CPSC NEISS · code 711

Fire Escape Devices

Fire Escape Devices: danger rank #20 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #532 of 838 (931 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 28% over the last five years).

Home Heating & Cooling Equipment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Fire Escape Devices ranks #20 of 838 by danger score (48/100) at ER-volume #532 of 838 (931/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#20
danger rank of 838
#532
ER-volume rank of 838
48/100
danger score
931/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (48/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

48 Higher than most more dangerous than 97% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 52/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 34 100th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 931 32nd 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -28% 24th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 1 18th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 18,615 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 711. Segments sum to 18,615 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Heating & Cooling Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Home Heating & Cooling Equipment danger scores

1. Fire Escape Devices48/1002. Electric Timers44/1003. Fire Or Smoke Alarms40/1004. Safes34/1005. Carbon Monoxide Detectors33/1006. Padlocks, Chain Locks Or …33/1007. Burglar Alarms33/1008. Fire Extinguishers33/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10048/100
PlainSafety danger score · Fire Escape Devices

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 48/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for fire escape devices - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 931 ER visits/yr Below median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 22.5% Very high admission rate
  • Fatality rate 1.14% Elevated fatality rate
  • 5-year trend-28%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for fire escape devices are declining by about 28% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2012 (1,581 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2008 (310 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is fracture to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 1,372 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (1,238 cases). The 15-24 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 4,759 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 22.5% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer, and a small fraction (1.14%) result in fatality.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 1 consumer incident report filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how fire escape devices fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

05001K2K2K 20052008201120142017202020232024 1K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Fire Escape Devices, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 226 108 334
5-14 669 652 1,321
15-24 2,812 1,947 4,759
25-34 3,003 1,595 4,598
35-44 2,168 1,079 3,247
45-54 1,186 1,028 2,214
55-64 1,148 485 1,633
65-74 317 58 375
75+ 55 80 135

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Lower Trunk Fracture 1,372
Head Internal Injury 1,238
Ankle Fracture 1,015
Lower Trunk Contusions, Abr. 808
Ankle Strain, Sprain 690
Foot Fracture 686
Head Laceration 603
Upper Trunk Fracture 568
Lower Trunk Other 550
Lower Leg Fracture 516
Lower Arm Laceration 483
Finger Laceration 428
Face Laceration 426
Face Fracture 382
Lower Leg Laceration 370

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 67.5% (12,559)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 22.6% (4,202)
Left Without Being Seen 3.3% (619)
Held For Observation 2.8% (517)
Treated And Transferred 2.8% (515)
Fatality Incl. Doa, Died In Er 1.1% (203)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 22 · Male · Lower Trunk · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

22YOM IN MVA, RUNNING OVER FIRE HYDRANT. BRUISE TO LOWER ABDOMEN. INTOXICATED, BAL 296 DX: MVA, ALCOHOL INTOXICATION

Age 19 · Female · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

19YOF PRESENTS TO ED FOR CONCERNS OF ALCOHOL INTOXICATION. EMS REPORTS PTS FRIENDS BECAME CONCERNED THAT TOO INTOXICATED SO THEY CALLED EMS. TRIED TO CLIMB FIRE ESCAPE TODAY BEFORE STOPPING DOING THIS AND MAY HAVE HURT HER LEG. ETOH: 2291 DX: ALCOHOL INTOXICATION W/O COMPLICATION

Age 30 · Female · Ankle · Strain, Sprain · 2024

30 YOF SLIPPED DOWN TWO STEPS ON THE FIRE ESCAPE OF HER BUILDING. DX: SPRAIN OF RIGHT ANKLE.

Age 60 · Female · Upper Trunk · Fracture · 2024

60YOF - PATIENT PRESENT FOR FALL AND BACK PAIN. PT STATES SHE WAS ON THE FIRE ESCAPE OF THE 3RD FLOOR AND FELL FROM THE SECOND FLOOR TO THE GROUND BECAUSE IT WAS WET, PT C/O BACK PAIN, ABRASIONS TO B/L ELBOWS, PER REPORT THE POLICE CAME TO THE DOOR. DX: PELVIC FRACTURE AND MULTIPLE RIB FRACTURES

Age 36 · Male · Knee · Other · 2024

36YOM PRESENTS TO ED AS TRAUMA ALERT AFTER FALLING FROM 2ND STORY FIRE ESCAPE. PATIENT STATES HE WAS SITTING ON THE ESCAPE PLATFORM HAVING A BEER AND SLIPPED OFF, LANDING ON HIS FEET. EXPERIENCED ACUTE FOOT AND KNEE PAIN BILATERALLY, AND LOW LEG PAIN BAL UNKNOWN DX; FALL FROM HEIGHT GREATER THAN 3 FEET, KNEE INJURY

Age 63 · Male · Shoulder · Other · 2024

63YOM P/W ARM PAIN. PATIENT REPORTS 4 MONTHS AGO, WAS GOING DOWN FIRE ESCAPE AND THE PLATFORM WHICH WAS LOOSE AND PREVENTED HIMSELF FROM FALLING BY HOLDING ONTO THE RAILING WITH HIS L ARM. DX: CHRONIC LEFT SHOULDER PAIN

