CPSC NEISS · code 471

Food Grinders

Food Grinders: danger rank #482 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #545 of 838 (827 estimated ER visits a year; roughly flat over the last five years).

Containers, Tableware & Packaging CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Food Grinders ranks #482 of 838 by danger score (34/100) at ER-volume #545 of 838 (827/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#482
danger rank of 838
#545
ER-volume rank of 838
34/100
danger score
827/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (34/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

34 Lower than most lower than 57% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 53/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 7 56th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 827 30th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +4% 71st 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 37 66th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 16,562 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 471. Segments sum to 16,562 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Containers, Tableware & Packaging group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Containers, Tableware & Packaging danger scores

1. Waste Containers, Trash B…45/1002. Knives, Not Elsewhere Cla…44/1003. Drinking Glasses, Cups, A…42/1004. Cookware, Not Specified42/1005. Manual Cleaning Equipment…41/1006. Kitchen Gadgets, Not Else…41/1007. Unpowered Coffee Makers O…41/1008. Food Grinders34/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10034/100
PlainSafety danger score · Food Grinders

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 34/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for food grinders - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 827 ER visits/yr Below median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 6.6% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+4%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for food grinders are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2006 (1,204 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2005 (357 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 6,264 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by amputation to the finger (1,766 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 3,134 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 6.6% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 37 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how food grinders fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

2004006008001K1K1K 20052008201120142017202020232024 983
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Food Grinders, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 233 387 620
5-14 552 177 729
15-24 1,388 588 1,976
25-34 1,745 793 2,538
35-44 2,081 1,053 3,134
45-54 1,389 623 2,012
55-64 1,910 673 2,583
65-74 1,121 651 1,772
75+ 838 358 1,196

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 6,264
Finger Amputation 1,766
Hand Laceration 1,697
Finger Fracture 1,332
Finger Avulsion 1,019
Face Laceration 413
Wrist Laceration 316
Upper Leg Laceration 314
Lower Arm Laceration 259
Hand Contusions, Abr. 218
Lower Leg Other 186
Finger Contusions, Abr. 175
Finger Other 156
Hand Fracture 144
Lower Leg Laceration 127

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 91.7% (15,192)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 4.4% (730)
Treated And Transferred 2.3% (380)
Held For Observation 0.9% (157)
Left Without Being Seen 0.6% (103)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 81 · Male · Hand · Laceration · 2024

81YOM WITH SKIN TEAR AND LACERATION TO HIS LEFT HAND HE WAS USING A GRINDER AT WHICH TIME IT SLIPPED HITTING THE TOP OF HIS HAND. DX: SKIN TEAR OF UPPER EXTREMITY, LACERATION OF HAND

Age 38 · Male · Lower Leg · Other · 2024

38YOM ABRASION TO LEG ON A MEAT GRINDER 1 WEEK PRIOR AND C/O INCREASED REDNESS AND SWELLINGDX CELLULITIS LEG

Age 21 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

21YOF-SMALL LACERATION ON THE TIP OF HER RIGHT THIRD AND FOURTH FINGERS-WAS USING A MEAT GRINDER WHEN SOMETHING STUCK AND SHE ATTEMPTED TO PULL A COUPLE OF THE PIECES APART WHEN SOMETHING CUT THE TIPS OF HER FINGER-DX: FINGER LACERATION

Age 38 · Male · Lower Trunk · Other · 2024

38YOM WAS BENDING OVER TO PUT A COFFEE GRINDER IN THE BOTTOM CUPBOARD AT HIS HOUSE AND WHEN HE WENT TO STAND UP, HE HAD ACUTE PAIN TO HIS LOWER BACK. HAS HAD ONGOING PAIN SINCE THE HAPPENED THIS MORNING. DX: PAIN LOW BACK ACUTE

Age 49 · Male · Hand · Laceration · 2024

49 YOM WAS USING A MEAT GRINDER WHEN BLADE BROKE AND HIT HIS HAND DX LACERATION HAND

Age 39 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2024

39 YOM R MIDDLE FINGER CAUGHT IN MEAT GRINDER DX; OPEN FX

Age 48 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

48 YOM C/O FINGER LACERATION S/P GRINDING FRUIT WITH A FOOD GRINDER. DX: FINGER LACERATION

Age 36 · Male · Finger · Amputation · 2024

36 YOM PRESENTS WITH COMPLETE AVULSION AMPUTATIONS OF LEFT INDEX, MIDDLE AND SMALL FINGERS AFTER A MEAT GRINDER INJURY WHILE CUTTING MEAT THIS MORNING. DX: TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION OF FINGER EXCLUDING THUMB.

