Danger score versus ER volume
Danger score versus ER volume
According to CPSC NEISS 2005-2024, Ice Makers (separate From Refrigerators) ranks #574 of 838 by danger score (32/100) at ER-volume #594 of 838 (565/yr). They are not the same ranking.
- #574
- danger rank of 838
- #594
- ER-volume rank of 838
- 32/100
- danger score
- 565/yr
- estimated ER visits (avg)
Danger score combines injury volume, hospitalization, fatality, and five-year trend. ER volume is the average annual NEISS estimate alone. Rank 1 is highest on each list.
Where this category's danger score sits nationally
Danger score (32/100) across 838 scored CPSC product categories
32 Lower than most lower than 68% of 838 product categories
scored CPSC product categories, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more product categories. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CPSC NEISS, PlainSafety danger-score model · 2024
Composite verdict
Composite Safety Score: 51/100
One verdict blending 4 independently-sourced dimensions from two separate CPSC systems, each benchmarked against all 838 scored product categories by percentile rather than raw value, so no single huge-volume category can dominate the scale.
| Dimension | Value | National percentile | Weight applied | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury severity (hospitalization + fatality blend) | 7 | 59th | 35% | CPSC NEISS 20-year severity index |
| Annual ER injury volume | 565 | 27th | 30% | CPSC NEISS estimated annual ER-treated injuries |
| 5-year injury trend | -7% | 55th | 15% | CPSC NEISS 5-year % change in ER-treated injuries |
| Consumer incident reports | 40 | 68th | 20% | CPSC SaferProducts.gov public incident report count |
Methodology: each dimension is ranked against the full population's p10/p25/p50/p75/p90 breakpoints and interpolated to a 0-100 percentile; the composite is the weighted average of available percentiles. See methodology for the full benchmark table.
Where 11,306 estimated ER injuries land on the body
Body-part shares from the same CPSC NEISS injury_types extract for product code 227. Segments sum to 11,306 - a body-map mix, not a danger score or ER-volume rank.
Two danger lenses
Same-group peer scores and this product's dial
The bars compare PlainSafety danger scores inside the Kitchen Cooking Appliances group (same CPSC NEISS extract). The dial is this product's score alone on the Low/Moderate/High bands. Do not read a peer bar as an ER-visit count.
Kitchen Cooking Appliances danger scores
How this 32/100 score is built
The score is computed from four CPSC-derived factors for ice makers (separate from refrigerators) - no opinion, no editorializing:
- Injury volume 565 ER visits/yr Below median volume
- Severity (hospitalization rate) 7.2% Above median admission rate
- Fatality rate 0.00% No recorded fatalities
- 5-year trend-7%
Band labels compare this category against the corpus of 838 scored CPSC product categories, see the full methodology for the exact weighting of each factor.
What the CPSC Data Shows
Across the 20-year NEISS window from 2005 to 2024, injury counts for ice makers (separate from refrigerators) are roughly flat over the last five years, with the busiest year on record being 2014 (856 estimated ER visits) and the quietest 2021 (253 estimated visits). The single most common ER diagnosis is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,732 visits across the 20-year NEISS window, followed by internal injury to the head (976 cases). The 35-44 age group absorbs the largest share of injuries, about 2,269 cases over the NEISS window, and females appear slightly more often than the opposite sex in that cohort. Severity outcomes from the NEISS disposition field show that 7.2% of ER visits involving this product end in hospital admission or transfer.
Beyond the hospital-sampled NEISS projections, this page also aggregates 40 consumer incident reports filed directly on SaferProducts.gov, plus 20 anonymized ER narratives - together forming a layered picture of how ice makers (separate from refrigerators) fail in real households. Every figure on this page comes from CPSC-published data: NEISS projects national estimates from a probability sample of about 100 U.S. hospital emergency departments, while SaferProducts.gov collects voluntary reports from consumers, manufacturers, and clinicians. The danger score, trend indicators, and demographic breakdowns update automatically when CPSC releases a new yearly NEISS file, which is why this page is dated 2024-12-31. For regulatory context, consult CPSC recall notices and the SaferProducts.gov public database linked below.
