36
CPSC NEISS Data 2005–2024

Outdoor Awnings Or Shutters

Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.

Building Materials & Home Structures · CPSC Code 1808

Down 29% over 5 years

The verdict

Outdoor Awnings Or Shutters carry a danger score of 36/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 3,079 ER-treated injuries a year that are declining by about 29% over the last five years.

36/100
danger score (low risk)
3,079
ER visits per year (avg)
9.8%
end in hospital admission
65-74
most-injured age group

Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 1808 - last data year 2024.

PlainSafety danger score

0/100100/10036/100
PlainSafety danger score

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 36/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for outdoor awnings or shutters - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume3,079 ER visits/yr
  • Severity (hospitalization rate)9.8%
  • Fatality rate0.04%
  • 5-year trend-29%

See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Outdoor Awnings Or Shutters (CPSC product code 1808, in the Building Materials & Home Structures category) generate an estimated 3,079 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 61,576 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 36/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are declining by about 29% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2017 (8,850 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2020 (1,830 estimated visits).

The single most common ER diagnosis for outdoor awnings or shutters is laceration to the head, accounting for approximately 5,196 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (4,786 cases). The 65-74 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 10,914 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 9.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.04%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 6 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how outdoor awnings or shutters fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

3,079
Injuries / Year
9.8%
Hospitalization Rate
0.04%
Fatality Rate

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

02K4K6K8K10K 20052008201120142017202020232024 4K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Outdoor Awnings Or Shutters, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 769 256 1,025
5-14 1,841 886 2,727
15-24 2,879 1,091 3,970
25-34 5,388 2,503 7,891
35-44 5,895 2,385 8,280
45-54 6,103 2,380 8,483
55-64 6,898 3,076 9,974
65-74 8,137 2,777 10,914
75+ 6,350 1,942 8,292

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Head Laceration 5,196
Head Internal Injury 4,786
Finger Laceration 4,452
Face Laceration 3,008
Hand Laceration 2,869
Upper Trunk Other 2,125
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 2,060
Lower Leg Laceration 2,014
Finger Fracture 1,801
Lower Arm Laceration 1,486
All Parts Body Other 1,381
Head Concussion 1,161
Shoulder Strain, Sprain 1,114
Head Contusions, Abr. 1,068
Foot Laceration 1,059

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 87.8% (54,046)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 10.4% (6,405)
Treated And Transferred 0.8% (507)
Left Without Being Seen 0.7% (433)
Held For Observation 0.2% (113)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.1% (79)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 30 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

30YOM WALKED INTO A METAL AWNING AT A SHOOTING RANGE RESULTING IN A LACERATION TO THE BRIDGE OF HIS NOSE. DX: FACIAL LACERATION

Age 19 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2024

19YOM WITH A LEFT INDEX FINGER INJURY. FINGER WAS HIT BY A END-CAP OF A CAMPER AWNING. A JAGGED OPEN WOUND ON THE DORSUM OF HIS LEFT PROXIMAL INDEX FINGER. DX: FRACTURE INDEX FINGER PROXIMAL PHALANX NONDISPLACED OPEN INITIAL LEFT

Age 77 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

77YOM STS WALKED INTO AWNING ON MOTOR HOME 3 WEEKS AGO C/O HEADACHE & FOREHEAD PAIN DX CONCUSSION

Age 76 · Male · Shoulder · Other · 2024

76YOM WAS WALKING WHEN HE STRUCK THE FRONT OF HIS HEAD ON THE BOTTOM OF A STORM SHUTTER THAT WAS ROLLED HALFWAY DOWN AND THEN PULLED HIS LEFT SHOULDER DX: ACUTE PAIN OF LEFT SHOULDER; CLOSED HEAD INJURY

Age 78 · Male · Head · Concussion · 2024

78YOM WS FIXING A SHUTTER AT HOME WHEN HE FELL BACKWARDS STRIKING HIS HEAD DX:CONCUSSION

Age 62 · Male · Head · Laceration · 2024

62YOM REPAIRING AN AWNING AT HOME AND THE WIND BLEW IT AND HIT PTS HEAD. DX: SCALP LACERATION

Age 40 · Female · Neck · Other · 2024

40YOF WAS AN UNRESTRAINED DRIVER OF A CAR WHICH STRUCK MULTIPLE PARKED CARS, A STOP SIGN AND AWNING AFTER SHE HAD BEEN HUFFING. REPORTS LEFT SIDED FACIAL PAIN, LEFT NOSE PAIN AND NECK PAIN. DX: MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION; NECK PAIN; HEAD PAIN

