CPSC NEISS · code 4005

Filters

Filters: danger rank #482 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #596 of 838 (563 estimated ER visits a year; rising by about 17% over the last five years).

Floors, Walls & Ceilings CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Filters ranks #482 of 838 by danger score (34/100) at ER-volume #596 of 838 (563/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#482
danger rank of 838
#596
ER-volume rank of 838
34/100
danger score
563/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (34/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

34 Lower than most lower than 57% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 52/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 7 57th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 563 27th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend +17% 80th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 30 62nd 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 11,247 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 4005. Segments sum to 11,247 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Floors, Walls & Ceilings group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Floors, Walls & Ceilings danger scores

1. Beds Or Bedframes, Other …55/1002. Chairs, Other Or Not Spec…51/1003. Ladders, Other Or Not Spe…49/1004. Bedding, Not Specified49/1005. Tables (excl. Baby Chang…47/1006. Stools, Other Or Not Spec…44/1007. Scales, Not Elec. Or Batt…44/1008. Filters34/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10034/100
PlainSafety danger score · Filters

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 34/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for filters - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 563 ER visits/yr Below median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 6.8% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend+17%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for filters are rising by about 17% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2024 (1,145 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2011 (180 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 2,417 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by contusions, abr. to the eyeball (642 cases). The 55-64 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 2,056 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 6.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 30 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how filters fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

05001K2K 20052008201120142017202020232024 1K
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Filters, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 371 171 542
5-14 383 16 399
15-24 748 330 1,078
25-34 642 286 928
35-44 1,476 447 1,923
45-54 1,072 620 1,692
55-64 1,186 870 2,056
65-74 805 522 1,327
75+ 792 512 1,304

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
Finger Laceration 2,417
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 642
Face Laceration 504
Hand Laceration 385
Upper Trunk Other 309
Eyeball Foreign Body 295
All Parts Body Other 289
Lower Trunk Strain, Sprain 288
Lower Trunk Other 278
Head Internal Injury 259
Ear Other 228
Foot Laceration 220
Toe Laceration 215
Knee Other 207
Eyeball Derma/conjunct 203

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 90.7% (10,198)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 6.5% (730)
Left Without Being Seen 1.6% (184)
Treated And Transferred 0.7% (81)
Held For Observation 0.5% (54)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 67 · Female · Finger · Laceration · 2024

67 YOF CUR RT POINTER FINGER ON AIR FILTER DOOR AT HOME. DX: LAC OF RIGHT INDEX FINGER

Age 19 · Female · Ankle · Strain, Sprain · 2024

19YOF PRESENTS AFTER SLIPPING ON A COFFEE FILTER RESULTING IN INJURY OF HER RIGHT FOOT AND ANKLE AT APPROX 9:30 PM THIS EVENING AT HOME DX: ANKLE SPRAIN AND STRAIN, FOOT SPRAIN

Age 16 · Female · Eyeball · Foreign Body · 2024

16YOF PRESENTS WITH FOREIGN BODY SENSATION OF LEFT EYE AFTER CLEANING THE FILTER (NO DETAILS STATED) HAD AN ONSET OF LEFT EYE PAIN DX: FOREIGN BODY LEFT EYE56

Age 50 · Female · Hand · Other · 2024

50YOF PATIENT WAS CHANGING HER FILTERS AT HOME ON A LADDER WHEN SHE FELT HER RIGHT HAND CRAMP. SHE WAS ABLE TO GET OFF THE LADDER AT WHICH TIME SHE HAD TUNNEL VISION AND FELT WEAK. SHE LAID ON THE FLOOR WHERE SHE BELIEVES SHE PASSED OUT FOR FEW MINUTES. DX: MUSCLE SPASM, SYNCOPE, TACHYCARDIA

Age 61 · Male · Lower Trunk · Nerve Damage · 2024

61 YOM WITH LOW BACK PAIN THAT STARTED 2 DAYS AGO WHILE CHANGING FILTERS IN AN AIR SYSTEM. HAS RIGHT LUMBAR PAIN RADIATING DOWN HIS LEG TO THE KNEE. DX LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY

Age 40 · Female · Face · Derma/conjunct · 2024

40 YOF REPORTS SHE GOT *** AIR FILTERS YESTERDAY. SHE BEGAN TO HAVE ITCHINESS AND A RED RASH AFTERWARDS TO HER FACE AND LEGS. DX ALLERGIC REACTION, URTICARIA

Age 75 · Male · Eyeball · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

75YOM, WAS CHANGING AIR FILTER YESTERDAY WHEN FELT DUST GOT INTO HIS RIGHT EYE FOLLOWED BY IRRITATION REDNESS AND DISCHARGE, DX: ABRASION OF RIGHT CORNEAL

Age 42 · Male · Finger · Laceration · 2024

42YOM, ACCIDENTALLY CUT HIS FINGER WHILE CHANGING A FILTER ON THE WATER COOLER, DX: LACERATION OF LEFT MIDDLE FINGER WITHOUT DAMAGE TO NAIL

