CPSC NEISS · code 972

Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners

Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners: danger rank #574 of 838 is not ER-volume rank #597 of 838 (560 estimated ER visits a year; declining by about 13% over the last five years).

Home Workshop Tools & Equipment CPSC NEISS through 2024

Danger score versus ER volume

Danger score versus ER volume

According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners ranks #574 of 838 by danger score (32/100) at ER-volume #597 of 838 (560/yr). They are not the same ranking.

#574
danger rank of 838
#597
ER-volume rank of 838
32/100
danger score
560/yr
estimated ER visits (avg)

Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.

Where this category's danger score sits nationally

Danger score (32/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories

32 Lower than most lower than 68% of 838 product categories

scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024

Composite verdict

Composite Safety Score: 43/100

One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.

C
Dimension Value National percentile Weight applied Source
Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) 8 64th 35% CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index
Annual ER injury volume 560 27th 30% CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries
5-year injury trend -13% 46th 15% CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries
Consumer incident reports 3 28th 20% CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count

Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.

Where 11,197 estimated ER injuries land on the body

Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 972. Segments sum to 11,197 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.

Two danger lenses

Same-group peer scores and this product's dial

The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Home Workshop Tools & Equipment group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.

Home Workshop Tools & Equipment danger scores

1. Gasoline47/1002. Methyl Alcohol (solvent)45/1003. Caustics43/1004. Lye42/1005. Gasoline Cans41/1006. Paints, Varnishes Or Shel…41/1007. General Purpose Household…41/1008. Paint Or Varnish Removers…32/100
Higher score = higher composite danger in this group. Peer set is other scored products sharing the same CPSC group.
0/100100/10032/100
PlainSafety danger score · Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners

Source: CPSC NEISS danger-score model As of 2024

How this 32/100 score is built

The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners - no opinion, no editorializing:

  • Injury volume 560 ER visits/yr Below median volume
  • Severity (hospitalization rate) 7.8% Above median admission rate
  • Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
  • 5-year trend-13%

Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.

What the CPSC Data Shows

Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners are declining by about 13% over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2006 (983 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2010 (217 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 2,724 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by burn, chemical to the hand (1,107 cases). The 25-34 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 1,899 cases over the NEISS window, and males appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 7.8% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.

Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 3 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.

Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)

02004006008001K1K 20052008201120142017202020232024 562
Estimated annual emergency-room visits for Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners, CPSC NEISS

Source: CPSC NEISS national injury estimates As of 2024

Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only

Who Gets Injured?

Age Group Male Female Total
0-4 477 425 902
5-14 251 391 642
15-24 1,292 477 1,769
25-34 1,561 338 1,899
35-44 1,250 517 1,767
45-54 1,019 770 1,789
55-64 884 295 1,207
65-74 509 488 997
75+ 226 0 226

Most Common Injuries

Body Part Diagnosis Est. Injuries
All Parts Body Poisoning 2,724
Hand Burn, Chemical 1,107
Eyeball Burn, Chemical 980
Eyeball Derma/conjunct 596
Eyeball Contusions, Abr. 474
Eyeball Other 410
Face Burn, Chemical 344
Lower Leg Burn, Chemical 315
Finger Burn, Chemical 311
Lower Arm Burn, Chemical 283
Face Derma/conjunct 260
Hand Other 217
Lower Arm Derma/conjunct 191
Hand Derma/conjunct 177
Lower Trunk Burn, Chemical 167

Severity Breakdown

Treated/examined And Released 89.1% (9,977)
Treated And Admitted/hospitalized 4.8% (539)
Treated And Transferred 3.0% (331)
Left Without Being Seen 2.3% (260)
Held For Observation 0.8% (90)

ER Visit Narratives

Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.

