Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Bunk Beds ranks #137 of 838 by danger score (41/100) at ER-volume #66 of 838 (38,230/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #137
- danger rank of 838
- #66
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 41/100
- danger score
- 38,230/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (41/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
41 Higher than most more dangerous than 79% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 69/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 5 | 43rd | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 38,230 | 92nd | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -9% | 52nd | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 195 | 92nd | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 764,689 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 661. Segments sum to 764,689 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Furnishings & Fixtures group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Home Furnishings & Fixtures danger scores
How this 41/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for bunk beds - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 38,230 ER visits/yr Very high volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 4.8% Below median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.02% Low fatality rate
- 5-year trend-9%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for bunk beds are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2018 (42,875 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (32,719 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 121,823 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by laceration to the face (63,600 cases). The 5-14 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 289,524 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 4.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (0.02%) result in fatality.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 195 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how bunk beds fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 125,697 | 94,336 | |
| 5-14 | 164,383 | 125,135 | |
| 15-24 | 44,054 | 33,198 | |
| 25-34 | 42,796 | 20,699 | |
| 35-44 | 35,655 | 17,528 | |
| 45-54 | 25,606 | 11,184 | |
| 55-64 | 12,983 | 5,148 | |
| 65-74 | 3,000 | 2,115 | |
| 75+ | 360 | 682 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Fracture | |
| Head | Concussion | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Mouth | Laceration | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Wrist | Fracture | |
| Ankle | Strain, Sprain | |
| Upper Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Elbow | Fracture | |
| Shoulder | Fracture |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
23 MOM FELL OFF TOP BUNK BED TO FLOOR DX FOREHEAD LACERATION
44YOM PRESENTS AFTER FALLING OFF THE TOP BUNK OF BUNK BEDS DX: CONCERN FOR SPINAL CORD INJURY, RIGHT LEG NUMBNESS, RIGHT LEG IMMOBILITY, NECK PAIN AND BACK PAIN
43YOM BROUGHT IN FROM JUSTICE CENTER AFTER PATIENT WOKE UP ON THE FLOOR. STATES HE SLEEPS ON THE TOP BUNK. HISTORY OF SEIZURES. HAD A SEIZURE 3 DAYS AGO AND HAS AN ABRASION TO HEAD FROM THIS EVENT. REPORTS LOWER BACK AND BILATERAL WRIST PAIN. DX: SEIZURE-LIKE ACTIVITY
4YOM FELL 5 FEET OFF A BUNK BED AND LANDED ON A FLAT WOOD FLOOR. COMPLAINS OF ABDOMINAL PAIN DX: FALL
54YOM PRESENTS WITH LUMBAR SPINE BACK PAIN AFTER REPORTS OF ROLLING AND FALLING OUT OF HIS BUNK AT JAIL DX: LOW BACK PAIN
3 YOM HIT FACE ON BUNK BED DX FACIAL LACERATION
9YOM WITH JUMPING OFF BUNK BED DX: LOWER LEG PAIN
2 YOF FELL FROM LOFT BED C/O LEG PAIN DX LOWER LEG PAIN
42 YOF FROM A REHAB FACILITY REPORTS RIGHT KNEE PAIN AFTER HITTING IT ON THE BUNK BED DX KNEE PAIN
4YOM WAS CLIMBING UP TO THE TOP BUNK OF A BUNK BED AND FELL STRIKING MOUTH DX LIP LACERATION DENTAL INJURY
48YOF INMATE IN JAIL FELL OUT OF HER BUNK BED. DX: RIGHT PROXIMAL HUMERUS FX.
46YOM FELL FROM THE TOP BUNK OF HIS BUNK BED AT THE GROUP HOME FELL ONTO OUTSTRETCHED LEFT HAND DX: LEFT HAND PAIN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
We purchase a twin of twin Barnwood Bunkbed from Black Forest Decor; Item number UFBWBUNKBEDTT. After owning this bunk bed for [some time] it suddenly collapsed this past week dropping the upper bunk onto the lower bunk. If someone had been in the lower bunk at the time it would have certainly caused serious injury. The cause of the failure is that the slats provided are at least one and a half inches too short. Because the slats are too short it causes the side rails to slowing rotate over time until they suddenly release the slats, causing the bed to fall. Our solution was to get new slats that are 44.5 long vs. the 43 slats provided with the bed, and to screw the ends of the slats into the rails. This assures that the rails cannot rotate and release the slats.
The consumer says the wood splits and the side rails do not stay in place. She says the screws pop right out of the wood with the slightest movement. She says the screws have continuously come out. She says they do not use them as bunk bed because it is a danger. The consumer is experiencing the same hazard as listed in Release # 11-214. The consumer's next step is to contact the manufacturer.
We had bought 2 sets of metal bunk beds from Aaron's Furniture in Lafayette Indiana. After having them for about 3 weeks, my 12 yr old son was going to bed one Sunday night when we hear an awful boom from his room and him scream. The top bunk had fallen straight down. He was not hurt thank goodness but I was furious. I called Aaron's and they came out and said that it was a manufacturer's problem not theirs even though they put the bed together. They would not replace both sets of bunk beds so they said they would come get them.
