CPSC NEISS · code 1892

Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels

Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels: danger rank #213 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #98 of 838 (27,357 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 26% over the last five years).

Building Materials & Home Structures CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels ranks #213 of 838 by danger score (39/100) at ER-volume #98 of 838 (27,357/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#213
danger rank of 838
#98
ER-volume rank of 838
39/100
danger score
27,357/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (39/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

39 Around the middle lower than 25% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 57/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 5 42nd 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 27,357 87th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -26% 26th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 27 60th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 547,144 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 1892. Segments sum to 547,144 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Building Materials & Home Structures group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Building Materials & Home Structures danger scores

1. General Home Or Room Invo…71/1002. Floors Or Flooring Materi…59/1003. Stairs Or Steps51/1004. Porches, Balconies, Open-…47/1005. Ceilings And Walls (inter…46/1006. Scaffolding46/1007. Doors, Other Or Not Speci…45/1008. Glass Doors Or Doors With…39/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10039/100
PlainSafety danger score · Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 39/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for glass doors or doors with glass panels - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 27,357 ER visits/yr High volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 4.8% Below median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.02% Low fatality rate
  • 5-year trend-26%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for glass doors or doors with glass panels are declining by about 26% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2007 (32,725 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2023 (19,573 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the lower arm, accounting for approximately 80,958 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the hand (74,856 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 116,615 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 4.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.02%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 27 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how glass doors or doors with glass panels fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

15K20K25K30K35K 20052008201120142017202020232024 23K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 29,176 19,311 48,504
5-14 61,856 40,147 102,003
15-24 72,213 44,402 116,615
25-34 47,835 36,208 84,043
35-44 24,597 26,177 50,774
45-54 17,011 23,141 40,152
55-64 12,788 21,637 34,425
65-74 10,721 20,802 31,523
75+ 13,981 25,107 39,088

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Lower Arm Laceration 80,958
Hand Laceration 74,856
Finger Laceration 41,643
Wrist Laceration 36,239
Head Internal Injury 35,090
Face Laceration 33,920
Lower Leg Laceration 13,873
Hand Contusions, Abr. 13,410
Head Laceration 13,350
Face Contusions, Abr. 12,496
Foot Laceration 11,582
Upper Arm Laceration 10,089
Elbow Laceration 8,995
Finger Fracture 8,475
Finger Contusions, Abr. 8,334

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 93.5% (511,527)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 3.7% (20,137)
Left Without Being Seen 1.5% (7,994)
Treated And Transferred 0.9% (5,030)
Held For Observation 0.4% (2,363)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 0.0% (93)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 77 · Female · Wrist · Fracture · 2024

77YOF WAS PULLING HARD ON A FROZEN SLIDING GLASS DOOR HANDLE WHEN IT BROKE AND SHE FELL BACKWARDS LANDING ON AN OUTSTREACHED RIGHT WRIST DX: DISPLACED FRACTURE OF RIGHT WRIST

Age 28 · Female · Toe · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

28YOF C/O TOE PAIN S/P FOOT GOT CAUGHT UNDER GLASS DOOR 2 DAYS AGO DX: ABRASION OF TOE

Age 28 · Female · Hand · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

28YOF WALKED IN TO ED STATING A GLASS DOOR FELL ON HER SIDE. PATIENT STATES GLASS IS IN HER RIGHT EAR, LEFT FOOT, AND HAS ABRASIONS TO RIGHT HAND. DX:RIGHT FACIAL PAIN; RIGHT EAR PAIN, PAIN OF TOE OF LEFT FOOT.

Age 86 · Female · Upper Trunk · Fracture · 2024

86YOF WAS ATTEMPTING TO OPEN SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND FELL ONTO CHEST DX:RIB FRACTURES

Age 62 · Female · Shoulder · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

62YOF PATIENT REPORTS THAT SHE INJURIED HER ARM IN THE SLIDING DOOR AT A LOCAL STORE (***), SHOULDER PAIN DX: CONTUSION OF LEFT SHOULDER

Age 57 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

57YOF CUT RIGHT INDEX FINGER ON A SLIDING GLASS DOOR AT HOME DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER

Age 28 · Male · Head · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

28 YOM OF HEAD INJURY. PATIENT STATES THAT HE WAS WALKING OUT OF A STORE, RAN INTO A GLASS DOOR HITTING THE FRONT OF HEAD. DX CONTUSION HEAD