Annual Injury Estimates (2005–2024)
Source: CPSC NEISS national estimates Injuries represent ER-treated cases only
Who Gets Injured?
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | 29 | 179 | |
| 5-14 | 406 | 243 | |
| 15-24 | 994 | 751 | |
| 25-34 | 911 | 662 | |
| 35-44 | 889 | 1,380 | |
| 45-54 | 966 | 689 | |
| 55-64 | 650 | 845 | |
| 65-74 | 315 | 574 | |
| 75+ | 169 | 658 |
Most Common Injuries
| Body Part | Diagnosis | Est. Injuries |
|---|---|---|
| Finger | Laceration | |
| Head | Internal Injury | |
| Face | Laceration | |
| Hand | Laceration | |
| Hand | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Finger | Avulsion | |
| Lower Trunk | Other | |
| Face | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Laceration | |
| Finger | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Head | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Not Stated/unk | Other | |
| Lower Arm | Contusions, Abr. | |
| Hand | Fracture | |
| Wrist | Contusions, Abr. |
Severity Breakdown
ER Visit Narratives
Real anonymized emergency room reports from the CPSC NEISS database.
30YOM STATED THAT YESTERDAY HE RAISED UP AND HIT HIS HEAD AGAINST A ICE DISPENSER. COMPLAINS OF FEELING NAUSEATED AND HAVING A HEADACHE. DX: CLOSED HEAD INJURY, CONCUSSION, HEADACHE
80YOF C/O LEFT KNEE PAIN AFTER A FALL. SLIPPED ON ICE AFTER GETTING ICE OUT OF THE ICE MAKER. LANDED ON HER KNEES. DX: FALL, ACUTE PAIN OF LEFT KNEE
49YOM WALKED IN TO ED STATING HE PASSED OUT AND FELL OVER AND HIT HIS HEAD ON THE ICE MACHINE. +LOC FOR 10 SECONDS. PATIENT ENDORSES DRINKING PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT. BAL:NOT DONE. DX:SYNCOPE AND COLLAPSE; SPASM OF MUSCLE.
60YOF PRESENTS TO THE ED WITH AS TRAUMA ALERT AFTER A SLIP AND FALL OUTSIDE STORE EARLIER TODAY WITH CANE . STATES THAT SHE HIT HER HEAD ON THE CORNER OF THE ICE MACHINE OUTSIDE THE STORE + HEMATOMA TO BROW DX: FALL
63YOF C/O INJURY OF HEAD S/P PATIENT STATES SHE DROPPED AN ICE MACHINE ONTO HER HEAD THREE DAYS AGO, HAS SINCE BEEN EXPERIENCING LIGHTHEADEDNESS AND A HEADACHE. DX: INJURY OF HEAD
62YOF BIBEMS AS TRAUMA ALERT FOR MECHANICAL FALL VS SYNCOPE AT HOME. +HEAD STRIKE. PT STATES PRIOR TO FALL SHE FELT DIZZY LIKE THE ROOM WAS SPINNING. SHE FELL ON HER WAY TO GRAB HER PORTABLE ICE MACHINE, THEN DEFECATED ON HERSELF , USED COCAINE TODAY , PT HAS BLOOD IN NOSE DX: OTHER CLOSED FX OF DISTAL END OF FEMUR , GI BLEEDING
38YOM PT PUNCHED MULTIPLE ITEMS, INCLUDING AN ICE MACHINE & A TREE DX; CONTUSION OF FINGER, LEFT HAND
27 YOM TRIPPED, NEAR ICE MACHINE IN PRISON, FELL HIT FACE. DX OPEN MANDIBLE FRACTURE
73YOF STATES THAT SHE WAS FIXING HER ICE MACHINE BECAUSE IT WAS STUCK WHEN SHE SLIPPED ON AN ICE CUBE AND FELL LANDING ONTO BUTTOCKS DX: CLOSED FRACTURE OF LEFT HIP
93YOF FELL WHEN GETTING ICE OUT OF AN ICE MAKER. DX: RT HIP PAIN
36YOF, WAS FIXING A NEW ICE MAKER THAT SHE HAD JUST BOUGHT TONIGHT, WHEN SHE WENT TO GRAB A PIECE OF THE ICE MAKER AND ACCIDENTLY CUT HER LEFT THUMB, RESULTING TO A LACERATION TO THE SITE, NO THINNERS, DX: SYMPTOMATIC CHOLELITHIASIS
49YOM C/O RT HAND PAIN 1 MTH AFTER HAND WAS HIT ON ICE MACHINE ON FATHER'S DAY WEEKEND DX: RT HAND WEAKNESS, RT HAND PAIN
Consumer Incident Reports
Reports filed by consumers on SaferProducts.gov.
