Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Laser Pointers ranks #659 of 838 by danger score (30/100) at ER-volume #728 of 838 (150/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #659
- danger rank of 838
- #728
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 30/100
- danger score
- 150/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (30/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
30 Among the lowest lower than 79% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 29/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 2 | 15th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 150 | 11th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | +45% | 92nd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 5 | 34th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 2,994 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 562. Segments sum to 2,994 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Structures & Construction Materials group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Structures & Construction Materials danger scores
How this 30/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for laser pointers - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 150 ER visits/yr Low volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 2.1% Low admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend+45%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for laser pointers are rising by about 45% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (329 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2013 (21 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is other to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 1,265 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by ingestion to the internal (762 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 701 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 2.1% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 5 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how laser pointers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 316 | 357 | |
| 5-14 | 430 | 271 | |
| 15-24 | 256 | 127 | |
| 25-34 | 463 | 165 | |
| 35-44 | 128 | 18 | |
| 45-54 | 170 | 30 | |
| 55-64 | 219 | 16 | |
| 65-74 | 16 | 0 | |
| 75+ | 16 | 0 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Eyeball | Other | |
| Internal | Ingestion | |
| Eyeball | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Radiation | |
| Eyeball | Laceration | |
| Toe | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Hand | Other | |
| Lower Leg | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Eyeball | Foreign Body | |
| Head | Other | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Ankle | Other | |
| Mouth | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Ear | Other |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
22YOF PRESENTS FOR EVALUATION OF BLURRY VISION AND RIGHT EYE IRRITATION AFTER LASER POINTER INJURY. DX EYE INJURY DUE TO LASER POINTER
17 MOF SWALLOWED A TIP OF A LASER LIGHT. DX FB INGESTION
21YOM, COMING IN WITH BILATERAL EYE PAIN AFTER HAVING A LASER POINTER POINTED AT HIS EYES ON MONDAY, DX: EYE IRRITATION
7MOM, WAS PLAYING WITH LASER POINTER AT HIS GRANDPARENTS HOUSE WHEN MOM NOTICED THAT TWO OUT OF THREE BUTTON BATTERIES WERE GONE AND UNSURE IF THE PATIENT SWALLOLWED THEM, DX: ENCOUNTER FOR ROUTINE CHILD HEALTH EXAMINATION WITHOUT ABNORMAL FINDINGS
2YOF. PT WAS FOUND TO BE LOOKING DIRECTLY AT A LASER @ DAD'S WORK FOR 15-30 SECONDS. NOW C/O NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE OUT OF RIGHT EYE. DX: RIGHT EYE PAIN.
23MOF PRESENTS WITH POSSIBLE INGESTION OF A BUTTON BATTERY. PATIENT AND SIBLING WERE FIGHTING OVER A LASER POINTER WHICH CAME APART. THEY FOUND 2 OF THE 3 BATTERIES. WHEN PT WAS ASKED WHERE IT WAS, SHE POINTED TO HER MOUTH. DX: SUSPECTED FOREIGN BODY INGESTION BY INFANT NOT FOUND AFTER EVALUATION.
11YOM. PT STATES YESTERDAY HAD A LASER POINTED BRIEFLY IN HIS EYES AS WELL AS HE RUBBED SUNBLOCK IN EYE WHILE PLAYING SPORTS. DX: LEFT CORNEAL ABRASION.
49YOM WAS WALKING ON THE SIDEWALK WHEN SOME KIDS CAME UP AND SHINED A LASER INTO HIS LEFT EYE CAUSING PAIN DX: LEFT EYE PAIN
12YOM,EYE VISION BLURRED,CLASSMATE FLASHED A RED LASER IN EYE,PAIN,DX:EYE PAIN
58YOM LOWER LEG PAIN WHEN WALKING IN YARD. MAY HAVE BEEN SHOT WITH A LASER BEAMDX SOFT TISSUE CONTUSION
13YOM WAS PLAYING WITH A LASER POINTER AT SCHOOL, HE TURNED IT AND LOOKED INTO IT FOR A BRIEF SECOND. DX: EYE PAIN
12YOM PT HAS HAD BILATERAL BLURRY VISION SINCE YESTERDAY AFTER STARING INTO LASER POINTER FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME DX: BILATERAL BLURRY VISION
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
I purchased a Strikeman Laser Firearm Training System with a .40 cal laser module. The laser module uses rubber O-Rings for retention and centering in the barrel. I tested the system, then I removed the laser module from the firearm, and noticed the front O-Ring was missing from the module. I checked the barrel. I found the O-Ring was stuck in the barrel, creating a blockage that could have resulted in a catastrophic failure and personal injuries. I contacted the company and have not gotten a satisfactory response and followup, which is shocking, considering what could happen if a live round is used afterwards when a blockage exists. I was able to duplicate the problem and even sent in pictures to the manufacturer. I explained the engineering team needs to be notified and there may be a manufacturing defect where the channel is not deep enough to hold the O-ring in place as the module is removed from the barrel.
