CPSC NEISS · code 710

Electric Timers

Electric Timers: danger rank #63 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #829 of 838 (40 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 428% over the last five years).

Home Heating & Cooling Equipment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2009-2024, Electric Timers ranks #63 of 838 by danger score (44/100) at ER-volume #829 of 838 (40/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#63
danger rank of 838
#829
ER-volume rank of 838
44/100
danger score
40/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (44/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

44 Higher than most more dangerous than 90% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 62/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

D
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 33 100th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 40 3rd 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +428% 100th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 19 55th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 243 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 710. Segments sum to 243 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Heating & Cooling Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Home Heating & Cooling Equipment danger scores

1. Fire Escape Devices48/1002. Electric Timers44/1003. Fire Or Smoke Alarms40/1004. Safes34/1005. Carbon Monoxide Detectors33/1006. Padlocks, Chain Locks Or …33/1007. Burglar Alarms33/1008. Fire Extinguishers33/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10044/100
PlainSafety danger score · Electric Timers

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 44/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for electric timers - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 40 ER visits/yr Low volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 33.3% Very high admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+428%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 16-year NEISS window from 2009 to 2024, injury counts for electric timers are rising by about 428% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2022 (81 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2016 (5 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is contusions, abr. to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 81 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by strain, sprain to the ankle (69 cases). The 55-64 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 150 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 33.3% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 19 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 3 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how electric timers fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2009–2024)

020406080100 200920112016201920222024 51
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Electric Timers, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 21 5 26
5-14 16 0 16
55-64 81 69 150
75+ 0 51 51

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Lower Trunk Contusions, Abr. 81
Ankle Strain, Sprain 69
Upper Trunk Fracture 51
Internal Ingestion 26
Hand Laceration 16

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 70.4% (171)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 27.6% (67)
Left Without Being Seen 2.1% (5)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 81 · Female · Upper Trunk · Fracture · 2024

81 YOF WAS WALKING IN THE RAIN WITH HER WALKER TRYING TO UNLOAD HER CAR WHEN AN OUTSIDE LIGHT THAT WAS ON A TIMER WENT OUT UNEXPECTEDLY AND SHE FELL ONTO LEFT SIDE SUSTAINING AN ABRASION TO LEFT FOREHEAD. DX: FALL, RIB FRACTURES

Age 9 · Male · Hand · Laceration · 2019

9YOM WITH LAC TO HAND FROM A TIMER

Age 212 · Female · Internal · Ingestion · 2019

12MOF PLAYING WITH MAGNETIC TIMER WHEN BACK CAME OFF AND SHE INGESTED A BUTTON BATTERY FROM IT;DX FOREIGN BODY INGESTION

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/4/2016 · Incident, No Injury · Belkin International, Inc. · California

outlet/socket timer burned

9/24/2011 · Incident, No Injury · AMERTAC COMPANY · California

I utilized the Westek mechanical electric timer for operating a resistive heater. The Westek timer is Item #TM77DHB listed with the CSA certification lab on file #227259. The timer has a mechanical on/off feature and is rated for 1875W restistive load (1250W tungsten load). The timer was utilized with a Delonghi Heat machine with a maximum power consumption rating of 1500W electric. After about 6 months of regular use, I noticed one morning a smell of burning plastic. The area of the timer near the prongs was beginning to melt. The item was grossly overheated and had begun to melt onto the underlying power strip, a UL listed power strip rated at 1800W resistive load. The item was almost too hot to touch, and the plastic left a melted/charred region around the prongs. It appears a serious fire was narrowly averted. The company has asked me to return the timer to them, but I am able to share it for examination with the CPSC before returning it.

8/4/2022 · Incident, No Injury · Intermatic · Washington

Installed 2 Intermatic IW505K 15-Amp Digital In-Wall Timer on 6/2017 over the past 3 months they have not been keeping their programmed on off times, and the wall plates where getting very hot, removed them both (7/22/22) and discovered they where discoloring the housing (plastic) to a tan color, and wiring insulation was melting. This would have most certainly created a in wall electrical fire. And I would have lost my home.

7/3/2020 · Incident, No Injury · GE Trademark Licensing, Inc. · District of Columbia

Timer began to buzz whenever it was turned on, and a burning smell and sparks started to come out of it. It's a fire hazard.

7/10/2016 · Unspecified · Intermatic · California

Used "Intermatic Time-All" timer model TN111 for turning a small appliance off/on. When the timer was in use plugged into an electric outlet, suddenly around 10pm on 7/8/16, it made a loud pop sound and there was a bright flash of electricity/light from it.

6/3/2015 · Incident, No Injury · THE NCC NY LLC · New York

I bought a Stanley Digital Timer model TM231 (Item #31207) on 12/4/2014. I used it for the first time on 3/15/2015. A small decorative light was plugged in. A short time after the timer turned the light on I smelled smoke and saw the smoke was coming from the timer. I was able to grab the very hot, smoking timer and throw it outside. The plastic was already discoloring and sticky with strong fumes and a lot of smoke. If I had not been in the room when this happened I'm sure a fire would have resulted.

6/16/2022 · Incident, No Injury · BRINKS HAMPTON PRODUCTS · New York

Brinks model 44-2020 electrical appliance shut off timer. The model appears to be functioning normally with indicator lights, but will fail open. Failure was seen with multiple appliances well within product specifications. No tungsten devices were used. I have a second timer that doesn't have this issue. Description of Risk of Harm The device in question is designed to shut off the flow of electrical current based on a pre-set timer. Nevertheless, the relay will fail open, meaning that the electrical current will be hot, even if indicator lights appear to be working normally. There is risk of electrocution if the user incorrectly believes that the current has been turned off based on an off indicator light. Also, there is a fire risk, as cooking devices that may be attached to the timer will not turn off at preset times. There are no warnings on the packaging and/or instructions for this type of potential situation. There is only a max wattage threshold for resistive devices and a max wattage threshold for tungsten based devices.

4/25/2024 · No Incident, No Injury · Intermatic · Virginia

I purchased and installed an Intermatic EH40 water heater digital timer from Home Depot in August 2020. Until March 2024, the unit worked as expected. However, in March 2024, the unit began (unbeknownst to me) internally melting from what appears to be poor internal electrical connection for carrying 30 Amps worth of electricity to the water heater. It began to fill my home with smoke and burning smell, likely toxic from burning plastics inside the timer unit. Luckily, I was able to investigate the smoke and found that the Intermatic EH40 electrical timer was burning itself up and likely would have burned my home down if I had not been there to turn off the electrical breaker. I also was able to vent the likely toxic-to-breathe smoke. I feel that this consumer product sold in DIY big box retailers like Home Depot is a threat to human health and safety. I urge you to recall this device before others are harmed.

Showing 8 of 19 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to electric timers on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Home Heating & Cooling Equipment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Electric Timers: cross-group products nearest on danger score (44/100), estimated annual ER visits (40/yr), and hospitalization share (33.3%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Electric Timers ranks #63 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #829 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does electric timers rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, electric timers ranks #63 by PlainSafety danger score (44/100) and #829 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (40/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from electric timers?

The most common injury is contusions, abr. to the lower trunk, accounting for approximately 81 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from electric timers increasing or decreasing?

Up 428% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for electric timers injuries?

The 55-64 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 150 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by electric timers?

Of all ER visits involving electric timers, approximately 33.3% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (66.7%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with electric timers?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Electric Timers is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.