Age 218 · Female · Face · Laceration · 2024

18MOF PT RAN INTO AN AIR FILTER SCRATCHING HER RT UPPER EYELID DX: RT EYELID LACERATION

Age 75 · Male · Shoulder · Other · 2024

75YOM PRESENTS FROM HOME WITH ARM PAIN. PATIENT REPORTS HE WAS CHANGING THE WATER FILTER AND HAD SUDDEN EPISODE OF ARM PAIN IN SHOULDER. DX: SHOULDER PAIN

Age 17 · Male · Lower Trunk · Other · 2024

17YOM PRESENTS TODAY AFTER FALLING FROM THE CEILING APPROX 12 FEET. PT WAS IN THE ATTIC ATTEMPTING TO CHANGE AN AIR FILTER ON AN A/C WHEN HE FELL THROUGH. LOWER BACK PAIN. DX: FALL

Age 42 · Male · All Parts Body · Electric Shock · 2024

42YOM PRESENTS W/ ELECTRIC SHOCK LIKE PAIN IN LT ARM AFTER SUBMERGING HIS LT HAND INTO AN ICE BATH TO CHECK THE FILTER THAT WAS PLUGGED INTO A HOUSEHOLD OUTLET DX: ELECTRICAL SHOCK OF HAND

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/16/2022 · Incident, No Injury · Express Water, Inc. · Colorado

Regarding the 'express water' reverse osmosis system which contains a UV lamp. Based in CA and currently available on [REDACTED]. The UV lamp O-ring is not lubricated and is the wrong size. The o-ring can easily cause a leak into the high voltage lamp which is connected directly to the power supply. I contacted the company and was met with a PR-wall. They know this is a problem and they are playing the plausible deniability game.

8/28/2012 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · RPS PRODUCTS, INC. · Maryland

I purchased a new HEPA filter insert ([REDACTED]) and charcoal pre-filter (HON38002) for my old [REDACTED] air purifier. The products came from AllergyBeGone (866-234-6630) via Amazon.com. I am reporting the HEPA filter insert (HON24000) as unsafe. It came with a small identifying sticker: RPS Products / BestAir / 847-683-3400. The new HEPA filter insert is white overall. All previous HEPA filter inserts I have purchased for the air purifier have been black outside. I first used the new HEPA filter on 8/13/12. I have operated my air purifier with the new HEPA filter in place three times. All three times when I turned on the unit I immediately noticed a strong organic chemical sort of smell, a smell too objectionable for me to remain in the room. Never before have I experienced any sort of smell when using the air purifier (I have owned it since it was new, perhaps more than 10 years ago, and have purchased and used several replacement HEPA filters and charcoal pre-filters through the years). I ran the air purifier for 3 hours each time on two different days and in two different rooms. The smell was just as strong after each time, so I turned off the air purifier, opened the windows and, after a time, was able to return to the room. On both occasions the next morning I awoke with a sore throat, which was gone by later that morning. A third time I ran the air purifier in my bedroom for 1-1/2 days while I was out of town. The same strong smell was immediately present, and remained as strong after 1-1/2 days of operation. I turned off the air purifier, opened the windows and, after a time, was able to return to the room. I later went to bed in the room. The next morning I again awoke with a sore throat, but this time by midday I was experiencing such low energy that I spent much of the rest of the day lying down. I developed a runny nose and scratchy throat during that day. All my symptoms worsened over the next several days, and I developed a significant c

7/27/2025 · No Incident, No Injury · Filterbaby · United States

I am reporting Filterbaby. I have a Filterbaby Skincare Water Filter 2.0 for my bathroom sink. I noticed that over time, colorful gunk has built up in between the clear plastic layers in the front of the device. Water is able to seep in and be trapped. I contacted customer service, whom identified it as mold initially instructed me to clean it, as they did not realize it was inaccessible. Once I reiterated that it's between the clear plastic that cannot be separated, I was told that visible mold build up that can never be cleaned is normal and to continue using the device. I am not going to wash my face with faucet water that continually comes into contact with visible mold. This is a dangerous product that the manufacturer has refused to replace despite their policy on their website that they will replace defective products.

5/23/2019 · Injury, Level of care not known · E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company · South Carolina

Dear Consumer Protection, Our office is filing said complaint to your office for a full investigation into a defective Dupont or now Dow-DuPont Water Filter System Model No. WF-FM 100. Last week our [REDACTED] Ms.[REDACTED] a senior was going to make coffee. ms [REDACTED] turned down the plastic black knob to get filtered water etc. Once turned the plastic knob shot out like a bullet towards Ms [REDACTED] eye which Ms. [REDACTED] almost lost. Please see attached Exhibit 1 to CEO [REDACTED] regarding said matter. It was requested of Dow-DuPont CEO [REDACTED] to address said matter because of the defect that [REDACTED] almost lost an eye because of the pressure this black know shot out towards her eye on May 3, 2019 at 7am. [REDACTED] made no contact, nor has their executive offices nor has their legal dept. as well. This product is very defective and can cause a person to loose their eye, which Dow-DuPont and [REDACTED] feel they do not have to respond, resolove or Investigate said defective Model No. WF-FM 100 product they make. The unit has been saved as evidence for any legal recourse regarding said matter. It is requested you address this complaint please, file this for an Investigation to save other victims form this defective Dupont Product made in your state. Thank you [REDACTED] [REDACTED][REDACTED]

4/9/2024 · Incident, No Injury · VIVOHOME INC. · Virginia

(04/09/2024) The pond filter exploded. The consumer heard a loud noise. He saw that the plastic housing of the filter had blown off. He also saw flames.