I purchased this laser pointer online via Amazon, from "Instapark". It worked intermittently for a couple hours over a period of time, then only when pointing it up. Then when using, it became very unreliable and then warm, and hot today. I believe this laser pointer has never worked well and there is something wrong with the internal wiring as it became very hot to hold. There are more unhappy users than satisfied ones from the Amazon reviews where I purchased it. A common problem with it not working correctly at a minimum, let alone unsafe. I purchased this from Instapark on Amazon Marketplace 12/25/2010. Listed as Classic Style Laser Pointer Merchant SKU: LR-4 ASIN: BOOOKCL3RW Order-Item ID: 29213430355898 The SN of the product is 2009108 Amazon Order ID: 104-5179006-7701025.
One month ago I purchased a Targus Remote Presenter, which is the little gadget that let's you run a PowerPoint presentation and has a red laser pointer. The product comes with 2 AAA batteries and has 2 battery compartments. One is marked to show which way to install the battery. The other is labeled as the spare battery but there are no markings to indicate which way to install the spare. It should not make a difference as there is no metal contact point in the spare compartment. I needed to test the product with our computer equipment so I installed the first battery by following the + and - markings. I installed the spare battery facing the same way. I then turned the presenter on. Within 2 minutes the bottom half of the product became hot in my hand. I continued trying to get the product to work with our computer and it got hotter and hotter to the point where it was uncomfortable in my hand. At that point, I shut the product off and removed the battery cover. The batteries were melting and there were signs of battery acid seeping out of the seam. I returned the defective product to Staples and was issued a refund. Because I still need a presenter, I purchased another Targus Remote Presenter yesterday. It was the same exact model as the one purchased last month. The exact same thing happened again. When I removed the battery cover, the label around the "spare" battery was already separating from the battery. In other words, it was melting due to the heat. I again returned the defective product to Staples and a refund was issued. There is something seriously wrong in the wiring of this product. No surprise it was made in China. I went to the Targus website but was unable to find any where that I could alert them of this problem.
The device only requires 1 battery to operate, however, there is a second slot to store a spare battery. The second slot has no electronics, no battery tabs of any kind. When/if you put the extra battery in the spare slot, the device starts getting very very hot, too hot to hold.
Consumer reported about product Targus 3-in-1 STYLUS / ink pen / laser pointer made by Targus Group International, Inc. The Stylus/Laser/Ink Pen is in the form / shape of an ink pen. The ink pen is located at one end covered with a cap. The caps tip is rubber, which makes for the stylus. The opposite end of the ink pen/stylus is an eye of a laser. The laser is activated by pushing a small chrome button on the side of the product that is located below the tip of the laser (See accompanying pictures). While using the product, the laser end is pointed towards the consumer's body and face. The chrome button can inadvertently be pressed activating the laser. While consumer was using it as a stylus the button was in fact inadvertently pressed causing the laser to shine on consumer's cheek, narrowly missing his eye. Consumer contacted manufacturers Manager of Customer Support about risk of causing eye damage.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to laser pointers on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Structures & Construction Materials
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Laser Pointers: cross-group products nearest on danger score (30/100), estimated annual ER visits (150/yr), and hospitalization share (2.1%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
Related Products in Home Structures & Construction Materials
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Laser Pointers ranks #659 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #728 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does laser pointers rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, laser pointers ranks #659 by PlainSafety danger score (30/100) and #728 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (150/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from laser pointers?
The most common injury is other to the eyeball, accounting for approximately 1,265 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from laser pointers increasing or decreasing?
Up 45% over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for laser pointers injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 701 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by laser pointers?
Of all ER visits involving laser pointers, approximately 2.1% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (97.9%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with laser pointers?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.