Age 22 · Female · Eyeball · Other · 2024

22 YOF GOT PAINT PRIMER IN EYE DX: EXPOSURE TO CHEM

Age 52 · Female · Lower Trunk · Other · 2024

52 YOF WITH LOWER BACK PAIN S/P LIFTING A 5 GALLON PAIN BARREL ON TUESDAY. DX ACUTE BILATERAL LOW BACK PAIN

Age 24 · Male · Eyeball · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

24YOM PATIENT GOT PAINT REMOVER IN HIS EYE DX: CORNEAL ABRASION

Age 60 · Male · Knee · Burn, Chemical · 2024

60YOM REPORTS FROM HOME AFTER HE WAS USING A CHEMICAL PAINT STRIPPING MATERIAL ON HIS FLOORS AND WAS KNEELING IN IT WHILE WEARING PANTS AND NOTICED BURNING TO SKIN AROUND HIS KNEES. DX CHEMICAL BURN TO KNEES.

Age 31 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

31YOM MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEM, PATIENT WAS HUFFING PAINT CANS AND FIND RUNNING INTO TRAFFIC IN THE STREETS, POSITIVE FOR MARIJUANA USE DX: SUBSTANCE USE

Age 43 · Male · Lower Trunk · Burn, Chemical · 2024

43 YOM WITH A BURN TO HIS LEFT ARM, NOSE AND LEFT SIDE OF HIS ABDOMEN AND FLANK THAT OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 3 DAYS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL. HE STATES THAT HE WAS IN HIS SHED AND WAS REACHING UP TO GET SOME CHEMICALS OFF A SHELF, AND HE STATES THAT A CAN OF CAUSTIC ACID THAT STRIPS PAINT SPILLED ONTO HIM. DX CHEMICAL BURNS, CELLULITIS

Age 55 · Unknown · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2024

55YO UNK ***, REPORTS ACCIDENTALLY TOOK A SIP OF, ***, SPIT IT OUT AND DIDN'T SWALLOW IT, THEN RINSED MOUTH WITH WATER, DX: CHEMICAL EXPOSURE

Age 72 · Male · Lower Trunk · Burn, Chemical · 2024

72YOM WAS USING PAINT STRIPPER AND GOT IT ON HIM AND IT BURNED HIM. DX CHEMICAL BURN TO BUTTOCKS

Age 7 · Female · Eyeball · Contusions, Abr. · 2024

7YOF. 3 DAYS AGO HURT LEFT EYE AT SCHOOL WITH THE BACK OF A PAINTBRUSH. NOW WITH INCREASED PAIN AND REDNESS.

Age 64 · Male · All Parts Body · Poisoning · 2023

64YOM PRESENTS WITH THROAT AND NOSE IRRITATION AND SWELLING AFTER WHILE REFINISHING HIS GUITAR WITH A SPRAY LAQUER THE NOZZLE BECAME CLOGGED SO HE BLEW INTO IT AND THE PRESSURE CAUSED THE LAQUER TO SPLASH INTO HIS MOUTH AND NOSE DX: THROAT SORENESS, CHEMICAL EXPOSURE, NASAL CONGESTION

Age 24 · Male · Eyeball · Contusions, Abr. · 2023

24YOM WAS CHIPPING PAINT AT HOME & GOT SOMETHING IN LEFT EYE WAS NOT ABLE TO REMOVE, DID FLUSH W/O RELIEF DX LEFT EYE PAIN, CORNEA ABRASION. LEFT

Age 56 · Male · Hand · Burns, Thermal · 2023

56 YOM WAS WORKING ON HIS CAR WITH ACETONE, ACCIDENTALLY GOT SOME OF IT ON HIS GLOVES AND LIT A CIGARETTE, CATCHING HIS GLOVES ON FIRE SUSTAINING BURNS TO HAND , WRIST AND FACE; PT ALSO ENSORSES SNORTING HEROIN AND DRINKING ALCOHOL DAILY AND REQUESTS DETOX, BAL 116, UDS+ FENTANYL, AMPHETAMINE. DX: BURNS, CELLULITIS, OPIOID USE DISORDER

Consumer Incident Reports

Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.