Age 28 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

28YOM C/O LACERATION TO HIS RIGHT THUM. AT 4 AM THIS MORNING WHILE INTOXICATED, BECAME ANGRY AND PUNCHED A SCREEN DOOR BREAKING THE GLASS. LACERATION TO HIS RIGHT THUMB. SCANS WERE NEGATIVE. NO ETHANOL LEVEL NOTED. DX: LACERATION OF RIGHT THUMB WITHOUT FOREIGN BODY WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 64 · Female · Hand · Laceration · 2024

64 YOF PUSHED ON A GLASS DOOR AND THE GLASS BROKE, PT SUSTAINED LACERATIONS TO HAND AND FOREARM, DOES NOT TAKE BLOOD THINNERS, DX: HAND LACERATION, FOREARM LACERATION

Age 2 · Male · Mouth · Laceration · 2024

2YOM PRESENTS WITH LACERATION TO LIP AND BILATERAL WRISTS AFTER RUNNING ON TILE FLOOR WITH SOCKS ON AND SLIPPED AND FELL THROUGH FRENCH DOOR GLASS DX: LACERATION OF LIP, LACERATION OF ARM

Age 11 · Male · Hand · Laceration · 2024

11 YOM CUT HAND ON GLASS FROM CABINET DX LACERATION HAND

Age 21 · Male · Face · Laceration · 2024

21YOM PRESENTS TO THE ED AFTER THE PATIENT WAS WRESTLING WITH A FRIEND (FOR FUN) AND WENT THROUGH THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR COMPLAINING OF LEFT EYEBROW LACERATION. DX: LACERATION OF EYEBROW

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/26/2021 · Incident, No Injury · Trinity Glass International, Inc · Virginia

Middle section of door glass fell out of the door and on to an 8 year old when he shut the door. My son closed the door and the middle section of window landed on his foot. The window did not break or cause injury other than a sore toe but it did scare him badly. Luckily he was wearing good shoes at the time of the incident but this really could’ve caused significant damage.

9/19/2020 · Incident, No Injury · Vitro Flat Glass LLC · Unspecified

While sitting outside today I heard a loud explosion and the sliding glass door next to me had shattered spontaneously. Nothing hit the glass, it just exploded.

8/7/2012 · Incident, No Injury · ANDERSEN CORPORATION · Virginia

The "thumb latch" on our Andersen sliding glass door (installed only 7 weeks ago) has experienced a mechanical failure exposing three small plastic ball bearings creating a risk of choking. The product includes a retaining ring which is snapping, subsequently exposing the internal components and rendering the latch useless. Two replacement latches were received from Andersen. One of the latches arrived broken, the second shows signs of initial degradation and is well on its way to being broken. When I outlined to the Andersen customer service representative that there is an apparent fundamental design flaw in this product I was told that I should utilize the ten year warranty to receive replacements. I find that ongoing replacement of a defective product is an unsatisfactory solution. Furthermore, the customer service representative indicated that this is a familiar problem and that their supplier has been advised of the issue and has taken steps to change their manufacturing process. I find it odd that the replacement product I received today has the same design flaw.

8/30/2013 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · ANDERSEN CORPORATION · New Jersey

I injured my elbow on my Andersen sliding door while I was walking through the doorway. Andersen designed their "reach out lock" to have a protruding, stationary, metal pin on the door frame. Because the pin has no "give" to it, when I hit my elbow, the pin went right between my bones. I did not seek medical attention but asked Andersen to start an insurance claim for me as I have psoriatic arthritis, and being I couldn't use my elbow for two days after the injury, I'm concerned about future arthritis in that elbow due to the injury. Andersen sent a tech to my house to change the lock set to their newer design; which has a plastic, retractable, pin on the lock. They would not admit that they changed the design due to the safety hazard the old design posed. They also would not agree to recall the dangerous lock set either as I proposed to them. I am sure that there are many doors out there with the dangerous lock design. Since Andersen wouldn't follow through with an insurance claim for me, I'm sure they wouldn't follow through with other people's injuries either (unless a lawyer was involved) - so there's really no way to know how many other injuries from this occurred. I have also pointed out to Andersen several times that the pin is at eye level of a small child and, once again, having no "give", it could easily hurt a child's eye or even blind them.