Age 41 · Male · Finger · Fracture · 2024

41 YOM GRINDING CORN FOR CORN TORTILLAS GOT FINGER CAUGHT IN MACHINE DX OPEN FX FINGER

Age 62 · Female · Head · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

62YOF, ON ***, WAS USING A NEW PEPPER GRINDER IN THE KITCHEN WHILE COOKING IT WAS TOUGH TO TURN AND LOST HER BALANCE FALLING BACKWARDS STRIKING HEAD ONTO THE WALL THEN LANDING ON THE BUTTOCKS, TAILBONE CONTUSION NOTED DX: INJURY OF COCCYX; FALL INITIAL ENCOUNTER

Age 49 · Male · Finger · Amputation · 2024

49YOM PRESENTS WITH AN AMPUTATION TO HIS LEFT HAND SECOND DIGIT. PT STATES HE WAS AT HOME WHEN HE PUT HIS HAND IN A FOOD GRINDER AND THE BLADE CUT THE TIP OF HIS FINGER . DX: FINGERTIP AMPUTATION,OPEN FRACTURE OF FINGER DISTAL PHALANX,OPEN FRACTURE OF TUFT OF DISTAL PHALANX

Age 53 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

53 YOF WAS GRINDING COFFEE BEANS AND PT LACERATED HER FINGER ON THE GRINDER. DX: RIGHT MIDDLE FINGER LACERATION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/8/2021 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · CONAIR CORPORATION · Massachusetts

Cuisinart coffee grinder stopped grinding. Disassembled to find entire inside filled with coffee grounds. Where the burr grind is attached to the motor and inside a plastic housing, about 1/2 to 3/4 of this plastic housing had been decimated by probably the whole beans hitting it over several years. So essentially the wife and I have been drinking pieces of plastic.

9/8/2012 · Incident, No Injury · ADVANCED MARKETING INT'L., INC. · Unspecified

A $259 Kitchen Kutter manual food grinder was purchased on 6/30/12 from Kitchen Craft in West Bend, WI. Customer service is at: [REDACTED], see www.kitchencraftcookware.com Although my mother loves the food grinding capabilities of this Kitchen Kutter product there is a big problem with metal peeling off of the stem of this manual food grinder and concern that it can end up in the gastrointestinal tract of babies and adults. Please see enclosed photo's. I'm not sure if the peeling metal caused damage to the inside of the metal sleeve of the main unit where the stem goes, but see pictured. Also on the stem inside the grinding cup that's now stuck on the stem screw shows rusting problems. On the base of the stem the metal is starting to bubble. Although I haven't contacted the company to given them a chance to resolve this danger: Due to dangerous circumstances to child and adult bodily safety I'm thinking this needs to be food and safety alert and has been reported to the http://www.consumer-action.org/hotline/complaint_form/ and then to needed State and Federal agencies. Please advise immediately. Thanks very much.

9/5/2014 · Incident, No Injury · Bodum USA Inc. · Michigan

The consumer stated that the plastic under the black rubber is falling apart. The consumer stated that he noticed pieces of plastic falling into his salad. The consumer stated that he moved the black rubber and saw that the plastic underneath it is damaged. The consumer contacted the manf through e-mail in August. The consumer was informed that he would receive 20% off of a new one. They informed him that he would need a receipt in order to receive a replacement. The consumer was given the product as a gift and does not have a receipt. The consumer stated that he sent the photos of the defective product to the manf as well. The consumer believes that this is a safety hazard as pieces of plastic can be consumed without being aware that the product is breaking apart. Consumer stated he emailed mfr several times over the past few months and also spoke to them over the phone but they were not interested in replacing the product or looking into possible defects.

9/5/2014 · Unspecified · Munchkin Inc. · California

Munchkin brand Blue Baby food grinder It produced shards of metal into my child's food.

