30
CPSC NEISS Data 2005–2024

Laser Pointers

Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.

Home Structures & Construction Materials · CPSC Code 562

Up 45% over 5 years

The verdict

Laser Pointers carry a danger score of 30/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 150 ER-treated injuries a year that are rising by about 45% over the last five years.

30/100
danger score (low risk)
150
ER visits per year (avg)
2.1%
end in hospital admission
5-14
most-injured age group

Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 562 - last data year 2024.

PlainSafety danger score

0/100100/10030/100
PlainSafety danger score

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 30/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for laser pointers - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume150 ER visits/yr
  • Severity (hospitalization rate)2.1%
  • Fatality rate0.00%
  • 5-year trend+45%

See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Laser Pointers (CPSC product code 562, in the Home Structures & Construction Materials category) generate an estimated 150 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 2,994 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 30/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are rising by about 45% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (329 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2013 (21 estimated visits).

The single most common ER diagnosis for laser pointers is other to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 1,265 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by ingestion to the internal (762 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 701 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.1% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 5 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how laser pointers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

150
Injuries / Year
2.1%
Hospitalization Rate
0.00%
Fatality Rate

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

0100200300400 20052008201120142017202020232024 182
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Laser Pointers, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 316 357 673
5-14 430 271 701
15-24 256 127 383
25-34 463 165 628
35-44 128 18 146
45-54 170 30 200
55-64 219 16 235
65-74 16 0 16
75+ 16 0 16

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Eyeball Other 1,265
Internal Ingestion 762
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 177
Eyeball Radiation 174
Eyeball Laceration 80
Toe Contusions, Abr. 78
Head Contusions, Abr. 76
Hand Other 68
Lower Leg Contusions, Abr. 55
Eyeball Foreign Body 37
Head Other 33
Face Laceration 32
Ankle Other 17
Mouth Contusions, Abr. 17
Ear Other 16

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 93.3% (2,793)
Left Without Being Seen 5.7% (170)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 0.8% (25)
Treated And Transferred 0.2% (6)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 22 · Female · Eyeball · Other · 2024

22YOF PRESENTS FOR EVALUATION OF BLURRY VISION AND RIGHT EYE IRRITATION AFTER LASER POINTER INJURY. DX EYE INJURY DUE TO LASER POINTER

Age 217 · Female · Internal · Ingestion · 2024

17 MOF SWALLOWED A TIP OF A LASER LIGHT. DX FB INGESTION

Age 21 · Male · Eyeball · Other · 2024

21YOM, COMING IN WITH BILATERAL EYE PAIN AFTER HAVING A LASER POINTER POINTED AT HIS EYES ON MONDAY, DX: EYE IRRITATION

Age 207 · Male · Internal · Ingestion · 2024

7MOM, WAS PLAYING WITH LASER POINTER AT HIS GRANDPARENTS HOUSE WHEN MOM NOTICED THAT TWO OUT OF THREE BUTTON BATTERIES WERE GONE AND UNSURE IF THE PATIENT SWALLOLWED THEM, DX: ENCOUNTER FOR ROUTINE CHILD HEALTH EXAMINATION WITHOUT ABNORMAL FINDINGS

Age 2 · Female · Eyeball · Other · 2024

2YOF. PT WAS FOUND TO BE LOOKING DIRECTLY AT A LASER @ DAD'S WORK FOR 15-30 SECONDS. NOW C/O NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE OUT OF RIGHT EYE. DX: RIGHT EYE PAIN.

Age 223 · Female · Internal · Ingestion · 2024

23MOF PRESENTS WITH POSSIBLE INGESTION OF A BUTTON BATTERY. PATIENT AND SIBLING WERE FIGHTING OVER A LASER POINTER WHICH CAME APART. THEY FOUND 2 OF THE 3 BATTERIES. WHEN PT WAS ASKED WHERE IT WAS, SHE POINTED TO HER MOUTH. DX: SUSPECTED FOREIGN BODY INGESTION BY INFANT NOT FOUND AFTER EVALUATION.

Age 11 · Male · Eyeball · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

11YOM. PT STATES YESTERDAY HAD A LASER POINTED BRIEFLY IN HIS EYES AS WELL AS HE RUBBED SUNBLOCK IN EYE WHILE PLAYING SPORTS. DX: LEFT CORNEAL ABRASION.

Age 49 · Male · Eyeball · Other · 2023

49YOM WAS WALKING ON THE SIDEWALK WHEN SOME KIDS CAME UP AND SHINED A LASER INTO HIS LEFT EYE CAUSING PAIN DX: LEFT EYE PAIN

Age 12 · Male · Eyeball · Other · 2023

12YOM,EYE VISION BLURRED,CLASSMATE FLASHED A RED LASER IN EYE,PAIN,DX:EYE PAIN

Age 58 · Male · Lower Leg · Contusions, Abr. · 2023

58YOM LOWER LEG PAIN WHEN WALKING IN YARD. MAY HAVE BEEN SHOT WITH A LASER BEAMDX SOFT TISSUE CONTUSION

Age 13 · Male · Eyeball · Other · 2023

13YOM WAS PLAYING WITH A LASER POINTER AT SCHOOL, HE TURNED IT AND LOOKED INTO IT FOR A BRIEF SECOND. DX: EYE PAIN

Age 12 · Male · Eyeball · Other · 2023

12YOM PT HAS HAD BILATERAL BLURRY VISION SINCE YESTERDAY AFTER STARING INTO LASER POINTER FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME DX: BILATERAL BLURRY VISION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/12/2025 · Incident, No Injury · STRIKEMAN USA, INC. · Florida

