Scaffolding
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Building Materials & Home Structures · CPSC Code 1816
Up 18% over 5 years
The verdict
Scaffolding carry a danger score of 46/100 (moderate risk), driven by roughly 5,034 ER-treated injuries a year that are rising by about 18% over the last five years.
- 46/100
- danger score (moderate risk)
- 5,034
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 17.6%
- end in hospital admission
- 35-44
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 1816 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 46/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for scaffolding - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume5,034 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)17.6%
- Fatality rate0.18%
- 5-year trend+18%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Scaffolding (CPSC product code 1816, in the Building Materials & Home Structures category) generate an estimated 5,034 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 100,676 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 46/100 for this category (moderate risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are rising by about 18% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2007 (6,483 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2015 (3,586 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for scaffolding is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 9,228 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by fracture to the upper trunk (5,130 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 21,146 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 17.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.18%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 5 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how scaffolding fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 607 | 250 | |
| 5-14 | 2,586 | 738 | |
| 15-24 | 7,203 | 1,426 | |
| 25-34 | 14,393 | 1,525 | |
| 35-44 | 18,756 | 2,390 | |
| 45-54 | 16,361 | 1,840 | |
| 55-64 | 14,635 | 2,124 | |
| 65-74 | 10,795 | 811 | |
| 75+ | 4,049 | 152 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Upper Trunk | Fracture | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Fracture | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Foot | Fracture | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Lower Trunk | Strain, Sprain | |
| Wrist | Fracture | |
| Ankle | Fracture | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Upper Trunk | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
57YOM PRESENT TO ED PT WAS ON SCAFFOLDING THAT GAVE OUT CAUSING HIM TO HIT HIS HEAD AND 6FT FALL LANDING ON HIS HEAD REPORTED 5MIN LOC.RECEIVED ***/*** BY EMS,BECAME A SCENE *** ACTIVATION.ENROUTE VS STABLE,NO AIRWAY DIFFICULTYDX:FALL;CONCUSSION W/ LOC 30MIN OR LESS
66YOM WAS PAINTING A HOUSE AND WAS ON SCAFFOLDING WHEN HE LOST HIS BALANCE AND FELL 4-5 FT. DX: FALL ON AND FROM SCAFFOLDING CAUSING ACCIDENTAL INJURY; CLOSED HEAD INJURY WITHOUT LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS; RIGHT-SIDED CHEST WALL PAIN; ACUTE BILATERAL LOW BACK PAIN; SPASM OF THORACIC BACK MUSCLE.
47YOM C/O WRIST PAIN. FELL 3FT BACKWARDS OFF A SCAFFOLDING AND LANDED ON HIS RIGHT WRIST. DX: WRIST SPRAIN
62YOM WALKED IN TO ED FOLLOWING A FALL FROM SCAFFOLDING APPROXIMATELY 10 FEET 3 DAYS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL, REPORTS FALLING ON BOARDS. PATIENT REPORTS FALLING ON RIGHT SIDE. PATIENT REPORTS RIGHT SIDED PAIN IN CHEST, ABDOMEN, SHOULDER, AND FACE. PATIENT REPORTS CHIPPING 3 TEETH. DX:SYNCOPE AND COLLAPSE; FACIAL PAIN; NECK PAIN.
39YOM - PATIENT PRESENT FOR FALL. PT FELL OFF SCAFFOLDING. PT HAS + LOC AND SCALP LACERATION. DX: FALL.
60YOM REPORTS AFTER FALLING FROM SCAFFOLDING GREATER THAN 20 FT. PATIENT REPORTS LEG AND BACK PAIN. DX S/P FALL, HIP FRACTURE,PELVIC FRACTURE, ANKLE INJURY, ADMIT.
