Food Grinders
Twenty years of CPSC NEISS emergency-room records for this consumer product category, combined with demographic breakdowns, multi-year injury trends, and matching recall notices.
Containers, Tableware & Packaging · CPSC Code 471
Stable over 5 years
The verdict
Food Grinders carry a danger score of 34/100 (low risk), driven by roughly 827 ER-treated injuries a year that are roughly flat over the last five years.
- 34/100
- danger score (low risk)
- 827
- ER visits per year (avg)
- 6.6%
- end in hospital admission
- 35-44
- most-injured age group
Every figure is rendered from the CPSC NEISS record for product code 471 - last data year 2024.
PlainSafety danger score
How this 34/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for food grinders - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume827 ER visits/yr
- Severity (hospitalization rate)6.6%
- Fatality rate0.00%
- 5-year trend+4%
See the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Food Grinders (CPSC product code 471, in the Containers, Tableware & Packaging category) generate an estimated 827 emergency-room visits every year in the United States, adding up to roughly 16,549 ER-treated injuries across the 20-year span from 2005 to 2024. PlainSafety derives a danger score of 34/100 for this category (low risk), combining raw injury volume, demographic reach, severity of outcome, and multi-year trend. The five-year trajectory shows that injury counts are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2006 (1,204 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (357 estimated visits).
The single most common ER diagnosis for food grinders is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 6,264 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by amputation to the finger (1,766 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 3,134 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 6.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 37 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how food grinders fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 233 | 387 | |
| 5-14 | 552 | 177 | |
| 15-24 | 1,388 | 588 | |
| 25-34 | 1,745 | 793 | |
| 35-44 | 2,081 | 1,053 | |
| 45-54 | 1,389 | 623 | |
| 55-64 | 1,910 | 673 | |
| 65-74 | 1,121 | 651 | |
| 75+ | 838 | 358 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Finger | Amputation | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Finger | Fracture | |
| Finger | Avulsion | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Wrist | Laceration | |
| Upper Leg | Laceration | |
| Lower Arm | Laceration | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Lower Leg | Other | |
| Finger | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Other | |
| Hand | Fracture | |
| Lower Leg | Laceration |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
81YOM WITH SKIN TEAR AND LACERATION TO HIS LEFT HAND HE WAS USING A GRINDER AT WHICH TIME IT SLIPPED HITTING THE TOP OF HIS HAND. DX: SKIN TEAR OF UPPER EXTREMITY, LACERATION OF HAND
38YOM ABRASION TO LEG ON A MEAT GRINDER 1 WEEK PRIOR AND C/O INCREASED REDNESS AND SWELLINGDX CELLULITIS LEG
21YOF-SMALL LACERATION ON THE TIP OF HER RIGHT THIRD AND FOURTH FINGERS-WAS USING A MEAT GRINDER WHEN SOMETHING STUCK AND SHE ATTEMPTED TO PULL A COUPLE OF THE PIECES APART WHEN SOMETHING CUT THE TIPS OF HER FINGER-DX: FINGER LACERATION
38YOM WAS BENDING OVER TO PUT A COFFEE GRINDER IN THE BOTTOM CUPBOARD AT HIS HOUSE AND WHEN HE WENT TO STAND UP, HE HAD ACUTE PAIN TO HIS LOWER BACK. HAS HAD ONGOING PAIN SINCE THE HAPPENED THIS MORNING. DX: PAIN LOW BACK ACUTE
49 YOM WAS USING A MEAT GRINDER WHEN BLADE BROKE AND HIT HIS HAND DX LACERATION HAND
39 YOM R MIDDLE FINGER CAUGHT IN MEAT GRINDER DX; OPEN FX
48 YOM C/O FINGER LACERATION S/P GRINDING FRUIT WITH A FOOD GRINDER. DX: FINGER LACERATION
36 YOM PRESENTS WITH COMPLETE AVULSION AMPUTATIONS OF LEFT INDEX, MIDDLE AND SMALL FINGERS AFTER A MEAT GRINDER INJURY WHILE CUTTING MEAT THIS MORNING. DX: TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION OF FINGER EXCLUDING THUMB.