I purchased a Strikeman Laser Firearm Training System with a .40 cal laser module. The laser module uses rubber O-Rings for retention and centering in the barrel. I tested the system, then I removed the laser module from the firearm, and noticed the front O-Ring was missing from the module. I checked the barrel. I found the O-Ring was stuck in the barrel, creating a blockage that could have resulted in a catastrophic failure and personal injuries. I contacted the company and have not gotten a satisfactory response and followup, which is shocking, considering what could happen if a live round is used afterwards when a blockage exists. I was able to duplicate the problem and even sent in pictures to the manufacturer. I explained the engineering team needs to be notified and there may be a manufacturing defect where the channel is not deep enough to hold the O-ring in place as the module is removed from the barrel.

7/13/2011 · Incident, No Injury · NBO GROUP INC · Washington

I purchased this laser pointer online via Amazon, from "Instapark". It worked intermittently for a couple hours over a period of time, then only when pointing it up. Then when using, it became very unreliable and then warm, and hot today. I believe this laser pointer has never worked well and there is something wrong with the internal wiring as it became very hot to hold. There are more unhappy users than satisfied ones from the Amazon reviews where I purchased it. A common problem with it not working correctly at a minimum, let alone unsafe. I purchased this from Instapark on Amazon Marketplace 12/25/2010. Listed as Classic Style Laser Pointer Merchant SKU: LR-4 ASIN: BOOOKCL3RW Order-Item ID: 29213430355898 The SN of the product is 2009108 Amazon Order ID: 104-5179006-7701025.

6/21/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Targus · Wisconsin

One month ago I purchased a Targus Remote Presenter, which is the little gadget that let's you run a PowerPoint presentation and has a red laser pointer. The product comes with 2 AAA batteries and has 2 battery compartments. One is marked to show which way to install the battery. The other is labeled as the spare battery but there are no markings to indicate which way to install the spare. It should not make a difference as there is no metal contact point in the spare compartment. I needed to test the product with our computer equipment so I installed the first battery by following the + and - markings. I installed the spare battery facing the same way. I then turned the presenter on. Within 2 minutes the bottom half of the product became hot in my hand. I continued trying to get the product to work with our computer and it got hotter and hotter to the point where it was uncomfortable in my hand. At that point, I shut the product off and removed the battery cover. The batteries were melting and there were signs of battery acid seeping out of the seam. I returned the defective product to Staples and was issued a refund. Because I still need a presenter, I purchased another Targus Remote Presenter yesterday. It was the same exact model as the one purchased last month. The exact same thing happened again. When I removed the battery cover, the label around the "spare" battery was already separating from the battery. In other words, it was melting due to the heat. I again returned the defective product to Staples and a refund was issued. There is something seriously wrong in the wiring of this product. No surprise it was made in China. I went to the Targus website but was unable to find any where that I could alert them of this problem.

11/30/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Targus · California

The device only requires 1 battery to operate, however, there is a second slot to store a spare battery. The second slot has no electronics, no battery tabs of any kind. When/if you put the extra battery in the spare slot, the device starts getting very very hot, too hot to hold.

1/10/2012 · Incident, No Injury · Targus · Unspecified

Consumer reported about product Targus 3-in-1 STYLUS / ink pen / laser pointer made by Targus Group International, Inc. The Stylus/Laser/Ink Pen is in the form / shape of an ink pen. The ink pen is located at one end covered with a cap. The cap’s tip is rubber, which makes for the stylus. The opposite end of the ink pen/stylus is an eye of a laser. The laser is activated by pushing a small chrome button on the side of the product that is located below the tip of the laser (See accompanying pictures). While using the product, the laser end is pointed towards the consumer's body and face. The chrome button can inadvertently be pressed activating the laser. While consumer was using it as a stylus the button was in fact inadvertently pressed causing the laser to shine on consumer's cheek, narrowly missing his eye. Consumer contacted manufacturer’s Manager of Customer Support about risk of causing eye damage.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to laser pointers on the CPSC website.

Frequently Asked Questions

How dangerous are laser pointers?

Based on 20 years of CPSC data, laser pointers have a danger score of 30/100 (low risk). An estimated 150 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.

What are the most common injuries from laser pointers?

The most common injury is other to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 1,265 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from laser pointers increasing or decreasing?

Up 45% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for laser pointers injuries?

The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 701 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by laser pointers?

Of all ER visits involving laser pointers, approximately 2.1% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.9%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with laser pointers?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Safety Guides

What this means for you

Treat the 30/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.

  • See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
  • Injuries cluster in the 5-14 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
  • Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls

NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.

Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.