Age 4 · Female · Foot · Fracture · 2024

4YOF COMES TO THE ER WITH FOOT PAIN. THE PARENT STATES THEY ARE INSTALLING PLANTATION SHUTTERS IN THEIR HOME AND THE PATIENT ACCIDENTALLY PULLED ON ONE AND IT FELL ON TOP OF HER LEFT FOOT. EXAM SHOWS TENDERNESS AND ABRASION. X-RAY SHOWS FRACTURE. DX FRACTURE CUNEIFORM CLOSED LEFT

Age 41 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2024

41YOM WAS CLOSING AN AWNING AND GOT HIS LEFT THUMB PINCHED CAUSING A LACERATION TO HIS THUMB. DX: OPEN NONDISPLACED FRACTURE OF DISTAL PHALANX OF LEFT THUMB

Age 80 · Male · Lower Trunk · Nerve Damage · 2024

80YOM FROM HOME STATES THAT HE WAS DOING HURRICANE SHUTTER WORK AT HOME AND DEVELOPED PAIN IN LEFT SIDE OF LOWER BACK ADMITTED FOR BRADYCARDIA DX: SCIATICA OF LEFT SIDE

Age 89 · Male · Lower Trunk · Fracture · 2024

89YOM C/O FALL S/P PT STATES HE HAD A MECHANICAL FALL WHILE ATTEMPTING TO CLEAN HIS AWNING WHEN HE TWISTED, CAUSING HIM TO FALL AND LAND ON HIS RIGHT HIP. DX: CLOSED FRACTURE OF RIGHT HIP

Age 64 · Female · Lower Arm · Fracture · 2024

64YOF PRESENTS WITH DEFORMITY TO LEFT ARM AS WELL AS ABRASIONS TO LEFT LEG AND SHOULDER AFTER BEING KNOCKED DOWN BY A FALLEN AWNING THAT BLEW DOWN IN THE WIND DX: GROUND LEVEL FALL, RADIUS FRACTURE

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/26/2022 · Incident, No Injury · ALEKO · Maryland

Item is a Aleko brand AWCL 10’x8’ motorized retractable awning. The unit has had 3 identical failures over the past year. The awning works normally for 2 to 3 cycles, then without warning when hitting the extend button the awning instantly deploys at unimpeded speed (no gradual extension). The awning came out so fast I was barely able to get my arm up to keep from striking me in the head. The extension arms are under great pressure. The awning extension arms break in the process. The manufacturer just sends more parts. They have all been defective. Again, three identical incidents 1. The original parts 2. First replacement repair. 3. Second replacement repair. I was the operator for all incidents. The awning is installed at my house. This awning is dangerous. Awning come out with enough force to knock someone to the ground. I have multiple failed parts. I am a retired [REDACTED] defect investigator and give you a lot of detailed information and parts.

8/31/2020 · Incident, No Injury · SPRINGS WINDOW FASHION, INC. · Ohio

Catastrophic failure of lateral arm on a motorized SunSetter awning. Failure occurred during closing of the awning. The front bar connector bracket sheared off due to it not being properly secured during manufacture.

8/14/2019 · Incident, No Injury · SPRINGS WINDOW FASHION, INC. · United States

A standalone "Sunsetter" motorized awning has a short-circuit grounding problem. When the motor gets wet a ground surge occurs causing the electrical connection to short. This can trip a breaker or Ground Fault interrupter. This occurs even when the motor is not in use only connected to house outlets. In my case I found the outlets in my garage shut down including power to a refrigerator. I assume any motor designated for outdoor use should be waterproof or at least protected from getting wet. Sunsetter ignored my request for an upgrade to solve this problem. If for some reason the circuit breaker does not switch off current could flow and heat up the wiring. I recently got a safety upgrade concerning bungi clips used to hold down the awning cover. The government seemed to find this to be dangerous, but ignored the problem described here.