41 YOM GRINDING CORN FOR CORN TORTILLAS GOT FINGER CAUGHT IN MACHINE DX OPEN FX FINGER
62YOF, ON ***, WAS USING A NEW PEPPER GRINDER IN THE KITCHEN WHILE COOKING IT WAS TOUGH TO TURN AND LOST HER BALANCE FALLING BACKWARDS STRIKING HEAD ONTO THE WALL THEN LANDING ON THE BUTTOCKS, TAILBONE CONTUSION NOTED DX: INJURY OF COCCYX; FALL INITIAL ENCOUNTER
49YOM PRESENTS WITH AN AMPUTATION TO HIS LEFT HAND SECOND DIGIT. PT STATES HE WAS AT HOME WHEN HE PUT HIS HAND IN A FOOD GRINDER AND THE BLADE CUT THE TIP OF HIS FINGER . DX: FINGERTIP AMPUTATION,OPEN FRACTURE OF FINGER DISTAL PHALANX,OPEN FRACTURE OF TUFT OF DISTAL PHALANX
53 YOF WAS GRINDING COFFEE BEANS AND PT LACERATED HER FINGER ON THE GRINDER. DX: RIGHT MIDDLE FINGER LACERATION
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
Cuisinart coffee grinder stopped grinding. Disassembled to find entire inside filled with coffee grounds. Where the burr grind is attached to the motor and inside a plastic housing, about 1/2 to 3/4 of this plastic housing had been decimated by probably the whole beans hitting it over several years. So essentially the wife and I have been drinking pieces of plastic.
A $259 Kitchen Kutter manual food grinder was purchased on 6/30/12 from Kitchen Craft in West Bend, WI. Customer service is at: [REDACTED], see www.kitchencraftcookware.com Although my mother loves the food grinding capabilities of this Kitchen Kutter product there is a big problem with metal peeling off of the stem of this manual food grinder and concern that it can end up in the gastrointestinal tract of babies and adults. Please see enclosed photo's. I'm not sure if the peeling metal caused damage to the inside of the metal sleeve of the main unit where the stem goes, but see pictured. Also on the stem inside the grinding cup that's now stuck on the stem screw shows rusting problems. On the base of the stem the metal is starting to bubble. Although I haven't contacted the company to given them a chance to resolve this danger: Due to dangerous circumstances to child and adult bodily safety I'm thinking this needs to be food and safety alert and has been reported to the http://www.consumer-action.org/hotline/complaint_form/ and then to needed State and Federal agencies. Please advise immediately. Thanks very much.
The consumer stated that the plastic under the black rubber is falling apart. The consumer stated that he noticed pieces of plastic falling into his salad. The consumer stated that he moved the black rubber and saw that the plastic underneath it is damaged. The consumer contacted the manf through e-mail in August. The consumer was informed that he would receive 20% off of a new one. They informed him that he would need a receipt in order to receive a replacement. The consumer was given the product as a gift and does not have a receipt. The consumer stated that he sent the photos of the defective product to the manf as well. The consumer believes that this is a safety hazard as pieces of plastic can be consumed without being aware that the product is breaking apart. Consumer stated he emailed mfr several times over the past few months and also spoke to them over the phone but they were not interested in replacing the product or looking into possible defects.
Munchkin brand Blue Baby food grinder It produced shards of metal into my child's food.
I use my coffee grinder with a retractable cord daily. I noticed that there was a break in the electrical cord that exposed the copper wiring. There was also a black mark around the cut, indicating an electrical arc had occurred. Upon further investigation, there was an additional break in the cord also with a black mark. I immediately stopped using the coffee grinder and I was not injured. I contacted the manufacture, and I was informed that was nothing they could do as the warranty had expired.