Age 29 · Male · Head · Laceration · 2024

29YOM X PRESENTING TO THE ED AFTER BEING FOUND DOWN. PT WAS FOUND AT THE BOTTOM OF A FIRE ESCAPE, THOUGHT TO HAVE FALLEN OR JUMPED FROM 3 STORIES. PT HAS HEAD LAC, SHOULDER AND HIP ABRASION AND WRIST SWELLING DX: CRITICAL POLYTRAUMA

Age 21 · Male · Neck · Fracture · 2024

21 YOM FELL OFF FIREESCAPE DX CLOSED NON-DISPLACED FX C2 VERTEBRA

Age 28 · Female · Lower Trunk · Other · 2024

28YOF BIBEMS AS A TRAUMA ALERT AFTER THEY REPORTED SHE JUMPED FROM 3RD STORY FIRE ESCAPE. PT REPORTS SHE HAS CONFLICT WITH HER BROTHER, SO WHEN HE CAME TO HER DOOR, SHE LEFT HER APARTMENT OUT THE WINDOW, CLIMBED DOWN TO THE LOWEST LEVEL OF THE FIRE ESCAPE AND THEN JUMPED THE REST OF THE WAY TO THE GROUND. HAS LOW BACK PAIN AND ENDORSES ETOH USE BAL 117, NOT INTOX DX: LOW BACK PAIN

Age 46 · Male · Foot · Fracture · 2024

46YOM BIBEMS FOR A REPORTED FALL FROM A HEIGHT OF 25 FT. HE STATES THAT THE FALL OCCURRED LAST NIGHT. HE STATES THAT HE DROPPED HIS PHONE OFF THE FIRE ESCAPE AND WAS TRYING TO RETRIEVE IT WHEN HE FELL. PT HAS LOWER EXTREMITY PAIN AND LOW BACK PAIN. DX: CLOSED DISPLACED FX OF ANTERIOR PROCESS OF RIGHT CALCANEUS , NONDISPLACED FRACTURE OF POSTERIOR PROCESS OF RIGHT TALUS

Age 59 · Male · Upper Leg · Fracture · 2024

59YOM PT PRESENTED WITH COMPLAINTS OF RIGHT LOWER EXTREMITY PAIN S/P FALL. PT REPORTS BEING ON HIS FIRE ESCAPE WHEN HE TRIPPED AND FELL WHICH RESULTED IN RIGHT LEG PAIN, DX: PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF SHAFT OF FEMUR

Age 42 · Female · Ankle · Strain, Sprain · 2024

42 YOF WAS WALKING UP HER FIRE ESCAPE STEPS CARRYING GROCERIES ABOUT 10 DAYS AGO WHEN SHE ROLLED HER RIGHT ANKLE AND HAS BEEN HAVING SIGNIFICANT PAIN AND SWELLING SINCE. DX RIGHT ANKLE SPRAIN

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

4/2/2020 · Incident, No Injury · Safety International LLC · Pennsylvania

WHEN I TESTED THE BABY RESCUE FIRE BAG for babies and children (which is for lowering a child down during a fire), IT BROKE AND FELL 3 STORIES. IT WILL KILL YOUR CHILD! I just tested my Baby Rescue Emergency Rapid Evacuation Device and IT SNAPPED IMMEDIATELY. If my child had been inside it would have killed him! Two hours later, I’m still shaking. Here is what happened: I wanted to test the bag before an emergency so I filled it with 22 pounds of heavy material. I wrapped the rope around my wrist about 5 feet up from the bag, braced myself, then pushed the 22 pound bag out out window. It free-fell a few feet then snapped immediately and the baby bag dropped 3 stories to the ground. Thankfully no one was walking by or it probably would have killed them. It definitely would have killed my baby inside. Note, I wanted to let it free-fall for about 5 feet as I figured this is would would happen in a true emergency. My son is 45 pounds (5 years old) and the window is on the higher side. I was trying to simulate how I would get him out of the window. I am not tall enough to lower him slowly at the beginning (even though I'm 5 foot 9 in) so I figured I'd have to put the bag on the sill, brace myself, then “push” him in the bag out the window while holding the rope or securing it around a piece of heavy furniture. Anyway, when I checked out what happened, the thread broke (which was sewn from the bag to the rope). I’ll attach pictures. Looking now, I see that the thread doesn’t look reinforced or thick at all. The rope is unimpressive, but the thread is worse. In fact, all the strings look cheaply sewn up and down the line on the “loops” too. These loops would be what you would naturally hold onto or loop around something to secure the line. Likely these threads would spit at many points. There are hundreds of “weak points” all over this product. No rock climber would dare use this. It also wouldn’t take a fireman much to look at the line and see how flimsy it is.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to fire escape devices on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Home Heating & Cooling Equipment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Fire Escape Devices: cross-group products nearest on danger score (48/100), estimated annual ER visits (931/yr), and hospitalization share (22.5%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Fire Escape Devices ranks #20 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #532 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does fire escape devices rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, fire escape devices ranks #20 by PlainSafety danger score (48/100) and #532 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (931/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from fire escape devices?

The most common injury is fracture to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 1,372 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from fire escape devices increasing or decreasing?

Down 28% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for fire escape devices injuries?

The 15-24 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 4,759 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by fire escape devices?

Of all ER visits involving fire escape devices, approximately 22.5% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (77.5%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with fire escape devices?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Fire Escape Devices is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.