9/27/2023 · Incident, No Injury · Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. · Oregon

I use my coffee grinder with a retractable cord daily. I noticed that there was a break in the electrical cord that exposed the copper wiring. There was also a black mark around the cut, indicating an electrical arc had occurred. Upon further investigation, there was an additional break in the cord also with a black mark. I immediately stopped using the coffee grinder and I was not injured. I contacted the manufacture, and I was informed that was nothing they could do as the warranty had expired.

9/23/2011 · Incident, No Injury · CAPRESSO INC · New York

Last week, a huge "fire ball" - 3 to 4 inches large shot our of the electrical outlet while I had 2 appliances plugged in: my coffee maker and my Capresso coffee grinder. I switched outlets and continued making and grinding coffee. I taped over the outlet from which the fireball came. Two days later, I again had both appliances plugged in to another outlet. The coffee maker was running. The grinder was not running, but it was plugged in. A huge spark came out of the outlet and hit my jacket. At that point, I pulled everything out of the outlet and we turned off the breakers. I called the Scarsdale Fire Dept. The Fire Dept examined the outlets and breakers and saw nothing unusual. They questioned whether an applicance may have been at fault. When the electrician came, he too examined the outlets and wiring. He said everything was normal. He thought there may have been an unusual power surge. When he proceeded to test the 2 applicances: the coffee maker and the coffee grinder, the grinder did not work in one outlet. He looked at the grinder and thought the plug may have been faulty. At that point he saw that, at the point wheree the cord connects to the grinder, the rubber had worn away and the wiring was completely exposed. The cord is intended to be wrapped into a groove at the base of the grinder and evidently, little by little the rubber wore away exposing the wires. I think the grinder is about 2-3 years old. The electrician said that there should have been a piece of protective rubber at the point where the cord meets the unit The Grinder is Capresso Model 503. I emailed Capressor yesterday and have not received a response yet. As I could have been seriously burned, or this could have started a fire, I am alerting you.

9/21/2024 · No Incident, No Injury · Groupe SEB USA · Washington

KRUPS F203 Electric Spice and Coffee Grinder Purchased from Amazon on August 4, 2017 When the Krups coffee grinder was plugged in, there was a loud popping noise, a large electrical spark and a puff of smoke released from the electrical cord at the base of the grinder which was then partially severed. The product was plugged in by a 44 y/o male but the grinder was not being used at the time and no injuries were sustained. The electrical cord was intact prior to its insertion to the outlet with no obvious defects. The connection to the base of the grinder was firm and nonmobile. The breaker turned off at the time of the incident. This grinder was previously used about 3x daily without issue since 2017 and had not recently been cleaned nor exposed to water. Below is the appliance information about the product contained on the label KRUPS Type: F203 120V~ AC 60Hz 200W Made in China Fabriqu en Chine Intertek 3015314 CONFORMS TO UL STD.982 US CERTIFIED TO CSASID. CERTIFIE PAR LACNOR C22.2 No. 1335.1 &CSA C22.2 No. 1335.2.14 NE PAS IMMERGER DO NOT IMMERSE IN WATER POUR USAGE DOMESTIQUE SEULEMENT HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY Ref: F20342DI/6WO-2317 R

9/20/2011 · Incident, No Injury · Euro-Pro Operating LLC · Pennsylvania

GE Coffee and Spice Grinder model #111338 I bought this item in 09/2011 at Walmart. I only used it twice. Once the second day I bought it and today on 09/20/2011 at approximately 7:00am. After putting a small amount of coffee beans in the grinder top and pressing the pulse button I began to smell smoke after about 2 seconds. After another second I actually began to SEE smoke. I looked near the plug at the base (where the smoke was originating) and plug connected to the machine began to smoke and burn. This is a NEW product and could have caused a fire.

Showing 8 of 37 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to food grinders on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Containers, Tableware & Packaging

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Food Grinders: cross-group products nearest on danger score (34/100), estimated annual ER visits (827/yr), and hospitalization share (6.6%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Food Grinders ranks #482 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #545 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does food grinders rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, food grinders ranks #482 by PlainSafety danger score (34/100) and #545 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (827/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from food grinders?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 6,264 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from food grinders increasing or decreasing?

Stable over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for food grinders injuries?

The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 3,134 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by food grinders?

Of all ER visits involving food grinders, approximately 6.6% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (93.4%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with food grinders?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Food Grinders is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.