Last week, a huge "fire ball" - 3 to 4 inches large shot our of the electrical outlet while I had 2 appliances plugged in: my coffee maker and my Capresso coffee grinder. I switched outlets and continued making and grinding coffee. I taped over the outlet from which the fireball came. Two days later, I again had both appliances plugged in to another outlet. The coffee maker was running. The grinder was not running, but it was plugged in. A huge spark came out of the outlet and hit my jacket. At that point, I pulled everything out of the outlet and we turned off the breakers. I called the Scarsdale Fire Dept. The Fire Dept examined the outlets and breakers and saw nothing unusual. They questioned whether an applicance may have been at fault. When the electrician came, he too examined the outlets and wiring. He said everything was normal. He thought there may have been an unusual power surge. When he proceeded to test the 2 applicances: the coffee maker and the coffee grinder, the grinder did not work in one outlet. He looked at the grinder and thought the plug may have been faulty. At that point he saw that, at the point wheree the cord connects to the grinder, the rubber had worn away and the wiring was completely exposed. The cord is intended to be wrapped into a groove at the base of the grinder and evidently, little by little the rubber wore away exposing the wires. I think the grinder is about 2-3 years old. The electrician said that there should have been a piece of protective rubber at the point where the cord meets the unit The Grinder is Capresso Model 503. I emailed Capressor yesterday and have not received a response yet. As I could have been seriously burned, or this could have started a fire, I am alerting you.
KRUPS F203 Electric Spice and Coffee Grinder Purchased from Amazon on August 4, 2017 When the Krups coffee grinder was plugged in, there was a loud popping noise, a large electrical spark and a puff of smoke released from the electrical cord at the base of the grinder which was then partially severed. The product was plugged in by a 44 y/o male but the grinder was not being used at the time and no injuries were sustained. The electrical cord was intact prior to its insertion to the outlet with no obvious defects. The connection to the base of the grinder was firm and nonmobile. The breaker turned off at the time of the incident. This grinder was previously used about 3x daily without issue since 2017 and had not recently been cleaned nor exposed to water. Below is the appliance information about the product contained on the label KRUPS Type: F203 120V~ AC 60Hz 200W Made in China Fabriqu en Chine Intertek 3015314 CONFORMS TO UL STD.982 US CERTIFIED TO CSASID. CERTIFIE PAR LACNOR C22.2 No. 1335.1 &CSA C22.2 No. 1335.2.14 NE PAS IMMERGER DO NOT IMMERSE IN WATER POUR USAGE DOMESTIQUE SEULEMENT HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY Ref: F20342DI/6WO-2317 R
GE Coffee and Spice Grinder model #111338 I bought this item in 09/2011 at Walmart. I only used it twice. Once the second day I bought it and today on 09/20/2011 at approximately 7:00am. After putting a small amount of coffee beans in the grinder top and pressing the pulse button I began to smell smoke after about 2 seconds. After another second I actually began to SEE smoke. I looked near the plug at the base (where the smoke was originating) and plug connected to the machine began to smoke and burn. This is a NEW product and could have caused a fire.
Showing 8 of 37 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to food grinders on the CPSC website.
Frequently Asked Questions
How dangerous are food grinders?
Based on 20 years of CPSC data, food grinders have a danger score of 34/100 (low risk). An estimated 827 ER-treated injuries occur annually in the U.S. related to this product category.
What are the most common injuries from food grinders?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 6,264 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from food grinders increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for food grinders injuries?
The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 3,134 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by food grinders?
Of all ER visits involving food grinders, approximately 6.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (93.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with food grinders?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
Related Products in Containers, Tableware & Packaging
Safety Guides
What this means for you
Treat the 34/100 score as relative risk between products, not your personal odds of injury.
- See where this category ranks against every other tracked product. Full rankings
- Injuries cluster in the 35-44 age group, take extra care if that describes your household.
- Check for active recalls on this product before you assume it is safe. CPSC recalls
NEISS estimates ER-treated injuries from a national probability sample of hospitals; they do not capture injuries treated elsewhere or not treated at all.
Data: CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments. This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, scored, and verified.