The ice that is produced from this ice maker comes out imbedded with [REDACTED]. As the ice melts in the glass of drink, you commence to drinking [REDACTED] contaminated drink.
(09/17/2025) The consumer stated that there were plastic shards in the ice. When the product was opened, it was discovered that the plastic propeller in the ice make is breaking. The consumer also discovered that mold is collecting in the reservoir.
Details of the incident: I purchased an Orgo Nugget Ice Maker, which began leaking water uncontrollably. Despite checking all components, the source of the leak remained unclear. Product used: Orgo 33 lbs Capacity Sonic Countertop Nugget Ice Maker - https://www.walmart.com/ip/Orgo-33-lbs-Capacity-Sonic-Countertop-Ice-Maker/3404310520 Who was using the product? The entire family, customers How was the product being used? The ice maker was used in a kitchen setting for its intended purpose of making nugget ice. Injuries or potential injuries: Water leaked onto the floor, causing several people to slip in the kitchen due to the unexpected hazard. I am disabled and fell at least twice in the kitchen from the leaking water. Additional damage: The water spread across the counter and caused damage to the kitchen counter and underneath, including the wooden structure supporting the dishwasher. There are over 723 reviews of the item leaking on walmart from other customers having the same issues. Over 2740 1 star reviews. I contacted both Walmart and Orgo to return it and they both refused.
My wife found 1 chunk of a blade lying on top of ice that she scooped out of our Newair air maker on Sunday July 30, 2023. Then on Thursday, Aug 3, 2023, she found another chunk of Blade in the Ice Bucket.
I have a serious concern and formal complaint regarding a Frigidaire ice maker, Model EFIC256, which I purchased from Walmart in May 2024. The unit functioned properly for over a year. I have diligently followed all maintenance instructions and have only used double-filtered water to ensure its longevity and cleanliness. Recently, however, the machine began to produce an unusual noise. After an initial cleaning did not resolve the issue, I decided to remove the side panels to investigate further. To my shock and disgust, upon opening the unit, I discovered an extensive amount of mold growth inside. It appears that condensation from the compressor combined with the warmth of the motor, created a breeding ground for this hazardous mold. This is not only a major defect but also a severe health hazard. I initially contacted Frigidaire regarding this issue and was directed to Curtis International. Despite multiple attempts to resolve this, I have been met with various excuses and a lack of urgency. The serious health risks associated with a household appliance producing a product for consumption while harboring mold have not been adequately addressed.
The Ionchill ice maker is producing ice and water contaminated with black specks. The black specks are believed to be mold. An online search and subsequent inspection revealed mold buildup, particularly in the water intake area. The presence of mold in a food and water preparation appliance is a serious health and safety hazard. This product could potentially cause illness to consumers who ingest the contaminated ice or water. I performed regular cleaning cycles as recommended by the manufacturer. When the problem persisted, I followed online advice to run a water and bleach solution through the machine. This process flushed out a significant amount of black, mold-like material. I believe this issue may be a widespread design or manufacturing defect that allows mold to grow in inaccessible areas of the machine. I urge the CPSC to investigate this product and consider a recall to prevent other consumers from potential illness.