4/27/2023 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · QINGDAO ECOPURE FILTER CO., LTD · New Jersey

On April 15th 2023 I  PURCHASED ELFIN WATERDROP WATER PITCHER WITH A FILTER ON ITS TOP FROM AMAZON.COM. THE UPC BAR CODE ON IT IS X002XRX84J EPA EST NO 95301-CHN-1 MADE IN CHINA tel# for the company is 1-888-352-3558 email [REDACTED] .I FOLLOWED ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS ON PREWASHING THIS ITEM AND ITS FILETRS AND SET IT UP THE CORRECT AWAY...IT TURNED OUT THAT AFTER I RECEIVED THIS ITEM AND USED IT FOR A FEW DAYS FROM AROUND  APRIL 22TH OF 2023 TILL APRIL 27TH OF 2023 THE WATER COMING OUT OF THIS PITCHER CAUSED ME TO HEAVE PAINFUL HEAVINESS ON MY CHEST ON MY LEFT SIDE  IS IF I WAS GETTING A HEART ATTACK AND PAINFUL LYMPHNODES UNDER MY LEFT AND RIGHT ARMS.I DISCONTINUED USING IT AND ASKED FDA ON WHERE TO REPORT IT AND THEY ADVISED ME TO CONSUMERS SAFETY PRODUCTS COMMISSION. It seems that this water filter is leaking dangerous chemicals to its so called "filtered" water .. I CALLED AMAZON TODAY  ON 04-27-2023 AMD REPORTED THE ISSUES WITH THIS WATER FILTER TO THEM AMD ALSO I TOLD THEM TO CONTACT THE SELLER AS WELL,BECAUSE IT IS TOO DANGEROUS TO SELL THIS PRODUCT.I ALSO LEFT A BAD REVIEW IN AMAZON IN REGARDS TO THE ISSUES FOR  THIS PRODUCT AS WELL.I also called the manufacturer at 1-888-352--3558 today 04-27-23 as well and I told them what happened they were thinking that it was an allergy, but I work in health care and the signs and symptoms that I had were of a toxic substance not of an allergen ..and NO I am not allergic to anything ...A LOT OF THE STUFF THAT AMAZON IS SELLING IS NOT GOOD FOR CONSUMPTION THEY NEED TO BUILD A TEAM OF PEOPLE THAT QUALITY CHECK THE PRODUCTS, BEFORE THEY SELL THEM TO US AS CONSUMERS AND SO ARE [REDACTED] ,[REDACTED] ,[REDACTED] AND MANY OTHERS TOO.PLEASE INSPECT THIS PRODUCT which is very dangerous AND MAKE SURE TO ASK FOR RULES TO ENFORCE THE QUALITY CHECKS ON THESE PRODUCTS AS WELL.THANK YOU!

4/20/2025 · No Incident, No Injury · APEC Water Systems · California

Drinking water filtration cartridges contanimated with copper specules.

3/6/2025 · Incident, No Injury · iSpring Water Systems, LLC · Washington

The iSpring WCFM500K system significantly elevates water pH to hazardous levels (9.59) without disclosure, violating EPA/WHO safe drinking water standards (6.58.5 pH). This poses: Health Risks: Skin irritation, potential alkalosis, and disruption of bodily pH balance. Appliance Damage: Accelerated scale buildup in water heaters and plumbing fixtures. 3. Timeline of Events Pre-Purchase Consultation (11/27/2024): I provided iSpring with professional water test results (iron: 1.5 ppm, manganese: 0.665 ppm, pH: 7.88). [REDACTED], iSpring Representative, recommended the WCFM500K system, stating: The WCFM500K will take care of iron and manganese The UVF55FS [UV filter] is always a good option to kill bacteria, which is more common on well water. No warnings about pH elevation were provided. Post-Installation Testing: pH spiked to 9.59, far exceeding safe limits. 3. Evidence of Company Knowledge Chat Transcript (11/27/2024): iSpring reviewed water test results but failed to disclose pH risks. Representative explicitly stated the system was suitable for well water.

Showing 8 of 30 reports.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to filters on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Floors, Walls & Ceilings

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Filters: cross-group products nearest on danger score (34/100), estimated annual ER visits (563/yr), and hospitalization share (6.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Filters ranks #482 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #596 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does filters rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, filters ranks #482 by PlainSafety danger score (34/100) and #596 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (563/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from filters?

The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 2,417 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from filters increasing or decreasing?

Up 17% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for filters injuries?

The 55-64 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 2,056 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by filters?

Of all ER visits involving filters, approximately 6.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (93.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with filters?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Filters is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.