5/4/2016 · Incident, No Injury · Euramax International, Inc. · California

I bought an outdoor BBQ kitchen from Tropicana Outdoor Living Company and had it installed by their installers. The kitchen top came off its footing with the winds we had two months ago. Luckily I was home to tight it down during the rain storm to prevent it from flying off to my neighbors' yard and possibly causing property damage and/or Injury to personnel. Enclosed are pictures of the top and screws used to attach the footing. I'm no engineer, but the size of the top overhang and footing are bad designs. This product should have never been on the market as designed; I was expecting a stronger footing design. Use of a metal plate with bolts would make a big different in the strength of the footing with a smaller top overhang. Notified the company of the Incident, talked to a person named [REDACTED], he stated that the design was safe and that the company's Installation team simply did not installed It correctly, maybe due to the installation team fatigue. I check with Amerimax engineering for specifications on size of overhang for the amount of spacing between posts for the patio top Installed by Tropicana Outdoor living installers and it specifies it should be no longer than 25% of post spacing (2 feet). Top installed has an overhang of over six feet, way beyond specs provided by Amerimax engineering and presents an extreme safety Issue and should no longer be on the market. Enclosed are Amerlmax engineering specifications. In addition, this company sale their products at home shows throughout Southern California. Yes, I would like to get reimbursed for the faulty product I bought from Tropicana Outdoor living Company, but most important is the unsafe condition that could exist out in the public in Southern California due to design of this product and faulty installation.

12/20/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Eclipse Awning Systems LLC · New Jersey

While in the closed position, one of the awnings arms snapped launching pieces of plastic/metal. Luckily no-one was outside at the time as someone could have been injured – several pieces were launched and the integrity of the support was lessened. We are concerned that there is a safety hazard. For background - after the installer indicated that the item in question would not be covered under warranty, the manufacturer ultimately decided to cover the cost of the part (not the installation) under said warranty. At that time, I inquired as to the cause of the product failure and if there was any risk of it happening to the other arm. To that, I did not receive a response. We happened to be home at the time of the product breaking. It was rather loud and violent. If someone were outside - even with the awning closed, injuries could have occurred.

10/27/2014 · Incident, No Injury · SUNSETTER · Unspecified

Name = [REDACTED] Organization/Affiliation = self Daytime Phone = [REDACTED] E-mail address = [REDACTED] Message = I have recently discovered a potential hazardous condition with the Sunsetter "Oasis" Free Standing Awning. The self contained drive motor is subject to a ground fault if it gets wet. Sunsetter, Inc. is aware of this problem as indicated in its literature. Apparently the thermal sensor which is integral to the motor causes the actual fault. It is not necessary to operate the motor for the fault to occur. It just has to be plugged in to the outlet. This problem eventually goes away after the system dries out. In my case I had the awning plugged into a GFI protected outlet and was not aware that it failed until I noticed an odor coming from my spare refrigerator located in the garage and also connected to the same GFI circuit. This certainly makes for an unreliable circuit since other devices connected to the GFI sourced circuit will be turned off whenever the Awning connection fails. Sunsetter does recommend that their product is connected to a GFI outlet and they don't feel that they have a hazardous design problem. This assumes that the consumer is using an appropriate GFI protected circuit, but of course this cannot be guaranteed and the excited consumer may not have read all the instructions (many of which are found in extraneous fine print) and has plugged the unit into a non-protected circuit. This free standing "Oasis" product is relatively new and does not have the same protections as does the prior wall mounted units. The wall mounted units have a vinyl flap that protects the motor from moisture when the awning is rolled up and when rolled down most water rolls off the end of the awning. The free standing model has no built in vinyl flap and when open or closed is subject to water accumulating in the tubing which contains the motor. The consumer can buy an additional cover for the unit for use when it is unfurled, but this is very inconvenient t

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to outdoor awnings or shutters on the CPSC website.

Frequently Asked Questions

How dangerous are outdoor awnings or shutters?

Based on 20 years of CPSC data, outdoor awnings or shutters have a danger score of 36/100 (low risk). An estimated 3,079 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.

What are the most common injuries from outdoor awnings or shutters?

The most common injury is laceration to the head, accounting for approximately 5,196 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from outdoor awnings or shutters increasing or decreasing?

Down 29% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for outdoor awnings or shutters injuries?

The 65-74 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 10,914 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by outdoor awnings or shutters?

Of all ER visits involving outdoor awnings or shutters, approximately 9.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (90.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with outdoor awnings or shutters?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Safety Guides

What this means for you

Treat the 36/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.

  • See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
  • Injuries cluster in the 65-74 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
  • Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls

NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.

Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.