8/27/2015 · Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional · LF, LLC · Michigan

We purchased and installed a shower door from Lowe's in Jackson, MI in April of 2013. July 3, 2015 one of our house guest was showering, we heard a loud CRASH and he was standing and bleeding in a pile of glass. I blamed him for "slamming the door too hard". He stuck to his story that he barely touched it and it just broke. I didn't believe him. Well, this past weekend on 8/23/15 a little 10 year old girl was using the new replacement shower and we heard a CRASH and then her screaming at the top of her lungs. Another exploding shower door. She was also bleeding with glass in her hair and cuts from head to toe. It was then I realized it was a faulty door or bad design. I find it hard to believe a 10 year old girl could fling it open to the point it breaks all over her. I apologized to the young man who broke the first one and told him I was going to call Lowe's. Lowe's in Jackson, MI initially told me they will NOT refund me for either door nor will they accept any responsibility. I just got a call that they are "working on a refund". I requested (on the first call) they pull the doors off the floor and quit selling them and he said we were the only complaint, so I'm sure they will continue to sell them. These doors are a HAZARD. Unfortunately, we did not get any pictures of the 2 incidents because, quite honestly, we were in EMERGENCY MODE and taking pictures was never on our minds. We are very fortunate both victims didn't end up in the ER since both were covered in cuts. Something needs to be done. Please help or advise. [REDACTED] in Brooklyn, Michigan

8/24/2015 · Injury, Level of care not known · Andersen Windows, Inc. · New Jersey

In October of 2014 purchased Andersen model 3000 storm door. I had it installed professionally by contractor for Home Depot from whom I purchased the door. Unfortunately, although installed correctly, the door slams shut with such force and so quickly that guests and family members have been hit on the back of the leg and or ankle causing severe bruises...fortunately no medical attention has been needed so far. This is a significantly heavy storm door and it slams to within a foot and a half or less of the door jamb before the 2 pneumatic cylinders stop the door and then slowly close it. This does not allow enough space or time for the person entering to do so without getting hit on the legs by the door. In researching this situation on the internet I have found quite a few purchasers of Andersen storm doors have the same complaint. My opinion is that Andersen is trying to avoid having to design a different pneumatic closure which stops the slamming of the door further away from the door jamb giving the person entering the space and time necessary to enter safely. Other then this situation the door itself seems to be well made and I prefer to find a way to overcome the stated problem but my contact with the manufacturer to date has been to no avail. They state that the door is working normally...even though injury to people entering is a destiny possibility. I would welcome further contact from Andersen to find a way to remedy the situation.

7/28/2011 · Incident, No Injury · KOHLER CO. · California

Recently purchased Kohler Sterling Vista Pivot II (#1500D) & had it installed. My husband & I had been using the shower for about a week & everything was fine. Normal usage. About 1:30am one morning we awoke to a strange sound & wasn't sure what it was, went to lay back down & then we hear a loud popping & screeching sound - we thought someone was breaking into our home. Our shower door had exploded into a million pieces. Thank goodness we were not in the shower or our 5 year old son.

7/25/2022 · Death · PGT Industries · Florida

I was installing a pgt windows and door product wen I notice the product is lose I call the company exchange got the same quality I install it it felt on a infant crush the infant instantly the infant was tapping the whole product collapse they are not a professional company as they said they are is devasting to me and the family I want to reach this agency hoping to get results..they have to be responsible.

Showing 8 of 27 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to glass doors or doors with glass panels on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Building Materials & Home Structures

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels: cross-group products nearest on danger score (39/100), estimated annual ER visits (27,357/yr), and hospitalization share (4.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels ranks #213 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #98 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does glass doors or doors with glass panels rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, glass doors or doors with glass panels ranks #213 by PlainSafety danger score (39/100) and #98 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (27,357/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from glass doors or doors with glass panels?

The most common injury is laceration to the lower arm, accounting for approximately 80,958 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from glass doors or doors with glass panels increasing or decreasing?

Down 26% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for glass doors or doors with glass panels injuries?

The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 116,615 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by glass doors or doors with glass panels?

Of all ER visits involving glass doors or doors with glass panels, approximately 4.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (95.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with glass doors or doors with glass panels?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.