9/28/2016 · Injury, Seen by Medical Professional · BEHR PROCESS CORPORATION · Wisconsin

While reading directions for use I set the container on my ottoman when the phone rang. It tipped over and destroyed the fabric on my furniture. The container had no been opened yet. When I opened it there was no protective sealant on the container. If this had spilled on a child (or anyone) it would have been worse. Or a pet could have licked it up. Later, when I used this product on my deck, some splashed up on my legs and I received 2nd degree burns. I reported this to Behr and their mother company masco at this time. I was at Home Depot the other day and had a store clerk open a container of this. There is still no sealant. Even ketchup has a sealant. The instructions do say to wear protective clothing, but nothing specific. Maybe a person needs to wear hazmat gear to use this product safely?? Please do something about this.

9/22/2011 · Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received · BACK TO NATURE PRODUCTS CO., INC · Florida

I researched "non toxic, enviromentally friendly paint strippers and found Back to Natures Ready Strip with claim to be safe and non caustic, non toxic ODORLESS , no fumes etc.....I went and bought it from a local paint store.....got home opened it and it was not like the photo it had 6 inches of brown liquid sitting on top and green slug on the bottom I had to stir 10 minutes to get it mixed....it was thin not think like it claimed and had an odor....however I tried it on a 3 ft section of door frame, it dripped all over but I left it..closed the doors to the bath and bedroom from rest of the house, had 3 windows open fully, 2 fans going to ventilate the entire bath and bedroom............I already had a headache and went outside to which I smelled coming strongly from the bedroom window the smell of acetone or something very very strong........I had to go in a remove all I put on the door frames, wash everything and the toxic fumes remained...the next morning I returned the product to the store and the employee opened the top and immediately the smell can out in less than 1 second, those fumes came out burned my eyes, nose lips and still tonight I am sick with blisters on my lips, skin burns, breathing problems, cough and headache..I never touched it with my skin or hands or anything and the area was well ventilated.....even though the company claims is it safe...no fumes..virtually odorless, non caustic...you could eat it etc........NO WAY........this and the employee agreed, it was either very old or contaminated somehow or the chemicals had changed or something because the fumes from that was as strong as acetone or some other toxic fume...now I am very sick tonight with pain on my skin like burns.........and I am still smelling some of the fumes even though I have cleaned the area several times with water, hot water, mild soap and water....will tery baking soda tomorrow and still have the windows open with fans going.....I am very very sick and am hurting a

6/2/2024 · Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received · Watts Removal · Washington

Inadequate safety precautions and negligent training material for highly caustic substance. A worker received chemical burns that required emergency medical attention when using the Walkoff graffiti removal product made by Watts Removal Products. The product was used in accordance with the safety instructions and training videos provided by Watts Removal Products. The core issue is the Walkoff product comes in spray bottles, and is encouraged to be used in spray bottles. However, the mist and bounce-back from using a spray bottle is sufficient to cause serious chemical burns on skin. The safety instructions do no include warnings are about arm protection, and the training videos produced by Watts Removal Products show workers using the product in spray bottle form without sleeve protection. Communications of the issue were made with Watts Removal Company. It does not appear the company is interested in self-correcting the obvious issue.

Product Recalls

Search for active and past recalls related to paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners on the CPSC website.

Compare beyond Home Workshop Tools & Equipment

Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization

Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners: cross-group products nearest on danger score (32/100), estimated annual ER visits (560/yr), and hospitalization share (7.8%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.

Read with this product

About this data

CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.

According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners ranks #574 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #597 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners rank on danger score versus ER volume?

Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners ranks #574 by PlainSafety danger score (32/100) and #597 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (560/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.

What are the most common injuries from paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners?

The most common injury is poisoning to the all parts body, accounting for approximately 2,724 injuries over 20 years.

Are injuries from paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners increasing or decreasing?

Down 13% over 5 years.

Who is most at risk for paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners injuries?

The 25-34 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 1,899 cases recorded over 20 years. Males are more frequently injured in this age group.

What happens when someone is injured by paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners?

Of all ER visits involving paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners, approximately 7.8% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.2%) are treated and released from the emergency department.

How can I report a safety problem with paint or varnish removers, paintbrush cleaners?

You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.

Data on Paint Or Varnish Removers, Paintbrush Cleaners is compiled directly from CPSC NEISS and SaferProducts.gov records, current through 2024. See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and is not affiliated with the CPSC.

PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.