53 YOM FELL OFF SCAFFOLD DX; LHIP FX, PELVIC FX
40YOM STATES THAT HE FELL OFF OF A SCAFFOLDING THIS MORNING WAS WEARING A HELMET AT THE TIME DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY; MUSCULOSKELETAL LOW BACK PAIN
65YOM PRESENTS AFTER HE WAS ON SOME SCAFFOLDING SLIPPED AND FELL AND LANDED ON HIS RIGHT HIP, PRESENTS WITH PAIN TO HIS RIGHT HIP AND SORENESS TO HIS RIGHT SHOULDER DX: CLOSED DISPLACED FRACTURE OF RIGHT ACETABULUM
49YOM WAS AT A HOME IMPROVEMENT STORE WHEN 450 LBS OF SCAFFOLDING FELL STRUCK HIM IN THE RIGHT SHOULDER DX: PAIN RIGHT SHOULDER
38 YOM FELL APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET OFF SCAFFOLDING AND REPORTEDLY LANDED ON HIS BOTTOM. SUSPECT PATIENT ALSO HIT HIS HEAD. DX: LACERATION OF SCALP, TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY.
59YOM PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT FELL FROM A 8 FT SCAFFOLD LANDING ON RIGHT SIDE COMPLAINING OF WRIST PAIN. DX: FALL FROM SCAFFOLD, WRIST PAIN AND SWELLING, WRIST FRACTURE
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
The door latch for staging guard rail is installed wrong. The door unexpectedly opened and almost fell off. UPDATED ON 8/24/2023: [I installed the rails on the platform. The fault latch was installed at the factory. It was not at work. ]
I was working on a UST Work-A-Round scafflod when the weld holding the right front leg and caster broke. I was pitched forward and fell to the floor. I couldn't remove my body from the collapsing unit since my feet were caught and bent backwards within the unit. I went to the ER and had x-rays of my feet, ankles, knees and wrists. I had a broken big toe and later lost that nail and much tissue damage and swelling to my lower legs and feet. I also had tingling from my knees to my toes and also to my wrists. I used crutches for one week to get around since I couldn't put my weight on my lower legs or feet.
Scaffolding collapsed due to the securing pins not engaging fully, I was treated for a broken forearm at Via Christi Hospital in Wichita Kansas. Total cost of the broken arm was more than $19,000.00 to the hospital & Doctor. The scaffolding was made by Buffalo Tools Corp. & sold by Tractor Supply in Wichita Kansas.
A contractor was working on a scaffold when a newly replace 5-inch caster broke away. As a result, the contractor fell 4 feet from the ground causing bruised ribs and a broken rib to his right side. Further investigation revealed the caster was not properly weld between the stem and the top plate. The caster was improperly manufactured and could not sustain the recommended rating of 440lbs. The caster was in the lock position and no movement was conducted with the scaffold. While inspecting other casters, we noticed the newly purchased casters did not have an outside weld like other original casters. The contractor stated they purchased the castors from Amazon and the vendor is still to be determined. We recommended the vendor to conduct an inspection of all scaffolds to determine if they possess the new replacement caster. If so, they were to suspend operations of the scaffold until further notice.
One of our employees was using a Werner PS-48 4 ft Portable Scaffold. He was applying drywall mud with the wheels locked. The unit broke apart and the employee fell 3' to the floor. The diagonal bracing broke away from the center piece on the back side of the scaffold. It appears the metal in the center piece is too thin to handle the type of use it's designed for. A check of 4 other Werner PS-48's showed one unit about to fail for the same reason and two of the units with stress cracks in the same area. We believe these scaffolds have a faulty design and we have pulled them from the field.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to scaffolding on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are scaffolding?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, scaffolding have a danger score of 46/100 (moderate risk). An estimated 5,034 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from scaffolding?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 9,228 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from scaffolding increasing or decreasing?
Up 18% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for scaffolding injuries?
The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 21,146 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by scaffolding?
Of all ER visits involving scaffolding, approximately 17.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (82.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with scaffolding?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Building Materials & Home Structures
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 46/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 35-44 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.