I have a set of bunk beds in my sons' room, my older son is 9 and sleeps on the top bunk, my younger son who is 2 sleeps on the bottom. We purchased the beds either late February or early March (My newest baby was born February12, 2011 and I remember taking her to the store when she was between 2-3 weeks old when we purchased this set). My brother and my husband put together the set that night and we placed coil-springed mattresses on them. The FIRST incident: After the beds were up for nearly a week, my older daugther (then 9) was on the top and she must have put too much weight down when she got to the top, I guess and broke one of the support slats under the mattress. I was upset, but did not blame the company because I thought it was her fault and she probably jumped too hard on the top. I didn't think to report it because my daughter should not have placed herself on the top bunk so firmly. My husband replaced the broken slat on the top bunk wih another piece of the same type of wood, same depth and length, but it is wider so that it is stronger. The SECOND incident: Just yesterday (9/28/11) probably about 8pm, I was trying to settle down my 2 year old for bed. He weighs 32 lbs, and I am about 130lbs. I believe the weight limit was somewhere between 180-200lbs...but I'm not posiive. I remember the manual saying something about teenager to young adult, so i would assume at least a person of my size would be supported. So anyhoo, I was lying in the bed (BOTTOM BUNK) with my son both our heads at one end on his pillow. He sat up looking for a stuffed animal. I sat up so that I was on the edge of the bed (feet over the side), and he was looking for his animal leaning over the headboard. He reached over the side to get his animal (which was not on the floor but resting on some other stuff that was over the side, so he didn't have too far to reach), and I heard the board SNAP that was under the matress where his pillow rested; his pillow and his ma
The metal slats holding up the bottom full size mattress in the bed separated and broke apart. This is a bunk bed - twin size on top and full size bed on bottom. The same style of metal slats holds both the twin mattress on top and the full size mattress on the bottom. The top bunk is rarely used anymore but originally our middle daughter slept there and the bottom bunk is where the youngest sleeps on the full size mattress. The lengthwise metal slat bent, and the cross-wise round tube slats broke in half and separated from the lengthwise slat. She was not injured, but the lower bed is no longer usable, and the safety of the top bank is very doubtful.
Portion of lower side rail that supports the bed cross slats was not fastened to side rail sufficiently and broke away causing several slats and the mattress to collapse. After looking at the fastening screws is was apparent the screws were driven in a such an off angle that they barely engaged the side rail. After fixing this problem by using L-brackets to fasten the slats directly to the side rail, one of the upper bunk slats broke under the weight of a 60 pound boy. This bed is extremely under designed. The slats are too small and too few and the side rail design is weak. This bed, in my opinion, is unsafe for children.
See next page for full explanation. Pictures of sheared bunk rail support are attached to email. On 9/27/12, I purchased a bunk bed for my son from the Room Store in Sterling, VA before the store went out of business. The bed we purchased has two single beds, one on top and one on the bottom. My son always sleeps on the bottom bunk. This past Sunday, my son got into his bed to go to sleep and the metal support rods sheared. I was grateful he was not on the top bunk when this happened. Realizing that The Room Store went out of business, I found an identifying sticker on the support that says "Discovery World Furniture PO#X092111-4 Made in China." I researched Discovery World Furniture and found factorybunkbeds.com is the US distributor. I called factorybunkbeds.com to ask about a potential warranty. I spoke to a representative named [REDACTED] and he said the product was no longer under warranty. I asked about the language on the website which states "Discovery World Furniture will replace any components part for 50% of the then prevailing retail price plus freight for the lifetime of the product." He explained that the shipping cost was very expensive and I would need to pay the shipping. Clearly, this warranty is of no benefit to the customer with regard to the metal support rods. He suggested I go to the website and find 'plywood decking modification" and do the repair myself. Curious as to why there would be so great a need for a repair of this part to warrant a special link on the website, I asked if the part was perhaps defective. He said the part only broke due to misuse. When I asked him to explain, he said the part broke when kids jumped on the bed and broke them. When I explained that was not possible in my situation as it was the bottom single bunk that broke, and it would not be possible for kids to jump on the bottom bunk from the top or otherwise, he abruptly placed me on hold and never returned to the line. I am concerned that the met
My 10 yr old son was sitting on the edge of his bunk bed and the side rail split completely from one end of the bed to the other. The rail and mattress both fell onto his leg and ankle.
Showing 8 of 195 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to bunk beds on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Home Furnishings & Fixtures
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Bunk Beds: cross-group products nearest on danger score (41/100), estimated annual ER visits (38,230/yr), and hospitalization share (4.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
- Snow Skiing (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 38,116/yr
- Wrestling (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports & Recreation Equipment 38,569/yr
- Other Ball Sports (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 37,690/yr
- Golf (activity, Apparel Or Equipment) Sports & Recreation Equipment 36,909/yr
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Glass Doors Or Doors With Glass Panels Building Materials & Home Structures 4.8%admitted
- Tableware & Accessories (excluding Drinking Glass,cups,mugs) Containers, Tableware & Packaging 4.8%admitted
- Drinking Fountains Laundry & Household Appliances 4.7%admitted
- Wallpaper Building Materials & Home Structures 4.7%admitted
Related Products in Home Furnishings & Fixtures
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Bunk Beds ranks #137 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #66 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does bunk beds rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, bunk beds ranks #137 by PlainSafety danger score (41/100) and #66 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (38,230/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from bunk beds?
The most common injury is internal injury to the head, accounting for approximately 121,823 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from bunk beds increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for bunk beds injuries?
The 5-14 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 289,524 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by bunk beds?
Of all ER visits involving bunk beds, approximately 4.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (95.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with bunk beds?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.