Auger/ wheel that pushes ice shattered and fell into the ice basket, I dumped the basket into a thermal bottle and was adding water when I noticed something black mixed with the ice. I dumped it into the sink and checked it to find out it was various sizes of sharp , hard plastic. If I hadn't noticed I could have choked, cut my mouth or throat, or ingested it. It was very early and I was rushing to leave the house. The kitchen had only the light from the open door to the back porch.
AUGER BLADES on Taotronics Model TT-IC001 ice maker broke and are in the ice dispenser bucket
Showing 8 of 40 reports.
Product Recalls
Search for active and past recalls related to ice makers (separate from refrigerators) on the CPSC website.
Compare beyond Kitchen Cooking Appliances
Nationwide peers by danger score, ER volume & hospitalization
Three PlainSafety-derived comparison paths for Ice Makers (separate From Refrigerators): cross-group products nearest on danger score (32/100), estimated annual ER visits (565/yr), and hospitalization share (7.2%). Same-group neighbours stay in Related Products above.
Similar danger score
Nearest cross-group products by PlainSafety danger score (100-point scale).
Similar ER visit volume
Nearest cross-group products by NEISS estimated annual ER visits.
Similar hospitalization rate
Nearest cross-group products by % of NEISS ER visits resulting in hospital admission.
- Door Sills Or Frames Building Materials & Home Structures 7.2%admitted
- Video Players And Recorders (excl. Cameras) Home Structures & Construction Materials 7.2%admitted
- Recording Tapes Home Structures & Construction Materials 7.2%admitted
- Other Grills Or Stoves Sports Protective Equipment & Gear 7.1%admitted
Related Products in Kitchen Cooking Appliances
Read with this product
About this data
CPSC National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) 2005–2024 and SaferProducts.gov consumer incident reports form the basis of this page. Injury estimates are based on a nationally representative probability sample of U.S. hospital emergency departments.
According to PlainSafety's CPSC NEISS corpus ranking, Ice Makers (separate From Refrigerators) ranks #574 of 838 scored CPSC product categories by PlainSafety danger score and #594 of 838 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does ice makers (separate from refrigerators) rank on danger score versus ER volume?
Among 838 scored CPSC product categories, ice makers (separate from refrigerators) ranks #574 by PlainSafety danger score (32/100) and #594 by 20-year estimated ER injury volume (565/yr). The two rankings come from the same NEISS extract and are not the same order.
What are the most common injuries from ice makers (separate from refrigerators)?
The most common injury is laceration to the finger, accounting for approximately 1,732 injuries over 20 years.
Are injuries from ice makers (separate from refrigerators) increasing or decreasing?
Stable over 5 years.
Who is most at risk for ice makers (separate from refrigerators) injuries?
The 35-44 age group accounts for the most injuries, with approximately 2,269 cases recorded over 20 years. Females are more frequently injured in this age group.
What happens when someone is injured by ice makers (separate from refrigerators)?
Of all ER visits involving ice makers (separate from refrigerators), approximately 7.2% result in hospital admission. The majority of patients (92.8%) are treated and released from the emergency department.
How can I report a safety problem with ice makers (separate from refrigerators)?
You can file a consumer incident report at SaferProducts.gov, the official CPSC reporting portal. Reports help the CPSC identify emerging hazards and trigger investigations or recalls. You can also call the CPSC hotline at 1-800-638-2772.
PlainSafety is rendered directly from U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall and incident records, no number is typed in by an editor. Product recall timelines and hazard labels are drawn from CPSC recall records for this product. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of August 2026.