it would tip over. I wanted to use it for weeding my garden beds. I would be leaning forward to pull weeds and reaching back to put them in a trash can and think it would be very dangerous so I didnt use it. I dont think that "seats" should be wider at the seat than they are at the base.
(07/28/2016) The consumer stated that he was sitting on the stool. He moved forward on the stool and suddenly the seat assembly collapsed under him. The consumer had his feet on the stool's footrest. The consumer was thrown sideways but did fall. The consumer stated that his right arm hit the edge of the work bench that was near the stool. There was a bruise on his arm. The consumer looked at the seat and saw that the plate that mounts the seat had torn. (07/28/2016) The consumer contacted the firm's customer service to advised them of what happened. The consumer was advised that the product would be replaced. When the consumer stated that it was design flaw, he was advised that the information would be passed on to quality control. The consumer was also advised that the firm had only received one negative complaint about the quality of the stool. (08/01/2016) The consumer also complained at the place of purchase. Injury information: Nerve damage, right hand 9/12/16
Caller reported that the bath stool collapsed while in use. She stated that her spouse was using the stool in shower when the back legs bent inwards causing him to fall sideways hitting the back of head. She stated that his elbow was swollen as well. No medical attention was received. Caller stated that this was the 4th time using the stool. She stated that the retailer was not contacted about the incident. She feels that the bath stool is a safety hazard and should be recalled.
i was sitting on the stool brushing my hair. I heard a crack and the bottom legs folded in. I fell backward with my head hitting a tile wall. The material the stool was made of was cheap and unsafe.The ad on online states it is made of solid wood. It is not. It is cheap
Showing 8 of 36 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to stools, other or not specified on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Floors, Walls & Ceilings
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Stools, Other Or Not Specified: cross-group products nearest on danger score (44/100), estimated annual ER visits (28,843/yr), and hospitalization share (10.1%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
- Computers (equipment And Electronic Games) Home Structures & Construction Materials 28,902/yr
- Clothing, Not Specified Personal Care & Safety Products 28,969/yr
- Martial Arts (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 28,993/yr
- Recliner Chair Home Furnishings & Fixtures 29,038/yr
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Floors, Walls & Ceilings
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Stools, Other Or Not Specified ranks #63 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #91 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does stools, other or not specified rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, stools, other or not specified ranks #63 by PlainSafety danger score (44/100) and #91 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (28,843/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from stools, other or not specified?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 77,982 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from stools, other or not specified increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for stools, other or not specified injuries?
The 75+ age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 133,449 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by stools, other or not specified?
Of all ER visits involving stools, other or not specified, approximately 10.1% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (89.9%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with stools, other or not specified?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.